Hitting her? Is this an empty threat, it seems to just repeat?What does this even really mean, harsh….

So the baby is a her

So the Natives healed him but she still credits God?

How was she having visitors

It’s sad that she believes that if she prayed more(?) she would not have been thrown into this by God and that she holds guilt that God abandoned her

So basically I guess she didn’t pray to God and now she is all upset about it. How far into “hell” and suffering can one go without questioning? God can do no wrong. Natives are never under God and are therefore evil creations of …. The devil? satan? How does it work

okay is it bad I don’t know what “the Sabbath” is? I’ll look it up I guess

Pagans already and still an enemy…..

What is “Viz” and where is it?????

In another text we read, the white men claimed that the Natives did not use time. This is more proof that they have their own way to keep track of time.

Starvation is basically a form of torture

What is the baby even sick with? Does it have a physical wound? Like a cut or something or is the cold hurting it

OK at least they’re helping you

Do they actually care and how? They can see that she is weak and could not travel on her own with the baby.

What journey are we even taking

So we still can’t use names or anything. I’m assuming this means the Natives?

Did native societies have nations with strict borders?

I wonder if this native society had always been this violent towards outsiders, or if that was in response to the European violence?

She is enslaved by a native?

It's hard not to feel bad for Rowlandson. She's clearly incredibly distressed by this whole encounter and the loss of her child.

This is heartbreaking, it also illustrates that she is in shock and maybe denial.

The kidnappers must've beaten this child pretty badly for her to die 9 days after the incident.

What horrible things that child must've witnessed and felt to want to die at such a young age.

That's probably one of the most depressing stories I've ever heard. Depressing, not horrific; that would be bashing babies against rocks.

Damn again I feel bad for her. Not being able to rest at all especially when it partains to ones religion.

For anyone who doesn't know the Sabbath is the day god took to rest their for Christians and Jewish people rest on that day.

All I'm going to mention is the Trail of Tears.

Meaning they were knocking her out? This seems as merciful as possible, as I don't know if they had access to anesthesia in 17th century New England.

Sgt. Pepper?

What a name.

The Christian guilt is strong with this one. I can tell by reading this that the major driving forces in the society she comes from are shame and judgement.

Are they polytheists, or is she just assuming that? I'm going to go ahead and assume that she wasn't very interested in studying their culture.

Ah, definitely not nomads. Still, they seemed to be travelling for quite some time, and food was much harder to preserve in the 17th century.

And there probably wasn't any food for the natives either, as nomadic societies (which I'm just assuming these folks were a part of) eat whenever the opportunity arises.

I don't know if I missed something, but what exactly are their wounds? I know they'd been beaten allegedly, but she keeps mentioning how they're sick and injured without elaborating much further on that.

Still sounds like the natives are helping the Rowlandson's out. They can tell she and her child are too weak to travel on their own horse as they fell off of one before, so they're travelling on the same horse as a native. Obviously they aren't trying to help them too much, otherwise they wouldn't have abducted them, but they don't seem as comically evil as Rowlandson writes them to be.

Roughly three years.

This is an important note when revising our "My Community" essays. While peer reviews can be very helpful, they should not strip our writing of our individual voice.

I wonder how going from only watching movies on special occasions to almost every weekend impacted Sindu. Did the increased family make them closer? Did she ever take it for granted or did she remember how things had once been?

I like this line because it shows that data can look exact even when it is based on estimates and it’s a good reminder to question where data comes from before treating it as accurate

Is she ever doubting God? Or just pouring her full being into it.

Even if you had a Christian friend nearby I don’t know if they could help you, maybe comfort you, but I don’t know about help. She’s heavily dropping her emotions her and the waterfall of everything effecting her mental state and physical state.

Wait, what month was this again, February ish? How much snow are we talking and how were they protected against it (clothing wise)

She still believes that it is the Lord giving her all of this strength instead of her own internal will. And maybe she draws this internal will (unknowingly that it is herself) from her belief that the lord is real, so in one case it’s her lord, but also herself.

