1,738 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Step 2. Post the status Make a POST call to: https://[YOUR MASTODON SERVER]/api/v1/statuses?access_token=[YOUR ACCESS TOKEN] Set the type to application/x-www-form-urlencoded and pass the status field containing your status message. If you are attaching an image as well, pass the media_ids[] field with the media id you retrieved in the previous step. More info: Documentation for the /statuses endpoint on Mastodon.

      URL form for a POST call to my Mastodon endpoints. Form submission with just status is enough. Repurpose jsonclassic.php for it.

    1. Your research interest should be genuine. It’s a mistake to choose something you think is “safe” to fail at. It may seem rational to experiment with something where failure has no serious consequences (e.g., having to start over). But this only leads to a lack of motivation to build the intensity and seriousness needed for thorough work. If the content of your Zettelkasten isn’t important to you and only serves to learn the Zettelkasten method, you’ll quickly become superficial and sloppy with the content. The Zettelkasten method requires serious engagement with the content – it cannot be learned with dummy content.

      Bad advice. Safe to fail probes are not 'unserious', bc of aiming to limit the downside should they fail. The point is having the probe to explore 'cheaply' within the actual context of work. First part, the interest should be genuine, is completely true. It does not mean you can't do risk containment though. Probes are real and safe simultaneously. [[Probe proberend handelen 20201111162752]]

    1. Het hernieuwde convenant geldt voor de periode 2024-2027. Er zijn in totaal acht Kennis- en innovatieagenda’s (KIA’s) binnen de KIC opgesteld, waaronder de KIA Digitalisering. Digital Holland is coördinator van de KIA Digitalisering.

      Binnen het innovatieconvenant van Rijk et al, 2024-2027, zijn er 8 Kennis Innovatie Agenda's KIA. Digitalisering is er 1, en DigitalHolland is er coord van. Dwz: Vu deze KIA is de SIDN call te bezien.

    2. Over Digital Holland Digital Holland (voorheen Topsector ICT) identificeert, prioriteert en organiseert ICT-onderzoek en innovatie door publieke en private partijen bijeen te brengen met focus op digitale sleuteltechnologieën en maatschappelijke uitdagingen. Hierbij bestrijkt Digital Holland het traject van fundamenteel onderzoek tot en met valorisatie. Opleiden van nieuw talent, om- en bijscholing, kennis-disseminatie, breed betrekken van mkb en internationale samenwerking vormen een belangrijk onderdeel van de missie.

      Digital Holland is voorheen TopsectorICT. Onhandige naam.

    1. Bijvoorbeeld omdat ze zijn uitgegeven onder een opensource-licentie, gebruik maken van open standaarden, van dataspaces Link opent in een nieuwe browsertab-technologie (gericht op het delen van data in een beschermde op publieke waarden gebaseerde context) of gebaseerd zijn op decentrale, federatieve modellen.

      Links to data spaces on Wikipedia: note that that link talks about data spaces as tech only, not in the sense of the EU single market for data, which is a much more meaningful context when it comes to (design)values.

    1. By 15 May 2014 and every six years thereafter the Commissionshall present to the European Parliament and to the Council areport on the implementation of this Directive based, inter alia,on reports from Member States in accordance with Article 21(2)and (3).Where necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposalsfor Community action

      replaced, by a one time(!) eval after 6 years.

    2. By way of derogation from Article 11(1), Member States maylimit public access to spatial data sets and services through theservices referred to in points (b) to (e) of Article 11(1), or to thee-commerce services referred to in Article 14(3), where suchaccess would adversely affect any of the following

      changed to Member States may limit public access to spatial data sets and services where such access could adversly affect any of the following:

    3. By way of derogation from Article 11(1), Member Statesmay limit public access to spatial data sets and services throughthe services referred to in point (a) of Article 11(1) where suchaccess would adversely affect international relations, publicsecurity or national defence

      changed to Member States may limit public access to spatial data sets and services where such access could adversely affect international relations, public security or national defence

    4. Rules for the implementation of this Article shall be adoptedby 15 May 2008 in accordance with the regulatory procedurereferred to in Article 22(2). These rules shall take account ofrelevant, existing international standards and user requirements,in particular with relation to validation metadata

      Replaced by 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts laying down rules for the application of this Article, taking account of relevant, existing international standards and user requirements, in particular with relation to validation metadata. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22b(2)’

