2,409 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2016
    1. We will import the data of the 26 SSEDAS partners in the next 2 months. The template can also be used by other partners, as it is probably used for the next Shareable MapJam. The generated workflow will be manually tested and then automated. It can be used to integrate any type of POIs, that are in non-active data silos or get collected on the spot at onland-events, as the Shareable MapJam. Active data will be ported via the ETL.

      sic We should have talked about this. From the pad:

      I am challenging this statement, as we did never collectively agree on using CHEST resources to support the SSEDAS process. Also the evaluation of the mapping template is not backed by collective appreciation, as it has been created in an enclosed, intransparent process.

    2. and especially the forum is an active and very important tool for the development of the community. In“Discourse” we up to now have over150 people involved, which generated more than 550 topics and in total over 3500 posts up to now. Each week we have 3 – 5 new contributors coming in.

      Everything related to the Discourse has nothing to do with the Website, it is a separate service.

      Else we have to talk about the whole Web Services Infrastructure here, if "Website" is understood as the sum of its parts and not as Landing Page.

    3. We conducted 15mmm, mapping month may 2015, which involved partners from more than 9 countries, that mapped around 300 initiatives with our mapping tool. It helped us with user-feedback on the tools, lead to a pivoting in the taxonomy approach and helped to generate new tag-categories for the taxonomy development. It also generated a lot of attention and broadened our networks.

      Was marked for rework, but ignored.

      Is missing references to, at least:

      • Shareable Map Jam - April 2016
      • OSCE days - June 2016
    4. To cope with that we follow reduce down to a minimal viable product (MVP), that is just good enough to deliver value and generate expectation towards the next iteration, and by that build in small tangible steps and organic growth to maturity. - Very often organizations fail, as the complexity of the tasks to process is growing much faster thanthe ability of the individuals, and the organizational body to handle that complexity.

      These paragraphs contain assumtions which can be challanged and informed by a shown deeper understanding of network theory.

    5. In the cycle of technological development and it ́s respective funding, there is an upwards-spiral interaction between funding and proof of concept. Each new funding unlocks the potential for a further elaborated proof of concept and maturity, which then enables to leverage further funding for investing in the further advancement, allowing the generation of further funds. That cycle must be completed until a certain maturity is reached, and the viable product turns into running operations. One of the biggest risks is, to not deliver in one iteration of this cyclical proof of concepts stages, which is often connected to the lack of focus or milestones and goals set too far to reach.

      This wants to be reworked for the final report.

    6. s the open source editor system we fork from (uMap) has an active developer community, we will strategize our development to be useful for the whole community and the development of the base editor as well, and engage in the communication streams of the uMap community, which ultimately also enriches the OpenStreetMap community, as uMap is based on OpenStreetMap.

      Split up this sentence in many.

    7. 1.How many people are affected by the problem? Please describe the European dimension of the problem. Depending on the type of problem you are dealing with, it may be useful to provide additional information concerning the scale of the problem (e.g. size of the area, percentage or number of people affected in the case of environmental protection activities). 2.Has the scale of the problem changed during the reporting period? If possible, please also provide estimates for the likely future development. 3.What social consequences have already occurred, and what costs have been incurred by society as a result? What do you expect to be the consequences and costs if the problem remains unsolved?

      This sounds like a proper impact assessment.

    8. 1.Which specific problem did you intent to solve? The social problem should be described as specifically as possible. If several problems can be identified, they should be prioritized based on importance. 2.Who is affected by the problem? Please describe in detail who is affected by the problem and how so. 3.How has your perception of the problem changed during the reporting period (lessons learned? 4.How has the social problem itself evolved over time? What is the current situation? How will the problem develop in the future if no action is taken? 5.What are the underlying causes of the problem? Please describe interdependencies of different causes.

      Did anyone actually ever read this?

    9. Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, UK, Spain, Switzerland, but also USA, India, Brazil and Mexico

      Mapping of the Mappings plus a spatial mapping of partner organizations, actors and projects.

    10. Mariana Curado Malta – Linked Open Data Amy Guy - W3C/IndieWebCamp Ellen Friedman – Commons Silke Helfrich – Commons Giuliana Giorgi - Forum Solidarische Ökonomie Alessa Heuser – Solidarische Ökonomie

      Interesting to watch the silent change of this list.

  2. Feb 2016
    1. will import the data of the 26 SSEDAS partners in the next 2 months. The template can also be used by other partners, as it is probably used for the next Shareable MapJam. It is a very helpful tool for offline – mapping events.

