56 male patients age 12 to 76 years, from 40 families with VHL were examined as part of a larger screening program for VHL. VHL mutations were identified in 16 families. Individual patient phenotype-genotype data was not available, but the mutations found and whether the corresponding patient had epididymal cystadenoma (EC) was reported. A p.Asn78His (c.232A>C) VHL mutation was found in a VHL patient with EC. This mutation was referred to in the paper as c.445A>C due to a difference in transcript sequence.

PatientID: CIV:1

KindredID: C

Case: M, 28Y0M, Chinese

DiseaseAssertion: hemangioblastoma

FamilyInfo: A 4-generation family is given with 3 confirmed members with this mutation. 3 other members had VHL-presenations however had not been tested for the gene.

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0010797 (hemangioblastoma)

CaseHPOFreeText: diagnosed with hemangioblastoma and died of surgical complications at the age of 28Y

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0002666; HP:0005584; HP:0001737; HP:0009711 (pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic cysts, retinal capillary hemangioma)

CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: N/A

PreviouslyPublished: N/A

SupplementalData: N/A

Variant: p.S80I (c.239G>T) [assumed]

LegacyVariant: p.S80I (c.452G>T)

CaseProblemVariantFreeText: N/A

ClinVarID: 625229 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/625229/

CAID: N/A

gnomAD: N/A

VariantEvidence: No genetic testing was done prior to death, however family history and presentation leads to this assumption

MutationType: missense_variant; transversion

CivicName: S80I (c.239G>T)

MultipleGeneVariants: N/A

PatientID: None (Child 1)

KindredID: 1

Case: Sex Unknown, Age Unknown, Ethnicity Unknown

DiseaseAssertion: Asymptomatic

FamilyInfo: Awaiting testing of the proband’s eight siblings to determine whether or not this is a de novo mutation causing VHL disease. Two of three of the proband’s children have inherited the mutation, they have had no disease manifestations.

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: N/A

PreviouslyPublished: N/A

SupplementalData: N/A

Variant: p.G144R (c.430G>A)

LegacyVariant: N/A

CaseProblemVariantFreeText: N/A

ClinVarID: 576437, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/576437/

CAID: N/A

gnomAD: 0.000003976, https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/3-10188287-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

VariantEvidence: N/A

MutationType: missense_variant;transition

CivicName: G144R (c.430G>A)

MultipleGeneVariants: N/A

GroupID: 10B

DiseaseAssertion: Unknown. Patients were pulled from either the VHL-Registry or NET-Registry and recorded with the given mutation. Symptoms or manifestations are not clear.

GroupSize: 2

GroupNumberMales: N/A

GroupNumberFemales: N/A

GroupEthnicity: N/A

GroupAgeRange: N/A

GroupInfo: 2 patients with the given mutation were grouped as group 10(B) in this study. These patients were asymptomatic or unclear of symptoms.

GroupPresentingHPOs: N/A

GroupHPOFreeText: N/A

GroupNotHPOs: HP:0030405 (pancreatic endocrine tumor)

GroupNotHPOFreeText: N/A

PreviouslyPublished: N/A

SupplementalData: N/A

Variant: p.F119L (c.357C>G)

LegacyVariant: N/A

CaseProblemVariantFreeText: N/A

ClinVarID: 625240 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/625240/

CAID: N/A

gnomAD: N/A

VariantEvidence: N/A

MutationType: missense_variant; transversion

CivicName: F119L (c.357C>G)

MultipleGeneVariants: N/A

PatientID: None

KindredID: 1

Case: Sex Unknown, Age Unknown, Ethnicity Unknown

DiseaseAssertion: Adrenal pheochromocytoma

FamilyInfo: The proband was part of a cohort of apparently sporadic cases of pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma, implying this individual had no family history of VHL disease or pheochromocytoma.

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0006748 (Adrenal Pheochromocytoma)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0002668 (Paraganglioma)

CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: RET, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD

PreviouslyPublished: N/A

SupplementalData: N/A

Variant: p.R161Q (c.482G>A)

LegacyVariant: N/A

CaseProblemVariantFreeText: N/A

ClinVarID: 182983, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/182983/

CAID: N/A

gnomAD: N/A

VariantEvidence: N/A

MutationType: missense_variant;transition

CivicName: R161Q(c.482G>A)

MultipleGeneVariants: N/A

PatientID: None (Cousin 1)

KindredID: G

Case: Sex Unknown, 37Y0M, Hungarian

DiseaseAssertion: Assumed VHL

FamilyInfo: Large VHL family spanning five generations. The index patient presented with pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma as well as spinal cord, cerebellar, and medulla oblongata hemangioblastomas. Her parents showed no clinical, biochemical, or radiological evidence of the disease, but VHL-associated tumors were detected in five other family members (bilateral renal cell carcinomas in one, renal cysts in one, spinal cord, cerebellar, and medulla oblongata hemangioblastomas in three, retinal hemangioblastomas in four, and pheochromocytomas in two family members).

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0010797; HP:0009711 (Hemangioblastoma, Retinal capillary hemangioma)

CaseHPOFreeText: Presented with CNS hemangioblastoma at age 37 and retinal hemangioblastoma at age 18. No VHL diagnosis noted but assumed to have VHL based on genetic, clinical and familial findings.

