UK government officials have raised concerns that the decision to withhold access highlights a 'wider protectionist shift' among US tech companies
这是一个带有潜在偏见的表述，将Anthropic的行为描述为更广泛的保护主义趋势。需要核实这是否确实代表美国科技公司的普遍做法，还是仅限于个别案例，以及是否有其他美国AI公司也对英国安全机构采取了类似立场。
The Cappers Act of 1488 forbade, on penalty of a fine, the wearing of foreign-made caps in England and Wales. A further Act of Parliament in 1571, during the reign of Elizabeth I, stated that every person above the age of six years (excepting "Maids, ladies, gentlewomen, noble personages, and every Lord, knight and gentleman of twenty marks land") residing in any of the cities, towns, villages or hamlets of England, must wear, on Sundays and holidays (except when travelling), "a cap of wool, thicked and dressed in England, made within this realm, and only dressed and finished by some of the trade of cappers, upon pain to forfeit for every day of not wearing 3s. 4d." This legislation was intended to protect domestic production, as caps were becoming unfashionable and were being challenged by new forms of imported headgear. It was repealed in 1597 as unworkable
Example of legislating fashion as protectionism.
A 2016 Lancet study found that universal breast-feeding would prevent 800,000 child deaths a year across the globe and yield $300 billion in savings from reduced health care costs and improved economic outcomes for those reared on breast milk.
Pure corruption here. Protectionism to prop up profits of approximately 630 million versus major benefits and savings of 300 billion. Even if you look at the calculus of the entire industry of 70 billion it becomes a no brainer.
Brubaker, R. (2020). Paradoxes of Populism during the Pandemic [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/cy73b
Orbán will sicherstellen, dass die Mehrheit der Banken, Handelsketten und Medien im Land in ungarische Hand gelangen, ausländische Investoren sollen verdrängt werden. Dazu werden Sondersteuern für bestimmte Akteure und Gesetze gegen unliebsame Konkurrenz erlassen.