we all know that "child protection" is only a pretext for "more tyranny".
the actual "child fuckers" are you:<br /> you are destroying our families.<br /> you are forcing our children into your "schools".
milan hauth, jägerstr 10, 83308 trostberg
2 Matching Annotations
- Sep 2025
-
fightchatcontrol.eu fightchatcontrol.eu
- Oct 2023
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
but not hate speech that meet the standards of ECHR Article 10; which is to say that the views espoused in by this person were also deemed “worthy of respect in a democratic society”
This is incorrect. This is the opposite of what was held in Lilliendahl.
The ECtHR held in that case that the appellant was not entitled to relief, and that the €800 fine imposed on him was necessary and proportionate to his hate speech.
What was held was that the hate speech didn't fall within the scope of Article 17 (not Article 10, as Breslow claims in this blog).
-