more natural choice. The local and dynamic nature of the transition ap-proach provides an unprecedented view on the open future, on whichfuture truth, contingency, and stability come apart.
- Last 7 days
-
-
-
The transition semantics is deeply rooted in the picture of a dynamicactuality. Possible courses of events are modeled by chains of transi-tions, which can be extended toward the future. In the absence of anoverarching actuality which comprises an actual future, there is no needto conceive of possibilities as histories. In fact, transitions seem to be the
-
2596-4372
-
978-87-7210-265-8
-
-
-
-
2596-4372
-
978-87-7210-008-1
-
-
-
-
-
978-87-7210-008-1
-
-
-
-
978-87-7210-265-8
-
-
hypothes.is hypothes.is
-
xd
-
n account using the sidebar on the
Esto es x
-
-
criticaltheoryinberlin.de criticaltheoryinberlin.de
-
Clip 4
click moment: suddenly was, looked different
but given an opportunity to act on that
act on the world differently
act in the world differently
act in relations to others differently
that's the heart and soul of movement work
finding new ways of relating to each other and building on that,
building that into something where it's very broad and collective
and then you can press forward together
-
eine Gesellschaftstheorie, die in der Lage ist, dynamische Systeme zu erfassen
-
gesellschaftliche Stabilität und radikalen gesellschaftlichen Wandel
s.a. auch die Diskussion über Produranz (Produrance)
-
Hinzu kommt, dass Akteur:innen von den sozialen Systemen geprägt werden, in die sie eingebunden sind. Wir „passen“ uns in die Nischen gesellschaftlicher Strukturen ein, indem wir die Regeln verinnerlichen, die für unsere jeweiligen gesellschaftlichen Positionen entscheidend sind – es ist eben unvermeidlich, dass wir uns zu den herrschenden Bedingungen mit anderen koordinieren. Sich auch nur vorzustellen, aus dem System auszubrechen oder es maßgeblich zu beeinflussen und zu verändern, ist deshalb nicht einfach.
-
vieles von dem, was passiert, wurde weder zuvor entworfen noch war es gewollt
-
Videos
- 01:41:50
- 01:49:43
- 01:49:20
-
Auf welcher Grundlage nehmen wir auf jene gesellschaftlichen Systeme Einfluss, die Koordination ermöglichen – vor allem, wenn deren Störung zunächst eine Verschlechterung bewirkt, bevor es besser wird?
Siehe auch die Graphik, dort …
-
Clip 3
-
Tags
- Frage
- Practices
- Regeln
- Koordination
- System
- dynamische Systeme
- gesellschaftliche Strukturen
- Social Change
- Kontingenz
- Akteure
- Lectures
- Complexity
- Sally Haslinger
- Gesellschaftstheorie
- Dynamics
- einbinden
- Soziale Systeme
- Possibility
- produrance
- Social Relations
- Structure
- Positionalität
- einpassen
- Change
- video
- Bedingungen
Annotators
URL
-
-
dalii9zmprfjw7.archive.is dalii9zmprfjw7.archive.is
-
-
Institutionalisierung von Auseinandersetzungen
-
In seiner Ablehnung des Nationalen war Habermas auch ein herausragender Vertreter der westdeutschen Linken; seine Skepsis gegenüber der Vereinigung 1989/90 hatte mit seiner Skepsis gegen das von ihm befürchtete Erstarken des nationalen Fühlens in Deutschland zu tun.
-
-
www.telstra.com.au www.telstra.com.au
-
Christmas Sale
Don't fall for their spin. They are the worst company ever!
-
-
airecalefaccionprov1.blog.fc2.com airecalefaccionprov1.blog.fc2.com
-
🔥 ¡Ahorra hasta un 30% en tu factura de gas en Valencia! 🔥 Descubre las mejores calderas de gas de alta eficiencia para 2026, adaptadas al clima de Valencia. 🌡️💧 ✔️ Tecnología de condensación ✔️ Diseño optimizado para el clima y agua local ✔️ Instalación y servicio especializado
🌱 Ahorra energía y prepárate para 2026. Más info aquí: Guía completa
-
-
viewer.athenadocs.nl viewer.athenadocs.nl
-
Voortzetting
Wilsovereenstemming van de werknemer.
-
-
garnaudov.com garnaudov.com
-
How I think about Kubernetes
- Kubernetes functions as a runtime for declarative infrastructure with a type system, rather than just a container orchestrator.
- Users declare desired state via manifests; the system continuously reconciles actual state to match intent through a cycle: declare → persist → reconcile → place → execute.
- Kubernetes provides a type system with resource kinds like Pod, Deployment, Service—each with strict definitions, semantics, and behaviors; CRDs extend this by defining custom types.
- API server validates and persists declarations as durable state; controllers watch for changes, compare spec (desired) vs. status (observed), and act to converge them.
- Continuous reconciliation prevents drift: manual changes get reverted if they conflict with declared intent.
- GitOps integrates naturally—Git holds source of truth, GitOps controller reconciles cluster state to Git, treating
kubectlas a debugging tool for managed resources. - Practical advice: change desired state not symptoms, let reconciliation handle work, make ownership explicit, use the type system properly.
-
-
nesbitt.io nesbitt.io
-
How uv got so fast
- uv installs Python packages 10x faster than pip due to design decisions beyond just being written in Rust.
- Key standards like PEP 518 (pyproject.toml), PEP 517, PEP 621, and PEP 658 enabled static metadata parsing without executing untrusted code.
- uv drops legacy support: no .egg files, no pip.conf, no default bytecode compilation, requires virtual environments, stricter spec enforcement, ignores upper Python bounds, first-index wins.
- Non-Rust optimizations include HTTP range requests for metadata, parallel downloads, global cache with hardlinks, Python-free resolution, and PubGrub resolver.
- Rust-specific advantages: zero-copy deserialization, lock-free data structures, no interpreter startup, compact version representation.
- Lesson: Speed comes from modern standards, dropping legacy features, and fresh assumptions rather than language alone.
Hacker News Discussion
- Users praise uv's speed and discuss its impact on Python workflows, with many switching from pip.
- Debate on Rust's role: some credit architectural choices over language, others highlight zero-copy and concurrency benefits.
- Questions about compatibility gaps like missing pip.conf and .egg support, but most see them as acceptable trade-offs.
- Comparisons to Cargo and npm emphasize Python's late adoption of static metadata standards.
- Interest in PubGrub resolver and potential for pip to adopt similar optimizations without Rust.