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: N/A

PreviouslyPublished: 18416845

SupplementalData: N/A

Variant: p.S80I (c.239G>T)

LegacyVariant: N/A

CaseProblemVariantFreeText: N/A

ClinVarID: 625229, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/625229/

CAID: N/A

gnomAD: N/A

VariantEvidence: Variant reported as S80I and cDNA change was mapped to c.239G>T.

MutationType: missense_variant;transversion

CivicName: S80I (c.239G>T)

MultipleGeneVariants: N/A

Germline mutational data on VHL was gathered from various countries to assess variation in germline mutations that produce disease within different populations. Families were grouped according to three possible outcomes of disease: renal cell carcinoma without pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma with pheochromocytoma, or pheochromocytoma alone. SSCP and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis identified mutations in 300/469 (63%) of families affected with VHL. This germline familial VHL mutation (S111N (c.332G>A)) was taken from the National Cancer Institute database and the Cambridge, Department of Pathology database, with an unknown number of members belonging to Family IDs 3315NCI and 127CA. It was reported in the paper as c.545G>A due to a difference in transcript reference. As reported in Table 3, this mutation is found in VHL families without pheochromocytoma, and with renal cell carcinoma. Later publications reference this cohort as being reported in PMIDs: 7728151 and 9829911.

PMID: 34192316

Gene: IDUA

Disease: MPS1

Inheritance: AR

InsufficientEvidence: Study used fibroblasts from patients with MPS-1. Protein changes associated with the variants in the fibroblasts are provided, but no other patient details are provided.

Case#: Pt 103 , Age 19 years, Female, DiseaseAssertion: MPS1 Scheie syndrome. FamilyInfo: NA CasePresentingHPOs: NA CaseHPOFreeText: NA CaseNotHPOs: NA CaseNotHPOFreeText: NA

CaseEnzymeAssay: Low leukocyte IDUA enzyme activity CaseUrineGAGs: NA CaseERT: No CaseBMT: No Variant1: IVS7+1G>A This may be the variant c.972+1G>A, though cDNA not mentioned in text. Variant1ClinVarID: 198406 Variant1CAID: Variant2:p.X654R , cDNA not mentioned This variant may result from prev reported c.1960T>C ( ClinVar 960079) or from c.1960T>G ( ClinVar 11920) Variant2ClinVarID: Variant2CAID: AdditionalVariants: NA ParentalGenotype: NA PreviouslyPublished:NA

Case#: Pt 102 , Age 37 years, Female, DiseaseAssertion: MPS1 Scheie syndrome. FamilyInfo: NA CasePresentingHPOs: NA CaseHPOFreeText: NA CaseNotHPOs: NA CaseNotHPOFreeText: NA

CaseEnzymeAssay: Low leukocyte IDUA enzyme activity CaseUrineGAGs: NA CaseERT: No CaseBMT: No Variant1: p.Q70X Variant1ClinVarID: 11909 Variant1CAID: CA204563 Variant2:p.D445del Variant2ClinVarID: 840115 Variant2CAID: AdditionalVariants: NA ParentalGenotype: NA PreviouslyPublished:NA

Case#: 205 5 yrs male, age at initial diagnosis 1.1 yrs DiseaseAssertion: MPS IH FamilyInfo:Nil CasePresentingHPOs: CaseHPOFreeText: CaseNotHPOs: CaseNotHPOFreeText: CaseEnzymeAssay: IDUA activity: low leukocyte IDUA enzyme activity CaseUrineGAGs: CaseERT: 1.5 yrs on ERT, then study drug, valanafusp alpha, also called AGT-181 for 12 months

CaseBMT: No PreviouslyPublished Don't know Variant1:l Variant1: c.494-1G>A ClinVarID: 557942 Variant1CAID: Variant2:c.494-1G>A Variant2ClinVarID: 557942 Variant2CAID:

Case#: Patient 1 of family A: Enrolled in study at 16 months, male, DiseaseAssertion:MPS1 FamilyInfo:Consanguinity Yes CasePresentingHPOs: Asthma HP:0002099, Sleep apnea HP:0010535, Multiple joint contractures HP:0002828, Kyphosis HP:0002808, Recurrent ear infections HP:0410018, Coarse facial features HP:0000280, Hepatosplenomegaly (HP:0001433), Inguinal hernia HP:0000023 Corneal opacity (HP:0007957), Joint stiffness (HP:0001387), CaseHPOFreeText: nose/throat infections, aggressive, heavy eye brows, large tongue, thick lips , rough skin CaseNotHPOs: CaseNotHPOFreeText: CaseEnzymeAssay: enzyme values lower than the cut-off values CaseUrineGAGs: NA CaseERT: NA CaseBMT:Nil Variant1:c.1456G>T ,Glu486 Variant1ClinVar ID: 651168 Variant1CAID: Variant2:c.1456G>T ,Glu486 Variant2ClinVarID:651168 Variant2CAID: AdditionalVariants:Nil ParentalGenotype:NA PreviouslyPublishedNA

Case#: P2 (IDUA-02)

DiseaseAssertion: MPS1

FamilyInfo: None provided

CasePresentingHPOs:No info

CaseHPOFreeText: No info

CaseNotHPOs: No info

CaseNotHPOFreeText: No info

CaseEnzymeAssay: Newborn screening using dried blood spot by stable isotope dilution flow injection MS/MS %IDUA enzyme activity =0.17 microM/hour

CaseUrineGAGs: Confirmatory testing using urinary GAGs (heparan [HS] and dermatan sulfate [DS] by LS-MS/MS method: DS=1.79 mg/L, HS=0.77 mg/L

