hiw about money being onne of the options. also lets make titles two fonts like h1. . importnt word teal and italic thing

why is the pick at least one in a box that looks drag and drop

perfect.

lets not make it look visually similar to the bo under it.

lets make those two statements sisually better looking

the open now, should be more still open, closed, if a human has reviewed and chosen 10, but they can still click to get promo in exchange to the waitlist signup form/process thigns

whats the current on? also need to say 2 a month

this too can be mulit select, bold , italics, rotate, wtb so peopel can skim options easily. ther has to be research on this we ca mplement, some pshycologial trick or somethign to ge tmore peopel to answer btter

can be select more than one. can we highlisht or make it easier to read. images, or just highlight italics, bold, wtv? proabbly sam with other lengthy answer/options

also where is the quiz part?

pt this in the quiz before so everyon ehasd to answer

im thinkging we switch this into the ones we confirmed is the rounds, but th eusbmissions are for any lsit size?

do we need this here , why not just on the form?

in the section we should state not all invalid emails bounce. replace with the 26% stat or wtv and the url where it was from

this didn't look like it was a link.

why this award and not all of them or another one or?

back to back same guy normal right? jsut a cut?

16 17 are same cahracter same kind of line but different angles. which one do we keep? based on the rest?

remove this

Let's keep this one

This is completely wrong the table thing was supposed to happen during one of the tanks but we can just forget it

keep

rEJECTED — background hands/people

keep

3

3

2

1

2

v2

v1

v1

i liked mine better? maybehalf ay? or push back if you want

Bounces down, opens up. money. do i know why. yes? i got it, but no. do i care? no, because it works.

this joke is not as good really, i think my new idea is better idea

anything beter than we're good at that

from reviews, gemini ai, or exxagerated like we're Suuuuuper good at that.

why are we not allowed to say that ? thats just internal rule no?

how about this is the blocklist person who keeps getting cut off?, but somhow his gossip is in the testimonial reivew.

The funny part can also be that the one question was about how to get off the blacklist right and go to record step-by-step what to do everything done and they got like a warm-up and got listed and then the really laying other than like maybe what did they do to you it's that's not even what you do the clean emails addresses or whatever this was just free help. Because they wanna help? and so quick ...

and maybe there is like a shadow that always kind of appears and thats why she is whispering and looking around or at her nails when her attiute has t ocome out more than the fear.

kind of the liek the funny fear jokes from the language app, where the owl comes to yourw indow at night or wtv, but different version of that?

so we merge the whisper person with the person we cut off and merge them into just t ehsos weird omg why so nice. whats the catch. which is true, everyobe is like apprehensi eot get on a call and then they are liek holy shit best callive had in my life!

not this exactly, but the point is good but need the funny to be funnier.

this one is great!

we need better options for this sentence something like you give them your email list, and if you want more info about your email stuff, and they clean it and give you all this weirdly clear information.

how do we make sure this doesn'T feel like a bad edit but an actual on purpose?

dont knwo what this isç

b but different delphis maybe?

a

a, a, only option

already agree with all the after of this section

only option works

before revieweed by would be a button that would make me generate the report by hand and while that happens they cant delete the list

option b

lets not use dashboard as the title page or anythign already in the menu highlighted based on which page htey are on. the motto is in the footer on the left and the logo in behing=d as now is delph the octopus

i like option b

i like how it is no the colors, jst spacing of eyrbow from title is too close right now on the current app

for footer i like th trust beats tactics only from a and the octopus on the righ of the page like it is now

option b but use a different octopus for different reasons or pages?

agreed

only option

option a or current

keep as is

option a

Consumer Email

Consumer Email

ist it one of these Can't Receive Email / Site can't be reached

we don't labe this do we?

hmm is that a label no?

