- Jun 2022
-
Local file Local file
-
send off your draft or beta orproposal for feedback. Share this Intermediate Packet with a friend,family member, colleague, or collaborator; tell them that it’s still awork-in-process and ask them to send you their thoughts on it. Thenext time you sit down to work on it again, you’ll have their input andsuggestions to add to the mix of material you’re working with.
A major benefit of working in public is that it invites immediate feedback (hopefully positive, constructive criticism) from anyone who might be reading it including pre-built audiences, whether this is through social media or in a classroom setting utilizing discussion or social annotation methods.
This feedback along the way may help to further find flaws in arguments, additional examples of patterns, or links to ideas one may not have considered by themselves.
Sadly, depending on your reader's context and understanding of your work, there are the attendant dangers of context collapse which may provide or elicit the wrong sorts of feedback, not to mention general abuse.
-
- Apr 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Please do not directly email any Sidekiq committers with questions or problems. A community is best served when discussions are held in public.
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Here's the last issue where source maps were discussed before the beta release.
-
- Dec 2020
-
hacks.mozilla.org hacks.mozilla.org
-
The exact form of the platform is yet to be finalized, and we want to involve you, the community, in helping to provide ideas and test the new contribution workflow!
-
- Nov 2020
-
cryptocurrencyresearch.org cryptocurrencyresearch.org
-
indipendently
typo pointed out by David Butler (https://github.com/nimisis)
-
-
github.com github.com
-
In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.
Tags
- allowing sufficient time for discussion/feedback/debate before a final decision is made
- feeling blindsided
- have discussion/feedback/debate in public (transparency)
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
Annotators
URL
-
- Sep 2020
-
elemental.medium.com elemental.medium.com
-
Austin S. (2020) This Lawyer Ran Errands for His High-Risk Wife. Then an Epidemiologist Rated His Every Move.https://elemental.medium.com/this-lawyer-ran-errands-for-his-high-risk-wife-then-an-epidemiologist-rated-his-every-move-f9a926ad96ec
-
- Aug 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Moshontz, Hannah, Grace Elizabeth Binion, Benjamin T. Brown, and Haley Walton. ‘A Guide to Self-Archiving Preprints’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 21 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dp4x9.
-
- Jul 2020
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Mikolai, J., Keenan, K., & Kulu, H. (2020). Household level health and socio-economic vulnerabilities and the COVID-19 crisis: An analysis from the UK [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4wtz8
-