Key Revisions from Previous Outline Opening: Now starts with March 2020 crisis moment, not methodological discovery Context Before Method: Institutional context and theory come before explaining data collection Orphan Comments: Moved to Chapter 2 where it makes sense methodologically Evidence Flow: Pre-pandemic baseline consolidated in 1.2.2, referenced elsewhere Narrative Logic: Crisis -> Context -> Theory -> Method -> Preview Implementation Notes Total target: 14,000-15,000 words Each evidence ID appears in ONE primary location Cross-references use section numbers, not repetition Transitions connect sections without redundancy

(how CUNY’s digital communities responded to systematic institutional crises, how students constructed educational infrastructure through peer networks, how platform architectures shaped crisis resilience)

comment_ljsi5h9

ethnographic supplementation.

call “non-digital-centric” digital ethnography. They trea

Frame research questions emerging from crisis

Reddit’s pseudonymity enables what Proferes (2017) calls “context collapse management.” Users

This temporal mismatch—crisis operating 24/7 while support operates 40 hours weekly—creates the necessity for peer networks analyzed in this chapter and documented ethnographically in Chapter 3.

.

private navigation of institutional barriers transformed into collective public discourse.

“Rate my schedule”: 275 CUNY vs 34 NYU

two decades ago, the influential environmentalist Herbert Girardet (1999) was still posing the relationship between the two as a potential ‘contradiction in terms’. What happened? Why does everyone think cities can save the planet, and why now?

This is actively being worked on - for those interested you can follow the progress in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10836

Seeing how this has been treated for 4.5 years makes this seem like a pretty dysfunctional project. Please have mercy on your poor users and fix this.

After 5 years there's still no fix. This is so annoying. I'm now getting rid of all snap packages and installing deb variants instead. Finally I'll purge snap and if these weird decisions keep on going I'll also move to another distro. Common Canonical. Seriously?

I'm trying to help in some way by bringing these issues to light so a discussion about them can take place.

Unfortunately, even though this bug/request was opened in 2016, this feature is still not implemented in ruby-install.

If the document is uncontroversial and agreement is reached quickly it might be committed directly with the "accepted" status. Likewise, if the proposal is rejected the status shall be "rejected". When a document is rejected a member of the core team should append a section describing the reasons for rejection.

Add this statement to the newspaper_search.R program library(RMySQL)

Tip: Take your time to think about table design and naming since a well designed database will be easier to work with and understand.

Run the CREATE DATABASE command. Click

However, there are times when databases are very useful including: Placing the results of an R program on a web site where the data can be interacted with. Handling large amounts of data. Storing the results of long running programs so that a program can continue from where it left off in case it was interrupted.

R language

Using a database also offered the ability to recover from errors when my R program stopped during processing. Since the database stores the most recently processed work, the R program was able to begin from where it left off before it ran into an error. This was very important because I did not want to waste days of processing by starting over from the beginning.

relational database

I wanted to make further improvements to the finding aid by using natural language processing

Introduction

The search bar can be used to view them all at any time.

loaded whenever you return to the document.