Die Rauchwolken der riesigen Waldbrände in Kanada bedrohen zum zweiten Mal die Gesundheit der Einwohnerinnen und Einwohner großer Teil der USA. In vielen Städten erreicht der Air Quality Index Werte von über 200. Ab 100 sind Menschen mit Atmwegsbeschwerden akut gefährdet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/28/us/canada-wildfire-smoke-air-quality-midwest.html

Each highlighted statement expresses political talking points aligned to induce trump-like support.

Trump introduced new marketing and strategy, formulated using concepts and metrics mastered by Reality TV and Hollywood and then paired with advertising propaganda and "selling" techniques to create a "Brand". This is after-all Donald Trump, this is what he does, has done and is the only way he has found to make money. Trump built the "brand" (just barely) while teetering on self destruction.

His charismatic persona became "the glue" that allowed creative narratives to stick to certain types of people in-spite of risk. Trump learned OTJ how to capture a specific type of audience.

The mistake people make about Trump is assuming his audience to be "Joe Six-Pack", redneck's with limited education! This assumption does not have merit on its own.<br /> * There is a common "follower" theme among his audience that is exploited by those who: * Bought the "licensing rights" to the master-class Trump "how-to" course.

the Guardian. “Wildfire Smoke Has Caused Rise in Covid Infections and Deaths, Study Finds,” August 13, 2021. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/13/wildfire-smoke-covid-infections-deaths-study.

视频烟雾检测研究进展

This is the only line that might have related to the "fire" within his sermon title. As well as the images that surfaced prior to this "book."

The beginning of this line correlates with the constant image of "flames," "smoke," "fiery," "firelight," etc. "From satin" appears to be a reference towards Lucifer himself in relation to this woman that is sitting in her chair, "like a burnished throne."

Why is this necessary to explain?

impressive? By whose judgement?

Impressive? Never <- never that we know about.

impressive?

impressive?