CaseERT: Started ERT (100 U/kg/Week) withing 15 days of birth

CaseBMT: No info

Variant1:c.46_57del12

Variant1ClinVarID:92643

Variant1CAID:

Variant2: p.Y201X

Variant2ClinVarID:1323100

Variant2CAID:

AdditionalVariants:

ParentalGenotype: No info

PreviouslyPublishedNot stated

Case#: 2, Male, 4 years 4 months (diagnosed), 17 years (report), weight at presentation : NA, Height at presentation NA, Born in Uruguay

Disease Assertion: Hurler Scheie ( attenuated phenotype)

FamilyInfo: Parents are not consanguineous

Case Presenting HPOs: HP: 0002808, HP: 0002937, HP: 0000280, HP:0000470, HP:0001376, HP:0034337, HP: 0000768, HP:0000943 (Kyphosis, Hemivertebrae, Coarse face, Short neck, Limitation of joint mobility, claw hands, pectus carinatum, dysostosis multiplex )

CaseHPOFreeText: Bony dysplasia

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0007957 HP:0001249, HP:0001433, ( Corneal opacity , Intellectual disability , visceromegaly)

CaseNotHPOFreeText:

CaseEnzymeAssay: IDUA enzyme in dried blood spot 0.26 nmol/h/L ( 2.20-11.70 )

CaseUrineGAGs: NA CaseERT: N/A

CaseBMT: N/A

Genotyping Method: Sanger Sequencing

Variant1: p.L18P (c.53C>T)

Variant1ClinVarID: 193062

Variant1CAID: NA

Variant2: p.W402X

Variant2ClinVarID: 11908

Variant2CAID: 220498

AdditionalVariants: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

PreviouslyPublished: N/A

Case#:Not assigned

DiseaseAssertion:MPS type I with evidence of cognitive impairment defined as a score of at least 1 SD below mean on IQ testing or in one domain of neuropsychological function; attenuated MPS I

FamilyInfo:No information

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0100543

CaseHPOFreeText:

CaseNotHPOs:HP:0032557

CaseNotHPOFreeText:Subjects were excluded if they had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, were unable to comply with study procedures, had significant lumbar pathology precluding access to the intrathecal space via lumbar puncture, or significantly impaired spinal CSF flow as detected on a nuclear medicine flow study as part of screening.

CaseEnzymeAssay:No information

CaseUrineGAGs:No information

CaseERT:Yes

CaseBMT:No (exclusion criterion)

Variant1:int3 -2a>g

Variant1ClinVarID:

Variant1CAID:

Variant2:L238Q

Variant2ClinVarID:265418

Variant2CAID:

AdditionalVariants:N/A

ParentalGenotype:Not specified

PreviouslyPublished

Case#:Not assigned

DiseaseAssertion:MPS type I with evidence of cognitive impairment defined as a score of at least 1 SD below mean on IQ testing or in one domain of neuropsychological function; attenuated MPS I

FamilyInfo:No information

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0100543

CaseHPOFreeText:

CaseNotHPOs:HP:0032557

CaseNotHPOFreeText:Subjects were excluded if they had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, were unable to comply with study procedures, had significant lumbar pathology precluding access to the intrathecal space via lumbar puncture, or significantly impaired spinal CSF flow as detected on a nuclear medicine flow study as part of screening.

CaseEnzymeAssay:No information

CaseUrineGAGs:No information

CaseERT:Yes

CaseBMT:No (exclusion criterion)

Variant1:L238Q

Variant1ClinVarID:265418

Variant1CAID:

Variant2:W402X

Variant2ClinVarID:

Variant2CAID:

AdditionalVariants:N/A

ParentalGenotype:Not specified

PreviouslyPublished

Case#:Not assigned

DiseaseAssertion:MPS type I with evidence of cognitive impairment defined as a score of at least 1 SD below mean on IQ testing or in one domain of neuropsychological function; attenuated MPS I

FamilyInfo:No information

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0100543

CaseHPOFreeText:

CaseNotHPOs:HP:0032557

CaseNotHPOFreeText:Subjects were excluded if they had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, were unable to comply with study procedures, had significant lumbar pathology precluding access to the intrathecal space via lumbar puncture, or significantly impaired spinal CSF flow as detected on a nuclear medicine flow study as part of screening.

CaseEnzymeAssay:No information

CaseUrineGAGs:No information

CaseERT:Yes

CaseBMT:No (exclusion criterion)

Variant1:L238Q

Variant1ClinVarID:265418

Variant1CAID:

Variant2:63delC

Variant2ClinVarID:

Variant2CAID:

AdditionalVariants:N/A

ParentalGenotype:Not specified

PreviouslyPublished

Case#:Not assigned

DiseaseAssertion:MPS type I with evidence of cognitive impairment defined as a score of at least 1 SD below mean on IQ testing or in one domain of neuropsychological function; attenuated MPS I

FamilyInfo:No information

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0100543

CaseHPOFreeText:

CaseNotHPOs:HP:0032557

CaseNotHPOFreeText:Subjects were excluded if they had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, were unable to comply with study procedures, had significant lumbar pathology precluding access to the intrathecal space via lumbar puncture, or significantly impaired spinal CSF flow as detected on a nuclear medicine flow study as part of screening.

