5-04 是华尔街向 AI 双寡头格局 正式确权 的日子 OpenAI 阵营（TPG / Brookfield / Bain / Advent / SoftBank）vs Anthropic 阵营（Blackstone / H&F / Goldman / GA / Apollo / Leonard Green / GIC / Sequoia）—— 两个阵营完全没有交集 。
作者声称两个阵营'完全没有交集'，这是一个过于绝对的断言。在复杂的商业生态中，资本流动和合作关系往往更为复杂，存在交叉投资、战略合作等多种形式。这种二元对立的划分可能过度简化了市场格局，忽视了商业生态系统中的灰色地带和动态变化。
A company cannot credibly claim to support human rights, as Anthropic have done in arguing against the use of their technology for war, and in the next breath undermine the fundamental human rights to privacy and data protection.
作者将Anthropic对人权的主张与其当前行为直接对立，但没有分析两者之间的复杂关系或可能的解释。这是一个简化论点，忽略了公司行为可能的多维度性和背景。改进方法应承认问题的复杂性，或者提供更具体的证据证明Anthropic的人权主张与其当前行为之间存在直接矛盾。
in the United States, both political parties take money from the military-industrial complex, from the fossil fuel industry, from the pharmaceutical industry, from the gun industry.
for - two party system - false dichotomy - opinion - James Hansen
one of two outcomes which is either you mass decentralize
for - false dichotomy - AI - centralised robot police - decentralised with lone wolf bad actors
with issues framed as having only two sides, and thus hardly any space for complexity or nuance.
for - polarization - challenge - false dichotomy - no room for moderates
it is through the ascetic formations of monasticism that an opening was made for reevaluating labor positively rather than negatively
for - false dichotomy - throughout history - clerics and warriors - excluded majority of the working class - inclusive third way - reviving works as spiritual activity - Benjamin Suriano
Society was thus ruled largely through a bipartite structure of oratores and bellatores, clerics and warriors, with little place for the lot of ordinary workers.
for - false dichotomy - common throughout history - clerics and warriors - alienated masses of the ordinary workers - Benjamin Suriano
we're in a position as a modern techno-industrial culture this is my view that it's false to say what the oil 00:29:32 companies are saying that we can keep producing oil and gas we'll get the society to pay for carbon capture and storage and and other stuff but it's going to be a technological salvation 00:29:44 and then we can keep on with our life that's one version the the other version is the environmentalist version which the federal government has bought into and that is we'll go green and then we 00:29:57 can keep everything
for: false dichotomy of sustaining modernity
paraphrase
comment
She introduces a phenomenon she calls the "double bind for men" (232). Her explanation makes use of the more documented female double bind which is created by sexual object/prey stereotypes of women, and reduces women to choosing between being considered either a "virgin" or a "whore." In Serano's male double bind, the options are between "nice guy" and "asshole."
I don’t want to force my opinion on you
This is false. Betteredge himself confesses during this conversation that his thoughts were "muddled" until "Mr. Franklin took them in hand, and pointed out what they ought to see". Furthermore, wasn't it Franklin who pushed Betteredge to write his recollection in the first place? Franklin's influence on the Betteredge is apparent, putting into question the reliability of his narrative as well as Franklin's motives.
It again brings up the dichotomy of opinion versus fact, subjective versus objective. This reminds me of "In a Grove" by Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was adapted into the film "Rashomon" by Akira Kurosawa. Very similar themes and narrative structure.
to put the Person before the Thing, which is but common politeness
The capitalization of "Person" along with "Thing" leads me to believe that Rosanna may be a key character, especially as Betteredge describes her in great detail compared to the other characters he has introduced thus far. It's interesting that he quips it is "common politeness" to "put the Person before the Thing", when looking at the narrative as a whole, it is the "Thing" which comes before all else. This juxtaposition sets up a dichotomy of the personal versus the objective, which given the format of multiple narrators makes sense.
Also establishes Betteredge as someone who values social etiquette while subtly hinting that those who are obsessed with the Diamond are somehow indecent. Could that be a jab at the audience as well?
Second, this is a false dichotomy right out of the gate.
Amen. Systemic vs. individual approaches to improving education are absolutely both necessary.
The regional brain activation responses to a stimulant drug also differ between controls and cocaine abusers in ventral prefrontal regions. In control subjects, intravenous stimulant administration decreased the activity of ventral medial frontal regions (OFC and ventral ACC), whereas in cocaine abusers, it activated these regions, which are involved in salience attribution and conditioning (Dosenbach et al., 2006, O’Doherty et al., 2001 and Shackman et al., 2011). Activation of the OFC in cocaine abusers was associated with craving (Volkow et al., 2005). In contrast, activity in the right inferior frontal region Ba 44, a key brain region involved in inhibitory control (Aron et al., 2004), was associated with the deactivation of the NAc and ventral PFC upon successful control of cocaine craving (Volkow et al., 2010). This pattern of responses uncovers distinct contributions of PFC regions to addiction on the basis of their striatal projections: dlPFC and inferior frontal regions that project to the dorsal caudate facilitate self-control, whereas ventral PFC regions projecting to NAc facilitate drug taking (Goldstein and Volkow, 2011). This is also consistent with preclinical findings that identified distinct contributions of prelimbic mPFC (PL) and infralimbic mPFC (IL) to cocaine seeking in rats (review in Bossert et al., 2013). Studies using the reinstatement model of relapse found that, after extinction of cocaine self-administration, PL activity promoted cocaine seeking while IL activity inhibited it (Peters et al., 2008). Importantly, in the incubation of the cocaine-craving model (response to cocaine cues progressively increases with time after withdrawal), reversible inactivation of IL, but not PL, decreased “incubated” cue-induced cocaine seeking after prolonged withdrawal, while pharmacological activation of IL, but not PL, increased cocaine seeking during early withdrawal (Koya et al., 2009). However, in the same animal model, optogenetic inhibition of PL neurons (projecting to NAc core) that previously underwent a specific form of cocaine-induced synaptic plasticity (recruitment of silent synapse) decreased incubation of craving, while the opposite effect was observed following inhibition of the IL projection to NAc shell (Di Forti et al., 2014). In clear contrast, in a punishment-induced suppression model of “compulsive” cocaine seeking, in which most rats suppressed cocaine self-administration by shock punishment while a few did not (punishment-resistant “compulsive” rats), optogenetic stimulation of PL inhibited cocaine seeking in punishment-resistant rats while optogenetic inhibition increased it (Chen et al., 2013). However, in the same model, excitotoxic lesions of the PL or IL had no detectable effect on cocaine seeking in punishment-resistant rats (Pelloux et al., 2013). Taken together, the PL and IL appear to play different and complex roles in cocaine-seeking behaviors in rat addiction models, which are highly dependent on the particular behavior being assessed and the experimental procedure used to manipulate local neuronal activity. The results underscore the complexity of the neuroplasticity within the mPFC circuitry, a multimodal brain structure involved in the orchestration of diverse behaviors.