depends as well on other laebls

not always

no label remove other labels might arise though

no label at all , remove

Invalid/Typo/Trap

stay as keep high risk

no suppress low risk is oue out of the box choice

no to monitor hgh risk is correct

to monitor, low is the correc t one

keep high

keep high is correct for this

to keep high for military

suppress low is correct out of th ebox, they can put to monitor if they want

keep medium is correct

high

i prefer this one not invalid or Typo as the label in the list

high not medium

to keep medium is correct

yes keep low is correct

low not high

suppress, low not monitor medium so red dot is bigger but to monitor is still avaialle

suprpress

medium

medium

medium

Monitor, Low is correct the dot is wrong it is bigger at medium and can be put in to keep or in to suppress, but it is To monitor

Low

i still don't get how having bad sender rep is an issue inreceiving an email, there must be other things too this label appears for?

i think i need new descrption for this?

exaplin that iit may still have active dns, but human person can'T use i unless htye buy it again or someone else does an creates new inbox

approved

appfroved

i prefer Schools keep mailboxes alive for years, so old addresses linger and still accept mail. The catch: they sit behind aggressive institutional filters, so a low open rate here is usually the filter, not the person.

approved

i don't think this is true same for the description version , why would sending to somepne who has bad sned er rep be bead for me?

approved

approved

approved

approved

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

approved

approved

dont make it as a list, as a apragraph, use lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too

remo dash and update sentence to accomodat this change

dont make it as a list, as a apragraph, use lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too

approved

write as Paragraph not as a list 123

CHANGE TO: The address looks made-up rather than real: all numbers, keyboard mashing (asdf, qwerty), test or filler words, or obvious refusals. These usually come from forms with no confirmation step, where people type junk to get past a gate. Deliverable ones can sit in a low-frequency segment, but anything clearly fake is worth removing, and the real fix is a confirmation step so the junk never lands on your list in the first place.

CHANGE TO: The domain has no working website (a 404, or no web DNS), though it may still handle email. Plenty of legitimate senders are email-only, so this isn't fatal, it's a yellow flag that the business could be inactive. Send with a light touch and let engagement and bounces tell you whether anyone's really home.

CHANGE TO: The website won't load (a DNS failure), even though the mail server may still be alive. Mail can sometimes still get through, but a site that's fallen off the internet is a sign the domain may be drifting toward abandoned. Keep sending for now if the mailbox responds, but watch for bounces and don't be surprised if this one degrades.

CHANGE TO: The domain shows a 'parked' or 'for sale' page instead of a real site, which usually means it's expired, abandoned, or being held by a squatter rather than run by a real business. Mail to it is a coin flip at best. Remove these, because the person or company you thought was there almost certainly isn't sending or receiving from this address anymore.

CHANGE TO: The domain was registered less than 30 days ago, so it has almost no track record yet. It might be a brand-new business or something short-lived thrown up for a single purpose. Nothing to remove, just watch it: if real engagement develops the flag stops mattering, and if it goes quiet or starts bouncing, treat it as the throwaway it might be.

CHANGE TO: A military address (.mil). Mail routes through the Department of Defense gateway, which accepts everything at the door but then filters hard inside and often drops what it doesn't like without a bounce, so a real inbox can still silently swallow your mail. Keep them if they're your audience, but treat delivery here as unproven, watch engagement rather than trusting 'delivered', and don't read a lack of bounces as success.

CHANGE TO: The person's mailbox is over its storage limit and can't take new mail right now. Sometimes that's temporary, but an inbox that stays full is usually one nobody empties anymore, meaning abandoned. We'd suppress these by default. If you want to give them a chance, park them in a retry segment and re-check in 60 to 90 days before sending, rather than mailing into a full box now.

CHANGE TO: The address is on a defunct or absorbed ISP (sbcglobal.net, earthlink.net, prodigy.net and similar). These still receive mail, but nobody's really maintaining the service anymore, and many are checked rarely or not at all. On its own it doesn't change the verdict, so keep it, but if it pairs with other caution flags or shows no engagement, lean toward retiring it.