    5. The description of the existing data themes referred to inAnnexes I, II and III may be adapted in accordance with theregulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 22(3), inorder to take into account the evolving needs for spatial data insupport of Community policies that affect the environment.25.4.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 108/5

      Replaced by The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22a in order to amend Annexes I, II and III by adapting the description of the existing data themes in the light of technological and economic developments

    6. In the case of spatial data sets which comply with thecondition set out in paragraph 1(c), but in respect of which athird party holds intellectual property rights, the public authoritymay take action under this Directive only with the consent ofthat third party.

      deleted

    7. ‘interoperability’ means the possibility for spatial data setsto be combined, and for services to interact, withoutrepetitive manual intervention, in such a way that the resultis coherent and the added value of the data sets and servicesis enhanced

      deleted

    1. Article 17 of Directive 2007/2/EC requires Member States to adopt measures thatmake it possible for spatial data collected at one level of public authority to be sharedbetween all the different levels of public authorities and to ensure that spatial data andservices are made available under conditions that do not restrict their extensive use.Pursuant to Directive (EU) 2019/1024, data is open-by-default which also applies tospatial data, including spatial datasets falling within the scope of Directive 2007/2/EC.Article 17 should therefore be deleted for the purpose of simplifying the legalframework and avoiding overlapping rules

      this again mixes use and re-use as interchangeable. Not all spatial data is actually open by default, so we get some return to pre-2007. Who will notice when govs stop providing access?

    2. dapting thedescription of the existing data themes. It is of particular importance that theCommission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, includingat expert level, in accordance with the principles laid down in the InterinstitutionalAgreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equalparticipation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and theCouncil receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and theirexperts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealingwith the preparation of delegated acts.

      themes to be redefined?

    3. Article 14 of Directive 2007/2/EC sets out the rules for making discovery and viewservices available to the public free of charge, as well as for making e-commerceservices available where charges are levied. Directive (EU) 2019/1024 establishesprinciples and rules governing charging for making documents and high-value datasetsavailable free of charge, including exceptions and derogations from the rules oncharging, for the purpose of ensuring the maximum impact and to facilitate re-use ofdata. Pursuant to Article 1(7) of Directive (EU) 2019/1024, that Directive sets out thatthe Directive governs the re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodiesand public undertakings of the Member States, including documents to whichDirective 2007/2/EC applies. To ensure consistency with Directive (EU) 2019/1024and to avoid overlapping provisions, the rules on charging for discovery and viewservices in Directive 2007/2/EC should be deleted

      INSPIRE charging provisions replace by ODD charging provisions (and those are imo potentially eroded in the digital omnibus)

    4. Pursuant to Article 1(7) of Directive (EU) 2019/1024, that Directive governs the re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodies and public undertakings of theMember States, including documents to which Directive 2007/2/EC applies. Since theinteroperability requirements for open data apply to spatial data, the empowerment toadopt implementing rules laying down technical arrangements for the interoperabilityand, where practicable, harmonisation of spatial data sets and related provisionsshould be deleted

      Wrt standards this makes usage (g2g) the same as re-use (INSPIRE was not only for re-use imo) but not explicitly?

    5. contains reference to third parties, whereas Directive (EU)2019/1024, which applies to public sector bodies and public undertakings, does notextend to private entities or businesses. To ensure coherence with the Directive (EU)2019/102439, the reference to third parties should be deleted

      non psbs / third parties removed from scope INSPIRE.

    6. Remove four empowerments for adoption of implementing rules for interoperability,network services, data sharing and reporting requirements that no longer reflectcurrent best practices or standards, thereby removing rigid technical requirements.The four implementing acts adopted on the basis of the empowerments will berepealed by separate adoption procedure (comitology)

      agreed wrt rigid tech reqs. Stil, I wonder if HVD doesn't actually build on them

    7. As a consequence of the amendments set out above in relation to network services,interoperability and data sharing, it is furthermore proposed to repeal the following relatedimplementing acts, by way of the applicable procedure, and to delete the correspondingempowerments:(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009 as regards Network Services21(2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 on interoperability of spatial data setsand services22, and(3) Commission Regulation (EU) No 268/2010 on data and service sharing23.(4) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 implementing Directive2007/2/EC as regards monitoring and reporting24.

