10 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2026
    1. a 45-year-old man

      Case#: a 45-year-old man from Sardinia, Italy

      DiseaseAssertion: Cone rod dystrophy

      FamilyInfo: Five members, this patient is the only one affected by CRD

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000505, HP:0007663, HP:0000603, HP:0001123, HP:0000608, HP:0007401, HP:0011504, HP:0000548, HP:0030329, HP:0000543

      CaseHPOFreeText: 1998: Subacute central vision loss in both eyes, choroidal and RPE atrophy surrounding left fovea and small white patches of atrophy around right fovea. Pale appearance of optic disc in both eyes. Punctate retinal pigment epitheliopathy observed bilaterally in midperipheral retina, hyperfluorescent macular regions suggesting bull's eye maculopathy. Paracentral ring scotoma, surrounded by a relative annular scotoma, early and predominant involvement of photopic over scotopic responses; 2018: BCVA was bilateral light perception with visual field extinction. FAF showed a central round area of decreased autofluorescence corresponding to area of macular atrophy, surrounded by an area of relatively increased autofluorescence. Several roundish areas of reduced autofluorescence in midperipheral retina. Severe macular atrophy surrounded by a ring of preserved RPE in both eyes. Sparse pigmentary deposits in midperipheral retina of both eyes. Severe bilateral retinal thinning with disappearance of external retinal layers. Outer retina tubulations

      CaseNotHPOs: HP:0025148

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: No pigment deposits on optic disc, no dark choroid

      Genotyping Method: Candidate gene approach on ABCA4 followed by whole exome sequencing

      PreviouslyPublished: NR

      Variant: NM_000350, c.4535C>G, p.P1512R

      ClinVar: 99291

      CAID: CA227203

      SupplementalData: Patient's healthy brother showed the same molecular condition for ABCA4. Patient also has 2 novel frameshift mutations in C2orf71.

    1. a 12-year-old female

      Case#: a 12-year-old female admitted to the B Department Hédi Raies institut of Ophtalmology in Tunis, Tunisia

      DiseaseAssertion: Cone rod dystrophy

      FamilyInfo: No parental consanguinity nor pathological or opthalmological history in the family

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000529, HP:0000662, HP:0001141, HP:0000543,HP:0007737, HP:0030602

      CaseHPOFreeText: progressive visual loss, poor night vision, 1/20 visual acuity in both eyes, pallor of the optic disk, attenuated retinal vessels, paravascular bone spiculed pigmentations and an epimacular membrane, paravascular and macular heterogeneous hypoautofluorescence, diffuse alteration of ellipsoid zone, decreased photopic and scotopic responses.

      CaseNotHPOs: NR

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: NR

      Genotyping Method: Whole exome sequencing, Sanger sequencing

      PreviouslyPublished: NR

      Variant: c.885delC, NM_000350.3

      ClinVar: 438109

      CAID: CA958684

      SupplementalData: Karyotyping showed monosomy 45,X in the patient

  2. Jan 2025
    1. there’s an admirable motivation behind Dreher’s ethical project of reenchantment: He wants to help people find meaning

      for - definition - reenchantment - source - book - Living in Wonder: Finding Mystery and Meaning in a Secular Age - Rod Dreher - adjacency - reenchantment - Meaning crisis - John Vervaeke

  3. Jun 2024
  4. Nov 2023
  5. Apr 2023
    1. Samuel Butler had made the phrase ‘Spare the rod and spoil the child’immortal in his satirical poem Hudibras.

      While the original proverb appears in King James Version of the Bible, Book of Proverbs 13:24, the satirical poem Hudibras is the first appearance of the quote and popularized the aphorism "spare the rod and spoil the child".

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudibras

      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/spare_the_rod_and_spoil_the_child

      syndication link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hudibras&oldid=1148518740

  6. Dec 2015
    1. Therefore, those in your experience who are attempting to “help” you see that what is unfolding here in your experience is the Christ-consciousness revealing Itself, are correct to that degree. However, they are incorrect in attempting to “help” you see that an individuality by the name of Raj is an illusory part of this experience. Their view is still so limited—in spite of the grandness and infinity of the view they see currently, as opposed to what they saw originally—that you would be foolish to use their vantage point as your own.

      This reminds me of Rod's assertion that channeled beings are just the channels higher self.

      Read on to get another perspective.

    2. It is true that you are not participating in spiritualism. You are not communicating with a soul that has “passed on.” You are not speaking to an individuality still befuddled by the three-dimensional illusion of birth and death who thinks that he was ever born or ever died. I am not the medium through which the Christ-consciousness is revealing Itself as your conscious experience of Being. But, I do exist, as does every other individualization who has existed as an infinite aspect of Fourth-dimensional Conscious Being. There is infinite progression, even beyond the partial, three-dimensional-only view. It is simply ignorance—the inability to see infinitely—which would make one think that once the “mortal dream” is grown out of, there does not continue to be the infinite unfolding of Being as Conscious Being. This is true before or after the experience called death.

      Definition: Ignorance - the inability to see infinitely.

      More about Raj - not caught in belief of birth and death.

      There is an infinite progression of the unfolding of Being as Conscious Being. "Death" does not end it - it never ends.

      This is implied by WOM when it speaks of *The journey to the Kingdom and the Journey within the Kingdom."