- Jan 2024
-
greattransition.org greattransition.org
-
The second thing we are missing is our need to grow beyond our predominantly postmodern worldview
for - key insight - polycrisis - solving - postmodernism alone if insufficient
definition - postmodernism - worldview that champions decentralization, diversity, leaderless coalitions, horizontal networks, etc., etc. author: John Bunzl
claim - post modernism alone is no match for the dynamics of hierarchical Destructive Global Capitalism (DGC) - unity of required amongst the fragmented postmodern movements
-
- Nov 2023
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
you have to pay for auto caption in davinci resolve so if you're willing to spend the 300 bucks fine if you're not and you want and you need and you absolutely love to do auto caption for free cap cut it is
OK, super important: free version of DaVinci Resolve doesn't offer auto captioning. Confirmed by a second source.
-
trying to edit a super small video a short actually on DaVinci Resolve and I cannot do anything anything it's like the weirdest thing uh so I guess there is a super uh deep learning curve to start using this software
CapCut剪映又多了一票
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
on the traditional empiricist account we do not have direct access to the facts of the external world 00:11:03 that is we do not experience externality directly but only immediately not immediately but immediately because between us and the external world are those what do you call them oh yes 00:11:18 sense organs and so the question is how faithfully they report what is going on out there well to raise the question how faithful is the sensory report 00:11:30 of the external world is to assume that you have some reliable non-sensory way of answering that question that's the box you can't get out of and so there is always this gap 00:11:42 between reality as it might possibly be known by some non-human creature and reality as empirically sampled by the senses whose limitations and distortions are very well 00:11:56 known but not perfectly classified or categorized or or measured
-
for: good explanation: empiricism, empiricism - knowledge gap, quote, quote - Dan Robinson, quote - philosophy, quote - empiricism - knowledge gap, Critique of Pure Reason - goal 1 - address empiricism and knowledge gap
-
good explanation : empiricism - knowledge gap
-
quote
- on the traditional empiricist account
- we do not have direct access to the facts of the external world
- that is we do not experience externality directly but only MEDIATELY, not immediately but MEDIATELY
- because between us and the external world are those what do you call them oh yes, sense organs
- and so the question is how faithfully they report what is going on out there
- To raise the question how faithful is the sensory report of the external world
- is to assume that you have some reliable non-sensory way of answering that question
- That's the box you can't get out of and so there is always this gap between
- reality as it might possibly be known by some non-human creature and
- reality as empirically sampled by the senses
- whose limitations and distortions are very well
known
- but not perfectly classified or categorized or or measured
- whose limitations and distortions are very well
known
- on the traditional empiricist account
-
Comment
- Robinson contextualizes the empiricist project and gap thereof, as one of the 4 goals of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.
- Robinson informally calls this the "Locke" problem, after one of the founders of the Empiricist school, John Locke.
- Robinson also alludes to a Thomas Reed approach to realism that contends that we don't experience reality MEDIATELY, but IMMEDIATELY, thereby eliminating the gap problem altogether.
- It's interesting to see how modern biology views the empericist's knowledge gap, especially form the perspective of the Umwelt and Sensory Ecology
-
Tags
- The Locke problem
- Thomas Reed
- quote - Ben Robinson
- good explanation
- quote
- quote - empiricism - knowledge gap
- John Locke - empiricism
- Critique of Pure Reason - empiricism knowledge gap
- good explanation - empiricism
- Critique of Pure Reason - goal - resolve empiricism and its knowledge gap
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
BTW, the modules used to be called moduleDirectories in previous versions.
-
The resolving process is basically simple and distinguishes between three variants: absolute path: require("/home/me/file") relative path: require("../src/file") or require("./file") module path: require("module/lib/file")
Very important distinction
-
In contrast to import (which handles 1+2 pretty much the same way, but would send you looking in node_modules right away) path 'module' indeed means your project root for paths without a need to resolve, like output.path in your webpack config... and: (on resolving) Only 3 is subject to resolve.root and resolve.moduleDirectories resolving, see webpack docs here
-
The problem is that by default, module paths only work with things imported via npm because the new modules variable on resolve defaults to ["node_modules"]. This lets you import 3rd party code from npm really easily. But it means importing your code with a module path needs a config change.
-
-
webpack.js.org webpack.js.orgConcepts1
-
When enabled, symlinked resources are resolved to their real path, not their symlinked location. Note that this may cause module resolution to fail when using tools that symlink packages (like npm link)
-
-
gist.github.com gist.github.com
-
resolve: { extensions: ['.jsx', '.js'], modules: [ path.resolve(__dirname, 'src'), 'node_modules' ] },
-
There was a major refactoring in the resolver (https://github.com/webpack/enhanced-resolve). This means the resolving option were changed too. Mostly simplification and changes that make it more unlikely to configure it incorrectly.
Linked from: https://stackoverflow.com/a/36574982/47185
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
For future reference, webpack 2 removed everything but modules as a way to resolve paths. This means root will not work.
-
- Oct 2020
-
final-form.org final-form.org
-
Returns a Promise<?Object> that resolves with no value on success or resolves with an Object of submission errors on failure. The reason it resolves with errors is to leave rejection for when there is a server or communications error.
-
- Nov 2016
-
ionicframework.com ionicframework.com
-
Note: We do not recommend using resolve of AngularUI Router. The recommended approach is to execute any logic needed before beginning the state transition.
Re: APOD, note that Ionic doesn't recommend the use of resolve. This is the best argument not to!
-
- Dec 2015
-
dl.dropboxusercontent.com dl.dropboxusercontent.com
-
Roassal maps objects and connections to graphical elements and edges. In additions, values and metrics are represented in visual dimentions (e.g., width, height, intensity of graphical elements). Such mapping is an expressive way to build flexible and rich visualization. This chapter gives an overview of Roassal and its main API. It covers the essential concepts of Roassal, such as the view, elements, shapes, and interactions.
I would try a less technical introduction to combine with this one. How about:
When we're building a visualization, we want the properties of the objects in our domain to be expressed graphically, by shapes, connections and visual dimensions like width, height, intensity of graphical elements. Roassal builds such mappings as an expressive way to build flexible and rich visualizations.
-
-
dl.dropboxusercontent.com dl.dropboxusercontent.com
-
Once a Roassal element has been created, modifying its shape should not result in an update of the element.
This part should be clarified. Could a further example be referenced?
-
c := TRCanvas new. shape := TRBoxShape new size: 40. c addShape: shape. shape when: TRMouseClick do: [ :event | event shape remove. c signalUpdate ]. c
I get this error
MessageNotUnderstood: TRMouseLeftClick>>myCircle
for this similar code:| canvas myCircle data | canvas := TRCanvas new. myCircle := TREllipseShape new size: 100; color: Color white. data := #('lion-o' 'panthro' 'tigro' 'chitara' 'munra' 'ozimandias' 'Dr Manhatan'). canvas addShape: myCircle. myCircle when: TRMouseClick do: [:event | event myCircle remove. canvas signalUpdate ]. canvas
If I change
myCircle
withshape
it works fine, but I wouldn't imagine that variable names could be so picky. Generic names should work (circle
doesn't work neither).
-