      I read this as taking out all INSPIRE obligations, whereas the HVD reg builds on these pre-existing obligations. (Stating that sharing data / services must be open)- [ ] Crosscheck if HVD states an explicit independent mandate, without reference to INSPIRE mandates. #geonovumtb #10mins #belangrijkeerst

    8. Directive (EU) 2019/1024 sets out that data is open-by-default which also applies to spatialdat

      This seems odd, ODD does not constitute an obligation for sharing (HVD does), just mandates conditions when sharing is done.

    9. With a view to reducing administrative burden, it is proposed to delete the reportingrequirements set out in Article 21. Member States shall provide the Commission with a reporton the measures taken to implement Implementing Regulation No (EU) 2023/138

      reporting obligation folded into HVD reporting (already combined in practice per 2026)

    10. The proposal is a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amendingDirective 2007/2/EC

      Remains a Directive that amends INSPIRE directive. While ODD / HVD are regulations.

    11. It is thereforealso proposed to delete the obligation on the Commission to operate the Inspire geo-portal

      as announced, the inspire portal will move into the eu data portal. Has consequences for the HVD monitoring (now part of inspire portal) too and shifts resp from #jrc to #eupb

    12. The application of the INSPIRE Directive is not only relevant for environmental policy.Several pieces of EU legislation refer to the INSPIRE Directive, such as Regulation (EU)2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 (LULUCF), Regulation (EU)2021/2116 of the European Parliament and the Council14 (Common agricultural policy),Regulation (EU) 2018/109115 (integrated farm statistics), Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council16 (Union Space Programme), Directive (EU)2024/2881 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 (Air Quality Directive), andRegulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NatureRestoration Regulation)18,

      List of regs where INSPIRE is referred to

    13. ot otherwise affected by the Digital Omnibusproposal, because the Commission did not propose relevant substantive changes to thesolutions set out in the Open Data Directive

      although definitions will shift in the omnibus and that carries uncertain effects.

    14. Notably, the high-value datasets defined under that framework wereselected to match the data sets already covered by the INSPIRE Directive

      only partly true. Not all INSPIRE themes covered in HVD, and not all themes covered are fully covered (e.g. transport networks is limited to inland waterways).

    15. n addition, the EU’s objective of creating Common European Data Spaces set out in the 2020European strategy for data, includes a dedicated Green Deal Data Space to support theEuropean Green Deal; this requires breaking data silos and ensuring that all relevantenvironmental data – spatial and non-spatial – can flow freely to inform EU environmentaland climate objectives and reduce administrative burden on companies and publicadministrations.

      Tied to GDDS

    16. Horizontal EU data legislation regulates the access to, reuse, interoperability, and governanceof public sector data in a coherent and technologically advanced manner. This includesDirective (EU) 2019/1024 (Open Data Directive)7 and Implementing Regulation (EU)2023/138 (High-Value Datasets)8, Regulation (EU) 2022/868 (Data Governance Act)9, andRegulation (EU) 2024/903 (Interoperable Europe Act)10. Horizontal EU data legislationintroduces open-by-default principles, structured metadata, mandatory ApplicationProgramming Interfaces (APIs) and where relevant as bulk download formats for high-valuedatasets, as well as a streamlined, common governance model for cross-border data us

      Tied to DA (incl DGA,ODD), HVD, and Interoperable Europe Act here. Note: #dgdigit assumes no connection w Interop act until its review.

    17. This proposal seeks to modernise and simplify the INSPIRE Directive by removing technicalrequirements for data and data sharing and aligning its obligations with more recent horizontalEU datal legislation.

      removes tech reqs --> harmonisation?

      connect to horizontal legislation --> ODD(DA) / HVD

    1. Today's simplification package is composed of six legislative proposals.

      6 legislative proposals (but press release lists 5)

      1. Environmental assessments wrt permits
      2. industrial emissions directive
      3. SCIP database (substances of concern, in the Waste Framework directive) to be replaced with DPP ( #openvraag DPP is not in effect yet, so repeal of SCIP early / protection erosion?)
      4. Extended Producer Responsibility req changed for EU producers.
      5. INSPIRE
    2. The current technical requirements for geospatial data under the INSPIRE Directive will be fully aligned with the horizontal legislation governing public sector high value geospatial data. This simplification will lower compliance costs for public authorities and facilitate access to high value geospatial data sets for all public and private users.

