985 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2019
    1. I added retain as the 5th R after coming to understand that retain is actually the fundamental permission that must be granted with regard to an open educational resource.

      Yes, it helps to read these declarations adversarially, to imagine what someone looking to abuse they system might do.

  2. Nov 2019
    1. three-quarters of college students who attend public institutions

      Can we see some data that compares their outcomes to those of the other 25% who go to private? I think that would clarify the situation tremendously.

    2. Why not both

      This is a good point. Would you rather be a certified HVAC person or one who in addition had taken some business courses and could more effectively work for themselves?

    3. College graduates account for a third of American entrepreneurs

      This will work better if a startup's business plan doesn't end with expected purchase by Google, Facebook, or Amazon.

    4. retooling their skills

      The assumption is that if more folks gain credentials they firms will hire them automatically? What about wage gap between US and other regions at similar education levels?

    5. college diploma or an advanced degree is a key to economic success

      But she failed to say, success for whom? For the individual who'll get a higher-paying job? For the corporations that will get the benefit of their skills? Or for society?

    6. will require cultivating their skills

      Or is it more an issue of unlocking their critical faculties and teaching them to question the inevitability of the dominant narrative? Training more engineers doesn't seem like it would guarantee more equitable income and opportunity distributions.

    7. transformed American higher education from a province of the privileged into a shared commitment to our future

      It would be interesting to trace the transition from the original agricultural and technical focus to R1.

    1. we cannot wall ourselves off in exclusive silos that separate the types of education and the different job markets

      Do we need to rethink the fairly explicit anti-vocational approach we've often taken to liberal arts?

    2. higher education with increasing entrepreneurship and higher productivity,

      I think this may be a more compelling angle than higher wages, which were to a great extent a function of labor unions.

    1. the overwhelming majority of faculty have no formal training whatsoever in teaching and learning.

      So the argument is that faculty are stupid, or are such narrow specialists, or are so time-constrained that this is best left to professionals?

    2. open textbook publishers may have actually been reinforcing publishers’ messages

      The idea may have been to equal the commercial texts before surpassing them, but I agree it's clearly time for phase two, where we use the advantages of the new platforms to take our texts somewhere else.

    3. effective instructional design

      Effective instructional design, like accessibility, is great until it is used to prevent instructor-created content from overtaking expensive commercial texts. If subject-matter experts continue to believe they are not qualified to produce content, publishers continue to win as they have been all along. This argument was once made in "quality" terms; now the argument is shifting to pedagogy and access.

    4. Me: If I cross out these lines about the publisher’s copyright and write “Licensed CC BY” above it, have I made this book more effective at supporting student learning? Student: (ponders briefly) I guess not?

      Yeah, you did, because the price dropped when you did that. Or doesn't reducing cost support student learning anymore?

    5. each become more focused on executing the strategies aligned with our specific goal

      This idea that you can't do everything and it's time to choose suggests not only that the goals aren't the same, but that they're so different as to be mutually exclusive. Is this perspective a result of having chosen one (student success) that it turns out you think might be better met in the commercial space than in open?

    6. critically examine all of our assumptions about conferences

      Personally, I'm feeling kind of bad about in-person meetings from a carbon-footprint perspective. I wonder if it's possible yet to do a virtual conference?

    7. as currently constituted, the conference does not leverage all the energy, enthusiasm, passion, and leadership ability in our increasingly large and increasingly diverse community

      Fair statement. But why rather than trying to harness that energy are you calling it quits. Or are you saying that energy = commercial publishers you were promoting?

  3. Oct 2019
    1. When colleges wait too long, their financial, political and enrollment value declines to the point that they may be unable to find a willing partner.

      I suppose it matters a lot whether you're seeking to acquire, be acquired, or to merge as equals with a similarly-sized peer.

    2. merger as a proactive option

      It would be interesting to consider the book even if an institution wasn't facing merger or consolidation, but I wonder if fear of "putting ideas in people's heads" will prevent that?