CaseEnzymeAssay:No information

CaseUrineGAGs:No information

CaseERT:Yes

CaseBMT:No (exclusion criterion)

Variant1:65delC

Variant1ClinVarID:

Variant1CAID:

Variant2:H240R

Variant2ClinVarID:947028

Variant2CAID:

AdditionalVariants:N/A

ParentalGenotype:Not specified

PreviouslyPublished

Case#: Patient 52, female, Han origin, 2 years old (age at diagnosis)

DiseaseAssertion: MPS1-H

FamilyInfo: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: Global Developmental Delay, Macrocephaly, Joint stiffness, Mongolian macula, Hepatosplenomegaly, Hernia, Airway obstruction (HP:0001263, HP:0000256, HP:0001387, HP:0011369, HP:0001433, HP:0100790, HP:0006536)

CaseHPOFreeText: Cardiac disease

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseEnzymeAssay: IDUA activity 1.1 nmol/h/mg protein. The normal range in Chinese controls was found to be 27.2–52 nmol/h/mg protein.

CaseUrineGAGs: Diagnosis was confirmed biochemically by the demonstration of an increased excretion of urinary dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate.

CaseERT: N/A

CaseBMT: N/A

Variant1: c.1210G>T (p.E404X)

Variant1ClinVarID: 552095

Variant1CAID: N/A

Variant2: c.1877G>A (p.W626X)

Variant2ClinVarID: 928997

Variant2CAID: N/A

AdditionalVariants: N/A

ParentalGenotype: The transmission of sequence variations found in each patient was inferred by sequencing the corresponding exons of the patient's parents - confirmed in trans by parental testing.

PreviouslyPublished N/A

Case: Patient 6 (Family C), male, 53yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 193, PFA 100 sec = 199, SPA % = 5.2, MADR mg/mL = 0.75, VWF:Ag U/dL = 47.1, VWF:CB U/dL = 44.6, VWF:CB ratio = 0.94, VWF:RCo U/dL = 38.0, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.80, Platelet VWF U/dL = 47.4, FVIII U/dL = 43.8, BAT F/M = 0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 10 (Family D), female, 24yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group AB, Platelet count x103/μl = 231, PFA 100 sec = 223, SPA % = 6, MADR mg/mL = 0.75, VWF:Ag U/dL = 46.0, VWF:CB U/dL = 49.1, VWF:CB ratio = 1.07, VWF:RCo U/dL = 40.5, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.83, Platelet VWF U/dL = 55.6, FVIII U/dL = 64.8, BAT F/M = NA

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 11 (Family E), male, 11yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 220, PFA 100 sec = >300, SPA % = 11.3, MADR mg/mL = 0.3, VWF:Ag U/dL = 28.8, VWF:CB U/dL = 28.4, VWF:CB ratio = 0.98, VWF:RCo U/dL = 23.0, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.80, Platelet VWF U/dL = 54.1, FVIII U/dL = 51.5, BAT F/M = 5

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4021C>T (p.Arg1341Trp)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4021C>T (p.Arg1341Trp)

ClinVarID: 100316; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100316/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00008674 (3/34586 alleles) in the Latino/Admixed American population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128563-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 8 (Family D), male, 49yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group A, Platelet count x103/μl = 252, PFA 100 sec = 175, SPA % = 0, MADR mg/mL = 0.6, VWF:Ag U/dL = 54.3, VWF:CB U/dL = 55.1, VWF:CB ratio = 1.01, VWF:RCo U/dL = 51.6, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.94, Platelet VWF U/dL = 60.3, FVIII U/dL = 62.2, BAT F/M = NA

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Variant 2: c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

ClinVarID: 100279; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100279/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.001346 (41/30468 alleles; 2 homozygotes) in the South Asian population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128787-G-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 12 (Family F), female, 50yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group A, Platelet count x103/μl = 204, PFA 100 sec = 91, SPA % = 10, MADR mg/mL = 0.45, VWF:Ag U/dL = 108, VWF:CB U/dL = 101.9, VWF:CB ratio = 0.94, VWF:RCo U/dL = 97.7, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.91, Platelet VWF U/dL = 136.4, FVIII U/dL = 107.5, BAT F/M = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

ClinVarID: 100279; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100279/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.001346 (41/30468 alleles; 2 homozygotes) in the South Asian population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128787-G-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 5 (Family C), female, 50yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 211, PFA 100 sec = 210, SPA % = 10, MADR mg/mL = 0.6, VWF:Ag U/dL = 40.6, VWF:CB U/dL = 42.8, VWF:CB ratio = 1.1, VWF:RCo U/dL = NA, VWF:RCo ratio = NA, Platelet VWF U/dL = 41.2, FVIII U/dL = 62.8, BAT F/M = 8

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 7 (Family C), female, 21yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 293, PFA 100 sec = >300, SPA % = 6, MADR mg/mL = 0.6, VWF:Ag U/dL = 26.7, VWF:CB U/dL = 27.2, VWF:CB ratio = 1.01, VWF:RCo U/dL = 25.8, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.92, Platelet VWF U/dL = 59.1, FVIII U/dL = 40.9, BAT F/M = 6

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 9 (Family D), male, 18yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group A, Platelet count x103/μl = 231, PFA 100 sec = 95, SPA % = 0, MADR mg/mL = 0.75, VWF:Ag U/dL = 151.1, VWF:CB U/dL = 175.5, VWF:CB ratio = 1.16, VWF:RCo U/dL = 153.5, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.87, Platelet VWF U/dL = 95.2, FVIII U/dL = 148.2, BAT F/M = NA

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3797C>A (p.Pro1266Gln)

