Ubuntu powers millions of PCs and laptops around the world.
这是一个模糊的数量描述,'millions'没有提供具体数字,无法确定Ubuntu的确切用户规模。相比其他Linux发行版如Red Hat或SUSE,Ubuntu确实拥有更广泛的桌面用户基础,但缺乏精确的市场份额数据支持这一说法。
Ubuntu powers millions of PCs and laptops around the world.
这是一个模糊的数量描述,'millions'没有提供具体数字,无法确定Ubuntu的确切用户规模。相比其他Linux发行版如Red Hat或SUSE,Ubuntu确实拥有更广泛的桌面用户基础,但缺乏精确的市场份额数据支持这一说法。
I'd weakly guess that it doesn't get them all the way to covering a 10x compute gap — probably it narrows the gap several times.
【结论的不可证伪性】全文的核心结论是「蒸馏+溢出大概能弥补几倍差距,但不够弥补十倍」——但「几倍」是多少?「不够十倍」的边界在哪里?这些关键数字完全是定性猜测,无法被任何数据证伪。当一个研究机构的分析结论以「weakly guess」「probably」构成时,它的政策价值和决策参考价值极为有限,却容易被媒体引用为「研究显示」。
Joe Wood keeps a 'vague' list of tasks that are equally important as other more tangible tasks but lack clarity about what steps to take. He added this within his GTD implementation. Interesting, as I notice I tend to put off important things when I don't have a clear path to execution yet (and the next action would be to think about those steps). I also think such vague actions may actually not be actions but projects lacking definition. It makes beginning harder, and keeping a vague list might help address it. I think I might use it as a tag in tasks, not as a separate list.
SO MOVED! This is a common statement which means nothing. One must state the actual motion so as to avoid confusion in the audience. Everyone has the right to know exactly what is being moved and discussed. "So moved!" is vague and pointless. Do not allow your club members to be vague and pointless.
less secure sign-in technology
What does that mean exactly?
All of a sudden my Rails app's attempts to send via SMTP started getting rejected until I enabled "Less secure app access". It would be nice if I knew what was necessary to make the access considered "secure".
Update: Newer information added to this article (as well as elsewhere) leads me to believe that it is specifically sending password directly as authentication mechanism which was/is no longer permitted.
This is the note that has since been added on this page, which clarifies this point:
To help keep your account secure, from May 30, 2022, Google no longer supports the use of third-party apps or devices which ask you to sign in to your Google Account using only your username and password.
Due to specific circumstances, there may be some devices that are incompatible even if they meet the specification requirements above.
Citing the work of a number of prominent scholars on the style of kwela she states, “Academics who have written about kwela have been no more precise, or more in agreement with one another, about the boundaries of this musical style” (Allen 1993, 58).
lso, really look closely into SignalR, as the Android and iOS clients aren't... uhm... great
For compliance reasons, you will not be able to see contacts who submit spam complaints in your exclusion list. We do not offer the ability to export a list of spam complaints from FBLs at the moment. This is also for compliance.
"For compliance reasons". That's pretty vague. Compliance with what?
The campaign against her has employed tactics that can only be described as bullying.
"The campaign" is significantly ambiguous. There was a student protest movement. There are also a number of critics of Stock. These are not all one thing.
"can only be described as bullying" is also extremely problematic. First, it is unscholarly. In a discussion of academic freedom and related notions of freedom of speech, it is vital to be precise about actions which are merely unpleasant (e.g., refuting counterspeech), aggressive but still legitimate, individually bullying (e.g., a threat), and individually not-bullying but collectively so (e.g., a hostile environment). It's also important to distinguish responsibilities. If lots of people oppose you independently but vigorously, that might have the net effect of a hostile environment with none of the opposers being required to cease their opposition. (The employers might have some obligations to mitigate, of course.)
something something Redbean and Justine Tunney
One workspace.platform.source of truth.Endless solutions.Orchestrate powerful business solutions with a single source of truth. The only limit is your imagination.
Leising, D., Grenke, O., & Cramer, M. (2021). Visual Argument Structure Tool (VAST). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dvfq7
Going through different search systems brings us some fruits in the form of indistinct mumbling about the untimely closed I/O data streams, TTYs and PTYs (pseudoterminals) and all the rest of it.
If eye movement were consciously controlled, the dreamer’s eyes could become a vehicle for getting a message to the waking world.
iirc this is relatively old news, the more novel bit is being able to communicate with sleeping people
How about renaming this to something more meaningful:
vague
The word 'vague' seems to repeat quite a lot in descriptions of Constantia's gestures and behaviors. She reminds me of Laura from the Garden Party, having her own inner world nobody knows of. But she's more reserved and reticent, which might stem from her insecurity and dependence on her older sister's views.
"doesn't work" is meaningless
Planet Earth
Free data-driven attribution model Use Google’s advanced machine learning to more accurately distribute credit to all ad clicks that led to a conversion
In other words, "just trust us" to magically figure it all out.
I'd trust you more if you explained more about how do it. Maybe if I clicked "Learn more"?
monitor such users’ behavior taking place in the EU.
Like #2, vague descriptors like "often" raise questions in buyers’ minds. Always be as specific as possible -- "40% of our customer base," or "Almost every prospect in your industry I’ve spoken with in the last quarter", for example.
Finally, a collaboration tool that gives you full context
Collaborate where your work happens, not the other way around
It's so frustrating how grey this all is at the moment - I'd imagine most sites still wont be compliant come May 25th.
Had a read through a few of the linked articles above... Wow. Messy, headache inducing stuff, and still so much vagueness.
the national history
"the" has nothing to reference here. Since it is factually inaccurate that there is only one nation on Earth, despite what may be the author's wish to the contrary, "the" should be replaced with the subject, "DPRK" or similar.
Rhetoric is the counterpart of Dialectic. Both alike are concerned with such things as come, more or less, within the general ken of all men and belong to no definite science. Accordingly all men make use, more or less, of both; for to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves and to attack others. Ordinary people do this either at random or through practice and from acquired habit. Both ways being possible, the subject can plainly be handled systematically, for it is possible to inquire the reason why some speakers succeed through practice and others spontaneously; and every one will at once agree that such an inquiry is the function of an art.
All I could think of was Crow's one liner from the Cave Dweller's Episode: Could you be a little more vague, please?