    1. identifying politicised collective actions that are already underway

      The point is, all three of these things are already happening and all three will continue into the future. There's no "choose one" future ahead.

    2. widespread recognition that ‘agency’ is collective, spanning human and more-than-human entities, and transcending individualism

      Is this really the key?

    3. OER also opened the doors to radically multiple perspectives on history, science and society

      Again, cool, and I think this is what I'm doing. But how does it address/prevent the previous two scenarios?

    4. Privacy by design become standard

      This is all well and good, but how does it address the choices made by the nomads in scenario 2? Doesn't seem connected at all.

    5. nomad parents have tended to argue that they can provide a better education than school classrooms by assembling their own teaching material as well as by using online educational videos, MOOCs and DOCCS à la carte

      This is happening now, of course.

    6. Formal education was assumed to be superfluous

      The only people who really believe this are folks that have been formally educated, but don't appreciate it.

    7. Students were to ‘respond to’ the ‘challenges’ of the digital world,

      Germany is far from the Silicon Valley, but we can imagine this happening in the flyover US too.

    8. rebranded existing companies (which were no longer called ‘textbook publishers’, but instead ‘global learning platforms’

      ...but they basically remained what they had been.

    9. structural transformations necessary to overcome entrenched socio-economic inequalities

      Does focus on equity necessarily line up with this interest in avoiding "dataveillance"? I'm not sure, but I think the question is worth asking.

    10. potential for learning analytics, artificial intelligence, adaptive learning, maker-centred learning and other interactive or data-driven technologies to increase equality of opportunity by fostering independent, flexible, reflective, team-working individuals who have developed grit, tenacity and a sense of self-empowerment

      Would this be the outcome of these tools?

  4. eastcentraluniversity-my.sharepoint.com eastcentraluniversity-my.sharepoint.com
    1. If not adequately maintained, it is easy for an OER repository to become cluttered with many broken links and out-of-date resources. Librarians who work with OER are already well aware of the challenges of such repositories.

      Opendora

    2. best practices for accessibility and open access

      But we should remember that this is an iterative process, and avoid rejecting efforts that make resources more open but fail to completely address ALL the accessibility issues on day one. I'm talking to you, Rebus.

    3. In light of format plurality, “every OER its reader” suggests that OER should be agnostic to format, medium, or platform and made available in a multitude of modalities

      Combine with the 5 Rs and we've got something.

    4. f academic libraries still see “every reader their book” as a relevant guiding principle, libraries are compelled to view course materials as another aspect of library collections. If academic library communities need these resources, OER offer a clear way to challenge cost and access restrictions

      So this is a two-pronged responsibility, to get the textbooks students need AND to help faculty learn about OER to reduce the expense of doing so,

    5. access to required and recommended course materials

      Although buying every required textbook would probably break the bank at most libraries, I wonder whether faculty could help by requiring the publisher to provide a desk copy and then donating it to the library?

    1. one of the for-profits to take to the OpenEd stage visited my campus (again, around me) and led a presentation that directly resulted in upper admin questioning the need for an Open Education Librarian (me!) were they to sign a contract with Lumen.

      Yeah, the idea that suggesting firing a librarian would enhance student success happens within a "civil" discourse is problematic.

    2. a conversation it needs to be. Not a PR exercise with pre-screened questions, plastic smiles, and marketing drivel. Not a reputation cleanse. And certainly not on a platform that frames for-profit players as the future of learning materials.

      Yeah, this seems to be the issue. Talk about in my OEG thing.

    1. integrating OER into a growing number of digital learning solutions, including our MindTap and Learning Objects platforms,” said Cheryl Costantini, VP of Content Strategy, Cengage Learning

      ...which platforms we're going to make available for free! Just kidding, no we're not.