      INSPIRE to be aligned with HVD (as expected)

    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20251210080852/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66634-7

      Cool! Hotmixing turns out to be the secret behind the durable Roman 'concrete'. A 2023 theory now confirmed by a Pompei construction site find.

      Researchers think this new insight may be applied in current building, and impact the climate footprint of modern day concrete.

      An unfinished Pompeian construction site reveals ancient Roman building technology in Zotero

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    1. On 24 November 2023, the EU and Canada launched a Digital Partnership to reinforce cooperation on digital issues. The partnership reflects a shared vision for a positive and human-centric digital economy and society. The EU and Canada agreed to work together in crucial areas such as AI, secure international connectivity, cyber security, online platforms, digital identity and digital skills. This Digital Partnership and its importance were highlighted in the New EU-Canada Strategic Partnership of the Future, adopted at the Canada-EU Summit on 23 June 2025.

      Digital Partnership started in 2023. June 2025 incorporated in strategic partnership. Now a first physical meeting at high level.

    2. EU and Canada are committed to working together on secure international connectivity, for example in 5G and subsea cables, and have agreed to explore new cable routes to strengthen global network resilience, including in the Arctic region. The EU and Canada will deepen the collaboration in priority topics such as quantum technologies, semiconductors, and high-performance computing. They also reaffirmed their commitment to resilient semiconductor supply chains and secure and sovereign cloud infrastructure and data centres.

      Covering deeper layers of the stack. So it's a digital sovereignty / autonomy pact.

    3. Both partners plan to establish a forum to facilitate joint testing of digital credential technologies, drive pilot projects, and share information. They will develop joint use cases and pilot projects towards interoperability of digital identity wallets and digital credentials and trust services.

      joint testing facility for wallets / data connectors

    4. the cooperation on digital credentials and trust services, including on technical interoperability and solutions based on digital identity wallets, the EU and Canada signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Digital Credentials and Trust Services.

      Relevant to EU wallett efforts and to trusted data transactions. This is a 2nd MoU

    5. the partners will share  best practices to accelerate AI adoption in strategic sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, energy, culture, science and public services, and support SMEs. They committed to work together on large AI infrastructures and support industry and academia's access to AI compute capacity. They will also explore scientific cooperation on fundamental AI research, and the development of advanced AI models for the public good, including in areas such as extreme weather monitoring and climate change. In addition, the EU and Canada will set up a structured dialogue on data spaces, of particular relevance to the development of large AI models.

      Elements in the MoU: - share good practices to support adoption - collab on large AI infrastructure (Apply AI strat EU, HPC network) - collab on access to HPC (in line w AI factories in EU) - explore coop in fundamental ai research (weak) - development of AI for public good (in line w EU AI goals) - structured dialogue on data spaces (as data source for AI models) Only the last one is not immediately obviously connected to existing EU efforts and actions.

    1. The labelled solutions are:   Core Vocabularies – common semantic building blocks that help public administrations describe key concepts (such as persons, organisations or locations) in a consistent way across borders and sectors.  DCAT-AP – a common specification that makes data catalogues interoperable and helps make public sector data easier to discover and reuse.

      Two things labeled as interoperability solutions now. DCAT-AP and core vocabs. Odd as they're not 'solutions' but DCAT-AP is a standard. Risk of board repeating existing standardisation efforts?

    1. Companies will not be obliged to use the European Business Wallets. The Regulation places obligations solely on public sector bodies to accept its core functions, while companies remain free to decide whether to adopt the wallets for their commercial operations or interactions with public authorities

      wallets are voluntary, but PSBs must accept them. Asymmetry may impact adoption? ('costly to prepare but noone uses them')

    2. In parallel, the Commission will work closely with Member States and the private sector to define the technical standards and requirements for European Business Wallets through ongoing efforts under the European Digital Identity Framework and in large-scale pilot projects funded under the Digital Europe Programme such as the WeBuild consortium.

      technical standards and reqs not yet defined.

    3. It is estimated that simplification efforts will save up to €5 billion in administrative costs between now and 2029. Moreover, the European Business Wallets should unlock at least EUR 160 billion in savings for businesses each year.