ClinVarID: 100279; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100279/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.001346 (41/30468 alleles; 2 homozygotes) in the South Asian population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128787-G-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: Patient 4 (Family C), female, 76yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2B

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0030129, HP:0030130, HP:0011871, HP:0012147

(impaired ristocetin cofactor assay activity, Impaired von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, Impaired RIPA, Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: blood group O, Platelet count x103/μl = 236, PFA 100 sec = >300, SPA % = 8.4, MADR mg/mL = 0.75, VWF:Ag U/dL = 35.4, VWF:CB U/dL = 37.3, VWF:CB ratio = 1.05, VWF:RCo U/dL = 25.4, VWF:RCo ratio = 0.72, Platelet VWF U/dL = 66.8, FVIII U/dL = 32.0, BAT F/M = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: Sequencing of exon 28 of VWF

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4135C>T (p.Arg1379Cys)

ClinVarID: 100333; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100333/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00003891 (5/128500 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128449-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P53, Chinese, female, 70yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeText: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseNOTHPOs: type O blood, bleeding score = 9; VWF:Ag (%) = 32.1, VWF:RCo (%) = 6.0, FVIII:C (%) = 50.8, VWF:CB (%) = 14.7, VWFpp (%) = 56.9, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.5, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.8, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.6

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4790G>T (p.Arg1597Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4790G>T (p.Arg1597Leu)

ClinVarID: 100392; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100392/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P44, Chinese, male, 6yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type A blood, bleeding score = 6; VWF:Ag (%) = 43.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 18.3, FVIII:C (%) = 38.7, VWF:CB (%) = 16.7, VWFpp (%) = 64.8, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.5, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 0.9

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.1870G>A (p.Gly624Ser)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.1870G>A (p.Gly624Ser)

ClinVarID: 619737; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/619737/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.004886 (59/12076 alleles; 1 homozygote) in the East Asian population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6166098-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Variant 2: c.4883T>C (p.Ile1628Thr)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4883T>C (p.Ile1628Thr)

ClinVarID: 284; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/284/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P19, Chinese, male, 35yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 4; VWF:Ag (%) = 17.5, VWF:RCo (%) = 5.1, FVIII:C (%) = 35.9, VWF:CB (%) = 16.9, VWFpp (%) = 45.3, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.6, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.1

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T (p.Arg1374Cys)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4120C>T (p.Arg1374Cys)

ClinVarID: 100329; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100329/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.000008824 (1/113322 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128464-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P63, Chinese, female, 23yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD3

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type A blood, bleeding score = 15; VWF:Ag (%) = 1.2, VWF:RCo (%) = 0.5, FVIII:C (%) = 5.9, VWF:CB (%) = 0.6, VWFpp (%) = 0.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.5, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 0.4, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 4.9

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.817C>T (p.Arg273Trp)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.817C>T (p.Arg273Trp)

ClinVarID: 100493; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100493/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.00005288 (6/113462 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6184558-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Variant 2: c.5335C>T (p.Arg1779Ter)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.5335C>T (p.Arg1779Ter)

ClinVarID: 100425; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100425/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P76, Chinese, male, 21yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type A blood, bleeding score = 3; VWF:Ag (%) = 4.7, VWF:RCo (%) = 5.4, FVIII:C (%) = 27.2, VWF:CB (%) = 5.5, VWFpp (%) = 4.3, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 1.1, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 0.9, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 5.8, RIPA (1.2 mg/ml, %) = 73.4

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: Exon1-exon5 del - Unregistered Variant

HGVS: NA

ClinVarID: NA

CAID: NA

gnomAD: NA

Variant 2: c.7464C>T (p.Gly2488=) - reported to be a splice site variant

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.7464C>T (p.Gly2488=)

ClinVarID: 619755; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/619755/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.000008799 (1/113644 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6080849-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P60, Chinese, female, 8yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 3; VWF:Ag (%) = 37.8, VWF:RCo (%) = 35.2, FVIII:C (%) = 56.6, VWF:CB (%) = 38.6, VWFpp (%) = 41.1, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.9, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.1, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.5

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5546T>C (p.Ile1849Thr)

HGVS: NM_000038.6(APC):c.5546T>C (p.Ile1849Thr)

ClinVarID: 654506; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/654506/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P46, Chinese, female, 55yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 14; VWF:Ag (%) = 45.4, VWF:RCo (%) = 44.5, FVIII:C (%) = 76.9, VWF:CB (%) = 54.9, VWFpp (%) = 43.2, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.0, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.7

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4414G>C (p.Asp1472His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4414G>C (p.Asp1472His)

ClinVarID: 256679; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/256679/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.5077 (12039/23712 alleles; 3078 homozygotes) in African/African-American population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128170-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P12, Chinese, Male, 11yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 6; VWF:Ag (%) = 15.8, VWF:RCo (%) = 7.3, FVIII:C (%) = 45.5, VWF:CB (%) = 4.1, VWFpp (%) = 50.3, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.5, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 3.2, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.9

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

ClinVarID: 100369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100369/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P16, Chinese, female, 25yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD3

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 15; VWF:Ag (%) = 2.1, VWF:RCo (%) = 1.9, FVIII:C (%) = 4.3, VWF:CB (%) = 1.7, VWFpp (%) = 1.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.9, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.8, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 0.7, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.1093C>T (p.Arg365Ter)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.1093C>T (p.Arg365Ter)

ClinVarID: 100172; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100172/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Variant 2: c.8116–2delA - Unregistered variant