-
Optimizations that don’t need Rust Some of uv’s speed comes from Rust. But not as much as you’d think. Several key optimizations could be implemented in pip today: HTTP range requests for metadata. Wheel files are zip archives, and zip archives put their file listing at the end. uv tries PEP 658 metadata first, falls back to HTTP range requests for the zip central directory, then full wheel download, then building from source. Each step is slower and riskier. The design makes the fast path cover 99% of cases. This is HTTP protocol work, not Rust. Parallel downloads. pip downloads packages one at a time. uv downloads many at once. This is concurrency, not language magic. Global cache with hardlinks. pip copies packages into each virtual environment. uv keeps one copy globally and uses hardlinks (or copy-on-write on filesystems that support it). Installing the same package into ten venvs takes the same disk space as one. This is filesystem ops, not language-dependent. Python-free resolution. pip needs Python running to do anything, and invokes build backends as subprocesses to get metadata from legacy packages. uv parses TOML and wheel metadata natively, only spawning Python when it hits a setup.py-only package that has no other option. PubGrub resolver. uv uses the PubGrub algorithm, originally from Dart’s pub package manager. pip uses a backtracking resolver. PubGrub is faster at finding solutions and better at explaining failures. It’s an algorithm choice, not a language choice
Many of uv's optimisations come from improvements that can be made without rust such as http range requests for packages, parallel downloading, better local caching
-
No .egg support. Eggs were the pre-wheel binary format. pip still handles them; uv doesn’t even try. The format has been obsolete for over a decade. No pip.conf. uv ignores pip’s configuration files entirely. No parsing, no environment variable lookups, no inheritance from system-wide and per-user locations. No bytecode compilation by default. pip compiles .py files to .pyc during installation. uv skips this step, shaving time off every install. You can opt in if you want it. Virtual environments required. pip lets you install into system Python by default. uv inverts this, refusing to touch system Python without explicit flags. This removes a whole category of permission checks and safety code. Stricter spec enforcement. pip accepts malformed packages that technically violate packaging specs. uv rejects them. Less tolerance means less fallback logic. Ignoring requires-python upper bounds. When a package says it requires python<4.0, uv ignores the upper bound and only checks the lower. This reduces resolver backtracking dramatically since upper bounds are almost always wrong. Packages declare python<4.0 because they haven’t tested on Python 4, not because they’ll actually break. The constraint is defensive, not predictive. First-index wins by default. When multiple package indexes are configured, pip checks all of them. uv picks from the first index that has the package, stopping there. This prevents dependency confusion attacks and avoids extra network requests. Each of these is a code path pip has to execute and uv doesn’t.
UV does not support egg files or legacy pip.conf and it doesn't check for upper bounds on dependencies or compile py files to pyc bytecode by default. This removes a number of codepaths and allows the tool to run faster.
-
PEP 658 went live on PyPI in May 2023. uv launched in February 2024. The timing isn’t coincidental. uv could be fast because the ecosystem finally had the infrastructure to support it. A tool like uv couldn’t have shipped in 2020. The standards weren’t there yet.
Before February 2024 the pip standards for pyproject.toml and wheel management weren't there and UV would not have been possible.
The relevant PEP standards are 517, 518, 621 and 658
-
-
pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca
-
These conversations I had in my mind usually repeated the beginnings of conversations I’d really had with Buddy, only they finished with me answering him back quite sharply, instead of just sitting around and saying “I guess so”.
Me
-
-
gemini.google.com gemini.google.com
-
جلسه پنجم
نتم
-
استحکام
T
-
-
poe.com poe.com
-
好的，我来整理一下你在开发这段代码过程中提供给我的提示词和需求演进：
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
First, the attainable Spearman correlation varies widely across prompts for the same assay: the gap between the best and worst prompt commonly exceeds 0.3. Second, the average variant log-likelihood also spans a broad range, and the optimal likelihood differs by assay.
Is this a good candidate for distillation? It seems like it could lock in these performance gains without the heavy inference cost, and it might naturally solve the prompt sensitivity issues that warrant ensembling in the first place. Curious to hear your thoughts.
-
During training, we randomized the order of sequences within each document to encourage invariance with respect to sequence order
When creating the prompt for a given homolog set {H_i, ...}, the order of concatenation is randomized to promote homolog order invariance. But was invariance ever tested post-training? Specifically, did you guys quantify the variance in model output when the exact same set of homologs is simply re-ordered? Establishing this baseline seems critical to determine whether the performance gains from ensembling truly derive from aggregating diverse evolutionary information, or if they are partially an artifact of smoothing out the model's sensitivity to arbitrary input ordering.
-
-
mediarep.org mediarep.org
-
10.25969/mediarep/2652
-
-
mediarep.org mediarep.org
-
10.25969/mediarep/2607
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-761-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0502-0
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0462-7
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
RemoteFoldSet: Benchmarking Structural Awareness of Protein Language Models
I have a major concern regarding the dataset construction. My primary question is, why did you choose to generate synthetic sequences (and structures) instead of using natural homologs? Databases like CATH or SCOP are full of naturally occurring protein pairs that share a fold but have very low sequence identity. Using those would have grounded your benchmark in real biological evolution rather than generative noise.
Regarding your use of the "twilight zone" concept. While your dataset technically hits the 26% identity mark, I feel this misrepresents what that term actually defines. The twilight zone describes evolutionary homology, aka where sequences have diverged over millions of years due to selection and drift while maintaining structure. Your sequences, by contrast, are hallucinations from an inverse folding model running at high temperature. Generative variance is not the same as evolutionary divergence, and a pLM recognizing ProteinMPNN's output patterns is not the same as understanding structural conservation.
Furthermore, relying entirely on synthetic validation creates a circular loop. You are testing if a pLM can recognize sequences made by ProteinMPNN and "validated" by AlphaFold3, without any experimental ground truth that these sequences actually fold. And to be frank, it's straightforward to generate high pTM AF3 structures that don't fold. Introduce a tryptophan mutation to your favorite protein. Its pTM will be almost unaffected by the mutation, but good luck expressing and purifying. A huge proportion of your dataset doesn't fold irl.
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0560-0
-
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-687-9
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-729-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-758-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0182-4
-
-
www.pastagang.cc www.pastagang.cc
-
User” centric design would argue that the happy path is one that allows the user to achieve their intended goals under normal circumstances. Unfortunately this view is heavily disincentivised, due to the ruthless logic of extractavism. Increasingly instead the happy path is determined to be the goal the business wants to achieve by manipulating and exploiting the “user’s” available resources, data, and ultimately time.
