14 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2026
    1. when you think about it that way, isn’t racing to build a cryptographically relevant QC, as quickly as possible, the most _ethical, socially responsible thing_ for an American QC company to do?

      这一观点提出了一个有洞见的伦理问题,即是否应该将快速开发量子计算机视为美国量子计算公司的道德和社会责任。

    2. The way they see it, cryptographically relevant QCs _will_ plausibly be built sometime soon: indeed, it’s ultimately unavoidable, even if people’s only interest in QC was to do quantum simulations for materials science and chemistry.

      这一观点揭示了量子计算机发展的必然性,即使其最初的应用并非用于密码学。

    3. some of the most reputable people in quantum hardware and quantum error-correction—people whose judgment I trust more than my own on those topics—are now telling me that a fault-tolerant quantum computer able to break deployed cryptosystems _ought_ to be possible by around 2029.

      这一观点令人震惊,因为它暗示了量子计算机可能在不久的将来就能破解现有的加密系统,这是一个非共识的观点。

  2. Apr 2026
    1. The best quantum processors make an error roughly once in every thousand operations. To become useful accelerators for scientific and enterprise problems, error rates must drop to one in a trillion or better.

      令人惊讶的是:量子计算的错误率要求如此极端—从当前的最佳水平(千分之一)需要提升到万亿分之一,这相当于要求一个系统连续运行数万年而不出错。这种巨大的性能差距凸显了量子纠错技术的巨大挑战,也解释了为什么AI在量子计算中如此重要。

  3. Jun 2022
  4. May 2020
    1. A quantum blockchain, the pair suggests, would take advantage of entanglement, which in most cases, applies to situations regarding space. But it could also be useful for situations involving time, such as blockchains. In such a blockchain, the pair explains, transaction records could be represented by pairs of entangled photons linked in chronological order. When transfers take place, photons would be created and absorbed by the hubs that comprise a network. But since entangled photons are linked across time, they can be caused to have never existed at the same time.
  5. Feb 2020
  6. Jan 2020
    1. What does it mean for a matrix UUU to be unitary? It’s easiest to answer this question algebraically, where it simply means that U†U=IU^\dagger U = IU†U=I, that is, the adjoint of UUU, denoted U†U^\daggerU†, times UUU, is equal to the identity matrix. That adjoint is, recall, the complex transpose of UUU:

      Starting to get a little bit more into linear algebra / complex numbers. I'd like to see this happen more gradually as I haven't used any of this since college.

  7. Dec 2015