    1. find out in advance which professors or sections use Open Educational Resources. Any time you have the option of picking the OER section, take it. Not only will you save money, but you’re more likely to get the benefit of a professor who went the extra mile to help students. It’s not a perfect barometer, but it’s a better-than-random indicator that this professor is particularly engaged in the course. When professors have helped curate, assemble, or even create the material themselves, they’re invested in it.  In my observation, faculty passion for a subject is contagious. Give me a passionate professor with pretty-good OER over a dutiful one with a solid commercial book any day of the week

      That's a nice endorsement of our work adopting and producing OER. Thanks!

    1. an online homework system.

      The other shoe drops. I use a fairly antiquated LMS, and I can do this without buying a homework system. This is the sneaky profit-center that would enhance student success, but at a cost that the "fanatics" should accept?

    2. Our primary priority should neither be minimizing cost nor maximizing pedagogical flexibility. Our primary priority should be increasing student learning, and our efforts to reduce costs and increase pedagogical flexibility must always be subservient to that end. When we fail to put student learning first, we can become zealots who confuse the means with the ends.

      This is tortured. The only difference I can see between priority 1 and preferred priority 2 seems to be an opportunity to sneak something in that adds cost (profit) under the claim that it's better for student learning. As if the top priority of OER or ZTC "fanatic" educators isn't student success.

      I think it's easier to find common ground than the author suggests. And I suspect much of the ZTC and OER fanaticism may be coming from outside the ranks of educators, via political focus that ignores nuance.

    3. None of that is possible with free but traditionally copyrighted content.

      I disagree again. Fair use in LMSs afford lots of pedagogical innovation, such as Hypothesis discussion of pdfs housed inside the shell and offered under fair use. I think the author is holding to tightly to his own 5-R formula, which is powerful but not omnipotent.

    4. little focus on asking students to engage in the kind of repeated practice that can be computer generated and computer graded

      Not so. Tools like Hypothesis help streamline discussions of texts in both in-person and online courses, in my experience.

    5. we’ll just read an open source equivalent of Catcher in the Rye

      But the statement "we'll read an open-source version of anything out of copyright" very much DOES.

    6. STEM disciplines

      Good point. STEM needs the software tools more than the content, perhaps. But much of that functionality is already available in LMSs, which in most institutions don't figure in the ZTC or OER discussion.

    7. openly licensed and not free

      Does this description of "courseware" include OER texts sucked into walled gardens and only available to students who pay first-day-access fees for them, with bundled assessment and ancillaries? What happens when OER authors mark all their content NC?

    8. traditionally copyrighted and “free”

      If we expand our view just a bit to concern ourselves with student cost, these are obviously not free, because they come at a cost assessed in student fees and/or tuition. Similarly, course-packs and fair-use content inserted in LMSs by instructors reduce student expenses and should probably be considered.

    9. the more students use a set of learning materials, the more the publisher owes the author

      Are you really suggesting that a for-profit publishing model should include using content that I wrote and then CONTRIBUTED to try to help build a more open learning community. You can't have that for free and then try to profit on it. I'm changing all my licensing to include NC.

    10. whole course OER

      While perhaps a goal, whole course OER is not the only way to significantly reduce student expense. We're being asked to get worked up over the wrong issue.

  5. Sep 2019
  6. Aug 2019
    1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology launched its OpenCourseWare initiative in 2000, which made materials from all of the university’s courses freely available on the internet

      MIT since 2000

    1. syllabus should be a manifesto that serves as a founding document detailing the rights of the students and the pedagogy of the classroom.

      Manifesto is something of a pledge that the instructor will try to live up to. If students annotate, does this suggest they're stepping into a relationship and making a similar pledge?

    1. Colleges should provide leadership by giving faculty the infrastructure to support their switch to open textbooks. It requires an investment of financial and human capital to support successful OER projects

      Academic labor needs to be recognized.

    2. Thirty-eight percent of courses in our study used access codes, and ninety-four percent of the time these access codes were sold in a bundle.

