2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2021
  2. www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
    Ulrike Hahn (u/UHahn) - Reddit
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 26 Jul 2021

      u/dawnlxh. (2021). Reviewing peer review: does the process need to change, and how?. r/BehSciAsk. Reddit

      lang:en is:blog peer review review process credibility scientific finding research indepedent validation expert publication reliable rigorous evidence COVID-19 crisis preprint public available bias
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/l64y1l/reviewing_peer_review_does_the_process_need_to/
  3. Feb 2014
  4. users-cs.au.dk users-cs.au.dk
    Untitled document
    1
    1. aculich 09 Feb 2014
      You're as bad as that character in Moliere who didn't know he was talking prose! You've b een committing philosophical nonsense with your \rigorous pro ofs of existence". Don't you know that what exists has to b e observed, or at least observable?
      Moliere existential talking prose philosophical nonsense rigorous proofs of existence
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    users-cs.au.dk/danvy/the-ideal-mathematician.pdf