User centred design is no longer desirable since companies typically want to extract as much value from the user as possible and this typically means introducing friction through ads and such
-
“Users” are a commodity, a hot one perhaps, but like any other commodity, can be bought and sold. In such an environment, goes the line of reasoning in the mind of the average executive, does it not make sense to heavily prioritise onboarding alongside user acquisition so that users won’t immediately give up or get distracted, or gasp, go to a competitor?!
When users are treated like a commodity by powers that be, there is a concentration on making apps "usable" and "universal" in order to avoid "churn"
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0187-9
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-633-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-742-5
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-803-3
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-815-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-307-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-353-3
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-375-5
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-111-9
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-900767-67-9
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-036-5
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-900767-82-2
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-204-8
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-603-9
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-621-3
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-653-4
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-667-1
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-699-2
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-933-7
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-956-6
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-994-8
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0292-0
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0276-0
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0310-1
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-7092-0362-0
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-812-5
-
-
www.passagen.at www.passagen.at
-
978-3-85165-577-3
-
-
ezabotkin.github.io ezabotkin.github.io
-
Доработан сервис выводов для физических и юридических лиц:
отсюда давай уберем этот функционал https://app.clickup.com/t/869bdj28h я не уверена что там доделано
-
Реализована возмо
давай тут и в https://app.clickup.com/t/869ba6kvn добавим тег (Касдев 2025)
-
Это решает проблему с продажей ордера по рынку вместо отмены.
Наоборот отменяет, а не продает по рынку. Двояко звучит
-
Исправлена проблема с попаданием в карту сайта некоторых .pdf-файлов.
тут давай добавим тег (SEO) и не нашла тоже по сео эту https://app.clickup.com/t/869bggg1n
-
озибко
опечатка
-
Исправлено поведение встречных волшебных ордеров: теперь они не скупаются друг другом, а меняют рейт одновременно, либо отменяются. Убрана ошибка, которая не позволяла выставить волшебный ордер, если недостаточно объема ликвидности на бирже.
давай тут как с АМЛ поставим в начале (волшебные ордеа )
-
-
rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub
-
n
acento
-
-
rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub
-
Conn, Gould, y Toint (1991).
como puede concluirs ene el trabajo de ...
revisar si de verdad eso está ahí
-
(3.12)
enlace
-
-
www.perlentaucher.de www.perlentaucher.de
-
9783037340578
-
-
rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub rocio-hernandez.quarto.pub
-
Bazaraa, Sherali
faltan las referencias
-
- K:=D(S+βC)>0, - a:=H/2>0.
no usar ese entorno, muy IA
-
-
mal entorno itemize
-
la varianc
si vas a usar << habrá que definir el significado de eso en los preliminares
y es varianza
-
matemático,
solo deja el análisis
-
ea
Qué es R_{++} no será error tipográfico?
-
Mi
la ecuación anterior hay que dividirla porque está fuera de margen
-
{0,1}m
Debe explicarse en los preliminares esta notación de conjunto
-
-
www.zylstra.org www.zylstra.org
-
I let go of the internal voice that any annotation should be a ‘proper and serious’ annotation, a result of thinking. Annotation is an every day activity, creating the breadcrumbs that may result in deeper thinking later on in my notes. All annotations flow automatically into my local notes, where I can work with them and re-use them.
While I read this paragraph make me started to experiment with Hypothes.is.
-
-
www.travelandleisure.com www.travelandleisure.com
-
The stunning beaches of the Salento are
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
I've got a couple of typewriters I mean I guess you're collector once you have more than three right? I would say that that does count if you if you buy the same item. Yeah three that's probably collecting. Right. If you have two not so much, yeah. —Keanu Reeves on collecting 7:31
-
-
www.dailykos.com www.dailykos.com
-
US democratic community site notices the Trump admin steps against DSA enforcement, and describes it well.
-
-
rms.churchofjesuschrist.org rms.churchofjesuschrist.org7644331
-
-
Git-based wikis like Gollum
by which the author means the types of wikis that aren't wikis.
-
-
-
Organize campaigns around specific goals, products, or audience segments
Campaigns should have as little overlap as possible to ensure they're targeting different users and not competing against each other
-
Schedule monthly or quarterly reviews to identify keyword overlap using Google Ads tools or third-party software. Pay special attention to broad match keywords.
-
Preventing Geographic Keyword Cannibalization in Google Ads
-
udit your keyword lists regularly and identify duplications. Apply negative keywords in less important campaigns to prevent self-competition
-
Google Ads takes several forms, each creating unique challenges for your campaigns.
-
Keyword overlap occurs when different parts of your account target the same or similar keywords.
-
-
uniworldstudios.com uniworldstudios.com
-
When identical keywords exist across multiple ad groups, your ads bid against each other in Google’s mini-auctions. This means you’re not just competing with other advertisers—you’re competing with yourself, needlessly inflating costs. Over time, this internal bidding war can lead to wasted budget allocations, especially if high-volume keywords are involved. Each bid siphons away funds that could have been allocated to more strategic, unique campaigns, ultimately diminishing your ROI.
They aren't LITERALLY competing against each other in the auction. It's not that each is setting a bid and then trying to one up each other. It's that if one KW has weaker relevance it might bid really high, resulting in a higher ad rank & winning the same click for a more expensive price, just because the structure wasn't clean enough. We also run the risk of Google favoring click heavy, but low CvR ad ad group placements.
-
Google will only show one ad per keyword from your account. Duplicate keywords limit your visibility, preventing you from reaching your audience effectively. Imagine crafting compelling ads, only to have them buried because of internal keyword competition. By restricting your ability to appear in diverse search queries, duplicate keywords act as a self-imposed cap on your potential reach. This not only stifles visibility but also curbs the growth of your brand in competitive markets.
- Limits visibility for at LEAST one of the ad groups with the duplicate KW. Now Google has to choose which version of the KW is most relevant and will split the performance of that KW across different ad groups. In theory, if you want to see overall performance you can still do so. It just makes it more complicated to analyse performance because you have to compare different ad group elements (ads, search terms, negatives) to see what caused performance.
-
-
engineering.grab.com engineering.grab.com
-
The monorepo has a total uncompressed size of 69.3 GiB, a fairly substantial figure. To put things into perspective, the Linux kernel repository, known for its vastness, currently stands at 55.8 GiB.
This perhaps puts things "in perspective", but somehow in a way that the author avoids attaining the (or, if you prefer, demonstrating) the corollary self-awareness that one would expect (having had things put into perspective, and all).
-
-
www.deepl.com www.deepl.com
-
Been using DeepL for some time. For longer texts I'd need an account at 90-300 E / yr. Better to set it up with a local model? Or the EC's translation service? An own environment might be better to more seemlesly work in multiple languages?