      I am challenging this statement, as we did never collectively agree on using CHEST resources to support the SSEDAS process.

      Also the evaluation of the mapping template is not backed by collective appreciation, as it has been created in an enclosed, intransparent process.

    2. he blog and newsletter are not very frequently used

      Let's use positive language here, i.e. blog is updated with essay-like (research) articles, while regular community updates are distributed via our mailing lists.

    3. The map of the maps is currently in an early prototype visualization:

      Here we should strategize how to use the data from the mappings of mappings to create a transformaps overview on TransforMap.co, using our API (see above).

    4. The website, and especially the forum is an active and very important tool for the development of the community. In “discourse” we up to now have over 150 people involved, which generated more than 550 topics and in total over 3500 posts up to now. Each week we have 3 – 5 new contributors coming in.

      Does not belong here.

    5. 04.04.201504.04.2015We conducted 15mmm, mapping month may 2015, which involved partners from more than 9 countries, that mapped around 300 initiatives with our mapping tool. It helped us with user-feedback on the tools and to generate new tag-categories for the taxonomy development. It also generated a lot of attention and broadened our networks.

      This whole paragraph is just wrong, as the Mapping has to happen within the project's timeframe and is - in following the application text - most close to Shareables March Map Jam and the OSCE days during June.

      In May we could link up with OuiShare Fest, too.

    6. already got a first prototype http://demo.transformap.co/ running, for which we get good feedback.

      This precurser needs to be seperated from a display frontend we are building to consume the API, i.e. to display the mapping of maps.

    7. do not follow the earlier approach, but build on another open source editor (Umap)

      We are using the frontend module of a popular collaborative open source web gis (Leaflet.Storage from uMap) and adapt it to our data storage backend.

    8. in our online-forum there are several expert-discussions around linked open data going on

      These are side aspects of our networking activity. This deliverable aims at a consciously moderated process.

    9. With the 26 SSEDAS partners we are building a common taxonomy for Social and Solidarity Economy in Europe. The first draft is ready by end of Feb.

      I suppose this does not count as a CHEST deliverable, as the current process doesn't follow our community-oriented, collaborative approach.

    10. We did something like that, right?

      The Federating Civic Data as a fringe event to the final Share-PSI 2.0 workshop could count as such. But only part one of two.

    11. noting any discrepancies against the Project Planand action to recover situation if necessary

      Where is our Project Plan and how do applied mitigation strategies look like?

    12. other dissemination activity

      Constant social media presence, Webinars, networking activities via travels to our partners (Encommuns, p6data), patterns of commoning article from Ellen.

    13. publicity

      Constant networking and mentioning of transformap via our partners within the (extending) network.

      We could show Discourse or Website statistics here.

    14. Describe any management concerns and activities to recover the situation

      This will be interesting to read and should link to the document for our Project Advisors.

    1. Significantly, artistic thinking aspires to develop in the opposite direction. An artistic image works its way from the realist, rational and analytic understanding back towards a mythical and animistic grasp of the world. Science and art, therefore, seem to move past each other in opposite directions along the same continuum. Whereas scientific thought progresses and differentiates, artistic thought seeks to return back to a de-differentiated and experientially singular, oceanic understanding of the world. Artistic imagination seeks expressions that are capable of mediating the entire complexity of human existential experience through singular images. In that sense, art is a perpetual tautology. It keeps repeating one and the same message: the experience of being a human being in this world. The paradoxical task of uniting singularity and universality is achieved through poeticised images that are experienced and lived rather than analyzed and understood. Alvar Aalto points out this paradoxical task and capacity of art: “In every case one must achieve a simultaneous solution of opposites[…] Nearly every design task involves te…, often hundreds, sometimes thousands of different contradictory elements, which are forced into functional harmony only by man’s will. This harmony cannot be achieved by any other means than those of art.”

      eine gegenstrebige Fügung sonder gleicher

  3. Jan 2016
    1. Our objective is to construct an interdisciplinary forum concerned with post-linguistic theories, such as those developed by Deleuze & Guattari, Derrida and Foucault, de-stabilising, de-constructing de-territorialising knowledge in order to re-consider the current civic environment.

      Weren't all these authors from the late 2nd millenium? No news in this regard?

  4. Dec 2015
    1. I hope researchers at universities and industry research labs can rise to the challenge of developing good high level cloud computing models that are portable across multiple clouds.