HGVS: NA

ClinVarID: NA

CAID: NA

gnomAD: NA

Case: P70, Chinese, female, 51yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 2; VWF:Ag (%) = 28.3, VWF:RCo (%) = 36.6, FVIII:C (%) = 61.3, VWF:CB (%) = 34.6, VWFpp (%) = 64.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 1.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.3, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.2

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6554G>A (p.Arg2185Gln)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.6554G>A (p.Arg2185Gln)

ClinVarID: 100443; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100443/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.1899 (4712/24810 alleles; 465 homozygotes) in the African/African-American population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6103072-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P56, Chinese, male, 6yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 13; VWF:Ag (%) = 15.4, VWF:RCo (%) = 7.1, FVIII:C (%) = 43.3, VWF:CB (%) = 2.4, VWFpp (%) = 43.8, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.5, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.8, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.8

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

ClinVarID: 100369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100369/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P25, Chinese, female, 23yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 5; VWF:Ag (%) = 15.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 4.4, FVIII:C (%) = 31.0, VWF:CB (%) = 14.2, VWFpp (%) = 47.7, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.9, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 3.1, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

ClinVarID: 100330; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100330/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P14, Chinese, female, 3yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 5; VWF:Ag (%) = 18.2, VWF:RCo (%) = 7.6, FVIII:C (%) = 29.1, VWF:CB (%) = 17.5, VWFpp (%) = 45.6, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.5, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.6

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

ClinVarID: 100330; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100330/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P84, Chinese, female, 36yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 5; VWF:Ag (%) = 26.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 3.3, FVIII:C (%) = 41.7, VWF:CB (%) = 25.2, VWFpp (%) = 41.1, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.1, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.6, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.6

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

ClinVarID: 100330; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100330/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P13, Chinese, male, 8yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 5; VWF:Ag (%) = 21.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 9.4, FVIII:C (%) = 53.2, VWF:CB (%) = 5.7, VWFpp (%) = 56.1, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.6, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.5

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

ClinVarID: 100369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100369/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P65, Chinese, female, 24yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 3; VWF:Ag (%) = 55.7, VWF:RCo (%) = 51.2, FVIII:C (%) = 72.7, VWF:CB (%) = 57.1, VWFpp (%) = 61.7, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.9, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.0, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.1, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.3

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4499C>T (p.Ala1500Val)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4499C>T (p.Ala1500Val)

ClinVarID: 439339; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/439339/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.003511 (70/19938 alleles) in the East Asain population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128085-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P4, Chinese, male, 35yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type A blood, bleeding score = 6; VWF:Ag (%) = 22.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 5.0, FVIII:C (%) = 36.6, VWF:CB (%) = 25.4, VWFpp (%) = 43.0, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.1, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.9, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.6

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4121G>A (p.Arg1374His)

ClinVarID: 100330; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100330/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P79, Chinese, female, 24yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD3

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 9; VWF:Ag (%) = 0.5, VWF:RCo (%) = <0.5, FVIII:C (%) = 5.7, VWF:CB (%) = <0.5, VWFpp (%) = <0.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = NA, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = NA, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = NA, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 11.4

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.1093C>T (p.Arg365Ter)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.1093C>T (p.Arg365Ter)

ClinVarID: 100172; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100172/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Variant 2: c.4975C>T (p.Arg1659Ter)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4975C>T (p.Arg1659Ter)

ClinVarID: 297; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/297/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.0004007 (10/24958 alleles) in the European (Finnish) population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6127609-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case: P45, Chinese, female, 8yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type A blood, bleeding score = 4; VWF:Ag (%) = 23.5, VWF:RCo (%) = 6.5, FVIII:C (%) = 40.0, VWF:CB (%) = 15.2, VWFpp (%) = 44.5, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.6, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.9, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.7

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4628C>T (p.Ser1543Phe)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4628C>T (p.Ser1543Phe)

ClinVarID: 100376; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100376/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P52, Chinese, female, 55yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 9; VWF:Ag (%) = 19.1, VWF:RCo (%) = 3.1, FVIII:C (%) = 35.8, VWF:CB (%) = 22.7, VWFpp (%) = 50.3, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.6, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.9

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>A (p.Arg1374Ser)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4120C>A (p.Arg1374Ser)

ClinVarID: 100328; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100328/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P26, Chinese, female, 30yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type AB blood, bleeding score = 14; VWF:Ag (%) = 11.3, VWF:RCo (%) = 3.7, FVIII:C (%) = 45.0, VWF:CB (%) = 4.0, VWFpp (%) = 41.7, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 3.7, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 4.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

ClinVarID: 100369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100369/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P3, Chinese, male, 7yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 5; VWF:Ag (%) = 13.0, VWF:RCo (%) = 5.0, FVIII:C (%) = 39.1, VWF:CB (%) = 3.5, VWFpp (%) = 46.8, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.3, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 3.6, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 3.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4517C>T (p.Ser1506Leu)

ClinVarID: 100369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100369/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P58, Chinese, female, 27yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2A

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeText: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseNOTHPOs: type O blood, bleeding score = 8; VWF:Ag (%) = 17.1, VWF:RCo (%) = 2.3, FVIII:C (%) = 44.3, VWF:CB (%) = 3.7, VWFpp (%) = 41.1, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.1, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.2, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.4, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.6

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4790G>T (p.Arg1597Leu)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4790G>T (p.Arg1597Leu)

