range of perspectives
useful list
range of perspectives
useful list
2015 study by Kacy Lundstrom andcolleagues
Teaching and Learning Information Synthesis: An Intervention and Rubric Based Assessment [Description](https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit/vol9/iss1/4/)
Learning anything coherently amid such a multiplicity of voicesrequires developing sophisticated synthesis skills.
I think there has been a tendency to leave synthesis to the domain of disciplinary specialists. But at the undergraduate level it should be recognized as a generalist skill.
But I maintain that all of this is a monumental and dangerous waste of human talent and energy. Imagine what might be accomplished if this talent and energy were turned to philosophy, to theology, to the arts, to imaginative literature or to education? Who knows what we could learn from such people - perhaps why there are wars, and hunger, and homelessness and mental illness and anger
nice case ofr liberal education
They will also start to critically question media that they didn’t create.
open pedagogy/info lit connection
understanding the implications of working openly
This is an under-examined aspect of info lit
“CRAAP isn’t about critical thinking – it’s about oversimplified binaries.”
The CRAAP test is crappy if taught crappily.
In a role reversal, media and retail platforms, such as Amazon, had begun to evaluate their users to determine what information they should receive
targeting info and ads to consumers has long been a goal of media companies.
need for ethical practice
What's missing when we frame ethics in terms of IP, plagiarism and academic integrity is an ethical duty to pursue truth.
college failed to prepare them to ask questions of their own
a core info lit skill, but perhaps difficult to assess
Timing of food intake can rewire temporal coordination of metabolism and gene expression and thereby modify disease progression
ending conversations is a classic “coordination problem” that humans are unable to solve because doing so requires information that they normally keep from each other. As a result, most conversations appear to end when no one wants them to.
emerging technologies such as deep fakes, facial recognition, and other applications of artificial intelligence
this sort of language will help make the document become outdated.
an extended notion of information literacy is essential to the future of democracy, if citizens are to be intelligent shapers of the information society rather than its pawns
information literates.They have learned techniquesand skills for utilizing the wide range ofinformation tools as well asprimary sources in molding information solutions totheir problems
initial definition
Information has value indirect onortion to the control it rovides him overwhat he is and whathe can become
Information has Value
poor searching and citing of the literature
a different open ed/info lit connection. Does the bias towards recent research play a part in this?
For students to work in the open, everything they use has to be original content, openly licensed, or in the public domain
have to disagree here. Students can link, quote, summarize, paraphrase, and thus build or contribute to open resources from closed information
differing nomenclature makes the search for a commonly agreed definition or understanding of digital literacies even more elusive
An important point. I wonder if Bruce's work might help here.
Representation of Digital Intelligence
I wonder if the similarity to a pie chart hints a message that the components are all equal. The use of the color spectrum also says something about continuity and adjacency which may not be intended. But it looks nice.
info lit resource
Information we receive without consciously asking a question
Information diet & filter bubbles are related concepts. I wonder if there is such a thing as "Information Affective Disorder"?
need to consider how this relates to info lit
German students were able to generate more than a dozen questions
like this emphasis - generating questions is a key IL skill
digital literacy and media literacy
interesting how this section discusses info lit without using the term. The concepts are all interconnected.
the protection of private information in an online environment has become the responsibility of user
Certainly an info lit issue. The Information Has Value frame puts heavy emphasis on other people's info, but we also need to be conscious of the value of our own
I want to argue they have the opposite problem.
as did Weinberger: https://books.google.com/books/about/Too_Big_to_Know.html?id=PkLuAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=false
information enters a community through only a few restricted channels
media consolidation since the 90s plays a big role here.
The human mind, however, is arguably broken, and educators must implement a rigorous curriculum of informal logic before our gathering gloom of fallacies, magical thinking, conspiracy theories, and dogma make the Dark Ages look sunny by comparison.