      Portability will remain a core discussion point between free, open, semi-open and closed implementations. Looking at few recent research projects funded by the European Comission, portability doesn't seem to be a main concern.

    2. When we are ready we could run something other than a compiler on this code to “synthesize” the actual implementation that should be deployed.

      Why do I have to think of Unikernels?

    3. Instead, we duct tape together individual components made of C++, Javascript, shell, Python, YAML/JSON configuration files and deployment and orchestration infrastructure which morally represent the main.c of our distributed programs.

      So true.

    1. Likewise, the era of "open data", "big data" and "open source mapping" has made previously inaccessible spatial datasets (or perhaps only accessible to those within certain, largely governmental, institutions) more widely available, allowing a range of people to come to grips with the geographies (aka map) any number of phenomena.
    2. The Internet–and information, more broadly–is always shaped by geography, and in turn shapes geographies. Rather than representing the 'end of geography', the Internet has made geography more important and visible in our everyday lives.
    3. For instance, why are there relatively more tweets referencing zombies in Germany than in France? Is it simply language differences? Or is there a German cultural meme that is conducive to zombies? Or is it population differences such as the presence of US military personnel in Germany who are doing all the zombie tweets? Or perhaps there are simply more zombies in Germany? (Graham, Shelton, and Zook. 2013).
    1. There are many other questions. Of course existing systems on the earth may be very much influenced by the geographical reality of a two-dimensional surface. Historical groups have been nested geographically. So though there may be aspects in which community size is scale-free, that maybe a completely different optimisation problem from the one we have when on the Internet anyone can connect to anyone. If you could devise an algorithm for connecting people into groups, and so that they each participated in communities of different sizes in a scale-free way, then how much more effective (at solving problems, etc) can you make a web-based society which ignores geographical borders? To what extent does humanity as currently connected by the web in fact deviate from geographical nesting anyway?
  5. Nov 2015
    1. Clauses” and “Schedules” are referencing to clauses of, and schedules of, this Agreement; 1.GET ACTIVE obligations

      Maybe you want to insert a TOC here before directly jumping into the Paragraphs.

  6. Oct 2015
    1. At the institutional level, there is a similar gap between setting up a Web service and requesting a domain name. For a Web service, all it takes is a phone call, but getting a site-specific DNS record looks like a long bureaucratic fight (I haven't tried yet).

      @gandhiano This is why we need to develop those federated socio-technical amalgrams as many Commons.

  7. Jun 2015
  8. May 2015
  9. Apr 2015
    1. Rather than expose half-finished work, for the 1.0 these elements of the UI will be hidden from view.

      Please refactor this sentence for easier readability.

    2. Many reports of IMAP bugs were actually configuration problems, which speaks to poor visibility into what the app is doing

      This sentence can be finished with a full stop, too!

    3. After that, people will be presented with a "home page" which gives an overview over configured accounts and makes it easy to add another one. Once an account has been added, it should be easy to browse the account's mailboxes (or folders, or tags) and contacts and either just read in place or easily opt in to one of copy/move/sync.

      These sentences need a complete rewrite and are almost ununderstandable.

    4. I

      the general we would sound much nicer in this context. Also for the whole text a we sound much more profound than just I ... I ... I, because it reflects the crew behind the process.

      Until now it sounds you're the benevolent dictator.

    5. ..

      Full Stop. New sentence. Much more easy to read, as there is no ambiguity to be introduced by the ... here.

      The second sentence could start with "It turns out..."

    1. If you have entered any ethics issues in the ethical issue table in the administrative proposal forms , you must : • s ubmit an ethics self - assessment, which: o d escribe s how the proposal meets the national legal and ethical requirements of the country or countries where the tasks raising ethical iss ues are to be carried out; o e xplain s in detail how you intend to address the issues in the ethical issues table, in particular as regard s

      See https://github.com/co-operating-systems/CAPS/pull/140

  10. Mar 2015
    1. Ist es vielleicht sinnvoller, von der “Plattformgesellschaft” anstelle von der “Netzwerkgesellschaft” zu sprechen?

      Es erscheint mir schwierig eine topologische Eigenheit von Netzwerk/-en als hinreichend strukturierenden Prozess des-/derselben aufzufassen.

      Vielmehr böte es sich doch an die Partikularität und Atomisierung, welche von den beständigen Strömen zusammengehalten werden, zu betonen und danach zu fragen wie sich daraus eine Prozesshaftigkeit kollektiver Intentionalität ableiten ließe.

      Nicht?