-
-
lifehacker.com lifehacker.com
-
You just need an APK file to install it on Android, no need for a developer account as such (only for Playstore distribution).
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
developer.android.com developer.android.com
-
https://developer.android.com/get-started/codelabs
has a bunch of tutorials for specific types of functionality in android apps
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
developer.android.com developer.android.com
-
https://developer.android.com/courses has training courses for Android Apps in Kotlin, also one for beginners. The website tracks your Google account.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
econweb.ucsd.edu econweb.ucsd.edu
-
economic and socialreturns
Economic returns (what do I gain?) = all measurable economic benefits. 1 Direct Monetary returns 2. Employment stability and options (Higher chances of getting a job, ability to switch and negotiate, less fear of losing job, access to better quality work) 3. Productivity and lifetime earning capacity - simply means that within the job either directly through the nature of the job, or buy time to progress outside of your job but make sure to become more productive and gain skills such that it does not only bring you money for the current year but also increases your chances of earnings for your lifetime. 4. Economic returns also encapsulates better health, financial literacy, mobility, and networks (access to opportunities)
Social returns (What do we gain?) What does a society gain when an individual is well educated? 1. Public health improvements Education changes the decision quality of people. Basic literacy helps deepen understanding about importance of hygiene, medical instructions, etc.
-
Social order and safety Education helps people control their impulses and improves conflict-resolution skills, improves understanding about consequences and drives a way to lawful income paths and gives confidence to engage with any kind of institutions.
-
Civic and democratic participation Basic pollical literacy and critical thinking - ability to think beyond immediate self interest.
-
Intergenerational human capital Educated parents talk more with children using good vocab, they themselves value schooling and intervene early when learning gaps appear.
-
Social cohesion and equality Education creates a common language. Not only linguistically but also creates common ways in which people can understand each other's reasoning. Common base = numbers, terms, concepts, and some std. ways and ref. to explain things.
Education brings about social mobility meaning a person's ability to move beyond social and economic status that they are born into - Education does not erase inequality but weakens the link between birth = destiny
-
-
-
-
Jaguar made its last fossil fuel car. The last production line for fossil fuel powered cars, the F-Pace SUV has been shut down. Only EVs now. Meanwhile the German car industry pushed for and got a 5 year extension from the EC to keep producing obsolete fossil fuel cars.
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Main entry point[edit] Main article: Entry point As in C, C++, C#, Java, and Go, the entry point to a Kotlin program is a function named "main", which may be passed an array containing any command-line arguments. This is optional since Kotlin 1.3.[26] Perl, PHP, and Unix shell–style string interpolation is supported. Type inference is also supported.
Kotlin had a mandatory, but now optional function main as entry point. Like C++ and Java
-
The name is derived from Kotlin Island, a Russian island in the Gulf of Finland, near Saint Petersburg. Andrey Breslav, Kotlin's former lead designer, mentioned that the team decided to name it after an island, in imitation of the Java programming language which shares a name with the Indonesian island of Java
Kotlin is named after a Russian Island in the Gulf of Finland, a nod to Java (Andrey Breslav, Kotlin's originator is Russian).
-
On 7 May 2019, Google announced that the Kotlin programming language had become its preferred language for Android app developers.[7] Since the release of Android Studio 3.0 in October 2017, Kotlin has been included as an alternative to the standard Java compiler.
Kotlin is Google's preferred programming language for Android apps since mid 2019. Is included in AndroidStudio
-
Kotlin programming language, object oriented, java interoperability. Integrated in Android Studio
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
openclassrooms.com openclassrooms.com
-
Envoyer
Valider
-
event
Visual Studio Code n'accepte pas "event" mais accepte "Event" (en tout cas sur mon pc c'est comme ça).
-
Envoyer
Valider
-
-
developer.android.com developer.android.com
-
Prerequisites Basic Kotlin knowledge
Kotlin https://kotlinlang.org/
-
Tutorial for Android Studio, to create a first simple app
-
-
developer.android.com developer.android.com
-
basic configuration of Android Studio
-
Android Studio is the official IDE for Android app dev. There is a MacOS version.
#openvraag is this usable to code up a personal app for mobile?
-
-
runestone.academy runestone.academy
-
true and false
in LOWERCASE
-
-
www.raptitude.com www.raptitude.com
-
This leisurely pace made Middle-Earth blossom before my eyes. When I paused after each comma, and let each sentence ring for a small moment after the period, the events of the story reached me with more weight and strength.
I don’t think I had ever considered this. There was always a desire to finish books quickly, and I have been admonishing myself for not reading fast enough. Perhaps it is time to slow down with purpose; or rather treat my natural slow reading as intentional and give it purpose.
-
-
dadaismee.github.io dadaismee.github.io
-
результате
Это может быть вложенный список, который можно превратить в mindmap вставив в сервис text2mindmap
-
фильм
чаще я смотрю ролики, которые вызывают не только эмоции, но и мысль. Например, недавно посмотрел ролик о манипуляции поведения потребителя, но не помню канал. Надо сделать заметку по этому видео.
-
разговор
у меня сегодня был разговор на работе, который будет связан с алгоритмом конкретных действий перед НГ. Я его записал в черновики корпоративной почты.
-
понятным
Можно использовать стандарты понятного текста из книг по "инфостилю" от М.Ильяхова (Пиши, сокращай!; Ясно, понятно; Текст по полочкам и т.д.)
-
система
Система = Индекс+Процессы
-
ваши
Насколько мысли, которые я укажу как свои, на самом дела, мои? Вдруг я взял из бессознательного, которое базируется на прочитанном, услышанном от других людей? Где грань оригинальности?
-
автора
Что делать с местами, где автор приводит идеи других людей? Их отдельно выписывать? Или если он в дискуссии с кем-то, то указывать только мысли автора, а мысли воображаемого оппонента упоминаются вкратце.
-
резюме
По сути как HR просматривают резюме кандидатов на вакансии, так и автор, использующий систему, смотрим много "резюме"
-
хайлайты
Как в обзорах иностранныъ спортивных матчей - лучшие моменты!
-
короткая
Насколько? Несколько слов? Предложений?
-
сгущать
как молоко) Получается "густой", насыщенный текст с минмумом "воды".
-
связи
Как технически связать две заметки между собой?
-
индекс
Похоже на одноименный раздел в иностранных книгах
-
сбора, обработки, хранения и развития
Похоже на этапы CODE у Тьяго Форте и этапов GTD Дэвида Аллена.
-
развивает
что означает развитие? как в выражении "развитие мысли"? То есть мы раскрываем идею/аргумент? это про углубление(например, ответ на 5 почему)? или про расширение (больше примеров)?
