- Nov 2024
-
www.mortati.com www.mortati.com
-
austinkleon.com austinkleon.com
-
He even kept “indexes to indexes,” as Robert D. Richardson describes in his wonderful biography, Emerson: The Mind on Fire: Indexing was a crucial method for Emerson because it allowed him to write first and organize later and because it gave him easy access to the enormous mass of specific materials in his ever-increasing pile of notebooks… Emerson spent a good deal of time methodically copying and recopying journal material, indexing, alphabetizing indexes, and eventually making indexes of indexes. When he came to write a lecture, he would work through his indexes, making a list of possible passages. He then assembled, ordered, and reordered these into the talk or lecture.
-
Ralph Waldo Emerson, the man who encouraged his friend Thoreau to start a journal and the man who had the most success with the journal > lecture > essay > book method, kept elaborate notebooks just for indexing his other notebooks.
-
Emerson’s creative process is so fascinating, Richardson wrote a wonderful slim volume about it, called First We Read, Then We Write.
This might be fruitful to read.
-
-
billyoppenheimer.com billyoppenheimer.com
-
“There is then creative reading as well as creative writing,” Emerson said. “The discerning will read…only the authentic utterances of the oracle—all the rest he rejects.”
-
Emerson is, “I cannot remember the books I’ve read any more than the meals I have eaten; even so, they have made me.”
source?
-
Emerson liked to identify four classes of readers: the hourglass, the sponge, the jelly-bag, and the Golconda. The hourglass takes nothing in. The sponge holds on to nothing but a little dirt and sediment. The jelly-bag doesn’t recognize good stuff, but holds on to worthless stuff. And the Golconda (a rich mine) keeps only the pure gems.
Where is the origin of this reading analogy?
-
-
www.vox.com www.vox.com
-
Its roots, though, don’t just lie in explicitly Christian tradition. In fact, it’s possible to trace the origins of the American prosperity gospel to the tradition of New Thought, a nineteenth-century spiritual movement popular with decidedly unorthodox thinkers like Ralph Waldo Emerson and William James. Practitioners of New Thought, not all of whom identified as Christian, generally held the divinity of the individual human being and the priority of mind over matter. In other words, if you could correctly channel your mental energy, you could harness its material results. New Thought, also known as the “mind cure,” took many forms: from interest in the occult to splinter-Christian denominations like Christian Science to the development of the “talking cure” at the root of psychotherapy. The upshot of New Thought, though, was the quintessentially American idea that the individual was responsible for his or her own happiness, health, and situation in life, and that applying mental energy in the appropriate direction was sufficient to cure any ills.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Class 2, Does Memory Matter? Why Are Universities Studying Slavery and Their Pasts? by David Blight for [[YaleCourses]]
Tags
- William James
- Charan Ranganath
- Pierre Nora
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
- invisible hand
- Paul Conkin
- zettelkasten examples
- Yale University history
- The Republic
- memory and history
- Andrew Jackson
- System 1 vs. System 2
- watch
- Avishai Margalit
- neuroscience of memory
- memory palaces
- Glaucon
- Daniel Kahneman
- information overload
- slavery
- memory vs. history
- David Blight
- Benjamin Silliman
- Mark Twain
- storytelling
- hard histories
- memory boom
- Paul Conkin's zettelkasten
- David Hume
- DeVane Lecture 2024
- Lieu de mémoire
- Augustine
- Robert McKee
Annotators
URL
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Surprisingly, the American author who is quoted most in the OED isnot Mark Twain or Emily Dickinson or Edgar Allan Poe, but rather EdwardH. Knight, a patent lawyer and expert in mechanics who wrote the AmericanMechanical Dictionary and The Practical Dictionary of Mechanics. Knight isthe seventy-fourth-most cited author in the Dictionary, quoted morefrequently than Percy Bysshe Shelley, George Eliot or Ralph Waldo Emerson(who comes in at 116, the next-most quoted American).
-
-
www.dalekeiger.net www.dalekeiger.net
-
Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, “Great genial power, one would almost say, consists in not being original at all; in being altogether receptive; in letting the world do all, and suffering the spirit of the hour to pass unobstructed through the mind.”
original source?
-
-
www.azquotes.com www.azquotes.com
-
A system-grinder hates the truth. Ralph Waldo Emerson
Ralph Waldo Emerson, Stephen E. Whicher (1959). “The Early Lectures of Ralph Waldo Emerson”, p.327, Harvard University Press
via https://www.azquotes.com/author/4490-Ralph_Waldo_Emerson/tag/hate
-
- Aug 2022
-
elyseahahne.com elyseahahne.com
-
consistent
In order to be professional and trusted, teacher need be reliable, but like Emerson said, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of a small mind."
-
-
www.historytoday.com www.historytoday.com
-
Archived version here: https://web.archive.org/web/20130825044646/http://www.historytoday.com/frank-prochaska/mills-and-emerson-sense-and-nonsense
<small><cite class='h-cite via'>ᔥ <span class='p-author h-card'>Ryan Holiday</span> in How And Why To Keep A “Commonplace Book” | Thought Catalog (<time class='dt-published'>08/05/2022 10:19:13</time>)</cite></small>
-
- Aug 2021
-
engl252fa21s6.commons.gc.cuny.edu engl252fa21s6.commons.gc.cuny.edu
-
OUR age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchres of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and criticism
What is the contrast in generations RWE sets up here? What is the problem with his generation in the middle of the 19th century?
