8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2016
  2. books.google.ca books.google.ca
    Scholarship in the Digital Age
    1
    1. daniel.odonnell 31 Jul 2016

      Page 187 On hyper authorship

      "hyper authorship” is an indicator of "collective cognition" in which the specific contributions of individuals no longer can be identified. Physics has among the highest rates of coauthorship in the sciences and the highest rates of self archiving documents via a repository. Whether the relationship between research collaborators (as indicated by the rates of coauthorship) and sharing publications (as reflected in self archiving) holds in other fields is a question worth exploring empirically.

      borgman 2007 authorship scientific authorship high energy physics collaboration collaborative nature of science
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    books.google.ca/books/about/Scholarship_in_the_Digital_Age.html
  3. Jun 2016
  4. scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com
    Does mega-authorship matter?
    2
    2. daniel.odonnell 16 Jun 2016
      Actually, I didn’t need Holmesian deductions to conclude that Aad et al. aren’t using a conventional definition of authorship. It’s widely known*** that at least two groups in experimental particle physics operate under the policy that every scientist or engineer working on a particular detector is an author on every paper arising from that detector’s data. (Two such detectors at the Large Hadron Collider were used in the Aad et al paper, so the author list is the union of the “ATLAS collaboration” and the “CMS collaboration”.) The result of this authorship policy, of course, is lots of “authorships” for everyone: for the easily searchable George Aad, for instance, over 400 since 2008.

      Physicists authorship models

      heard 2015 high energy physics authorship model contributor model
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/does-mega-authorship-matter/
  5. Local file Local file
    Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?
    5
    2. daniel.odonnell 16 Jun 2016
      TheHEP research community is thus characterized by highlevels of internal scrutiny, mutual trust—witness, for in-stance, the institutionalized practice of relying upon, andciting, preprints—and peer tracking, such that it is notsusceptible to systematic fraud. Contrary

      physicists live in a very trustful, observant, world; also they do a lot of internal, pre-referee, review

      cronin 2001 authorship high energy physics cultural differences disciplinary difference
    3. daniel.odonnell 16 Jun 2016
      The answer probably has to do with the relative intensityof socialization and oral communication (Traweek, 1992,pp. 120 –123), along with the character of the organizationalstructures and value systems, which define collaborations inlarge-scale, high-energy physics and biomedical research.

      Why is there less soul-searching about hyper-authorship in HEP? disciplinary differences

      authorship high energy physics hyperauthorship cultural differences disciplinary difference bibliography cronin 2001 traweek 1992
    5. daniel.odonnell 16 Jun 2016
      Thisarticle(a)beginswithabrief,historicaloverviewofscholarlypublishing,focusingontheroleoftheauthorandtheconstitutionoftrustinscientificcommunication;(b)offersanimpressionisticsurveyandanalysisofrecentdevelop-mentsinthebiomedicalliterature;(c)explorestheextenttowhichdeviantpublishingpracticesinbiomedicalpublishingareafunctionofsociocognitiveandstructuralcharacteris-ticsofthedisciplinebycomparingbiomedicinewithhighenergyphysics,theonlyotherfieldwhichappearstoexhibitcomparablehyperauthorshiptendencies;and(d)assessestheextenttowhichcurrenttrendsinbiomedicalcommuni-cationmaybeaharbingerofdevelopmentsinotherdisci-plines

      Great overview of what is going to happen in article:

      1. History of authorship
      2. Survey of state of biomedicine
      3. "extent to which deviant publishing practices in biomedical publishing are a function of sociocognitive and structural characteris-tics of the discipline by comparing biomedicine with high energy physics, the only other field which appears to exhibit comparable hyperauthorship tendencies"
      4. Assess extent to which biomedical trends may foreshadow trends in other fields.
      authorship biomedicine high energy physics cronin 2001

    Tags

    Annotators