-
почему и каким именно образом система письма
не хватает глагола в этом предложении. Например, "работает"
-
дополняет
в каком смысле дополняет? как слагаемое при сумме? или добавляет детали?
-
литературе
Есть ли отдельный жанр: "заметковедение"
-
файлы
Заметки в hipothesis - это тоже файлы?
-
картотеку
Я не начал вести картотеку, а пока только пишу заметки.
-
длиннее
Каков нижний и верхний порог длины номера? Нижний - это 1-2 цифры. Верхний - бесконечность.
-
хранить
Мест хранения много - это девайсы и облако. Также различные программы: читалки, заметки и т.д.
-
комментировать
Я даже комменты в соцсетях/мессенджерах не пишу обычно)
-
пересказывать
нет такой привычки - письменного пересказа. В основном, пересказ - это устный жанр в дружеской беседе.
-
источников
очень интересно, как фиксировать мысли о видео, например, ролике влоггера
-
фиксировать
С наличием фиксацим проблем нет, а вот чтобы фиксировать в одном цифровом месте/приложении/инструменты - есть. Потому что чаще всего заметки ведутся в разных местах
-
доступность
тут мне кажется значение не только техническое, но и экономическое: используя бесплатные программы с открытым исходным кодом делает возможным не только сам технический доступ, но говорит о том, что цена не измениться и будет доступ к системе даже при снижении дохода
-
Устойчивая
Синоним этого прилагательного, который я вспомнил - э то стабильный. Я имею в виду стабильный, как в терминологии бережливого производства или Toyota Production System. Согласно идее бережливого производства, чтобы улучшить процесс надо его стабилизировать. Мы смотрим отклонения от номры и можем спрогнозировать результаты будушего. Это позволит разработать стандарт, то есть закрепить лучшие практики.
-
социальная аннотация
Получается что-то вроде форума/чата/соцсети для читателей конретной статьи в интернете
-
простоДостаточно
Да, я уже зарегистрировался, установил расширения для браузера, залогинился и выделил текст, чтобы написать эту заметку
Tags
- список
- грамматика
- affordability
- mindmap
- accessability
- comment
- стабилизация
- пересказ
- объем
- GTD
- развитие
- видео
- дополнение
- файлы
- заметки
- стандарт
- комментарии
- копирайт
- CODE
- BASB
- номер заметки
- резюме
- результат
- прогресс
- source
- аналогия
- система "второй мозг"
- литература о заметках
- Ильяхов
- разговор
- retelling
- запись
- картотека
- paraphrase
- бессознательное
- highlight
- оригинальность
- инфостиль
- формат
- длина
- фиксация
- мимолетная заметка
- ошибка
- логика
- capture
- development
- TPS
- источник
- Индекс
- HR
- доступность
- collection
- начало
- свои мысли
- addition
- ЧАВО
- связь
- метафора
- краткость
- дискуссия
- лучшие моменты
- хранение
- плотность
Annotators
URL
-
-
captum.ai captum.ai
-
visualize_token2token_scores(norm_fn(output_attentions_all, dim=2).squeeze().detach().cpu().numpy(), x_label_name='Layer')
维度变化链路
output_attentions_all：(layer, batch, head, seq_len, seq_len) → norm_fn(dim=2)：聚合head维度 → (layer, batch, seq_len, seq_len) → squeeze()：删除batch维度 → (layer, seq_len, seq_len) → 最终用于可视化：每层的“token-token注意力强度矩阵”（汇总所有头的信息）
维度格式
output_attentions_all.shape = (layer, batch, head, seq_len, seq_len)<br /> （文档中通过代码output_attentions_all = torch.stack(output_attentions)明确堆叠逻辑，且在 [29] 单元格注释中验证了维度构成）各维度含义
-
layer（维度索引 0，数值示例为 12） 表示 BERT 模型中编码器的层数。以bert-base-uncased为例，模型默认包含 12 个 Transformer 编码层。 -
batch（维度索引 1，数值示例为 1） 表示输入样本的批次大小。文档示例中仅使用了 1 个问答对作为输入，因此该维度取值为 1。 -
head（维度索引 2，数值示例为 12） 表示每一层中的多头注意力头数。对于bert-base-uncased，每个编码层默认包含 12 个注意力头。 -
seq_len（维度索引 3，行维度，数值示例为 26） 表示输入序列的长度，包括[CLS]、[SEP]等特殊 token。该维度对应注意力的“发出者”（query）token。 -
seq_len（维度索引 4，列维度，数值示例为 26） 与上一维度含义一致，同样表示序列长度，但对应注意力的“接收者”（key）token。张量中的每个元素 $[l, b, h, i, j]$ 表示在第 $l$ 层、第 $b$ 个样本、第 $h$ 个注意力头下，第 $i$ 个 token 对第 $j$ 个 token 分配的注意力权重（经 softmax 归一化）。
文档中
norm_fn是 L2 范数计算函数（基于 PyTorch 版本选择torch.linalg.norm或torch.norm），调用方式为norm_fn(output_attentions_all, dim=2)，核心是在“注意力头（head）”维度上计算范数，以汇总每层所有头的注意力信息。操作逻辑 - 输入：
output_attentions_all维度为(layer, batch, head, seq_len, seq_len)<br /> - 关键参数：dim=2表示对第2维（head维度）计算L2范数——即对每层、每个样本、每个“发出者-接收者”token对（i,j），将12个注意力头的权重作为向量，计算其L2范数（ \(\sqrt{\sum_{h=1}^{12} w_{l,b,h,i,j}^2}\) ）。输出维度与含义 - 输出维度（
norm_fn后）：(layer, batch, seq_len, seq_len)<br /> （因在head维度（dim=2）上聚合，故维度数从5维减少为4维，删除了head维度） - 后续处理：squeeze().detach().cpu().numpy()是张量格式转换操作，不改变维度含义： -squeeze()：去除维度大小为1的维度（此处batch=1，故删除batch维度），最终维度变为(layer, seq_len, seq_len)； -detach().cpu().numpy()：将PyTorch张量转为NumPy数组，用于后续可视化。最终维度
-
layer（维度索引 0，数值示例为 12） 与输入保持一致，表示 BERT 的 12 个编码器层。 -
seq_len（维度索引 1，行维度，数值示例为 26） 表示输入序列的长度，对应注意力的“发出者”（query）token，与原始注意力张量的第 3 维一致。 -
seq_len（维度索引 2，列维度，数值示例为 26） 同样表示输入序列的长度，对应注意力的“接收者”（key）token，与原始注意力张量的第 4 维一致。张量中每个元素 $[l,i,j]$ 表示在第 $l$ 层中，第 $i$ 个 token 对第 $j$ 个 token 的多头注意力权重汇总范数，用于刻画该 token 对在该层上的整体注意力强度，而不区分具体注意力头。
-
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
https://web.archive.org/web/20251226113306/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/dec/26/ai-dark-ages-enlightenment Opinion piece asking if AI is taking on the similar (feudal) role of priests, kings and lords to outsource our decisions to. Leaving the enlightenment behind, and the romanticist invention of the self.
