βテスト期間中のご利用は無料です。
Beta 期间完全免费——对于一个声称能替代 CSO 团队数周工作的产品来说,这个策略令人惊讶。背后的逻辑是:Sakana 需要真实的企业级研究任务作为训练数据和案例积累,而这些数据只有企业用户才能提供。「用免费换真实场景数据」是 AI 产品冷启动的经典策略,但在如此高端的 B2B 定位下使用,意味着 Sakana 对自己产品当前状态的坦诚:它还不够好到让企业为初版买单,但已经足够好到值得企业免费试用。
βテスト期間中のご利用は無料です。
Beta 期间完全免费——对于一个声称能替代 CSO 团队数周工作的产品来说,这个策略令人惊讶。背后的逻辑是:Sakana 需要真实的企业级研究任务作为训练数据和案例积累,而这些数据只有企业用户才能提供。「用免费换真实场景数据」是 AI 产品冷启动的经典策略,但在如此高端的 B2B 定位下使用,意味着 Sakana 对自己产品当前状态的坦诚:它还不够好到让企业为初版买单,但已经足够好到值得企业免费试用。
Today, data is abundant, but for the most part, unusable. Seventy percent of a data scientist’s job is just cleansing data. The modern software architecture encourages data to be hoarded only accessible through proprietary APIs. And, even with proprietary APIs the market for data integrations is expected to grow to a trillion dollars by the end of the decade. When humanity is spending the GDP of Indonesia just so that the data in System X can work with the data in System Y, the field of software engineering has failed us. So much data - data that could be used by new startups and nonprofits that couldn’t exist today - goes unused because it’s so difficult to access.
Conflict-free Replicated Data Type (CRDT) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-free_replicated_data_type
Big tech has benefited from an educational dynamic that consistently underfunds public education but demands increased technology to prepare the workers of the future, providing low-cost solutions in exchange for data and the potential for future product loyalty
This is a pattern most of us are familiar with. The best example I know is Apple's launch of the iPad in LA schools without saying, or knowning, how it will be used. Apple has a long history of testing its products out on users. Google habitually does the same, offering products for "free" in exchange for data and expanding a user base for its products.
This doesn't seem entirely trust-worthy/useful.
The native name seems incorrect/missing for some languages, like German, Hebrew, compared to https://gist.github.com/piraveen/fafd0d984b2236e809d03a0e306c8a4d
The US Library of Congress has been designated the official registration authority by the ISO and they publish the entire, official, up-to-date list as a trivial to parse text file for free.
Because ISO code lists were not always free and because they change over time, a key idea was to create a permanent, stable registry for all of the subtags valid in a language tag.
Why was it not free???
Yang, K.-C., Pierri, F., Hui, P.-M., Axelrod, D., Torres-Lugo, C., Bryden, J., & Menczer, F. (2020). The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook. ArXiv:2012.09353 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09353
The repository also contains the datasets used in our experiments, in JSON format. These are in the data folder.
What this means is: I better refrain from writing a new book and we rather focus on more and better docs.
I'm glad. I didn't like that the book (which is essentially a form of documentation/tutorial) was proprietary.
I think it's better to make documentation and tutorials be community-driven free content
The ultimate goal of the Open Library is to make all the published works of humankind available to everyone in the world. While large in scope and ambition, this goal is within our grasp.
;
User subjects and data objects are treated as programmable matter, which is to say extractable matter.
yes.