- Jun 2023
-
inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net
-
There are now about 22,000 contributorsto the site, which charges between $1 and $5 per basic image
This reminds me of the article "Wikipedia and the Death of an Expert" how there are also so many volunteers running the wikipedia page. I inserted an article that mentions how many active editors there are on wikipedia so we can really compare the similarities in contributors.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Apr 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
I don't believe the sprockets and sprockets-rails maintainers (actually it's up to the Rails maintainers, see rails/rails#28430) currently consider it broken. (I am not a committer/maintainer on any of those projects). So there is no point in "waiting for someone else to fix" it; that is not going to happen (unless you can change their minds). You just need to figure out the right way to use sprockets 4 with rails as it is.
Tags
- frustrating when maintainers stubbornly stick to opinions/principles/decisions and won't change despite popular user support
- waiting for someone else to fix it: that is not going to happen
- at the mercy of maintainer
- whether maintainer or contributor should/will implement something
- whose responsibility is it?
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Thanks for the PR @RedHatter. I think it's important to be able to specify which warnings are being disabled, and I'm nervous about the use of the code frame for this sort of thing (feels brittle), so I've opened a new PR, #3351. Will close this in favour of that
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
you took 4 hours to respond, so I implemented it myself
-
- Aug 2020
-
casrai.org casrai.org
-
CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). CASRAI. Retrieved June 13, 2020, from https://casrai.org/credit/
-
- May 2020
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Holcombe, A. (2019). Farewell authors, hello contributors. Nature, 571(7764), 147–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02084-8
-
- Jun 2016
-
scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com
-
***By which I mean, it’s even in Wikipedia
Doesn't give reference on how the physicist detector models are known in wikipedia
-
Actually, I didn’t need Holmesian deductions to conclude that Aad et al. aren’t using a conventional definition of authorship. It’s widely known*** that at least two groups in experimental particle physics operate under the policy that every scientist or engineer working on a particular detector is an author on every paper arising from that detector’s data. (Two such detectors at the Large Hadron Collider were used in the Aad et al paper, so the author list is the union of the “ATLAS collaboration” and the “CMS collaboration”.) The result of this authorship policy, of course, is lots of “authorships” for everyone: for the easily searchable George Aad, for instance, over 400 since 2008.
Physicists authorship models
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Inthebiomedicalresearchcommunity,multipleauthorshiphasincreasedtosuchanextentthatthetrustworthinessofthescientificcom-municationsystemhasbeencalledintoquestion.Doc-umentedabuses,suchashonorificauthorship,havese-riousimplicationsintermsoftheacknowledgmentofauthority,allocationofcredit,andassigningofaccount-ability.Withinthebiomedicalworldithasbeenproposedthatauthorsbereplacedbylistsofcontributors(theradicalmodel),whosespecificinputstoagivenstudywouldberecordedunambiguously.Thewiderimplica-tionsofthe‘hyperauthorship’phenomenonforscholarlypublicationareconsidered.
Discussion of how this is a problem in Biomedicine (as King, Christopher. 2012. “Multiauthor Papers: Onward and Upward - ScienceWatch Newsletter.” Science Watch Newsletter, July. http://archive.sciencewatch.com/newsletter/2012/201207/multiauthor_papers/.) notes, this changed later in the decade to physics.
Discusses "contributor" model.
-