She still sees and labels them as inhumane creatures even though they helped her. They carried her baby and once she was too weak, they put her on the horses back which they definitely did not need to do. Yes, they laughed when she fell off, but maybe they didn’t expect it because it was normalized to ride a horse without a seat? Also, she’s still technically their prisoner. I wonder what they are thinking truly? I feel like even if my best friend were riding a horse if they fell off, after I knew they were okay, I’d be laughing too. Maybe that’s modern norms shining, but I wouldn’t say they were inhumane for that. But to be fair, I also get embarrassed easily and it feels like the end of the world if it’s REAL embarrassing

Holy negative thoughts……

Is it because it is a baby? Has done no right or wrong? They accept that fact and help it.

Religion gives her a reason to live, a light in the darkness, “sparing” her

Vast and desolate to her, but did the Natives know it? Even if it is unknown to one person does not mean it is unknown to all, especially the native people of a land.

Again, I am going to wager a guess and say that she would not have survived in the wilderness without the help of people who thrive in it.

It sounds to me like the natives, although they kidnapped her, were the ones carrying her through this. I'm getting the feeling that if they wanted them dead, they'd be dead already. Her husband is an important political figure (I'm assuming, I believe this was before the whole separation of church and state sentiment was popularized), so it stands to reason that having the Rowlandson family travelling with them is a massive advantage for the natives.

I wonder if they were actually laughing at their suffering, or at the fact that they are unable to ride horseback without a saddle? Or both?

Why is she calling her child it?

I'm interested to hear her describe what the New England wilderness looked like before it was developed.

Some traits that I would highly value in a professor is being honest, intentional, provides feedback on my work. Most of all, empowering!

Hello, Professor Soso

I hope my email finds you well! I am reaching out to you in regard to the class assignment that I could really use more insight on.

T F F T

Show up prepared with your questions written down and ask to speak with them for clarity.

Three benefits you might gain from effectively communicating with your instructor is:

1. slowly getting to know one another to develop a healthy relationship that could be very supportive.

2. The instructor may offer to write you a letter of recommendation or you may feel comfortable enough to ask.

3. The instructor could potentially become your mentor overtime.

How did they communicate, did they not have a language barrier? In other ways, what forms of communication were used?

Did they DO something? For every “white man” killed, how many natives followed?

Harsh words, what actions caused this?

“It’ being used in reference to a child, maybe her child? I think at least, from he introduction about who she was, I think she had a young child with her.

Even for whatever reason the Natives may have done this, it’s definitely hard to have all of your family and home life taken away from you, being alone, especially in hardship.

So many different words for “sad”

Extremely sad, hopeless, and impossible to cheer up. Food and hunger are definitely used against people and show a huge piece of a human’s drive.

Lively vs hell (dead) use of words in contrast in this comparison

Do we mean shadow? Skin color? Metaphor to a dark “evil” soul?

Wow yes because singing and dancing is so evil…. Maybe it was scary to a culture that did not express life in that way, but wow…

Very sad or mournful

IS this really what they asked? How reliable of a narrator is Mary?What does this question mean when asked by the Natives? If she takes refuge in the lodge, will she still love English men?

This is an interesting way to say it…? Still not 100% sure I am getting what she’s saying here.

Is this “we” her and her family or even more people that were captured and taken to this part of town intended to “lodge’

I think this is an interesting quote and it shows the profound trauma she endured and how her heart is not feeling much and is just an extension of the bod.

Something must have provoked this action and violence, right? OR?

Very harsh label, I’m already assuming for the Native Americans? Contrast to our other reading when the Christians were being called barbarians or a word similar to that sort.

She was a colonial American woman who was captured by Native Americans in 1676 during King Philip’s War. Her family suffered a lot. She suffered.

Damn, that actually sucks. I feel bad for her. She's still not great, but I do feel bad. I have only done some coursery research into her, but I do have to agree that asj1531 might her, family, village, or country have done something to deserve it.