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Russian gov now cracking down on 'probiv' market for hacked/leaked data. It was of use to themselves, but now also used by Ukraine to strike inside Russia.
-
-
Local file Local file
-
70% (n = 91) of women and 54% (n = 116) of menalso disagreed with the statement that “men in the industry are educatedor informed on the issue of sexism.” Most of the boys’ club atmospherethat women cited as uncomfortable was rooted in unprofessional officeconversations that men were comfortable engaging in
Extroverted sportsy, sex, gambling culture you mean? Being politicised, furry, and ace, I find those unremarkable, and often feel excluded of them too.
-
-
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
-
R0:
Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #1: Full Title:
Manuscript full title does not match with the short title. Full title reads "Climate change, livelihoods, gender and violence in Rukiga, Uganda: intersections and pathways". While short tile reads "Climate Change and Gender Based Violence". 'gender based violence' may not necessarily mean the same as 'gender and violence'. Authors should consider revising the wording in the full time if they meant gender based violence.
Abstract:
Inconsistency in FGD size, harmonize to consistent range across the manuscript. Author said "Between April and July 2021, we conducted 28 focus group discussions (FGDs), comprising 6-8 participants each (line 29-30" and in methods author said "From 20 April 2021- 02 July 2021 five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in each community (28 in total) each consisting of four to six participants (lines 135-136)".
clarify the CBV emergent theme. You said "This study, though not originally intended to focus on GBV, examines how it interconnects with poverty, shifting gender roles, alcoholism, environmental stress, and family planning dynamics." (lines 26-28). Consider adding a statement signalling GBV emerged inductively during data colletion and/or analysis.
Methods: Revise the methods section to ensure the study can be reprodcible, and signal reliability of findings.
What study design did you use? not clear
Author said participants were " purposively selected... with the help of community leaders" (lines 140-141). Clearly elaborate the eligibility criteria and how the gatekeepers' influence was mitigated, and proper justification why 28 FGDs and 40 KIIs were sufficient. Talk about saturation, was maximum variation considered? and how?
Results:
Tag all quotes with data source (FGD or KII), sex, age to evidence diversity across the groups.
Make sure all quotes are in clear quotations marks (lines 220-222). fix that for the entire results section and be consistent.
Authors said "When describing their experiences and perceptions of poverty and its associated consequences including poor diets, sickness, and lack of ability to pay for healthcare and transport to medical facilities, most respondents explicitly identified poverty as a direct cause of GBV:" (lines 311-314). Revise the wording on participants' perceptions to avoid implying causality from qualitative data. Check the entire document for this including the abstract lines 36 to 41.
Ethics: Include ethical committee name that gave ethical clearance for the study, also include the reference number and date.
describe safeguardings and referral procedures followed in the study if any.
Conclusion: The concept for this paper is timely and relevant. However several important elements require revision before the manuscript can meet PLOS Global Public Health Standards. Work on the clarity and consistency of the methods (study design was not clearly mentioned, there are several qualitative designs one can use, e.g. phenomenology, case study, etc. what design did you use?). PLOS Global Public Health guidelines on data sharing require that you provide some de-identified data, nevertheless authors stated that they would share data and the justification for that leaves much to be desired.
Reviewer #2: 1. Kindly mention the methodological orientation adopted for the study? 2. Discrepancy between number of participants in FGD mentioned in abstract and methods – (6 – 8 in abstract and 4 – 6 participants in methods)…Kindly make it uniform 3. Additional context on domestic violence and related statistics can be added in study setting 4. Details on steps taken to ensure internal validity/rigor to be mentioned – member checking, reflexivity 5. Give details of the parent project briefly 6. Any conceptual model/framework adopted to guide data generation/analysis? 7. What efforts were taken to address/refer victims of GBV once disclosed? 8. Socio - demographic details of the respondents could be added for better interpretation 9. Key themes are restated multiple times; Many dimensions of GBV (more details on each typology, coping strategies, prevention, etc) not elicited
Reviewer #3: Overall Comments The paper takes a qualitative approach to “examine locally held perceptions of the relationships between climate and livelihood-related stressors and changing dynamcis, including the risk of Rukiga district. Climate change remains a global threat, with many countries and communities within Africa, ill prepared to adapt and mitigate the consequences. The paper is an attempt to paint a picture of climate-related impacts, particularly how gender-based violence, a persistent public health, socioeconomic and development issue is shaped by and influencing social, economic and environmental stressors.
In its current form, the paper need to be strengthened to get it to be sufficiently robust for publication in PLOS Global Public Health. The paper needs to be strengthened in at least three ways:
1) Overall, the paper needs to better contextualise their goal. Authors state in line 115 to 117, that their purpose is to understand locally held perceptions of the relationship between climate and livelihood-related stressors, and in several other sections, indicate make clear that, their original intention was not GBV, but undertook a thematic analysis on the latter. This can be confusing making it difficult for readers to follow. Authors need to clarify their focus – if it is on GBV, they may consider better contextualising their paper, especially in the introduction.
As part of contextualising, authors may consider highlighting the initial primary research focus – this helps to provide context for readers to begin to appreciate how and why GBV took center-stage during the analysis. In doing so, it also provides an opportunity for authors to properly situate their contributions to the literature.
Other minor issues include: • Authors make claims about projected exponential increase (line 51-52) and yet, do not support with any data. Similarly, authors may want to consider revising the sentence, as it appears redundant.
• In line 55-57, it argued “Uganda’s vulnerability to climate change and climate-sensitive disasters is extremely high – it is not immediately clear to readers what this means. By which benchmark or metric are authors assessing Uganda’s vulnerability. Authors may consider revising to ensure clarity (also see lines 108-110 for punctuation issues).
• Lastly, the study takes place in Rukiga District – it would be helpful if authors provided some additional background context. Will the results be different, if the study was conducted in a different district rather than Rukiga? Basically, some discussions of the rationale and/or choice of the selected district is be useful.
2) Overall, authors need to improve their methods by revising and clarifying, some of the sections. For example, under study setting (line 128-130), it is not clear if the concluding sentence is provided additional context for the prior statement. Authors may want to revise for clarity purpose.
I. Reconcile the number of participants for FGDs – in the abstract, authors indicate 6-8 people form a FDG and in line 136, it says “…each consisting of four to six participants,…”. II. For both FGD and KII, it is useful to indicate and/or describe the demographic/characteristics of the people participating in the study (Perhaps, authors could outline their demographics by sex and age, and any other stratifier in the results section in a tabular format. How were participants selected, especially among the FGD participants? III. On ethics statement, although the data emanates from key informants and community members, authors do not indicate whether they sought ethnical approval for their study. If ethics was obtained, it is useful to indicate so. IV. Regarding data collection, lines 172 to 173, authors indicate that “discrepancies in the coding were re-examined…”. It useful to explain how the independent assessor resolved discrepancies and reached consensus. V. In the data collection section (line 155 to 157), authors indicate that they “undertook a specific analysis of what participants said about GBV”. However, in the results, it is often not clear, the specific thematic issues or results arising from this analysis. Related to this and linked to the analysis, it is not clear to readers how the two main clusters (line 188 to 191) link to GBV. While lines 193 to 212, describe nature of GBV, for the most parts (for example, line 213 to 308), it is difficult to follow how GBV is an interconnector in the results being discussed. At times, it difficult to see, where the analysis departs from its original intended goal. Were the issues around climate change and environment among others emergent from the data?
3) Overall, the results section outlines some very interesting insights. However, I do feel this section can be deepened. In many instances, the narratives are often not immediately supported by the relevant quotes, linking to GBV. • In line 230 – 323, authors reflect that the disruption to livelihoods leading to family instabilities and conflict, demonstrate how GBV is triggered. This assumption is challenging to sustain, considering that “unrest in families” and not having “peace in a home” do not necessarily connote GBV. Similar reflections are presented at line 306 (“...they both resort to quarrels…”), lines 316 to 320 (…start quarrelling and fighting…”) and (“…you fight with the woman”). • Although authors indicate these are “euphemisms for GBV” (line 208) that participants use – without critical analysis, we risk painting a picture that may not be correct. For example, will readers be correct to assume, that in Ugandan context, such referencs always mean GBV?. To avoid readers assuming without appropriate understanding of context, authors may consider, making explicit any additional nunaces related to the quotations or contexts for this pharses, to clarify and make the links to GBV much clearer.
Minor • Line 199 – please clarify how and why unintended pregnancies is considered a form of GBV • Line 208 to 209 – revise sentence – it is not clear what authors mean by throughout their experiences and perceptions • Line 211 – “GBV was raised during the discussions of a wide range of factors” – perhaps, useful to outline the contexts which GBV was raised
-
-
deugz.github.io deugz.github.io
-
Lecteur d’écran
intégrer lien vers ressource suivante : https://tetralogical.com/blog/2025/10/14/common-misconceptions-about-screen-readers/
-
-
deugz.github.io deugz.github.io
-
diagramme de Gant de Jana
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tduMaP0X1JrrPFvR8PHFvrPLITKH_u1cFJgnrwpvig4/edit?usp=sharing
Intégrer en iframe ? - modifier pour le rendre plus digeste pour les apprenants
-
Autres Outils
Ajouter une section prise de note
-
-
deugz.github.io deugz.github.io
-
Un site web
Rajouter un h3 : Qu'est-ce qu'un site web ?
-
Wide Web
créer une grid 3 avec HTML/HTTP/Navigateur
-
Son livre a formé
https://www.killersites.com/killerSites/core.html - lien vers son site à inclure
-
première version du World Wibe Web
Mettre dans un dropdown
-
Introduction
Tim Berners-Lee est un informaticien britannique, connu comme l’inventeur du World Wide Web. En 1989, alors qu’il travaillait au CERN, il a créé les bases du web en développant le langage HTML, le protocole HTTP et le premier navigateur internet. Son objectif était de faciliter le partage d’informations entre chercheurs du monde entier. Grâce à son invention, internet est devenu un outil essentiel de communication, de connaissance et d’échange à l’échelle mondiale.
-
-
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
-
Comments to the Author
- Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.
Reviewer #1: Partly
- Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #1: N/A
- Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #1: No
- Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?
PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #1: Yes
- Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. Overall, it makes an important contribution to understanding climate and health policy in Argentina, but several issues should be addressed before it is suitable for publication:
The manuscript addresses an important and timely topic, analyzing climate and health policy in Argentina through stakeholder perspectives.
The qualitative design (interviews, document analysis, stakeholder workshop) is appropriate for the research question.
Valuable insights are provided on governance, financing, technical networks, federalism, and awareness gaps, with lessons for Latin America more broadly.
Inconsistencies in sample reporting: text mentions both 31 interviews and 26 interviews with 31 participants. This must be clarified and reconciled with Table 1.
The analysis section requires more detail on how coding disagreements were resolved and how workshop data were integrated.
The rationale for merging WHO framework dimensions should be better explained to ensure analytical nuance is not lost.
The Data Availability Statement does not comply with PLOS requirements. Data are not publicly available and no concrete mechanism for controlled access is provided. At minimum, de-identified excerpts or a codebook should be shared.
Ethics approvals are described but approval identifiers/protocol numbers should be included for transparency.
The manuscript is intelligible and written in standard English but contains issues that should be corrected:
Abstract is too long and must be shortened to ~250–300 words.
“Intersectionality” should be corrected to “intersectorality.”
“Precarized personnel” should be rephrased as “temporary personnel with insecure contracts.”
“Professionals and non-professionals” should be replaced with clearer wording (e.g., “clinical and support staff”).
Redundancy around “technical teams” and “federalism” should be reduced.
References require major correction:
Multiple broken Zotero placeholders are present.
Several entries are incomplete or missing DOIs/URLs.
Reference formatting must be standardized to PLOS style.
Discussion section:
Some statements overgeneralize from interviewee quotes (e.g., physicians not sensitized); these should be framed more cautiously.
Financing section should explore in more depth why mitigation dominates international funding.
References to political events (2024–2025) should be time-stamped as “at the time of data collection” to avoid rapid obsolescence.
Overall, the study is methodologically appropriate and conclusions are mostly supported by the data.
Revisions are necessary to ensure methodological clarity, compliance with data availability policy, correction of references, and refinement of language before publication.
- PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.
For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #1: No
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
Figure Resubmissions:
While revising your submission, we strongly recommend that you use PLOS’s NAAS tool (https://ngplosjournals.pagemajik.ai/artanalysis) to test your figure files. NAAS can convert your figure files to the TIFF file type and meet basic requirements (such as print size, resolution), or provide you with a report on issues that do not meet our requirements and that NAAS cannot fix.