    2. Plattformbedingungen

      (1) Lassen sich diese in topologischen Begriffen fassen? Was kann quantifizielle Graphentheorie hier beitragen? Ab wann ist eine Super Node eine Platform?

      (2) Um auf die Tausend Plateaus zurückzukommen: Das Rhizom wurde ja nicht zufällig als epistemische Metapher angeboten, doch wie stellen sich differenzierte Phänomene in einem solch gleichartigen Raum dar? Es biedert sich vielleicht das Bild der Tausend Plateaus an. Einer Landschaft, in welcher die beständigen Bewegungen auch auf stabilisierte Ebenen treffen, von welchen sich vorzügliche Ausblicke auf andere bieten.

    3. wenn populäre Apps Ende-zu-Ende-Verschlüsselung für breite Nutzerschichten

      Im genannten Artikel fällt es schwierig den Faden zu behalten, wenn jeder zweite Absatz mit Ich beginnt oder ein Buch erwähnt, dass ich (noch) nicht gelesen habe.

      Die Regulationsmacht wurde freudigerweise explizit anerkannt. Doch möchte ich weiterhin daran erinnern, dass gleichzeitig eine andere Plattform, die Web Platform, auf einem guten Wege ist - noch immer! - als starkes Beispiel für mustergültiges Ineinanderspielen von offenen Standards zu gelten.

      Nebenbei ist von daher der Appification unserer Kommunikationsmittel, und weiterer Aufspaltung, mit Argwohn zu begegnen.

    4. auch als eine Stabilisierungs- und Übersetzungsoption

      Hier schwingt mir Beaudrillards Auffassung von Regulation vor, ganz besonders im Gegensatz zu reinen Regeln. Dass die Fähigkeit, die Regeln zu verändern weitaus schwergewichtiger sei, als Regeln stumpf durchzusetzen. Mit welcher Gewalt auch immer.

  11. piratenpad.de piratenpad.de
    1. oder wieder

      Es bleibt zu wünschen, dass auch Gegenentwürfen genügend Raum eingeräumt wird, um die argumentative Balance zu halten und sich keinem Fatalismus hinzugeben.

      Ich fand einmal in einem kleinen Buch zur Geschichte der Schrift die Beschreibung der Donauzivilisation, einer verzweigten Netzwerkgesellschaft ohne hierarchische Institutionen, vor 7000 Jahren und schon mit Schrift ausgestattet.

    2. Welche Ideen und Vorstellungen vom Netzwerk gibt es und wie schaffen sie Realitäten?

      Vielleicht heißt es hier besser "von Netzwerken"? Andernfalls träumen die Autorinnen hier vom giant global graph. Denn wenn es ums Realitätenschaffen ginge, würde der eigentlichen Analyse eine weitreichende Betrachtung von Alternativen, föderierten Systemen folgen.

    1. Kick off for Global Map Jam / online Event and Communication on several international lists and TransforMap communication platforms (see above) April 15th, 2015 3500 Webinars and managing online process guidance for the global MapJam: ● Designing online webinar / decentralized online- sessions: “Introducing TransforMap and starting a MapJam in your city/region” ● implementation of webinars, online support and coordination for participating communities April - May 2015 2000

      Ausschüttung für Teilnehmer des Treffens am 11.03. und folgende Aufgaben

  12. Feb 2015
    1. Definitions: ‘ Work package’ means a major sub - division of the proposed project . ‘ Deliverable ’ means a distinct output of the project , meaningful in terms of the project 's overall objectives and constituted by a report, a docume nt, a technical diagram, a software etc. ‘ Milestones ’ means control points in the project that help to chart progress. Milestones may correspond to the completion of a key deliverable, allowing the next phase of the work to begin. They may also be needed a t intermediary points so that, if problems have arisen, corrective measures can be taken. A milestone may be a critical decision point in the project where, for example, the consortium must decide which of several technologies to adopt for further developm ent.

      Wichtig.

    1. But emails are widely understood AKA: "Vanity domains are a very small minority of nerds. Email addresses have the widest common understanding by the average internet user." Decades ago email addresses were a very small minority of nerds, fax machines had a wider common understanding. Email addresses are a more well established technology, just like fax numbers used to be before that, and home landline phone numbers before that. Each was subsequently eclipsed. Email is simply the current such transitional legacy technology.

      You cannot imagine how much I regularly suffer due to being part of this "very small minority of nerds". Unfortunately the will not to learn about these different ways is very strong.