The platform will know your idea _is pregnant_ far before you will.
极其精准地描绘了人机权力不对等的现状。当执行成本归零,先发优势荡然无存。平台通过宏观意图数据的聚合,比创造者更早识别出创新的轨迹。这使得个人的“灵感”不再是护城河,而是平台预判市场的先验指标。
The platform will know your idea _is pregnant_ far before you will.
极其精准地描绘了人机权力不对等的现状。当执行成本归零,先发优势荡然无存。平台通过宏观意图数据的聚合,比创造者更早识别出创新的轨迹。这使得个人的“灵感”不再是护城河,而是平台预判市场的先验指标。
[[Spammy handelings asymmetrie 20201220072726]] has a name when it is about misinfo: Brandolini's Law (coined 2013)
. There is, however, an asymmetry inherent in this account, in that theneurocognitive overlap between past and future events reflects a unidirectional contributory relationship
for - question - asymmetry in past and future events - what does this mean?
Baghal, T. A., Wenz, A., Sloan, L., & Jessop, C. (2021). Linking Twitter and survey data: Asymmetry in quantity and its impact. EPJ Data Science, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00286-7
Columbus, S., Molho, C., Righetti, F., & Balliet, D. (2020). Interdependence and cooperation in daily life [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e8bhx
The main reason that sociologists of science feel that this perspective has not produced the needed encompassing citation theory, is the variety of behavioural characteristics underlying the citation patterns found in the literature. This is, however, the consequence of the semiotic inversion of the reference into the citation. This inversion is asymmetrical: whereas the references have very different characteristics (both textually and behaviourally), citations are all the same. The citation no longer betrays from what type of reference it was produced. This is why one should expect it to be difficult or even impossible to recreate this variety by citation analysis, unless one re-translates the citation to the reference, that is, as is done in reference analysis. This is also why it is impossible to exclusively link the sign citation to a specific behavioural characteristic with respect to citing.
Key point with some useful pull quotes. It is the assymetry of the reference and citation and the decontextualisation that is at the core of mainly failures to develop useful theory. See also Leydesdorff on explanans vs explanadum