I can excuse kidnapping, but I draw the line at racism. (If you spot the reference, you have great taste.)

Damn, leaving a perfectly good house in this economy couldn't be me.

For every European being killed, I wonder how many natives are being brutalized.

Why do we find it important to be publicly acknowledged?

How do people globally view American literature? Do they even think about it as we do with, say, British Literature?

Keep it interactive and fun, engaging, but also serious enough to learn.

I agree. Everything changes and you can never keep one thing from blossoming.

Education should be free..?..

How do you minimize such a broad category into one space

As meanings change, PSU students can change it as well. It is left to students to decide what is valued and what’s worth being in the project.

Good to state and understand that it is not perfect. What would a theoretical “perfect” representation be?

You have to get into the dirty deep questions in order to understand a small fraction of a difficult question involving America

Continent vs USA

It takes modern age concepts from films and other references as stated and compares them to the old literature

Let’s get diversity up in here!

How does this make it unique, what does it help in other students?

Never ending cycle of constantly having to reframe new ways to fit the current age of time as it moves forward.

I think that every person may have a different idea of what counts and so therefore is there really a flat answer for this?

Challenging us readers. Also, American Lit. Vs. History, how does an english class differ from a history class?

Which ends up being what? We look at whether author, location, consumer, as well as a multitude of other factors to see if that changes what counts

This statement means that a child’s personality and individual characteristics develop through both nature and nurture, but their experiences with other people play a particularly important role.

Infants initially depend on caregiver support for emotional regulation. Through responsive caregiving, they gradually learn to regulate their own emotions.

The two types of emotions

Three types of temperament

Definition

God speaks to Ezekiel, referring to him as "Son of man" (Ezekiel, 2:1). He says he will speak unto thee. Ezekiel is the chosen prophet to deliver a message to the people of Israel. God tells them that if they obey, they shall be rewarded as the children of gods. If they do not obey, however, they shall be killed and their bodies laid around the altars to their idols. As he states, "I will scatter your bones round about your altars." (Ezekiel, 6:5) The Burial of the Dead is not unlike this. World War One is a war fought over borders, power, and commerce, all of which man often would value above God. The rows and rows of graves after a war fought over such desires seems indicative of the making good of God's promise to spread the people's bones about their altars. Each grave is one individual's altar to their country and cause. It is not to undermine the nobility of these men, however. God may recognize that a man is capable of being redeemed should they accept him. Thus, stony rubbish may represent the graves. What grows out of it is the souls of the people who were slain in a war, taken out of "The Waste Land" and into a new land. As God ends in saying, " Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. [13] And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, [14] And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD." (Ezekiel, 37:12-14) A story exists in WW1 history of a poppy growing from the blood of fallen soldiers in Flanders, Belgium. In the midst of utter desolation, one may in dying escape "The Waste Land" and be transported somewhere better, or from the ashes of the "The Waste Land" something beautiful may grow.

After reading the story of the Countess Larisch and her ostracization after the scandal in the Austrian court there is a clear connection between the two. In terms of the voice and changing of narration within Eliot's poem, I disagree with the idea that a poem can be separated from the author that writes it simply by creating distance from a personal experience. If all of peotry was created simply by imagining and creating works of fiction with no connection to the creator's suffering, then the action and emotion portrayed within the poem would be unrealistic. Writing from within the bounds of a city under siege during the war, Eliot personally had a specific viewpoint on nature and the natural world being a freeing place.

The rest of Europe was also affected by the war, and this specific section could be interepreted as a child sent to the countryside in order to escape the violence of the city, like many rich parents across Europe did to protect their families. There is the initial feeling of fear at the height and total freedom atop the mountain, but also the sense of something being off with the rest of the world as well.

