6 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2021
  2. absolutelymaybe.plos.org absolutelymaybe.plos.org
    Systematic Evidence and the Covid-19 Stress Test: Pass Or Fail? - Absolutely Maybe
    1
    1. zoe_ikeotuonye 04 Jun 2021

      Systematic Evidence and the Covid-19 Stress Test: Pass Or Fail? (2021, May 25). Absolutely Maybe. https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2021/05/25/systematic-evidence-and-the-covid-19-stress-test-pass-or-fail/

      is:blog lang:en systematic evidence COVID-19 medicine research medical research evidence-based medicine
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2021/05/25/systematic-evidence-and-the-covid-19-stress-test-pass-or-fail/
  3. Aug 2020
  4. bjgp.org bjgp.org
    Understanding the role of GPs’ gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 28 Aug 2020

      Smith, C. F., Drew, S., Ziebland, S., & Nicholson, B. D. (2020). Understanding the role of GPs’ gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence. British Journal of General Practice, 70(698), e612–e621. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712301

      is:article lang:en COVID-19 GP gut feeling intuition cancer diagnosis decision making primary care systematic review meta-analysis empirical evidence accuracy utility symptom non-verbal cue experience
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    bjgp.org/content/70/698/e612
  5. osf.io osf.io
    Covid-19’s Socio-Economic Impact on Low-Income Benefit Recipients: Early Evidence from Tracking Surveys
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 28 Aug 2020

      Enriquez, D., & Goldstein, A. (2020). Covid-19’s Socio-Economic Impact on Low-Income Benefit Recipients: Early Evidence from Tracking Surveys [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/hpqd5

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 low income benefit tracking survey early evidence economic crisis USA household insecurity worsening debt accrual food experience ethnicity systematic evidence socioeconomic impact
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/hpqd5/
  6. www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
    Impact of payment model on the behaviour of specialist physicians: A systematic review
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 03 Aug 2020

      Quinn, A. E., Trachtenberg, A. J., McBrien, K. A., Ogundeji, Y., Souri, S., Manns, L., Rennert-May, E., Ronksley, P., Au, F., Arora, N., Hemmelgarn, B., Tonelli, M., & Manns, B. J. (2020). Impact of payment model on the behaviour of specialist physicians: A systematic review. Health Policy, 124(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.007

      is:article lang:en payment model physician healthcare worker systematic review strategy primary care utilization incentive empirical evidence fee-for-service adverse outcome
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851020300427
  7. Jul 2020
  8. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    The quality of research on mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: A note of caution after a systematic review
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 14 Jul 2020

      Nieto, I., Navas, J. F., & Vazquez, C. (2020). The quality of research on mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: A note of caution after a systematic review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ndgkj

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 mental health research quality systematic review consequence database evidence-based response
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/ndgkj/
  9. May 2020
  10. bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com
    Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 28 May 2020

      Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

      is:article lang:en systematic review scoping review guidance review metascience data analysis difference research evidence synthesis
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x