Is this bad? Not really, just uninspired. After all, validating a business idea was never about fancy design, and before the AI era, everything looked like Bootstrap.
大多数人认为AI生成的设计是'坏的设计'，但作者认为这只是'缺乏灵感'，将其与Bootstrap时代相提并论，暗示这种设计平庸化是技术发展的自然循环而非灾难性退步。这种观点挑战了我们对设计价值的传统认知。
The DESIGN.md format is at version `alpha`. The spec, token schema, and CLI are under active development. Expect changes to the format as it matures.
大多数人期望成熟的设计系统规范应该是稳定和向后兼容的。但作者明确表示DESIGN.md仍处于alpha阶段并预期会有重大变化，这挑战了设计系统应该高度稳定的主流认知，表明创新性工具可以采用更灵活的演进路径。
We introduce Autogenesis Protocol (AGP), a self evolution protocol that decouples what evolves from how evolution occurs.
大多数人认为AI系统的演化应该是一个整体过程，关注点在于如何实现演化。但作者提出了一种革命性的分离方法，将演化的内容与演化的方式解耦，这打破了传统系统设计的思维模式。这种分离可能使AI系统的演化更加可控和可预测，与当前主流的集成式演化方法形成鲜明对比。
a harness encodes an assumption about what the model can't do on its own
这一洞见是Agent工程演进的底层逻辑：脚手架是对模型当前能力边界的妥协。随着基座模型能力跃升，曾经的“必要组件”可能沦为冗余开销。因此，解构并剔除过时假设，是保持系统简洁高效的关键。
constructal law
for - definition - constructal law - Adrian Bejan - to - The constructal law of design in evolution and nature
to - The constructal law of design in evolution and nature - https://hyp.is/ZRIXfo76Ee-5yZdY2quRaQ/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2871904/ - youtube explainer video - constructal theory - flow - Adrian Bejan - https://hyp.is/R7V4Yo79Ee-52gO6UYAaYQ/www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgEBTPee9ZM
The constructal law of design and evolution in nature
for - paper - The constructal law of design and evolution in nature - Adrian Bejan - Sylvie Lorente - 2010 - from - The End of Scarcity? From ‘Polycrisis’ to Planetary Phase Shift - Nafeez Ahmed - 2024, Oct 16
from - The End of Scarcity? From ‘Polycrisis’ to Planetary Phase Shift - Nafeez Ahmed - 2024, Oct 16 - https://hyp.is/Qt8IMI74Ee--f4O18QMPFQ/ageoftransformation.org/the-end-of-scarcity-from-polycrisis-to-planetary-phase-shift/
nd the way in which these cate-gories changed, some being dropped out and others beingadded, was an index of my own intellectual progress andbreadth. Eventually, the file came to be arranged accord-ing to several larger projects, having many subprojects,which changed from year to year.
In his section on "Arrangement of File", C. Wright Mills describes some of the evolution of his "file". Knowing that the form and function of one's notes may change over time (Luhmann's certainly changed over time too, a fact which is underlined by his having created a separate ZK II) one should take some comfort and solace that theirs certainly will as well.
The system designer might also consider the variety of shapes and forms to potentially create a better long term design of their (or others') system(s) for their ultimate needs and use cases. How can one avoid constant change, constant rearrangement, which takes work? How can one minimize the amount of work that goes into creating their system?
The individual knowledge worker or researcher should have some idea about the various user interfaces and potential arrangements that are available to them before choosing a tool or system for maintaining their work. What are the affordances they might be looking for? What will minimize their overall work, particularly on a lifetime project?
By rejecting the idea that the stone provides useful evidence of a creator, Paley avoids the oversimplified argument that the existence of anything proves God’s existence. But the watch provides something different: evidence of purpose.
This piece argues that seeing Natural Theology simply as an attempt to prove the existence of a creator by claiming the living world is irreducibly complex is to misunderstand the main thrust of Paley's argument. Paley was primarily concerned with what the living world can tell us us about the nature (no pun intended) of such a creator. Organisms' complex adaptations, claimed Paley, show that the universe has purpose.
The piece argues that both advocates of evolution and advocates of 'intelligent design' have misunderstood the main thrust of Paley's argument. He was primarily concerned with disproving other theological viewpoints, rather than atheistic ones.
The spiritual vision of the Bauhaus was a faith in people’s ability to transform society for good by breaking down divisions and working together toward a common purpose.
Originally published on Medium on August 29, 2019.
Each of the programming language generations aims to provide a higher level of abstraction of the internal computer hardware details, making the language more programmer-friendly, powerful, and versatile.