This line is, in itself, a variation, a contradiction perhaps, of verse 5 from Ecclesiastes 12. Ecclesiastes illustrates the inevitable coming of age and death and argues that we should embrace it rather than fear it. It not only mentions our mortality, but also echoes the ephemerality of every moment. The central message of this poem is to remember God and live meaningfully while you are young because youth, strength, pleasure, and eventually life itself are temporary. The verse, "almond tree shall flourish, and the grasshopper shall be a burden," is an indicator of how, with age, small things become harder. The flowering almond tree could be interepretaed as gaining grey hairs, and the grasshopper becoming a burden suggests that even small things become physically difficult with age. However, in The Wasteland, Eliot rewrites this verse with a different tone: despair. Motifs that once meant meaningful symbols of age have now lost their reassuring sentimental value and become echoes of anguish and inevitable doom. The almond tree and the grasshopper now symbolize the futility of age and the painful approach of death. Eliot thus trasnforms the meaning of the biblical verse to reflect a darker conception of mortality in the aftermath of world war 1.

Eliot’s description of “a heap of broken images” (22) alludes to the state of Europe after the war. Life used to exist in many places, but now there is none: “the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, / And the dry stone no sound of water,” (23-4). A similar idea is reflected in the Orthodox funeral service, which emphasizes the fragility of human life: “All things are more fleeting than a shadow… one moment, and all these things are succeeded by Death.” (Burial of the Dead). However, while the funeral offers hope through Christian faith, Eliot ends the first section with, “I will show you fear in a handful of dust” (30), which likely refers to human mortality after World War I.

I think that this CyberCab is a very interesting product that I think will dominate the taxi/robotaxi market. Elon Musk is a very intelligent human being, could even be debatable that he is the smartest human in the world. His designing behind this CyberCab sounds like it absurd. This vehicle can deliver people from one spot to the other, with no driver, steering wheel, pedals, mirrors, or rear view windshield. Elon has put a ton of thought in this machine, as stated in the text, " Tesla opted for a two-seat vehicle based on research showing 85 percent of ride-hailing trips are for one or two people." Having bigger vehicles with more seats, might not get as much usage and cost Tesla more than it makes them. Another thing that is interesting about this vehicle is that it is powered by artificial intelligence instead of censors. To use artificial intelligence you would need service, conveniently enough Elon owns the company Starlink, so they will have service wherever and whenever. This CyberCab also has TVs in them because there aren't any drivers to be distracted. CyberCab will dominate the market for taxis/robotaxis because of how they outsmarted all of the competition.

shaped by our environment, culture, social interactions, and experiences.

evidence that the brain has specialized areas for language.

Biological component and psychological

Babies begin learning language before they can speak, by listening to sounds and recognizing patterns.

Apparently, he hasn't matured that much, though, as he completely misunderstands the play and the fact that they most likely can't smell their breath anyway. Alternatively, he could just be predicting how bad the play will go and preemptively marketing the sheer nonsense that will be displayed.

Knowing Bottom's sense for theatrics, they would have been here for a while. Conversely, Bottom's immediate line is to cheer up his fellow actors and spur them to action. Also, he seems to have developed on how the lion's part in the play should be played. It shows an odd sense of maturity for a character whose only intelligent line was spoken with the head of an ass.

This is teaching to read like a writer

noting with my sophomores that many are not proficient in this even after modeling

Because these brain systems are immature, infants may not be able to create memories that can be stored and recalled later in life.

The original DNA sequence in the image has a C that should be a G on the right strand, and the sequence given in the image description has a different pattern, is 2 letters longer, and doesn't line up with the mRNA sequence given in the image description. Also the tRNA in the image has both Ts and Us??

Piaget’s ideas are still being studied today with different stages of it

Definition

Definition

Definition

which is propaganda.

communicate a message.

Firstly, this dream did, in fact, have a bottom in all contexts. The character was present, there is a start and ending, and there was most certainly a lowest point in this story of his. Secondly, how false this statement is can be inferred to mean that Bottom's simi-wisecracks are limited to when he was an ass. In other words, Bottom is dumber than a donkey.