      Savings projects between 2025 and 2029, odd bc it is only now in proposal. May well be 2027 before law is there, implementation another 2 yrs, so no real change until 2029/2030?

    4. The technical architecture and features for the European Business Wallets will build on the one for the EU Digital Identity Wallets.

      Business wallets will build on existing personal wallets tech and infra. What about existing entity identifiers (Digidentity e.g.)?

    5. Designed to be accessible for businesses of all sizes, including SMEs and microenterprises, as well as public administrations

      EU wallets for all types of orgs. SME's / micro entities and PSBs, are 99% of all EU entities.

    6. The European Business Wallets are one of the key deliverables of the Digital Package. The Commission proposes a regulation to establish those Wallets as a harmonised digital solution to ease the administrative burden and to enable companies and public sector bodies to identify, to authenticate and to exchange data in a secure and user-friendly way, with full legal effect across the European Union.

      EU Business Wallets proposed as regulation in the 2025 work programma. So in first step of legislative process.

    1. this type of thing sounds like what I thought wrt annotation of [[AI agents als virtueel team]]. The example prompts of questions make me think of [[Filosofische stromingen als gereedschap 20030212105451]] die al per stroming een vraagstramien bevat. Making persona's of diff thinking styles, lines of questioning. Idem for reviews, or starting a project etc.

    1. For browsers on mobile devices (including iPads) To install the Hypothesis Bookmarklet you’ll make a bookmark in your mobile browser out of any page, and then edit the bookmark, replacing the URL with some javascript we specify below. To install the Bookmarklet

      this, suggested by the team should work.

    1. Bovendien geldt er nu een adequaatheidsbesluit voor de VS (Data Privacy Framework), waardoor doorgifte naar de VS, voor zover er aan het DPF wordt voldaan, ook voldoet aan de eisen van de AVG die gelden voor doorgifte.

      DPF is ingegaan op 10 juli 2025. Daarvoor was er geen adequacy, nadat Schrems II er in juli 2020 een einde aan maakte.

    2. Minister gaat uit van papieren werkelijkheid ipv daadwerkelijke. - Ook voor geaggregeerde statistieken worden de details wel vastgelegd en doorgegeven aan Google, alleen niet getoond aan de gebruiker van Analytics. - Je kunt Google Analytics ook gewoon uitzetten, ipv zeggen dat verbieden niet kan. - Al is de groep geinteresseerden niet hetzelfde als de groep sollicitanten, is het niettemin een kleinere en dus traceerbare groep dan 'random'

    1. GoVolta heeft een optie op extra NMBS-rijtuigen en onderzoekt een uitbreiding naar Parijs in 2027. De beoogde Nederlandse stops zijn Amsterdam, Haarlem, Den Haag, Rotterdam, Lage Zwaluwe en Roosendaal. Lage Zwaluwe is bewust gekozen vanwege de gratis parkeermogelijkheden. In België hoopt GoVolta via Gent te kunnen rijden. De strategische samenwerking met het Franse Keolis – een dochteronderneming van de SNCF – moet de toegang tot de Franse markt vergemakkelijken.

      Researching an Ams-Paris route for 2027. Through Gent in B, not Brussels. Keolis is French which should help in getting the space on F rail network.

    2. Keolis verzorgt de tractie in zowel Nederland als Duitsland. GoVolta richt zich op commercie en pakketreizen; Brouwer op onderhoud. Eerder wilde GoVolta zelf spoorvervoerder worden, maar die rol wordt nu door Keolis ingevuld.

      GoVolta no longer a rail provider itself , Keolis is the transporter.

    1. GPT-OSS OpenAI's open-weight models designed for powerful reasoning, agentic tasks, and versatile developer use cases.

      GPT-OSS is by OpenAI. It is available locally in Ollama it seems in various versions.

    1. Het bedrijf ontwikkelt al een AI-naar-FPGA-platform waarmee elk AI-model kan draaien op goedkope, in de EU geproduceerde herconfigureerbare chips. Als ze hierin slagen, zou dit de afhankelijkheid van Europa van buitenlandse GPU-fabrieken volledig kunnen wegnemen, een terugkerend thema in de strategie van Vydar.

      A potential path away from NVIDIA it seems, but not at the moment, the text suggests.

    2. We maken geen eigen AI-chips”, merkte Crijnen op, “maar omdat de hardware speciaal voor dit doel is gebouwd, kunnen we toekomstige in Europa gemaakte chips gemakkelijk integreren. Die flexibiliteit is cruciaal.”

      This suggests they do use NVIDIA Jetson now, but don't need to if alternatives are available?

    3. Hun systeem wordt nu voor 100% in Europa geproduceerd en weegt 30 gram, tegenover 176 gram voor concurrenten die op Jetson zijn gebaseerd. Het heeft een stroomverbruik van 3 watt, een efficiëntieverbetering van 88%.

      a sixth in weight, power reduction from 15 to 3 Watt range.

  2. Dec 2025
    1. If you’re constantly just making notes without structure

      Not having an upfront determined structure, is not the same as 'making notes without structure'. Structure is emergent and earned working with the notes (linking, grouping, adding to an index / MoC etc.)

      Also: not all structure needs to be in your note taking system. Many of my structures are in my own head. I know how I phrase things, and do things, I'm pretty predictable to myself. That is a structure to work with.

    2. I don’t see obsidian as my second brain, I see it as my second subconscious.”

      I think the Second Brain metaphor is getting to the point of creating damage, not promise.

    3. a decent use case for some kind of personal LLM

      yes, vgl [[Communicating with Slip Boxes by Niklas Luhmann]] as convo partner. Using a local LLM makes total sense to me.

    4. the best thing to do is just write the note. It’s a bit like throwing the text into a big bucket, and that’s okay.

      That's all there is to it indeed. Jot a note, perhaps add a link / choose a single physical location.

    1. The Apertus models also expand multilingual coverage, training on 15T tokens from over 1800 languages, with ~40% of pretraining data allocated to non-English content. Released at 8B and 70B scales, Apertus approaches state-of-the-art results among fully open models on multilingual benchmarks, rivalling or surpassing open-weight counterparts

      Apertus is trained on over 1800 languages (!?) with 40% non English content, meaning many of them can only have had 1/100 or 1/1000 of a procent (1/10k, 1/100k) 60/1799 is 0,033%

    1. Gettier claims to have shown that the JTB account is inadequate because it does not account for all of the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge.

      Edmund Gettier, Gettier problem, epistemology. 1963 paper.

      holds that the K def of 'justified true belief' is inadequate. Encountered in Is Understanding A Species Of Knowledge? in Zotero which posits that understanding is a species of knowledge that 'can be Gettiered'

    1. Binnen MeshCore is het niet alleen het apparaat, maar vooral de software die een belangrijke rol speelt. Bij het inrichten van een repeater dienen we dan ook bij de flasher te kiezen voor de rol repeater.

      A repeater is only different in software from a terminal.

    2. Eind 2025 is er een flinke verhuizing gaande van Meshtastic naar MeshCore. Dat heeft er o.a. mee te maken dat MeshCore een betere ontvangst lijkt te hebben en zijn de eerste signalen dus ook positief. Steeds meer eigenaren van repeaters zetten er dan ook MeshCore-firmware op en stappen daarmee over naar MeshCore.

      Implies there's a migration wave from Mehstastic to Meshcore

    1. The model is named Apertus – Latin for “open” – highlighting its distinctive feature: the entire development process, including its architecture, model weights, and training data and recipes, is openly accessible and fully documented.

      Apertus committed to openness wrt all its aspects. Is it in the overview yet?

    1. However, I also believe that therapy should be about the client; there’s a line between self-disclosure and self-indulgent

      when is it a conversation, when are you making it about yourself only?

    2. Dr Yalom talks about this as well in the book and argues that self-disclosure can be useful to building connection, the thing that accounts for 80% of success in therapy.

      Sessions also contain self-disclosure by Yalom, against therapeutic condition, but here positioned as way to connect. (and I think regular interaction between ppl.)

    3. focusing on the ‘here and now’. Often, he picks up on the dynamic between him and the client and raises this with the client, linking it with the issue that brought them to him. Most of the time, this is effective.

      Yalom makes the meeting between the original request and the current setting / dynamic in the conversational pair the thing to explore.

    4. The book is a collection of stories of these one-off sessions, and they are fascinating to me as a psychologist. How effective can one hour of conversation be? It is true that Dr Yalom (or Irv, as he asks his clients to call him) does not promise to resolve his clients’ needs in one hour; in fact, every consultation is ended with him providing names of other clinicians and urging the client to continue with longer-term therapy.

