Above: the time to do a production bundle
Nice way to demonstrate and let people feel how slow the competition is!
16 Matching Annotations
- Apr 2025
-
esbuild.github.io esbuild.github.io
-
- Sep 2024
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Free/Open Licenses Non-free Licenses
.
-
- May 2024
-
meta.stackexchange.com meta.stackexchange.com
-
We contributed free work to the company because the content is under a CC BY-SA license. It is fine to make money off our content as long as they adhere to the license. This forbids selling the content to OpenAI, though, since they do not provide attribution or release their derivative works under a compatible license.
-
- Jan 2023
-
ieeexplore.ieee.org ieeexplore.ieee.org
-
Possibly this one https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/VISSOFT55257.2022.00009
-
- Jun 2021
-
oeidsanders.pressbooks.com oeidsanders.pressbooks.com
-
Attribution
Providing attribution for source material
-
- Feb 2021
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
"Open access" refers to toll-free or gratis access to content
not necessarily free content
-
-
opentextbooks.concordia.ca opentextbooks.concordia.ca
- May 2020
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
The goal of the W3C Semantic Web Education and Outreach group's Linking Open Data community project is to extend the Web with a data commons by publishing various open datasets as RDF on the Web and by setting RDF links between data items from different data sources.
-
- Sep 2019
-
github.com github.com
- Nov 2017
-
opensource.com opensource.com
-
The H5P format is open and the tools for creating H5P content are open source. This guarantees that creatives own their own content and are not locked into the fate and licensing regime of a specific tool. Read more about how H5P ensures that the content remains yours in our blog.
-
- Jul 2016
-
medium.com medium.com
-
The majority of content comes from Western, developed countries
-
- Dec 2015
-
mfeldstein.com mfeldstein.com
-
Support for Creative Commons
-
content (or “learning resources”)
Some might argue that the problem with OERs and Open Content is this same focus on content.
-
-
-
user-generated content
Continuity with Web 2.0, emphasis on content. Though the coalition is forward-looking, there’s something of a timestamp on this wording.
-
-
www.meanboyfriend.com www.meanboyfriend.com
-
Anyone can say Anything
The “Open World Assumption” is central to this post and to the actual shift in paradigm when it comes to moving from documents to data. People/institutions have an alleged interest in protecting the way their assets are described. Even libraries. The Open World Assumption makes it sound quite chaotic, to some ears. And claims that machine learning will solve everything tend not to help the unconvinced too much. Something to note is that this ability to say something about a third party’s resource connects really well with Web annotations (which do more than “add metadata” to those resources) and with the fact that no-cost access to some item of content isn’t the end of the openness.
-
- Nov 2015
-
opencontent.org opencontent.org
-
Defining the "Open" in Open Content
Tags
Annotators
URL
-