ClinVarID: 100392; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100392/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P17, Chinese, female, 20yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD2M

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type B blood, bleeding score = 10; VWF:Ag (%) = 17.6, VWF:RCo (%) = 7.3, FVIII:C (%) = 35.8, VWF:CB (%) = 15.8, VWFpp (%) = 51.9, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.4, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.9, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.9, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3389G>T (p.Cys1130Phe)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3389G>T (p.Cys1130Phe)

ClinVarID: 100261; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100261/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P31, Chinese, female, 21yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD3

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 15; VWF:Ag (%) = 1.0, VWF:RCo (%) = 0.7, FVIII:C (%) = 4.1, VWF:CB (%) = 0.8, VWFpp (%) = 0.8, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.7, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 0.8, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 0.8, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 4.1

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant 1: c.953_954insG - Unregistered Variant

HGVS: NA

ClinVarID: NA

CAID: NA

gnomAD: NA

Variant 2: c.4368C>G (p.Tyr1456Ter)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4368C>G (p.Tyr1456Ter)

ClinVarID: 100350; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/100350/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: absent

Case: P66, Chinese, male, 27yo

DiseaseAssertion: VWD1

FamilyInfo: NA

ParentalGenotype(s): NA

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0012147

(Reduced quantity of VWF)

CaseHPOFreeText: type O blood, bleeding score = 1; VWF:Ag (%) = 56.0, VWF:RCo (%) = 43.4, FVIII:C (%) = 70.0, VWF:CB (%) = 58.9, VWFpp (%) = 53.6, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag = 0.8, VWF:CB/VWF:Ag = 1.1, VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.0, FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.3

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: NA

GenotypingMethod: NGS

PreviouslyPublished: NA

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4414G>C (p.Asp1472His)

HGVS: NM_000552.4(VWF):c.4414G>C (p.Asp1472His)

ClinVarID: 256679; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/256679/

CAID: NA

gnomAD: MAF = 0.5077 (12039/23712 alleles; 3078 homozygotes) in African/African-American population; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6128170-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r2_1

Case UZ053: 28 year old female (row 54 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext:vWF:Ag (%) = 20.4; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 22.1; Act/Ag ratio = 1.08; FVIII:C (%) = 58.9; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 261

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.449T>C p.Leu150Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100363

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614236) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6110457-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 14: 43 year old female, study ID UZ101 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2A/M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 23.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 9; Act/Ag ratio = 0.38; FVIII:C (%) = 35.3; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 244

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003098 (5 in 1613796) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019298-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ090: 4 year old female (row 91 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 15; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 14.1; Act/Ag ratio = 0.94; FVIII:C (%) = 9.1; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 395

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2573G>T p.Cys858Phe

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100229

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.7437+5G>A

ClinVarID: not found

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613728) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5976106-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 8: 6 y.o. female, study ID UZ026 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 30.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 8.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.28; FVIII:C (%) = 32.4; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 503

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4195C>T p.Arg1399Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100337

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00005143 (83/1613776) 0 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019223-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 11: 37 year old female, study ID UZ022 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2A VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 54.1; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 10.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.19; FVIII:C (%) = 56.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 291

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3569G>A p.Cys1190Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 626960

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.195e-7 (1 in 1614212) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022005-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants: F7:c.977G>A p.Arg326Gln (VUS)

Case 15: 48 year old female, study ID UZ097 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2B VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 34.3; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 17.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.50; FVIII:C (%) = 44.5; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 344

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3842T>C p.Leu1281Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 627206

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 12: 39 year old female, study ID UZ108

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2A VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 74.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 22.3; Act/Ag ratio = 0.30; FVIII:C (%) = 64; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 325

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3569G>A p.Cys1190Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 626960

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.195e-7 (1 in 1614212) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022005-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ080: 0 year old female (row 81 in supplementary table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A/M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 17.9; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 5.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.31; FVIII:C (%) = 19.7; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 324

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4121G>A p.Arg1374His

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100330

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613878) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019297-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 16: 1 year old female, study ID UZ052 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 3 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 1.5; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 0.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.40; FVIII:C (%) = 12.2; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 369

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.421G>A p.Asp141Asn

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100338

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.195e-7 (1 in 1614092) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6110483-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

VWF variant

Variant: c.7940C>T p.Thr2647Met p.Thr2647Met

ClinVarID: 100487

gnomAD: 0.004007 (6468 in 1614124) 21 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5953542-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ089: 17 year old female (row 90 in supplementary table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 17.7; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 14.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.80; FVIII:C (%) = 49.8; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 242

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3359G>C p.Trp1120Ser

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100256

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6023651-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ009: 42 year old female (row 10 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 26.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 20.8; Act/Ag ratio = 0.79; FVIII:C (%) = 29.7; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 337

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6859C>T p.Arg2287Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100450

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.0004764 (769 in 1614122) 3 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5985605-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 1: 0 y.o. female, study ID UZ083 in Supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD presequencing; type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 17.7; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 14; Act/Ag ratio = 0.79; FVIII:C (%) = 44.5; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 323

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished: If applicable.

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5087T>G p.Leu1696Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1684480

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ041: 2 year old male

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 9.9; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 5.7; Act/Ag ratio = 0.6; FVIII:C (%) = 19.9; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 352

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3380-2A>G p.?