The drug might have had some severe side effects about their feelings of each other, which most likely won't be addressed by the fairies at any point.

They turned around on their opinion of each other quite quickly. I like to imagine this as Bottom looking so ugly and unattractive after the drug wore off that Titania started to view Oberon as not so bad.

Smooth and furry... I'm not sure how this would take place, but it may allude to how the drug works. It is still likely that she sees Bottom like he is (with an ass head), but with many of his imperfections as perfections instead.

Bottom's waking speech is the only place in the play where the night in the wood is treated as something that cannot be told, and it comes from the character least equipped to tell it. The lovers, waking twenty lines earlier, immediately begin domesticating their experience into simile — far-off mountains turned into clouds, a jewel mine own and not mine own — and then agree to recount their dreams to each other on the walk home. Bottom refuses the same move: the dream has no bottom, and any man who expounds it is an ass. The play gives its most accurate account of the supernatural to the one character who was genuinely transformed by it, and he can only render it as broken scripture.

Claude AI

He's mangling St Paul, 1 Corinthians — the original is about what no eye has seen and no ear heard of God's kingdom. Bottom swaps the organs around. It's a joke, but the passage he's scrambling is the one about things too great to be reported.

Demetrius is the only one still enchanted — nobody ever took the flower off him. So the happy ending has a drugged man in it. He's also the one who sounds most certain, "will forevermore be true to it," which is worse.

In I.1 the Athenian law "by no means we may extenuate." Here it's gone in half a line, because Demetrius changed his mind. The law was never the obstacle.

First time she talks about her own life. Hunting with Hercules, before Athens. Theseus answers by describing his dogs' ears for eight lines.

He pities her now, four lines before explaining that she already handed over the boy. The order matters. He also says he taunted her at his pleasure while she begged in mild terms, and reports it like it's neutral information.

disposition. He gets it wrong even with a queen's arms around him.

This shows that belief in religion is important on how people can understand religion.

I think that this is an important concept that I need to focus on because I tend to use a lot of filler/ throat-clearing. This also leads into the idea of saying it's not X; its Y. I think that I tend to confuse my readers and don't make clear and concrete statements.

While Robin does not know this, "Jill" is to be sentenced to death if she stays with "Jack." Also, I'm not sure if "Jack and Jill" are the right two to refer to a deeply loving couple as.

This line in particular is quite comedic considering the two men that she asks for protection are, in fact, the cursed ones.

Each of them is under the same curse while they accuse each other of not being under said curse, although they don't know it. The fact that no one understands the minds of any other makes this scene extraordinarily chaotic.

Considering that Helena was here to expose Hermia's getaway attempt, this camaraderie is no more than a ruse to guilt trip Hermia for playing what Helena thinks is a cruel prank on her. Nevertheless, the guilt seems to be following suit.

I can't tell if this is an artifact of the times where crying was considered a pathetic act and an indicator of dishonesty or if he is spewing nonsense while intoxicated for comedic effect.

Due to this line, Hermia seems like either the most composed character of all or the least composed character of all. She could be weighing her options in order to realize that Demitrius's help is of bad value, or she could be simply too hateful of Demitrius to realize the situation that she is in.

This scene would do well in a more produced interpretation as a direct juxtaposition to the antics of Lysandre's intoxication. Cutting between the two may enhance the comedy of this scene.

"He is using them as a simile to describe how Bottom's fellow actors reacted when they saw him with the ass's head..." This line that details the actors' reactions to Bottom's transformation could play an important part in depicting the scene in an adaptation. It describes how the chaos was instant enough for all the actors to go crazy and run before thinking about what was happening.

She offers this. He didn't ask for it. Compare her soliloquy at the end of I.1, where she was the one explaining how love has no judgment — she knew, and it made no difference.

want = lack. Titania's whole speech makes the weather a symptom of a marital argument. The scale is out of proportion — they're fighting over one child and the crops are failing.

I usually listen to calm lyric less soundtracks of movies or even video games, and at the same time it feels very therapeutic to me.

I've never done this before. The thought has never crossed my mind, but it sounds like it could be a good idea for me to try

This is very true for me, it ultimately distracts me more and gets me focused on the lyrics of the song.

I use this to help myself sometimes when I'm having trouble focusing on work

The entire scene turns on the mechanicals' fear that their play will be taken for real — that Snug's lion will genuinely terrify the Duchess, that the audience won't know where the fiction stops. It's an anxiety about theatre performed inside a theatre, and Shakespeare sets it directly against the court scene before it, where Theseus and Egeus treat a legal fiction about ownership as if it were natural law. The tradesmen worry too much about illusion; the aristocrats don't worry at all.

Flute is embarrassed about a boy's part in a play — performed by a boy actor in Shakespeare's company, who would also have had a beard coming. The joke goes off in two directions at once.

The title contradicts itself before the play starts. Also: Pyramus and Thisbe are two lovers who run away from their parents and die for it, which is what Hermia and Lysander just decided to do one scene ago.

Asia and Africa possibly have these hight rates due to connected to poverty, food insecurity, diseases, and lack of access to healthcare.

Is it possible or safe if babies are fed a mix of formula and breast milk combined?

They trade half-lines back and forth here, he names a category of obstacle and she supplies the exclamation. It sounds rehearsed, like a game they've played before. Then Lysander's lightning speech runs way past the pattern and Hermia answers it with "let us teach our trial patience," which is much calmer than what he just said. Not sure if she's steadying him or not listening.

gauds = flashy trinkets. knacks = knick-knacks. nosegays = little flower bouquets. Egeus piles them up to make them sound cheap, but the list is longer than his actual legal argument.

He says this to her face, at their engagement. She was a prisoner of war. Then he says he'll wed her "in another key" — different tune, same arrangement? She has four lines in this whole scene and nothing after Egeus walks in. I keep wanting to know how she's standing while all this happens.

dowager = a widow living off her dead husband's estate, so the heir doesn't get the money until she dies. Theseus is comparing the moon to a woman who is taking too long to die. Claude

Almost like hippocampus but they also forget very easily.

Fixate definition: look closely or focus their eyes on something

sensory and perceptual abilities: abilities to receive information through senses and understand/interprete it

12/13

I really hope this just isn't the case. We are taking shortcuts and I get it most of the school work is boring but if you're gonna take shortcuts whats the point? And it is mostly inaccurate anytime I see the AI answer I never trust it. And we are using up water for what? We are lazy and need to stop using AI.

I believe I have seen this kind of experiment before. It just trips me up so bad because the arrows do mess me up. Ok started to long at this and got a head ache.

Okay so this answers my earlier question about observed replication after eliminating the lysogeny machinery from the genome. The replication-competent lambda-DART can still generate infectious particles that can systemically spread to other susceptible bacteria, but they deliberately left this as a risk because it provided the tradeoff of enhanced host editing.

So even though they had removed attp and integrase from the genome, lysogenic replication still occurred, if I am interpreting this correctly?

It seems like the paper's own data demonstrates that lambda-DART remains replication-competent and persists within the bacterial population. So they were able to prevent prophage integration but they still don't have complete control over the persistence or propagation of the phage-based editing vector?

I wonder why the authors are omitting the specific details of which constructs they did this step on?

So initially the editing efficiency was 1%?

So they basically removed a 12.3-kb chunk of lambda DNA, which includes attP + integrase (needed for lysogenization), and replaced it with the a 10.8-kb DART genome-editing system to create the new lambda-DART phages?

It's interesting how this DNA was non-essential enough to be removed without completely destroying the genome, but still performs an important function under the normal circumstances. This makes me think about so-called "junk DNA" and how whole chunks of the genome were initially thought to serve no purpose but later were identified as serving critical biological roles. I wonder if someone revisits this experiment in a few decades if we will have learned that this removal had unforeseen consequences that altered the results of the study. There is still so much we do not know about the functions of genetic components.

