Instead of trying to extract the internal dynamics resulting from them,modern scholarship has largely reduced the perceived asymmetry in the functionality of culturalor political features to an ‘objective’ asymmetry in power. This tendency has been mostprominently pronounced in postcolonial scholarship in the wake of Edward Said’s workOrientalism (1978).
I am a little bit unsure about this? How does work Edward Said fit into this asymmetry? In my understanding, criticizing a western imagination of the orient should challenge an euro-centric worldview? Is it problematic because such criticisms are situated in binaries (such as the east and the west), and overlooks multidimensional dynamics during the intercations?