5 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2022
  2. projects.fivethirtyeight.com projects.fivethirtyeight.com
    The Science You Need To Make Your COVID-19 Decisions
    1
    1. jackiekrauss 29 Aug 2022

      Koerth, M. (2021, November 3). The Science You Need To Make Your COVID-19 Decisions. FiveThirtyEight. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/covid-19-updates/

      is:news lang:en COVID-19 science published research decision assumption outside transmission children face mask testing quarantine long COVID-19 global spread
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    projects.fivethirtyeight.com/covid-19-updates/
  3. Mar 2022
  4. www.the-scientist.com www.the-scientist.com
    Opinion: The Problem with Preprints
    1
    1. jackiekrauss 23 Mar 2022

      Mullins, M. (2021, November 1). Opinion: The Problem with Preprints. The Scientist Magazine®. https://www.the-scientist.com/critic-at-large/opinion-the-problem-with-preprints-69309

      is:blog lang:en preprint peer review published research scientific literature perishable commodity medRxiv debate formal publication treatment questionable research
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    the-scientist.com/critic-at-large/opinion-the-problem-with-preprints-69309
  5. Jul 2021
  6. arxiv.org arxiv.org
    Does Publicity in the Science Press Drive Citations?
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 26 Jul 2021

      Antonoyiannakis, M. (2021). Does Publicity in the Science Press Drive Citations? ArXiv:2104.13939 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13939

      lang:en is:article publicity science press citation research paper regression published peer review vetting
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    arxiv.org/abs/2104.13939
  7. Aug 2020
  8. twitter.com twitter.com
    Andrew Althouse on Twitter: "@brnichols8744 @JeremySussman @FinancialGonzo @venkmurthy Many scientists use Twitter to carry on conversations (with varying degrees of formality) about published papers, the good, bad, and ugly. The people in this conversation all do this frequently. None of us are anti-science (cont...)" / Twitter
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 18 Aug 2020

      Andrew Althouse on Twitter: “@brnichols8744 @JeremySussman @FinancialGonzo @venkmurthy Many scientists use Twitter to carry on conversations (with varying degrees of formality) about published papers, the good, bad, and ugly. The people in this conversation all do this frequently. None of us are anti-science (cont...)” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1295168734219337738

      is:twitter lang:en Twitter conversation formality paper antiscience discussion published scientific research
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1295168734219337738
  9. Jun 2020
  10. www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
    How You Should Read Coronavirus Studies, or Any Science Paper
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 08 Jun 2020

      Zimmer, C. (2020, June 1). How You Should Read Coronavirus Studies, or Any Science Paper. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/how-to-read-a-science-study-coronavirus.html

      is:news lang:en COVID-19 how to read study science paper published scientific research first time exponential growth paper
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    nytimes.com/article/how-to-read-a-science-study-coronavirus.html