CHANGE TO: This domain shows up on threat-intelligence lists tied to malware, phishing, or other malicious activity. An address here often means a compromised or throwaway account, and mailing it does nothing good for you. Remove it right away. If it's genuinely someone you know, assume their account may be compromised and find a different way to reach them before sending anything.

CHANGE TO: This address turns up on lots of marketing lists, so the inbox is crowded and your mail competes with everyone else's. It's a real, sendable address, engagement just tends to run lower. To earn attention, make the subject line and timing count and keep the content genuinely relevant to them; if they never engage, treat them like any other cold contact and taper off.

CHANGE TO: This address has the hallmarks of people who tend to hit 'spam' more often than average, based on its pattern and history rather than anything the person has done to you yet. It's still deliverable, so this is a caution flag, not a removal. Only send mail they clearly asked for and expect, keep the unsubscribe obvious and easy, and watch complaints closely, pulling back fast if they climb.

CHANGE TO: A government or public-sector address (.gov and the like). These are real and reachable, but they sit behind strict filters built to block bulk and marketing mail, so even a valid inbox may never see a promotional send. Keep them, but expect low reach on anything that looks like marketing, and lead with plain, expected, relevant mail.

CHANGE TO: The domain's registration has lapsed, so it's no longer live and nothing sent to it can be delivered. Usually the business closed, moved, or simply let the domain go. Remove every address on it. If it was an important contact, look for them somewhere else (LinkedIn, a new address) rather than mailing a dead domain.

CHANGE TO: The domain hasn't set up the usual email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). This doesn't stop you from sending to them, it just tells you the domain owner hasn't locked things down, which makes the domain easy to spoof. Nothing to remove on its own, but if you weren't expecting this signup it's worth a second look, because a fake address is more likely to hide behind an unauthenticated domain. Keep by default and let other signals decide.

CHANGE TO: The domain is missing the basic security setup a maintained domain normally has, which usually means nobody is actively looking after it anymore. Abandoned domains drift toward trouble over time and are a poor bet to keep sending to. Remove these unless you have a specific reason to believe the domain is still cared for.

CHANGE TO: The domain's registration runs out within the next 30 days. If the owner doesn't renew it, the whole domain stops working and every address on it goes dead, so this is a short clock, not a permanent problem. If the contact matters, reach out now while mail still lands and ask for a longer-term address, and re-check the domain in a month. If they renew, the flag clears on its own.

approved. we can add a "cta" to decide if they wan to send to all the role accon=unts, or remove people that might not be the same or interested?

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too in this definition

this means nothing, can e make it ore clear without being specific?

remove the dashes, and explain what that means for them simply put? harder spam filters, lower thresholds?

approved

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text

how is this different from invalid email? no mx records is als invalid email no? (the same as Invalid/Typo/Trap no?)

Some of these mght be new domains that have automatically adde mx records but not real person, or there is a real person they just donM 't on'T care about having a website

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text Accept-All is high. Be smart about how you read "delivered" About 21% of this sample is on Accept-All servers. For B2B outreach this is normal (lots of corporate Microsoft 365 / Mimecast / Proofpoint behind those domains), but it means a "delivered" status from your sending tool is NOT the same as "the inbox actually exists." Mailbox providers will silently drop unknown addresses on accept-all servers, and those failures show up as zero engagement, not as bounces. Watch click rates per domain. Accept-All domains with consistent 0% clicks across multiple campaigns are likely dead boxes.

Accept-All 412 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

66% of this list is in great shape to send to For a combined tax marketing and booking customer list, the validation profile is healthy. Only 29 of 598 addresses (4.8%) need removal. The Monitor segment is mostly Accept-All on consumer providers like Yahoo and Hotmail, where the addresses are real but the providers respond conservatively to validation queries. These should still be sent to. Accept-All 123 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

Accept-All 19,281 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals. all incoming mail at the gateway but may silently discard messages that don't pass security checks. Monitor carefully. Military domains accept all email at the gate (accept-all) but have aggressive internal filtering. Bounces may not be reported, making it hard to detect delivery failures.

