(9 years later:)Both provided answers would fail on files without a newline at the end, this will effectively skip the last line, produce no errors, would lead to disaster (learned hard way:).

Did you really need to bump/hijack a 8 year old post?

And... next time create your own topic, this only illustrates your laziness!

Guys, I'm sorry to revive an old discussion, and if there's a new one, point me to it please.

Hi Vic, I know this post is old but was hoping to get some help here.

This thread is more than 5 months old. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though. I am aware that this thread is rather old but I still want to make a reply.

Reopening #162

I realize the question was asked 9 years ago, but this question is (still) ranked highly in search results and I came across it today

I realise this is old, but as it isn’t a forum i see no problem in replying

No worries, I was just thinking that this issue should probably get necro'd back to open.

Thank you. I appreciate your reply after all this time.

I know you acknowledged your response was late and you're just trying to help but please don't resurrect very old threads.

Is there a reason not to do caused-by stack trace printing? Or has it just not been implemented by anyone yet?

7 years after this question, I believe the correct answer is

I realize I'm 6 years late to this party, but