4 Matching Annotations
- Apr 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Fraser Myers. (2020, October 10). Google is censoring The Great Barrington Declaration. When you search for it you’re directed to a conspiracy theory from Byline Times https://t.co/OUVBeFi4Mr [Tweet]. @FraserMyers. https://twitter.com/FraserMyers/status/1314874791745277953
-
- Apr 2020
-
www.pnas.org www.pnas.org
-
Herz, N., Dan, O., Censor, N., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2020). Opinion: Authors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6282–6285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003500117
-
- Jun 2016
-
neurodojo.blogspot.com neurodojo.blogspot.com
-
The PDF of the paper gives a bit of a clue as to what’s going one. The author list is more modest on the title page, which lists the authors as, “Wilson Leung and Participating Students and Faculty of the Genomics Education Partnership.” So a lot of these authors are students who took a class, and probably completed part of the analysis as a course assignment.
difference between byline and authors: byline (like in HEP), lists collaborations
-
-
Local file Local file
-
what is implied by a byline in thesecases is typically a very precise, often specialized input to acomplex, multidisciplinary project. The classical idea ofauthorship cannot credibly accommodate the legions ofcoworkers associated with large-scale collaboration, nor canit adequately reflect “the epistemic role of support person-nel” in the conduct of science (Shapin, 1995, p. 359).
inadequacy of the byline to capture distinctions
-