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1684020

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ071: 2 year old female (row 72 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440, HP:0040225

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 16.1; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 3.4; Act/Ag ratio = 0.21; FVIII:C (%) = 17; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 537

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T p.Ser1506Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100369

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: FGG

Variant: c.571G>A p.Gly191Arg

ClinVarID: 16378

gnomAD: 0.003866 (6239 in 1613896) 21 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/4-154609725-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ043: 8 year old male (row 44 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 29.3; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 13.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.46; FVIII:C (%) = 68.1; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 176

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4021C>T p.Arg1341Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100316

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001859 (30 in 1613842) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019397-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ092: 28 year old female (row 93 in supplementary table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 16; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 12; Act/Ag ratio = 0.75; FVIII:C (%) = 28; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 288

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4135C>T p.Arg1379Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100333

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00002540 (41 in 1613910) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019283-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: F11

Variant: c.1305-2A>G

ClinVarID: 2572126

gnomAD: absent

Case 13: 40 year old male, study ID UZ094 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 61.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 24.8; Act/Ag ratio = 0.41; FVIII:C (%) = 31.5; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 368; normal multimers

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4195C>T p.Arg1399Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100337

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00005143 (83 in 1613776) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019223-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: 3 (Also in row 1 table 6)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 15

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.1324C>T p.Arg442Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 806808

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00003098 (50 in 1614024) no homoztygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6064354-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6536C>T p.Ser2179Phe

ClinVarID: 100442

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614072) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5993924-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #28 (also in row 14 table 6)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWF

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 39; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 61

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4078G>T p.Val1360Phe

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1809581

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #9

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 51

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2771G>A p.Arg924Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100240

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.01774 (28642 in 1614096) 297 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6031493-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #34

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 35; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 60

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4517C>T p.Ser1506Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100369

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #26 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 50; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 29; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 40

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3673T>G p.Cys1225Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100272

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #15 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 50; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = 25

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5191T>A p.Ser1731Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100420

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.001158 (1870 in 1614210) 5 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6016636-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #33 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 11; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 10

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>A p.Arg1374Ser

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100328

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #55

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 71; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4825G>A p.Gly1609Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100395

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003098 (5 in 1614130) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018593-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #29 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 42

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #12 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2M/2B/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 7; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 8

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3835G>A p.Val1279Ile

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100288

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.0003751 (605 in 1612942) 1 homozygote https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019583-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #25 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #9 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 91; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 28; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 105; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = 88

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4195C>T p.Arg1399Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100337

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00005143 (83 in 1613776) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019223-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #4 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 36

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100208

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #11 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 32; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = 14

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4225G>T p.Val1409Phe

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 3393378

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #36 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 53

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4241T>G p.Val1414Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 619752

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: 9

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 80; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 118

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2771G>A p.Arg924Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100240

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.01774 (28642 in 1614096) 297 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6031493-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T Arg1597Trp

ClinVarID: 285

Case: IP #14 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 94; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 89; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 126; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = 49

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5191T>A p.Ser1731Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100420

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.001158 (1870 in 1614210) 5 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6016636-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #64

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 34; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 42

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4892G>A p.Gly1631Asp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1342155

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #32 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 11; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 17

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>A p.Arg1374Ser

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100328

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #4 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 14; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 23

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3389G>A p.Cys1130Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1684001

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #3 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 52; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100208

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #24 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 40

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #35 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441 - blood group AB

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4241T>G p.Val1414Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 619752

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #12 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 23; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 21; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 52; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5191T>A p.Ser1731Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100420

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.001158 (1870 in 1614210) 5 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6016636-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #28 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 11; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 11

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #1

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIC) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 11.4; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.421G>A p.Asp141Asn

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100338

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #3 (also in row 1 splice variants table 6)

DiseaseAssertion: Type 2A (IIC) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 49; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.1110-6_1110-5insC

HGVS: NM_000552.5:c.1110-6dup p.?

ClinVarID: 507028

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #4

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIC) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 117; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 52; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 104

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.1309_1326del p.Asp437_Arg442del

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100179

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614154) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6064351-AGCGGGTGCACACAGCGTC-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #15

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 41; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 82

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3390C>T p.Cys1130Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 627186

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006021 (3 in 498246) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022888-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #39

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 110; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 14; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 103

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4645G>A p.Glu1549Lys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100379

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #13 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 47; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 46; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 86; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5191T>A p.Ser1731Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100420

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.001158 (1870 in 1614210) 5 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6016636-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #57

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 53; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4825G>A p.Gly1609Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100395

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003098 (5 in 1614130) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018593-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 36; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.-411T>C

HGVS:

ClinVarID: not found

CAID: not found

gnomAD: absent

**MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.+167G>T

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

ClinVarID: 100208

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #24 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 19; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003098 (5 in 1613796) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019298-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #2 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 18

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2625C>T p.Tyr875=

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 439330

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003717 (6 in 1614106) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034748-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #2

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIC) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 201; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 124; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 244

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.1309_1326del p.Asp437_Arg442del

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100179

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614154) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6064351-AGCGGGTGCACACAGCGTC-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #11 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 18; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 12; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3586T>C p.Cys1196Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100270

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614220) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6021988-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #63

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 45; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 36

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4885G>A p.Gly1629Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100398

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #8 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 61; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = 43

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4105T>A p.Phe1369Ile

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100326

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006197 (10 in 1613726) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019313-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #38 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2B) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 19; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 1; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4373G>A p.Cys1458Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100351

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #5 in type U VWD sub-cohort (also in row 3 splice variants table 6)

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3389G>A

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1684001

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3539–10T>G

ClinVarID: not found

**gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #31 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 32; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 14; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 43

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent