What needs to happen to get me a future? Something remarkable. Something utterly remarkable because it's not it's not going that way.
for - quote - future of humanity - something remarkable has to happen - Eric Weinstein
What needs to happen to get me a future? Something remarkable. Something utterly remarkable because it's not it's not going that way.
for - quote - future of humanity - something remarkable has to happen - Eric Weinstein
Mid-November Update by [[Dan Allosso]]
But Wanberg sees no contradiction in fighting gadgets with gadgets. “Can you sit down for three hours and just think about one thing deeply?” he asked me. “Because I can’t. And this device helps me.”
This feels like it relates to the ideas of extending self-consciousness in dialogue and dialectic from the other day: https://hyp.is/bBIVHmFPEeyvFMtzXQYYWA/docdrop.org/video/EvUzdJSK4x8/
Is being in dialogue with oneself via their writing or notes an innovation that has moved humanity forward.
In other words, once you've used Maybe you cannot hit nil with a missing method. This is remarkable because even &. doesn't save you from omitting || "No state" at the end of the computation. Basically, that's what they call "Type Safety".
Coming full circle...
Here is my effort to be more hands-on with my annotation.
Digital Writing
Is the phrase "digital writing" as fraught as "digital native"? Or has it morphed into just plain writing? I still find myself bridging the gap analog -digital gap. For example, a summer goal is to make annotation of pdf's as close to paper as I can. I invested in a reMarkable tablet to make this happen. Do I consider it "digital writing"--yes and no. It is the merging of digital and analog. I do it so as to have less friction and quicker feedback with students. None of this matters if students can't take in the feedback or if my feedback sucks, but that is another pedagogic and compositional concern.