Plattformunabhängigkeit

https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2020-0009

https://doi.org/10.1159/000534421

https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1548634

Florian Fischer - Produrance: A Process-Theoretical Account of Persistence

https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19992722

https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2003100319

https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology20062219

Robin Celikates: Epistemische Ungerechtigkeit, Loopingeffekte und Ideologiekritik: Eine sozialphilosophische Perspektive.

produrantism

Nevertheless, stability is as explanation-worthy as change.

9781032158815

WHO USES DOCKER?

faster

they cannot run operating systems other than the host

Wer will, dass ein Roboter eine Geschichte vorliest? Warum diese 6 Köpfe KI ablehnen

emotionale Aushöhlung

„Ich werde es auf keinen Fall dafür nutzen, irgendeinen Text zu erstellen“, sagt Royle. „Für mich ist es so, dass man während des Schreibens seine Ideen formuliert und durchs Überarbeiten und Redigieren kristallisiert sich erst richtig heraus, was man sagen will. Das eine Maschine machen zu lassen, ist nicht Sinn der Übung.“

ein technologisches Vorgehen der Unternehmen mit dem Ziel, uns zu isolieren und die Welt so einzurichten, dass alle unsere Interaktionen über ihre Produkte abgewickelt werden. Wir brauchen das nicht. Nicht für uns und nicht für unsere Communitys

„Nichts bremst den Akzelerationismus mehr als das Nichteinhalten von Versprechen. Gegen eine Mauer zu stoßen ist auch ein Weg, um abzubremsen“

978-3-495-86106-6

978-3-495-48983-3

978-3-7873-4237-2

978-3-7873-3640-1

To attempt an answer demands one radically reimagine one’s relationship to machines, the value of time, and the purpose of writing. Maybe there would be no typewriter and life would be governed by a different conception of the clock. Maybe the clock would only tell the time and not dictate how one should live in it. Maybe nothing would take too much time. Maybe no dream would be out of time.

the hidden labour of engineering

glorious and magnificent idling

In his 1937 bestseller, The Importance of Living, Lin cautioned: ‘The tempo of modern industrial life … imposes upon us a different conception of time as measured by the clock, and eventually turns the human being into a clock himself’ (pp. 168–69).

The question is whether we’re willing to do something imperfect now while working toward something better later.

longevity in the service of a leading interest is one of the most powerful things in the world

Maschinen zählen aber erzählen nicht.

In a resource-poor environment, the strategy is to create incompleteness, less organisation and to keep it partial and limited to a minimum of elements.

The capture of other futures

decoupled

Agree not merely to the right to difference, but,carrying this further, agree also to the rightto opacity that is not enclosure within animpenetrable autarchy but subsistence within anirreducible singularity. Opacities can coexistand converge, weaving fabrics. To understandthese truly one must focus on the texture of theweave and not on the nature of its components.(For Opacity, Édouard Glissant)

ideas of territory, population and history

infrastructuring

Rather than a homogenised rapid pace, the logic of temporal control fragments the pace of work and relies on the emergence of labour subjects who exist outside of the push for fast productivity.

facing adversity and getting yourself out of a tight spot are invaluable. “It’s not a cause for sadness – it’s the quintessential experience of life

“But the problem you’re confronting has incredibly high information content: It’s telling you about key weaknesses in your idea. And often, it’s giving you the clue you need to solve it.”

“Often you confront a problem, and if it feels bad, you want to deny it for a while. Then, when you accept it, you want to turn and run in the other direction,”

cycle between active problem solving and evaluating that progress

a more removed perspective

zoom out every once in a while

in the planning process, people are actually choosing an ensemble of paths – and when you get knocked off one course, you usually have the ability to switch to a different path

Expect twists and turns

Much of the framework that Fischbach teaches is essentially about making the plan before you set out to solve anything.

Take, for example, being interested in both artificial intelligence and climate change. You might move forward assuming that you should simply combine the two interests. But artificial intelligence may not be the right tool for the climate change issue you wanted to address. Forcing the connection between the two as your solution – rather than focusing on the main problem and keeping the approach to solving it flexible – may lead to getting stuck down the line.

a number of possible ways

Keep the details flexible

“You have to be very honest with yourself about what you’re solving for. If you get that wrong, you might make it hard for other people to understand why you’re doing what you’re doing,” said Fischbach. “So, ask yourself: What is your motivation? What are you aiming for? It’s easier for you to understand what you’re trying to do if you can articulate your goal.”

Getting other people on board is easier that way too. If you develop a keen awareness of the risks involved with your process, you have better odds of convincing others that the risks are worth it.

Sometimes you feel like you need to find something that is sure to succeed. But nothing worth doing has that profile – nothing in life.

conversation is an important part of the problem picking process because others may spot traps

His framework cautions people against choosing problems just because they’re easy, specializing so much that the problem is no longer useful, joining a trend too late, blaming external factors for issues you come across, and only copying the process of people you observe, rather than developing the actual process yourself.

Spark your inspiration

“It almost doesn’t matter which you use, as long as it gets you thinking.”

Use structure as a resource

Spend more time

What perhaps not everyone’s aware of is that we were working on making this team permanent and tried to apply for followup funding from different sources. None of this materialized due to the ban and the events surrounding it, and the team has since been disbanded.

Der Streit um den Kanon gehört zu einer pluralen liberalen Gesellschaft. Im besten Fall ist dieser Streit erkenntnisfördernd: Ein breiter Kanon ermöglicht einen differenzierten politischen Diskurs, weil er die ideologische Vereinseitigung und Verkürzung politischer Begriffe sichtbar macht. Immer wieder ist zum Beispiel in jüngeren Texten politischer Theorie darauf hingewiesen worden, dass der positive Freiheitsbegriff in antiken Quellen es uns ermöglicht, den Freiheitsbegriff der Gegenwart als negativen Freiheitsbegriff zu begreifen und in dieser Verkürzung zu kritisieren.

„Use it or lose it“

Man muss das alles nicht mehr können. Zumindest in der Theorie.

Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen sind keine Kulturtechniken mehr.

Dem Smartphone fehlt die Tastatur schon seit vielen Jahren, aber selbst digitale Tasten könnten vielleicht bald verschwinden.

„Wir sind von begrenzten Webseiten zu unbegrenzten, ständig aktualisierten Feeds und einer ständigen Flut von Benachrichtigungen übergegangen. Wir verbringen nicht mehr so viel Zeit damit, aktiv im Internet zu surfen und mit Menschen zu interagieren, sondern werden mit einer Flut von Inhalten konfrontiert. Es ist eine Abkehr vom selbstbestimmten Handeln hin zu passivem Konsum.“

Although open-source Linux has a global impact in servers, cloud environments, and the internet’s core infrastructure, its adoption in consumer-facing systems remains limited. Efforts to develop Linux-based national operating systems have struggled to achieve scale, yet Linux’s flexibility, security, and alignment with European values make it a critical asset for enhancing digital strategic autonomy.

9781098108304