One problem is people spend much more time and attention outside of educational curricula. The messages from family, friends and media tend to take precedence.
the ability to connect the dots between people and ideas, where others see no possible connection. An informed perspective is more important than ever
This points to the value of a broad based liberal education. One needs to see and understand the dots in order to make connections. "Informed perspective" suggests informed learning and info lit.
have the literacies to understand the work
Great point. Information literacies are for everyone, and we all need to continually develop our own to keep up with evolving modes of communication. Should we be evaluated by people who can only evaluate traditional publishing?
accessible
Not accessible because they're written for small audiences of specialized experts, and also because they're typically paywalled and off the radar of society at large. That inaccessibility makes it easy for others to distort research and science for political purposes - see the shrimp on a treadmill
public narratives and the possibilities of digital storytelling
I wonder if ds106 could be part of this? Could we take academese and translate it into internet vernacular? And use that idea as the theme of the course?
when Americans get news online, they increasingly reach for a smartphone (55%), with computer use falling significantly
Does this impact the quality of the news people receive? News on a phone would have less depth, and possibly trend towards clickbait. Is it more personalized, more subject to algorithmic interference?
the figure is just 53 percent when people are asked specifically about the news that they themselves use
This bears further investigation. Is it low by historical standards? If so, might it be a result of marketing efforts by media outlets, as they try to distinguish themselves from the competition?
people do not always distinguish between news reports and advertising on news sites, and the contrast between a professionally reported story and the “around the web” recommendations that may accompany it can be jarring
In the online environment these sites and articles are mixed together as if they were equivalent. When we encounter newspapers in stores, they are generally not adjacent to tabloids.
Technology is the problem. When the profit motive trumps the public good
That second thing is the major problem - the attitude that money matters and people don't. Truth becomes a casualty. Humanity becomes a casualty. It manifests itself in the precarious employment situation and the opioid crisis as well as the media.
The studying strategy with “the greatest power,” she adds, involves deeply questioning the text — asking yourself if you agree with the author, and why or why not.
Etexts have an advantage in the annotation department in that they're not limited to the marginal space. Annotations can be as lengthy as they need to be. They can also be organized through tags, and thus easily searched. They can contain hyperlinks and be hyperlinked, tying texts together. I wonder how many people are taught, in any meaningful or systematic way, to use digital texts. And if they were, how would that change this dilemma.
University-wide 33–39% of faculty said that fewer than half of their undergraduates meet their expectations
This could mean that students are lacking in info lit skills, or that a minority of faculty have unrealistic expectations
pedagogy of research
makes me think of Bruce's Six Frames, "Learning to Learn" http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/ital.2006.05010002
Sometimes, even people immersed in a discipline don’t quite understand how or why information is organized
an example of how literacy is a continuum. People immersed in a discipline are hardly "info illiterate," but how and why info is organized is a discipline in itself
many students I met were being told that Wikipedia was untrustworthy and were, instead, being encouraged to do research
Is this a problem with media literacy? Or does it stem from a mindless bias against Wikipedia? The problem described sounds like literacy taught poorly.
For the past 40 years, society has demanded information literacy of students
Some people have been advocating for information literacy, but I have not seen evidence of a societal demand. In my experience, info lit is regarded as something that would be nice to have as part of the curriculum, if there was time and as long as someone else is responsible for it. We've spent 40 years trying to get it on the radar of faculty and administration.
Information literacy presumes a set of unbiased institutions and incorruptible instructors are waiting in the wings to begin inculcating the masses with the proper truth procedures.
I'm not sure of the basis of this characterization of information literacy. It makes it sound as if we assume a mantle of papal infallibility, and it seems to ignore the complexities of info lit.
‘information literacy’ suffers from a lack of descriptive power. It is too ambitious in scope, too wide-ranging in application and not precise enough in detail to be useful in an actionable way.
Interesting point - information literacy is "too big to know." One response has been to define it down, others would fracture it into multiple literacies. While it may be necessary to break it down to make it manageable, the larger view is important too.
Open is a purposeful path towards connection and community. Open pedagogy could be considered as a blend of strategies, technologies, and networked communities that make the process and products of education more transparent, understandable, and available to all the people involved
ndividuals can organize bodies ofknoWl-elg=--Esearch texts or other presentations for useful_analyze----nesvzskills in orderatc0Jprogram" their ownwacq4isition sequences
These learning skills are all part of info lit.
evoteseeiin = rs= mtensiye- attention to itevelopmentskills _of learning i se =-will enaincreasin =o -le- arn--o10Ille-neehltema c=o _ca.rerarnrne -instrdd
I see this as a call for information literacy - relates to Bruce's Learning to Learn frame
information literacy needs to be embedded in digital inclusion programmes from day one
make it more than just a library thing.
the ability to critically evaluate information and use it to make informed choices
concise but narrow definition. compare to Claremont's
Shouldn't algorithmic simulation be studied as a driving cultural force
understanding information channels and how they operate is a significant part of IL
This is practically identical with librarians' conceptions of information literacy
yet info lit is so much more - metaliteracy
citizens are to be intelligent shapers of the information society rather than its pawns
Creating and communicating information are vital parts of info lit - parts that libraries should embrace
a new liberal art that extends from knowing how to use computers and access information to critical reflection on the nature of information itself, its technical infrastructure, and its social, cultural and even philosophical context and impact
Information comes in many forms and flows through many channels. It is important to understand the grammar and syntax of the forms, and the functions and workings of the channels, in order to understand the information.
clever men who rule over them in virtue of their necessary superiority
makes me think of "code is law" and the algorithms that run so much of the web
Literacy Compared to What
Good questions. Is information literacy as ill-defined as the open in open ed?
