One important thing to remember is that in regular strings the \ character needs to be escaped while in the regex literal (usually) the / character needs to be escaped. So /\w+\//i becomes new RegExp("\\w+/", "i")
Easier/prettier in Ruby than JS
One important thing to remember is that in regular strings the \ character needs to be escaped while in the regex literal (usually) the / character needs to be escaped. So /\w+\//i becomes new RegExp("\\w+/", "i")
Easier/prettier in Ruby than JS
We may havemade errors of selection.
A great admission to make upfront in such a massive endeavor which one hopes to shape the future.
What does this mean for ars excerpendi writ large? Particularly when it may apply to hundreds of thousands?
JavaScript, as a language, has some fundamental shortcomings — I think the majority of us agree on that much. But everyone has a different opinion on what precisely the shortcomings are.
You'll have to forgive me the dusty desk, I currently don't have a carpet in my office so it's almost entirely pointless dusting as it's back to this state within 2 days.
Its easy to see flaws in yourself, but when you point that out, everyone who did not see it so far, can see it too.