A 90% correct product is still 100% wrong.
大多数人认为在合规领域,90%的准确率已经相当不错,可以接受。但作者认为在合规工作中,任何低于完美准确率的解决方案都是完全失败的。这挑战了人们对合规工作可接受错误率的基本假设,暗示合规领域对准确性的要求远超其他行业。
A 90% correct product is still 100% wrong.
大多数人认为在合规领域,90%的准确率已经相当不错,可以接受。但作者认为在合规工作中,任何低于完美准确率的解决方案都是完全失败的。这挑战了人们对合规工作可接受错误率的基本假设,暗示合规领域对准确性的要求远超其他行业。
Most standards work in this space focuses on compliance artifacts: SBOMs for the Cyber Resilience Act, attestations for procurement requirements. Less attention goes to the underlying tools developers actually use. The dependency graph that feeds the SBOM generator, the metadata lookup that powers vulnerability scanning, the notification when a new version ships.
Says standards in this topic are aimed at compliance. SBOMs for the Cyber Resilience Act e.g. [[Cyber Resilience Act CRA EU 20231026123507]]
In the end, the IETF (RFC 5280), browsers and CAs run fast and loose, so it probably does not matter what key usage you provide.
This is actually correct, standards-compliant behavior. A *.xyz.net wildcard certificate is valid for abc.xyz.net or docker.xyz.net, but not docker.abc.xyz.net.
This module is similar to JSX, but provided as a standards-compliant ES6 tagged template string function.
Firefox is the most compliant with the proposed standard, and is, therefore, your best place to start when developing browser extensions