Accept-All 1,320 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals. ✓ 3,159 addresses are clean and safe to send first The Keep bucket is deliverable-only. Every risky, low-confidence, and accept-all-without-a-website address has been pulled out into Monitor or Suppress, so what is left in Keep is what a fresh sender can lead with.

One ask: if any of these bounce because the mailbox genuinely does not exist (a true "no such user" bounce, not a blocklist or content block), tell us at lists@reviewmyemails.com and we will credit 2 emails back. It helps us learn and improve the checks, and you get the credits. 1,885 addresses are real but need care (Monitor) Monitor is where the address is real but comes with a caveat, and the decision on each is yours. Some sit on accept-all servers: we confirmed the domain is live and its mail server responds, but the server says "yes" to every address at the connection level, so the one specific mailbox cannot be confirmed active by any tool. That is their server's setting, not a gap in our check. Another 1,334 verified as real but with lower delivery confidence. Many of these domains also sit behind security gateways like Proofpoint, Mimecast and Barracuda that only let mail through from senders they already trust, so even a real, active inbox can block a cold sender until you are recognised or allowlisted. A few carry other flags (breach history, a shared role inbox, heavy mail volume), each explained per label below.

Go label by label below and decide what fits your risk tolerance: som e are worth sending to with care, others you may prefer to hold back. Either is a valid choice. Accept-All 1,416 emails These sit on a server that says "yes" to every address at the connection level, so we cannot confirm whether the individual mailbox actually exists. That is the key difference from Low Delivery Confidence, where we did get a mailbox-level answer. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL run this way, and on business domains it usually comes from a security gateway (Proofpoint, Mimecast, Barracuda) sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every accept-all address so you can track them as their own segment. Do not blast these. Sprinkle a few into your sends over time rather than hitting them all at once, use a shorter sequence with bigger gaps between emails, and cut them off faster if they show no engagement. The ones that do engage can move into your main list; the rest you set aside. Low Delivery Confidence 1,281 emails We checked these mailboxes and they came back real, but with a "risky" signal. This is the key difference from Accept-All: with Accept-All the server accepts everything and hides whether the specific mailbox exists, whereas here we did get a mailbox-level answer, it just was not a clean pass. It usually means the domain or provider has a weaker sending reputation, or the domain is small and low-traffic. These are worth sending to, just keep a close eye on them: track opens and bounces, and drop any that hard-bounce on the first touch. Yahoo and AOL cannot be individually verified, and that is normal These providers run accept-all servers: they say "yes" to every address at the connection level, so no tool can confirm one specific mailbox. That is their server's design, not a gap in the check. Since these subscribers opted in, keep them, but Yahoo and AOL are strict on complaints, so send consistently and prune anyone who never opens.

Accept-All 609 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

approved

its a bit repetitive

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text . reply here with change and then once approved replace it

we confirmed th email address exists, not theat there is real human still using it

approved

approved

approved

Let's just remove the last sentence or replace something else because reach in a lot of things so it's just like these emails might be a band that have lower engagement because you get too much and we need to add the white matter

We need a better way to say this like some of these inboxes we can't actually tell like like a weird way but like if a yahoo email says it's except all and it works but then I tried to go sign up with it and I can then I'm about provider doesn't doesn't exist whereas if I try to create an account with just does exist don't exist so there are ways to check certain thingsbut is also a waste like do some deep checks but an acceptable inbox has been created to accept any variation of the username so instead of saying that we can't verify it let's just explain what it is it's possible it's some small cases to actually figure out if an inbox does or does not exist but except all is a domain that's been set up to meaning any username from a domain email address to go to a specific inbox and that's it and so how to and the white it's important we need to beat it up it has a higher stress it's more difficult to check if the email just doesn't engagement and which kind of accept all is important yahoo versus a main base one and making a decision on which wants to keep overtime or how long to keep them is important so they can create like a graph of all the six of these inboxes to create like a baseline and anybody who falls below the baseline get kicked off I thought amount of time the baseline says someone is less likely to return and pay or engage in why and the way it matters is that these emails will not bounce if they actually stop existing which is uneven worse thing than having the wrong email address or something and you not realizing this address is dead so

what are these merged into or with which other label can you add it here and then show me the label or add it I guess it should be one of the new labels or in use I guess

we can delete this role or whatever it is and a data a basic documentation is just like marketed as used or like you know deleted

For the disposable I wanted to be clear that in the database and Hetzner we have these labels in use but on the reports and for the client it's only disposable as a label and yes or whatever in the cell of the column disposable or whatever temporary email whatever we call it. what do you call the column of disposable email addresses where we say yes or – for now in the export what is that column called

i donT' know how to check htis

dont know what that means. is it bad? its jsut to show templates in react to devs for reskin, and some corrections

sure we can make pop up contact your admin

don't know what ths is

no plans, just credit based

the labels to use will be the ones in glossary when we are done with them

should be, ,lets tell the devs

we can fix those accross the board too right?

yea i agree billing setting should just be in billinf and sender preference should be in same place as notification we already have notdsa bout this and other things

ok no problem to all

ok sure we can fix that easy

i don't knwo what this emeans

lets update our front end to say the same thing like the backend says add that to glossary with description that are short but explian well what each process means

Let tell the devs to update it then To Keep, etc

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and all the following Breached ompromised Address 149 emails This email address has appeared in a known data breach. The account may have been abandoned, taken over, or is now used as a spam trap by security researchers. Send with caution. If the address has been abandoned since the breach, it may bounce or generate complaints. Compromised Address 86 emails This email address has appeared in a known data breach. The account may have been abandoned, taken over, or is now used as a spam trap by security researchers. Send with caution. If the address has been abandoned since the breach, it may bounce or generate complaints. Compromised Address 14,695 emails This email address has appeared in a known data breach. The account may have been abandoned, taken over, or is now used as a spam trap by security researchers. Send with caution. If the address has been abandoned since the breach, it may bounce or generate complaints.

Compromised Address 757 emails This email address has appeared in a known data breach. The account may have been abandoned, taken over, or is now used as a spam trap by security researchers. Send with caution. If the address has been abandoned since the breach, it may bounce or generate complaints. ,885 addresses are real but need care (Monitor) Monitor is where the address is real but comes with a caveat, and the decision on each is yours. Some sit on accept-all servers: we confirmed the domain is live and its mail server responds, but the server says "yes" to every address at the connection level, so the one specific mailbox cannot be confirmed active by any tool. That is their server's setting, not a gap in our check. Another 1,334 verified as real but with lower delivery confidence. Many of these domains also sit behind security gateways like Proofpoint, Mimecast and Barracuda that only let mail through from senders they already trust, so even a real, active inbox can block a cold sender until you are recognised or allowlisted. A few carry other flags (breach history, a shared role inbox, heavy mail volume), each explained per label below.

Go label by label below and decide what fits your risk tolerance: some are worth sending to with care, others you may prefer to hold back. Either is a valid choice. Compromised Address 117 emails This address has appeared in a known data breach. It may still be a normal working inbox, or the person may have gone quiet on it since. We have placed it in Monitor, but the call is yours. The mailbox is deliverable, so it will not bounce; the realistic outcomes are that the person engages, ignores it, or clicks "report as spam". Decide by your own risk tolerance: send with care, or hold it back. 2,253 are real but carry a signal to watch (Monitor) Most of the Monitor bucket is normal for consumer email: addresses that have appeared in a data breach (Compromised), that sit on a lot of marketing lists (Saturated), or that have a higher historical complaint pattern. These are still your customers and still sendable, they are just the ones to watch for complaints and engagement. A separate 268 are flagged Possible Invalid (short or numeric localparts) for you to eyeball, and most will be real.