      Yalom during Covid engaged in 1 hour sessions. Not as self-contained therapy, but still self-contained one-off conversations.

    1. It was, however, the usage of Franz Brentano (and, as he later acknowledged, Ernst Mach[6]) that would prove definitive for Husserl.[14] From Brentano, Husserl took the conviction that philosophy must commit itself to description of what is "given in direct 'self-evidence'."[15]

      Husserl wrt phenomenology based himself on Franz Brentano and Ernst Mach . p7 Moran, Dermot (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Routledge.

      Introduction to Phenomenology in Zotero

    1. Support for jumping to and displaying paper edition page numbers [7.17] If an e-book contains embedded information about the pages from the paper edition of the book, the calibre E-book viewer can now jump to a page number via the Go to button in the viewer controls.

      Calibre, if it can detect it, can use paper edition page numbers. It's #openvraag how I want to deal with location numbers in ebooks as ref.

    2. [8.11.1] Supports hundreds of AI models via Providers such as Google, OpenRouter, GitHub and locally running models via Ollama.

      Calibre supported Ollama since 8.11, for Ask AI tab in dictionary panel.

    3. New features Allow asking AI questions about any book in your calibre library. Right click the "View" button and choose "Discuss selected book(s) with AI" AI: Allow asking AI what book to read next by right clicking on a book and using the "Similar books" menu AI: Add a new backend for "LM Studio" which allows running various AI models locally

      AI features in Calibre. discuss book w C, book suggestions, and LMStudio back-end. I set up Calibre w the LM Studio back-end, so things remain loca.

      A posting elsewhere suggested it woud also suggest better metadata through AI. But that article seems generated itself, so disregarded.

    1. Het zijn markdown bestanden met een persoonlijkheid, frameworks, en output templates. Die heb ik niet zelf geschreven - ik heb Claude gevraagd om ze te maken. “Maak een Product Owner agent die goed is in prioriteren en impact/effort analyses kan doen.” Claude schrijft dan het volledige bestand, inclusief werkwijze en voorbeelden.Als ik vervolgens zeg “vraag dit aan Tessa”, laadt Claude dat bestand en wordt Tessa.

      Seems like these agent .md files contain description of a role that is then included in a prompt.

    1. In mijn werkmap heb ik een verzameling “agents” - tekstbestanden die Claude vertellen hoe hij zich moet gedragen. Tessa is er één van. Als ik haar “laad”, denkt Claude vanuit het perspectief van een product owner.

      Author has .md files that describe separate 'agents' she involves in her coding work, for each of the roles in a dev team. Would something like that work for K-work? #openvraag E.g. for project management roles, or for facets you're less fond of yourself?

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    1. Luhmann’s card structure:Front: Complete bibliographic information (author, title, publication year, etc.)Back: Page index = “Page x has this concept, page y has that argument”

      States that Luhmann's bibliographic cards had his own indexing on the back. Vgl with my own immediate annotations I keep in a book note.

    1. individuals constantly project into the world around them the interpretive frames that allow them to make sense of it; we only shift frames (or realize that we have habitually applied a frame) when incongruity calls for a frame-shift.

      Vgl brain continuously predicting/projecting, not observing out of efficiency. Predictive coding.

    2. When we want to explain an event, our understanding is often based on our interpretation (frame). If someone rapidly closes and opens an eye, we react differently based on if we interpret this as a "physical frame" (they blinked) or a "social frame" (they winked). The blink may be due to a speck of dust (resulting in an involuntary and not particularly meaningful reaction). The wink may imply a voluntary and meaningful action (to convey humor to an accomplice, for example). Observers will read events seen as purely physical or within a frame of "nature" differently from those seen as occurring with social frames

      Applying different frames yield diff interpretations. Humor often based on frame switch.

    3. Framing is an integral part of conveying and processing data daily. Successful framing techniques can be used to reduce the ambiguity of intangible topics by contextualizing the information in such a way that recipients can connect to what they already know.

      Vgl [[Social netwerk als filter 20060930194648]] , [[Chunking 20210312215715]

    1. Guardrail: Strict adherence to the Tagging Workflow. Everything defaults to #private. Only notes explicitly tagged #share pass through the publishing filter. Use clear folder structures to separate sensitive data that should never touch the publishing pipeline.

