17 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2025
  2. Jan 2024
    1. One of the reasons that some projects don't use Gitlab's issues and use an external tracking platform is the lack of issues relations. Without relations issues are just flat, no way to actually track progress of big features. No way to create a "meta" issue that depends on 4 other or create subtasks and so on. The same problem exists on Github too. It would surely make a difference if Gitlab offers a full features tracking issue, instead of just flat issues. Relations is a major first step towards that.
  3. Feb 2023
  4. Nov 2021
  5. May 2021
    1. You can now search for tasks using task: similar to block:. There is also task-todo: and task-done: which will match only the tasks that are incomplete or complete, respectively. Use task:"" to match all tasks.

      This will be incredibly useful to create as a view.

    2. Task lists [x] can now contain any character to indicate a completed task, instead of just x. This value can be used by custom CSS to change the appearance of the check mark, and is also available for plugins to use.

      I'll need to create some custom CSS for these in the past as I've used:

        • [>] to indicate that an item was pushed forward
        • [?] to indicate something I'm not sure was done in retrospect (typically for a particular day)
      • others?
  6. Dec 2020
  7. Nov 2020
    1. xperimental condition

      (1) tone discrimination (2) onset discrimination (3) nonlinguistic pitch judgement and discrimination of low tone, 90 Hz vs high tone, and 100 Hz. Respectively, the conditions are T, O and P judgements.

  8. Aug 2020
  9. Apr 2020
  10. Dec 2019
  11. Oct 2018
  12. cconlinejournal.org cconlinejournal.org
    1. the activities the participants claimed they used a computer to complete during their average day.

      Interesting that most of these are passive activities--watching TV and buying items. Uploading photos might be the most complex tasks students have done.

  13. Jun 2014
    1. A fundamental task for public philosophy is to attend to the work the public is doing in developing its own self-conception.

      This strikes me as a very productive way of identifying an important aspect of public philosophy. On the one hand, it allows us to distinguish between philosophers who think more people should be listening to them and philosophers who think they should be listening to more people. On the other hand, it suggests and leaves open a number of questions that can be addressed in and through the work public philosophers are doing in developing their own self-conceptions.