Compromised Address 911 emails This email address has appeared in a known data breach. The account may have been abandoned, taken over, or is now used as a spam trap by security researchers. Send with caution. If the address has been abandoned since the breach, it may bounce or generate complaints.

use this as final glossary description

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text

These inboxes can be hearder to inbox, and are more"emotional". can trigger issues from even one complaint or small negative thing. So if not needed or want to ignore small inboxes, =they can chyeck and drop these emals or monitor them.?

change the teal colours. it is lime now

can all thee section not have a sub container with beig background and jsut show two columns of info? side bby side make it take less space?

Legacy Inbox 451 emails some will be to suppress case they can'T recive emails but some of these will just be to monitor right?

Unverifiable Inbox 1,783 emails Verification could not complete (legacy ISPs, strict servers). Unknown is not bad, it is unknown.

doe sthis mean we couldn't check and give a reponsse? so we give 1783 credits back?

lets add in bold in description this label is in to monitr. so if it is the ony label for the meail the email will be marked as to monitor in the csv file.

are we using the right terminology? for saturated inbox or compromised addressetc?

also why are they one label instead of three? do we have three labels or we have merged ones as engagement risk signals?

For the accept all some of them can be checked with deep checks etc, so we need to explain what it is, but without losing its meaning or useflnness? what do you think we shoudl write?

what are the 91 domains? shoudl i check if the wbseit actually is parked?

we can'T tell people the typo fixed would allow them to email them. this is part of the typos, not a different kind of typo

This is the hook, but we need the rest? ii gues we jsut didnT' make it yet right?

isn'T email 55 yrs old? should be over 50 years no? or no because it wasn'T really "email email" that way 55 years

unless they are like us and set it up to get all the notifications at all times because we are crazy ;)

Didn't get the memo apparently

same issue with this form I was the one at the top of the page

it's based on their engagement and any other metrics we get sales from Google analytics website

this is the correct form that should be on all the pages at the bottom of the page that they have it but we still have the little bug from yesterday where the checkbox is centered in like two columns and a text in another column we need the checkbox to the complete left at th level as where the email field starts and then the tax for the fields need to be closer to the checkbox so it doesn't end up being 27 lines

I don't know why it seems to be in a column on the left there's nothing on the right so either center it and make the insights waitlist just a little bit longer so that it's not so tight and small

for now there's no app so it should be as well the free tools I don't know if that works there but if they give us a email we will remember them as long as they don't clear the cookies for extra amount of time

60 days make sure it's edited everywhere else in case I missed it as well

we don't use Google Drive anymore just Google cloud go on analytics google search console in any admin shit that goes without

we don't use Mongo TV anymore

change to resend

60 days or up upon request

I need something stronger like maybe not it's not a scam but something along the lines at good business cards makes good friends or if one sex if one of us succeed we all do kind of thing and maybe something along the lines that we're not too small for any kind of help everybody needs to grow some way in I don't know I don't have $1 million to put in Google art I would much rather work with partners then spend my time marketing myself and why not share the knowledge I have with one person who was lots of customers then try to manage individually I want to change the way people think about email their knowledge s let's give access to everyone to grow together

let's make this YT@so it feels personal

there is no drive it's gonna be a CSV or list output and report

let's make the text on the left a smaller column so that the table with the one $40.15 percent has more space and I think the font still too small

replace with Trust beats tactics.

We offer real help without charging because it is the right thing to do. Most questions fall into a few common patterns I see every week. Some people need a quick answer. Some need deeper support. Either way, the conversation starts the same.

If you need more than guidance, we offer done-for-you list reviews with expert interpretation included. But there is no pressure. The SOS Hotline exists to help, not to sell.

Litmus Coach Award 2020 MARsum Top 100 Marketing & Advertising Leaders 2021 Marketing 2.0 Best Business Award 2022 Lenovo Twinning Finalist 2026 this issue seems to have persisted across the website other than the 8000+ less reviewed unless it's specifically done this way we need to add the rest of the awards