      Have this for blog posts, separate folder and explicit status for publishing. A published garden first as a separate folder of cloned notes, then as tagged for publication? Needs a 'touching' process to see diverging note/clone.

    2. Publishing is Pausing: You push a rough idea out to pause your thinking and invite external input.

      Like the phrase. Vgl [[Kunst-artefact is (tussen)uitkomst proces 20140505070232]] any artefact is a (intermediate) output of ongoing process. Vgl [[Artefacten uit kennis met methoden 20220215202011]], artefacts brought forth from K through methods.

    3. What Is a Federated Garden? A federated digital garden is a personal knowledge space that: Starts private (your vault, your chaos, your unfinished thoughts) Grows selectively public (some notes bloom into garden pages) Connects across platforms (one source → many destinations) Links bidirectionally (gardens can discover and reference each other) Key principles: Gradual disclosure: Not everything needs to be public—choose what to share Version multiplicity: A note can exist as a draft, a garden page, a newsletter piece, and a toot Decentralized ownership: You control the source, not a platform Interoperability: Uses open standards (Markdown, RSS, ActivityPub, HTML)

      The page confuses tools and content imo, but this is a workable list of attributes. 'Grows selectively public' is the key imo. #openvraag #webbeheer What can I do to improve the note to webpage pipeline I have but seldom use?

    1. Ontdek hoe wij bijdragen aan een veiliger Nederland en hoe u deel kunt uitmaken van ons team van gepassioneerde radioamateurs.Door het Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken is aan de veiligheidsregio’s geadviseerd om de dienstverlening van DARES op te nemen in de rampenplannen.

      The DARES volunteers are actively preparing for emergency situations. Veiligheidsregio's sign convenants with them.

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    1. ESP32​ The ESP32 chip is older and consumes more power than the nRF52 chip, but is equipped with both WiFi and Bluetooth. Supported ESP32 devices include:

      ESP32 MCU supports both wifi and BT. Higher power consumption though.

      In general, as this network is supposed to provide alternative comms when regular networks break down: how reliant on battery / solar powered devices is the network?

    1. 530-B HARKLE ROAD, STE 100, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA

      Meshtastic LLC is registered in Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA. That information is not contained in the meshtastic website.

      The head office address given is that of a registration agent though: New Mexico Registered Agent by High Desert Corporate Filings LLC

    1. When you send a message on your Meshtastic companion app, it is relayed to the radio using Bluetooth, Wi-Fi/Ethernet or serial connection. That message is then broadcasted by the radio. If it hasn't received a confirmation from any other device after a certain timeout, it will retransmit the message up to three times. When a receiving radio captures a packet, it checks to see if it has heard that message before. If it has it ignores the message. If it hasn't heard the message, it will rebroadcast it. For each message a radio rebroadcasts, it marks the "hop limit" down by one. When a radio receives a packet with a hop limit of zero, it will not rebroadcast the message. The radio will store a small amount of packets (around 30) in its memory for when it's not connected to a client app. If it's full, it will replace the oldest packets with newly incoming text messages only.

      You use your phone or 'companion app'(?) to send a msg to a radio (over BT, wifi or wire). The radio broadcasts incoming messages, including the one you provide through the app.

      Msgs that are not acknowledged by another radion will be send at most 3 times. (will you be able to see it has not propagated?)

      A radio that receives msgs already received will not rebroadcast it. Any broadcasted msg has a 'hop limit' and if it hits 0 it will not be rebroadcast. This limits the spread of a message, no? What is the default hop limit? Otoh the hoplimit does not limit the initial number of paths for broadcasting. So it's an attenuation over paths.

      Theoretically in a dense network, my msg may reach Y number of other radios that all start out with the same hop limit.

      I do not see here yet how you could intentionally set and reach a specific recipient. This description provides attenuated propagation of messages but no direction/addressee?

    1. Additionally, Meshtastic radios can be paired with a single phone, allowing friends and family to send messages directly to your specific radio. It's important to note that each device is capable of supporting a connection from only one user at a time.

      Any meshtastic radio can connect a single phone for receiving / sending (?) messages on. Apart from repeater function 1 single connection for actual comms input?