6 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2023
-
bonpote.com bonpote.com
-
A non-essential culture?
- for cancel culture
- comment
- by cancel culture, what I mean here is that in cases of real emergency, culture has been canceled, as during the Covid crisis
- If elites cannot voluntarily control their extremely high emissions, then it will be done by policy as their inability to do so can threaten the survival of organized human life itself as research on millionaire's emissions have demonstrated:
-
-
phys.org phys.org
-
According to a new study by tourism professor Stefan Gössling, the millionaires will, within just a few decades, be responsible for almost three quarters of carbon dioxide emissions.
- for: wealth inequality, inequality, carbon inequality, elite emissions, 1% emissions, millionaire emissions
- According to a new study by tourism professor Stefan Gössling,
- the millionaires will, within just a few decades, be responsible for almost three quarters of carbon dioxide emissions.
-
- Jul 2023
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
In addition to their high GHG emissions from consumption, high-SES people have disproportionate climate influence through at least four non-consumer roles: as investors, as role models within their social networks and for others who observe their choices, as participants in organizations and as citizens seeking to influence public policies or corporate behaviour
- for: high-SES, 1%, W2W, inequality, carbon inequality, elites, billionaires, millionaires, leverage point
- five high carbon emission areas of high-SES, HNWI, VHNWI
- consumption
- investor
- role model within social networks
- participants in organizations
- citizens seeking to influence public policies or corporate behavior
-
- Mar 2023
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
Fig. 3. Remaining carbon budget and millionaire emission growth, 2022–2050*.
Graph - millionaire emission growth vs remaining carbon budget - Note the year 2037 on this graph - This is when millionaire emissions exceeds remaining carbon budget
-
Fig. 4. Millionaire numbers (nominal) by region: 1990, 2020, 2050
graph - millionaire numbers by region - 1990 - 2020 - 2050
-
Title: Millionaire spending incompatible with 1.5 °C ambitions Authors: - Stefan Gossling - Andreas Humpe
-
Abstract
-
Research question
- Growing evidence suggests that the wealthiest individuals contribute disproportionally to climate change.
- This study considers the implications of a continued growth in the number of millionaires for emissions,
- and its impact on the depletion of the remaining carbon budget to limit global warming to 1.5 °C (about 400 Gt CO2).
- The study presents a model that extrapolates observed growth in millionaire numbers (1990–2020)
- and associated changes in emissions to 2050.
-
Results
- The share of US$2020-millionaires in the world population will grow from 0.7% today to 3.3% in 2050,
- and cause accumulated emissions of 286 Gt CO2.
- This is equivalent to 72% of the remaining carbon budget,
- and significantly reduces the chance of stabilizing climate change at 1.5 °C.
- Continued growth in emissions at the top
- makes a low-carbon transition less likely,
- as the acceleration of energy consumption by the wealthiest
- is likely beyond the system's capacity to decarbonize.
- To this end, we question whether policy designs
- such as progressive taxes targeting the high emitters
- will be sufficient.
- The share of US$2020-millionaires in the world population will grow from 0.7% today to 3.3% in 2050,
-
// and if it is not sufficient, then what?
-
-