10 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2025
    1. Is Fast Charging Killing the Battery? A 2-Year Test on 40 Phones
      • Experiment Methodology: Researchers tested 40 phones over two years, completing 500 charge-discharge cycles using custom automation tools to compare the effects of different charging habits [00:01:11].
      • Fast Charging vs. Slow Charging: The study found that fast charging does not significantly harm battery health. After 500 cycles, the fast-charging iPhone group lost only 0.5% more capacity than the slow-charging group, while fast-charging Android phones actually showed slightly less wear than the slow-charging group [00:03:03].
      • The 30-80% Charging Habit: Maintaining a battery level between 30% and 80% reduced wear by 2.5% to 4% compared to full 0-100% cycles. While technically better, the researchers suggested the real-world benefit is limited compared to the effort [00:03:27].
      • Long-term Stability: Storing phones at 100% charge for a week showed no measurable change in capacity, reinforcing that battery degradation is a gradual, long-term process [00:04:13].
      • Battery Replacement Guidelines: Battery life begins to noticeably shorten when health drops to 85%, and the researchers recommend replacement when health reaches 80% to maintain a good user experience [00:05:01].
      • Performance & Throttling: Battery wear does not inherently slow down the phone's peak performance, but degraded batteries cause the system to throttle (slow down) earlier at low charge levels (e.g., at 11% instead of 5%) to prevent power failure [00:05:38].
      • Conclusion: The technical differences in battery wear from various charging methods are minimal. The best approach is to charge your phone conveniently and avoid trading "mental energy" for negligible battery gains [00:04:20].
    1. Now compare that for instance with another kind of biologically built structure where we're getting comparable amounts of morphological change of morphos species or technos species uh uh you know which have developed just over a few decades

      for - stats - speed - cultural (technological) evolution - cell phone - 35 years to touchscreen phones - comparison - speed of cultural vs biological evolution - progress trap

  2. Oct 2024
  3. Aug 2024
  4. Mar 2023
    1. Zo wordt erop gewezen dat wij een zeer beperkt werkgeheugen hebben, het belang van aandacht, en dat “multitasking” (eigenlijk schakelen tussen taken) door leerlingen interfereert met aandachtig luisteren en het functioneren van het werkgeheugen. Andere uitkomsten zijn dat ook kinderen die zelf niet bezig zijn met mobieltje of laptop last hebben van klasgenoten die dat wel doen (trekt de aandacht). Een verschijnsel dat vergelijkbaar is met gedwongen meeroken.
  5. Dec 2022
  6. Sep 2018
    1. We’ve got lots of telephones already. Can’t you think of anything else for your birthday? Something very special?

      This part of the dialogue creates a good view of how consumerism will be just as prominent as today if not more. when he says we've got a lot of telephones, it might suggest that they are extremely reliant on technology so in a sense the movie had correctly predicted our current addiction and reliance on mobile phones.

  7. Aug 2018
  8. Jan 2017
  9. Oct 2015
    1. More to the point, in situations of breakdown, whether epic or mundane, the humble mobile phone has extended the city's interactivity and adaptability in all kinds of ways and may well have been the most significant device to add to a city's overall resilience by adding an extra thread to the urban knot

      Technology is tying cities together, making them stronger, quicker to adapt to changes, and more able to respond to threats.