After uploading your figures to PLOS’s NAAS tool - https://ngplosjournals.pagemajik.ai/artanalysis, NAAS will process the files provided and display the results in the "Uploaded Files" section of the page as the processing is complete. If the uploaded figures meet our requirements (or NAAS is able to fix the files to meet our requirements), the figure will be marked as "fixed" above. If NAAS is unable to fix the files, a red "failed" label will appear above. When NAAS has confirmed that the figure files meet our requirements, please download the file via the download option, and include these NAAS processed figure files when submitting your revised manuscript.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
TypewriterMinutes - Typewriter Review: 1963 Sears Cutlass - YouTube<br /> by [[TypewriterMinutes]]<br /> accessed on 2025-12-26T01:20:57
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Сатурналий.
Новый год, день когда можно делать что угодно. и выводиться в потребление.
хватит делать из праздница просто формальный день, Когда нужно праздновать, что-то покупать просто чтоб подарить. или просто потреблять.
и даёт возможность. начинать с чего-то нужного, необходимого.
это не ритуал, а день, когда можно направить себя.
-
-
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
-
R0:
Reviewer #1:
The article “Profiling Zero-Dose Measles-Rubella Children in Zambia: Insights from the 2024 Post-Campaign Coverage Survey” addresses an urgent global health issue aligned with IA2030 and Gavi’s zero-dose priorities. The title is concise, descriptive, and fits the scope of PLOS Global Public Health (PGPH).
The study employs a cross-sectional, two-stage cluster survey following WHO guidelines, with robust sample size (n=8,634) and weighting for representativeness. Statistical analyses—survey-weighted logistic regression and confidence intervals—are appropriate. Ethical standards and data quality controls are well-documented. However, heavy reliance on caregiver recall (88.3%) introduces recall bias, and the absence of district-level disaggregation limits local applicability. The manuscript’s use of WHO standards and analytical transparency strengthens credibility.
It provides novel national evidence on MR zero-dose prevalence and systemic immunization failures in Zambia, filling a gap between administrative and survey estimates. The identification of access and awareness barriers (e.g., 42.6% unaware of campaigns) adds actionable insights for health The article follows a clear IMRaD structure with strong coherence between results, discussion, and policy recommendations. Figures and tables are informative, though data visualization could be simplified for readability. Language is clear and professional, though some sections (e.g., policy implications) could be condensed to reduce redundancy.
No conflicts of interest or funding bias reported. Data availability upon request aligns with journal policy, though full open-access data would enhance transparency. Overall, the manuscript is methodologically sound, policy-relevant, and well-aligned with PGPH’s thematic focus on equity and immunization coverage. Minor revisions are recommended—clarify recall bias mitigation, improve data visualization, and emphasize data accessibility. With these revisions, it is highly suitable for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.
Reviewer #2:
-
Is this a national wide surgvey? Please explain.
-
Does this survey cover whole population? or part of population? What is the percentage of coverage?
-
The survey is procpective study. How does it happen to miss the data? Please expalin.
-
The ststistical part need more elaboration considering the variables.
-
In discussion section, avoid bullet. Avoid the policy implecation rather right as paragraph.
-
Rewrite the conclusion. Avoid frequency, percent, only mentiont he fidnings in relation to the objective of the study.
Reviewer #3:
In the current era of changing global and public health landscape, this manuscript is very timely in helping Zambia to improve vaccination coverage and address the inequities that exacerbates children to miss vaccinations. The manuscript is nearly perfect for publication with exception of few editorial areas which I request the authors to work on before the manuscript gets published. The areas are highlighted below:
ABSTRACT Background Line 22: I suggest to add the abbreviation MR in brackets after “Rubella”. Line 23: I suggest to replace “and” with “can” between communities & sustain. Methods Line 27: suggest to insert “was conducted from” before 27th & replace “-” with “to” between 2024 and 16th. Conclusions Line 42: I suggest to write “RI” in its long form and the abbreviation in brackets. Line 44: I suggest to edit “IA2030” to be “Immunization Agenda 2030”.
INTRODUCTION Line 86: I suggest to insert the abbreviation “RI” in brackets after “immunisation” before “performance”.
METHODS Study Design Line 97: I suggest to replace “Post-Campaign Coverage Survey (PCCS)” with its abbreviation PCCS. Lines 98-99: I suggest to replace “Measles–Rubella (MR) Supplementary Immunisation Activity (SIA)” with the abbreviations “MR – SIA.
RESULTS Zero-Dose Prevalence Line 172: I suggest to write “DPT” in its long form and the abbreviation in brackets.
DISCUSSION Line 262: I suggest to replace “routine immunisation” with the abbreviation “RI”.
CONCLUSION Line 325: I suggest to replace “routine immunisation” with the abbreviation “RI”.
-
-
-
121.41.12.184 121.41.12.184伊阁批量创建5
-
视频流推广
视频流测试模版下-视频流推广无法创建计划
-
封面
视频流笔记不支持封面自动优化
-
蒲公英合作笔记
视频流-笔记部分-蒲公英合作笔记等分类不显示任何笔记，点击3个笔记分类就会显示服务器内部错误。
-
下载
关键词-点击下载模版时，跳转的是一个在线Office网址，而不是直接下载，且必须登录Office微软账号才能编辑使用，运营部门的投手用的是WPS。 关键词批量上传，应该说明上传小红书下载的词包模版，且上传后能够提示上传成功，支持CSV格式识别。
-
消耗速率
搜索-手动-点站-稳定成本，无消耗速率这一选项
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de
-
978-3-88221-862-6
-
-
-
www.fischerverlage.de www.fischerverlage.de
-
www.fischerverlage.de www.fischerverlage.de
-
-
978-3-10-490842-7
-
-
www.toledo-programm.de www.toledo-programm.de
-
„Die deutsche Sprache stellt sich extrem zur Schau und zeigt alles; sie (…) legt von Anfang alles offen. (…) Die Sprache ist in Deutschland keine Staatsaffäre, deshalb bleibt sie „unmittelbarer“, dichter am Ausdruck (…). Jedes Wort enthält genau das, was es meint. (…) In gewisser Hinsicht ist das Deutsche (…) im Materiellen gefangen, das die Ideen in strenge Formen zwingt, die im Übrigen auch nicht näher am „Sinn“ sind. (…) alle Sprachen sind dem, was sie sagen möchten, auf ihre je besondere Art fern, sonst würden sie es nicht sagen.“
-
-
www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de
-
978-3-88221-625-7
-
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
-
www.diaphanes.de www.diaphanes.de
-
derive.at derive.at
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
-
Georges Perec
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Georges Perec
Tags
Annotators
URL
-