      Is this comparable at BSU?

    3. At just the forty schools in the study, switching over these courses to OER would save up to $13 million in one semester alone, assuming students use the OER free online. Multiplied out to the full national enrollment at public and private non-profit schools, this switch would save students an estimated $763 million per semester, or $1.5 billion per year.

      I don't think this extrapolation is that conclusive, but it's interesting.

    4. Switching the ten introductory classes in our study to OER nationwide would save students $1.5 billion per year in course materials costs

      This is a big claim -- hopefully data will follow.

    1. When publishers bundle a textbook with an access code, it eliminates most opportunities for students to cut costs with the used book market. Of the access code bundles in our sample, forty-five percent—nearly half—were unavailable from any other source we could find except the campus bookstore

      How many bookstores are jumping onto this bandwagon as a way to once again become relevant?

    1. high cost of textbooks had led 64.2% of students to not buy a required textbook and 42.8% to take fewer courses. Additionally, 35.6% said the high cost of textbooks caused them to earn a poor grade and 22.9% said it led them to drop a course

      Updated in 2018?

    1. liberatory-resistance

      I'm assuming in this context resistance is a stance I'm sharing with the students, not that students are resisting me? But are we resisting something present and tangible, or are we adopting a stance because it seems (like the manifesto) more politically attractive?

    2. the day after course grades are due

      And yet my syllabi advertise skills and understandings that it's my goal they will take with them. I try to take them past the "you are here because you have to check this Gen Ed box" element in my course design.

    3. epigenetics

      I tend to think of the syllabus as DNA, and the reality of the course in the LMS over the course of the semester as epigenetics that may or may not be carried forward into the next course.

    4. syllabus-as-manifesto

      Is there a left/right bias hiding in these word choices? Do I respond to manifesto more positively because it sounds more bottom-up and revolutionary, versus the top-down, authoritarian feel of contract? I think so.

    5. power differential

      This too can be seen in a "war" or "dance" way: ideally, the reason the students are in our classes is because we have the power to aid them in their educations, not just serve as a gatekeeper to a grade or credential.

  7. Jul 2019
    1. du Pont Corp., a major investor in and producer of leaded gasoline

      I think Kovarik could spend more time digging into the DuPont/GM connection. Seems to me that there is a huge advantage moving auto engines to a fuel that can be patented rather than ethyl that any farmer could distill.

    1. “unfortunate” that some staff had felt the need to alter their teaching style

      Maybe this is polite British-speak for "it was unfortunate that their previous teaching style was not something they were willing to have recorded, so they rushed to change it when the cameras were switched on."

    1. I lorwitz, Transfonnation of American law,

      Historiographic note: Morton Horwitz was one of Steinberg's dissertation advisors. He wrote the most important book about the history of American Law, and his perspective influenced Steinberg heavily. I highly recommend Horwitz's book -- it may be the single most significant book I've read in US History.

  8. Jun 2019
    1. 1879 illustration of a prosperous Massachusetts farm,

      I chose this image from several dozen similar ones because it is a farm in Enfield Massachusetts. Anybody know why that's significant? (Answer in Chapter 9)

    1. CC BY NC license

      I've become much more of an advocate of the NC addition tot he open license since I've started noticing how OER texts seem to wind up in walled-garden turnkey learning systems that charge for the homework and assessment modules.

  9. bemidjistate.learn.minnstate.edu bemidjistate.learn.minnstate.edu
    1. obstacles and challenges that were preventing faculty from adopting OERs in their courses—primarily a lack of time, lack of availability of relevant OERs, and a lack of ancillary materials to accompany existing open texts (test banks, PowerPoint files, and other materials often provided by commercial publishers).

      Survey these objections? Is there a way to put $$ to them?

    2. trainings that include data on textbook costs and the impact on students. After the training, faculty participants are offered a stipend of $200 to provide a peer review of an existing textbook

      Add this to the slate of talks I do in the fall.