Should everyone take a course in creating a Web page, computer programming, TCP/IP protocols or multimedia authoring?
Over the past 20 years, the web has become a basic communications platform, and multimedia a basic form. We need to know them like we need to know keyboarding and MS Word.
Jenkins’ argument is that cultural progress is necessarily the result of freedom
that progress is a result of technical abilities (literacies) as well as permissions
less of a consumer space and one more useful for meaningful learning and interaction
again connecting to the Value and Authority frames
beyond character decoding and extends to publishing prowess, presentation skills, and the interpretation of things like memes and platforms
all of which are information literacies look to Belshaw
sociocultural development of participatory perspectives and literacies
participation in the information ecosystem as a way of developing information literacy
building blocks of the web and encouraging them to take an active role in the construction of their own digital identity
info has value - owning/controlling your own space & identity online constructing identity - constructing authority
students who are new to this kind of web and this kind of approach to interaction. Significantly, most students haven’t been taught to think about how the natures of knowledge, authority, composition, and learning have changed/are changing.
This is an information issue, not a digital one. understanding how info flows through different channels, how new channels impact the nature of information,
Identifying what information is needed Finding the information Evaluating the information
Some situate info lit here. It makes it easy to instruct & assess, but the other three matter just as much if not more. Number 2 is vital - asking good questions is where it starts, and formulating questions is a creative and information skill that is valued in the workplace, and seen as lacking in education. Number 5 is entirely within the librarian's field of expertise. Number 6 may belong to the disciplines in part, but it is a place to connect with them.
emphasizing information literacy as a holistic, as opposed to task-specific, practice and disposition
integrate IL
efficiency is not always the primary goal in gathering information
This definition/description limits IL mainly to finding & evaluating. Why aren't using and creating and communicating in the mix?
It highlights the importance of learner agency, learning in public, control over one’s digital identity, and the increasing importance of Web literacies.
Consider all the ways this ties to the ACRL Framework
Decide where and how their information is published;
connects directly to DoOO
critical comparison of similar messages delivered through multiple modes
hands on experience with creating media would be useful
Utilize information modalities that fit the needs and expectations of the activity and community of practice.
connects to DoOO - engage in processes to understand them, practice in multi media
reflective blogging is a way to do this - using comm. modalities to discuss them
Getting students to follow their instructors’ blogs and other informal scholarly writings on the web is a great introduction to this knowledge practice.
ties to DoOO, connected courses
Maintain a wiki, blog, or other platform to share reflections, thoughts, and analyses of scholarly work in a given discipline, field, or research area.
Open practices to develop IL
Debate is much more effective at developing this knowledge practice than the more commonplace research papers on hot topics.
See Bryan Jackson's post on this. Not sure that this could be done in a one-shot though.
This requires A LOT of exposure and practice across multiple courses.
worth bringing up to faculty? The library doesn't have the manpower to do it all, nor would we get the class time.
there is a big difference between someone who can intellectually describe what they SHOULD do, and actually practice what they preach
students know how they're supposed to answer questions of authority, but don't always do what they should
infobesity and infoxication - wondering how I can make use of these terms.
The Discovery/Curation image is good too - a different representation of info lit.
it is not simply about the ability to evaluate information for features such as authenticity, quality, relevance, accuracy, currency, value, credibility and potential bias.
Of course, neither is information literacy by any definition that I am aware of.
3. Summarize the background in five sentences or less
This whole process is a great example of active reading. Could this be adapted into a workshop? Time would be a challenge.
mean literally draw it
concept mapping FTW
6. Now read the methods section. Draw a diagram for each experiment, showing exactly what the authors did.
Purdue method gave methodology the short shrift. The goal there was information extraction rather than deep understanding. "Satisficing"
1. Begin by reading the introduction, not the abstract.
Interesting how the process differs from Purdue's. Different intentions though
I made a universally editable spreadsheet that students could interact with throughout the lesson.
Is there a way to make this work in an info lit one-shot?