-
He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its forms and tendencies, describing its own design.
What is implied about how we know what we know here? What might be some problems with this argument?
-
Nature, in the common sense, refers to essences unchanged by man; space, the air, the river, the leaf.
How does Emerson define "nature" and how does his definition differ from traditional definitions?
-
There is a property in the horizon
Who owns the landscape, according to Emerson? How does this ownership work, and how does it differ from traditional ideas of property and ownership?
-
Standing on the bare ground
What happens to Emerson as he stands on this "bare ground"? What does he gain and what does he lose in this moment? What are some of the anxieties that lurk in this passage beneath the celebratory tone?
-
- Sep 2020
-
indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu
-
I am merely a fragment of the Great Soul that surges within the boundaries
Note how Emerson's "transparent eyeball" slips in through the back door here as Zora becomes "cosmic." Very interesting to think that the ecstatic mode that she enters via jazz opens up the kind of transcendence that Emerson derives from nature, from the "bare common."
-
- Aug 2020
-
-
Universal Institutions of Humanity
Contextualize: This passage is from a piece written (separate from but in reference) to reading the Epic of Gilgamesh. The work alludes to Gilgamesh's understanding of human fear of death puts fear into categories of institutions (generally religious tradition) that divides the order of man from nature itself. These traditions historically have either held a greater distance from the outer natural world or have centered around and incorporated it (indigenous peoples).
Relate: Willemien Otten, in her book, 'Thinking Nature and the Nature of Thinking', approaches the division between nature and the institutions of man from a religious perspective, focusing mostly on the boundary of divinity written about in this passage (matrimony and burial as a part of a larger Divinity). She writes that religion has always "had trouble finding a proper role for nature" (therefore dividing it from human condition). She writes "...it seemed, as the order of nature, could only survive by repressing its more animal-like instinctual impulses. Otten describes human order as repressing nature, religion (Christianity) specifically, sought to tame nature in Genesis's divine imposition. Otten then states that in her more theophanic alternative view, nature will emerge not as rival to creation but as an anchor for it. Otten alludes to philospher, Eriugena's understanding of nature, describing 'natura' as dynamic and flexible- whereas, before, orthodox understanding of Divinity positioned God's providence over the spatiotemporal creation in which human history exists. In his work, Periphyseon, Eriugena gives emphasis enough to nature that it develops towards the divine, softening boundary between man and the natural.
Eriugena seems to make the natural world into a more mental concept that allows man to incorporate it into religion (including matrimony and burial). This does not necessarily oppose the boundary between nature and man within Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh talks about the human condition as it is (all within the mind) and therefore either encourages relationship between man and earth or encourages a more fearful mindset.
Though conceptualizing nature allows for destruction or neglect on beings that are not human, human ability to wrap one's mind around a force that is otherwise intimidating in actuality, may allow for coexistence despite the boundary.
Otten later references Emerson's thought of nature is more so use of nature in human psychology to dissect the human soul.
Otten, Willemien. Thinking Nature and the Nature of Thinking: From Eriugena to Emerson. Cultural Memory in the Present, 2020.
-
- Feb 2019
-
indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu
-
The cosmic Zora emerges. I belong to no race nor time. I am the eternal feminine with its string of beads.
Surprising echo of Emerson's "Nature" here, no?
-
- Jan 2019
-
indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu indivisible.commons.gc.cuny.edu
-
Standing on the bare ground
What happens to Emerson as he stands on this "bare ground"? What does he gain and what does he lose in this moment? What are some of the anxieties that lurk in this passage beneath the celebratory tone?
-
There is a property in the horizon which no man has but he whose eye can integrate all the parts, that is, the poet. This is the best part of these men’s farms, yet to this their warranty-deeds give no title.
Who owns the landscape, according to Emerson? How does this ownership work, and how does it differ from traditional ideas of property and ownership?
-
Nature, in the common sense, refers to essences unchanged by man; space, the air, the river, the leaf. Art is applied to the mixture of his will with the same things, as in a house, a canal, a statue, a picture. But his operations taken together are so insignificant, a little chipping, baking, patching, and washing, that in an impression so grand as that of the world on the human mind, they do not vary the result.
How does Emerson define "nature" and how does his definition differ from traditional definitions?
-
He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its forms and tendencies, describing its own design.
What is implied about how we know what we know here? What might be some problems with this argument?
-
OUR age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchres of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and criticism. The foregoing generations beheld God and nature face to face; we, through their eyes. Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe?
What is the contrast in generations RWE sets up here? What is the problem with his generation in the middle of the 19th century?
-
- Apr 2017
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
AndTaylornowtellsus:writingishaunted,foritiscomprisedofthe"spectralinterplayofparasitesandhosts"(196).Writingandlanguage-as-house-of-beingtherebyhaveincommonthesespectersandtheirhaunts.
“I am not solitary whilst I read and write, though nobody is with me” -Emerson, Nature
-
- Feb 2017
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
scheme:
This chart reminds me of Emerson's semiotic triads. Very structured, rigid, mathematical.
-