    3. Minnesota State, one of the largest public postsecondary systems in the United States, is comprised of seven universities and 30 two-year community and technical colleges on 54 campuses across the state. The system employs nearly 9,000 teaching faculty and serves approximately 400,000 students each year

      Good summary of MinnState

    1. focus their efforts on faculty who could adopt already-existing OERs, as this requires the least amount of money from the institution and the least amount of faculty time

      Low-hanging fruit

    2. with a strategic OER effort, an institution can achieve a level of 25% of their duplicated student headcount using OERs within a 2–5 year period.

      Build this into a goal statement?

    1. The involvement of for-profit companies like Lumen in the production and distribution of open educational resources remains controversial, since they oftentimes wind up charging students for content that is supposed to be free. Advocates for OER also sometimes worry about whether companies will capture and control student data.

      If more OER content was licensed CC-BY-NC-SA, this might dissuade this type of "capture".

    1. Digital Course Packs combine different course-related materials into a single point of access, including journal articles, e-books, web-sites and links, images, and videos, all in a variety of formats and all presented online.

      This is probably worth formalizing into a "thing" in addition to celebrating things faculty have done individually to achieve same goal.

    1. Faculty engagement[2] with a digital text (for example, faculty annotations that add insights to the text) can also increase student engagement

      Hypothesis as well as the fact that the instructor made the OER for the course probably both positive.

    2. students’ focus on the quality of the teaching rather than the format of the course materials

      AND, it's usually not an apples to apples comparison -- the ebook is often newer, better, more directly related to course goals, esp. if a specially-remixed OER.

    3. If the choice were entirely up to you, what would your preferred textbook option be when taking a class?

      Results might be different if we tested their price sensitivity: "Would you pay $50 for a print textbook if an online one was available free?"

    1. faculty have a greater responsibility in designing curricula and assignments that foster enhanced engagement with the core ideas about information and scholarship

      In many cases the info literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills may be more valuable than the course content.

    1. increasingly complex course content environment has produced the need for new service models involving collaboration across campus units to educate and support faculty and students

      This is a great statement. Complex both because of technology, but also new types of interactions between these stakeholders.

    2. wholesalers and publishers

      Should we distinguish between publishers that still believe in the value of their content and others who seem to be saying the content is worthless but they want to capture the homework and assessment revenue?

    3. Bookstores, like ours at the University of Minnesota, have worked hard to provide students with a range of affordable options including used books, rentals, robust buyback options, discounted digital textbooks

      Role of bookstores and their long-term interest in reducing student costs is often overlooked.

    4. Some faculty and staff may think course material costs are a minor concern when compared with the sticker shock of tuition

      Analogous to the difference between fixed and variable costs in business. Many firms fail because, in spite of impressive infrastructure, they fail to meet payrolls or pay for the next shipment of raw materials.

    5. difference between graduating or dropping out

      And also difference in course success, GPA, job prospects, and all the other results of performance in these courses the student has paid or borrowed so much to get into.

  10. www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
    1. archaeological digs should find many pigeon bones in the pre-Columbian strata of Indian middens. But they aren't there. The mobs of birds in the history books, he says, were "outbreak populations—always a symptom of an extraordinarily disrupted ecological system

      The last one, Martha, died Sept 1st, 1914 in the Cincinnati zoo.

    2. Terra preta, Woods guesses, covers at least 10 percent of Amazonia, an area the size of France

      TP is a mixture of charcoal, pottery shards, human and animal feces -- so at agricultural scale it's clearly a soil amendment rather than the "natural" soil of the region.

    3. plant trees, you get twenty years of productivity out of your work instead of two or three

      Note also that cassava, the staple developed by people in this area, was a tree-crop.

    4. scores of English ran off

      This led to a whole literature (propaganda) of captivity and redemption, which the colonial leaders used to try to dissuade defections.