It's interesting thinking about Cas13a and Cas9, since Cas9 targets dsDNA and permanently edits it, whereas it seems like Cas13a transiently modifies ssRNA without modifications to the genome. Also, I wonder why trans-cleavage specifically? I bet it has to do with steric repulsion and hindrance, since simple peptide molecules favor the trans configuration to reduce steric strain from bulky side chains.

So this is why they modified the phage to prevent it from entering the lysogeny phase, so it wouldn't destroy the host bacteria?

If I'm interpreting this correctly, one of the failsafe measures they used in the lambda phage to control viral reproduction is designing it to be able to deliver and enter the bacterial cell and but it cannot establish a lysogenic state for viral reproduction? The lytic pathway still exists though, right? Because the phage needs to be able to propagate itself to function.

I had to look up what this is because I couldn't remember anything from the slides / lectures or if we had covered this at all, but these can induce single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the DNA sequence without having to do a ds or ss break, super interesting!

What are they defining as minimal here? Is there a predetermined number of nucleotides that qualifies as minimal? It would be useful if they clarified their parameters more here.

I haven't gotten all of the way down the paper yet but I wonder if there is some non-engineered bacteriophage that could be used as an alternative method to using phage lambda. Most engineered features on recombinant genetic material come from other organism (example: GFP tag comes from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria), so it would be interesting to see if there was a "natural" (for lack of better word) equivalent that could perform the same or similar functions.

I believes this reveals that companies cannot just add AI and expect everything to improve. They also have to change how the business operates and find ways for people and AI to work together. How well a company adjusts to these changes could determine how successful AI is for them.

I believe this shows that a lot of companies are excited about what AI can do, but they may be moving faster than they are prepared for. They expect AI to help their businesses grow and make work easier, but many still need to update the way they work before they can fully benefit from it.

I found this intriguing because even as AI becomes more advanced and independent, human involvement still seems necessary. The 75% statistic demonstrates that companies see more value in people and AI working together instead of depending on AI to do everything on its own.

★ Learning English marks both public growth and the loss of his childhood world.

★ MAIN ARGUMENT: His personal experience does not prove bilingual education is necessary.

★ CENTRAL IDEA: His public gain comes with private loss.

★ Assimilation changes him from outsider → participant.

GAIN: English helps him develop a public identity.

LOSS: His private/family identity becomes weaker.

★ KEY IDEA: private and public individuality.

★ PUBLIC GAIN ↑ while PRIVATE CONNECTION ↓

★ Silence represents emotional distance, not just fewer words.

★ Spanish = emotional expression and confidence.

EVIDENCE: Spanish allows his father to express himself freely.

! This challenges Rodriguez's earlier understanding of his father.

★ Language change creates an identity conflict within the family

LOSS: Language change creates distance between the children and parents.

! English changes the family relationship without removing their love.

My dogs whenever a person walks past our house with another dog.

I find this section interesting because I definitely relate to the thought that things I am seemingly more suited for over other things should be easier than things that don't align with my personality type, but I also believe that this way of thinking isn't necessary harmful because it can help younger people discover something they are passionate about, potentially leading to successful careers that would have been otherwise dismissed.

how do things like believing we are predestined to behave/express traits a certain way based on our personality types effect/look different in individuals with things like borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, obsessive compulsive personality disorder, etc.?

What are the pros and cons of expecting someone to act a certain way based on predetermined traits that have been assigned to them by other people? Does this excuse certain behaviors and ignore other certain behaviors that would or would not be typically relevant to their personality types and/or zodiacs?

I honestly don't feel like this is true. As a young teenager, I discovered the Myers-Briggs Test and became obsessed because of how specific it was about my "personality type". There is so much to be read about each specific personality type, and even how they are predicted to get along with other personality types. I would go as far as to say that they are almost comparable, if not on the same level as, a lot of astrological predictions,.

Something is stalking you...

also interested in this one please, TANIA FATOVICH