    5. presentism

      I think a distinction can be made between "judging" the choices people made in the past and trying to appreciate their perspectives, experiences, and world views so we can better understood why they made the choices they did.

    6. 1987 American History: A Survey, a standard high school textbook by three well-known historians, described the Americas before Columbus as "empty of mankind and its works.

      This description seems to rely on a very narrow definition of "mankind".

    7. many plagues, not just one

      And this breaks the back of that argument about viruses rarely being as lethal as they were here. Individual viruses can't communicate with other viruses. Even if they're individually only 50% lethal, four 50% epidemics in a row will reduce a population by roughly 94%.

    8. That's one reason whites think of Indians as nomadic hunters," says Russell Thornton, an anthropologist at the University of California at Los Angeles. "Everything else—all the heavily populated urbanized societies—was wiped out.

      Even when we accept the idea that there were many more natives than previously thought, it's still hard to assess the number of people living in North America, where a century passed before much European exploration settlement began.

    9. high political and ecological stakes

      In other words, what at first might seem to be a historiographical disagreement can become a high-stakes political issue affecting how Americans think of their past actions and choices.

    10. ninety to 112 million

      This is among the higher estimates of pre-Columbian population, although the logic leading to it seems sound. To be safe, I use a mid-range estimate of 65 to 80 million, which would make the populations of Europe, the Americas, and Africa all about level.

    11. Francisco Pizarro was able to seize an empire the size of Spain and Italy combined with a force of 168 men

      And yet when Alfred Crosby wrote a book questioning the military superiority of the conquistadors and positing disease as the main cause, publishers rejected it with single-word responses like "Nonsense!"

    12. Should we let people keep burning the Beni?

      Point is, this is a question that can and should be answered, but NOT by automatic reflex of claiming what we think ancient people did.

    13. burning created an intricate ecosystem of fire-adapted plant species dependent on native pyrophilia

      Cronon talks about native North Americans managing forest understory with fire in Changes in the Land.

    14. a hemisphere thoroughly dominated by humankind

      So the story of Env Hist, that people have not only been affected by their environments but have altered them, enters deep history in the Americas just as it does in other regions humans have lived.

    15. the Beni, a Bolivian province

      We normally think of Bolivia as a nation of the "altiplano" and the Andes. Like the Inca Empire before it, it spreads down the eastern side of the mountains and includes the westernmost edge of the Amazon watershed.

    1. only appears when ice is locked up on land and sea levels drop

      Not a land bridge: as wide as Alaska. And not that temporary: probably existed from about 28,000 to about 12,000 years ago. That's 16,000 years, or three times longer than recorded history.

    2. there’s enough evidence

      Show your work! This is a "History Channel" statement. I've read fairly extensively through the peer-reviewed scholarship, and archaeologists don't seem agreed there's "enough evidence". Even the guys that discovered Monte Verde are much less certain about the 33,000 year old finds, and separated them into a different category.

    3. reject the idea that their ancestors migrated from somewhere else

      Vine Deloria Jr. is one of the big advocates for the idea that "we have always been here", but his argument is primarily political rather than scientific. Realistically, isn't a scientific certainty that native Americans have been here for at least 15,000 years enough?

    4. as the Navajo and other Native American tribes believe

      Which is to be expected, since their experience here goes back hundreds of generations. But that doesn't mean that Indian legends are any more valid than the old testament which says Eden was a place in the vicinity of Mesopotamia.

    5. weren't one group of people; they arrived at different times, and likely by different methods

      These are two separate statements, that require two different types of argument and evidence to back them up. Why do I get the sense you're not going to do that...?

  11. May 2019
    1. more detail

      I'll begin with a list of texts you might want to read, in addition to the ones we'll be reading excerpts from together, in the next week or so.

    1. lets us focus on critique without a requirement that we devalue the work

      An even more valuable element is that the critiques stay IN CONTEXT rather than appearing out of context in reviews, blog posts, etc.