Dermatology of the environmental political is problematic in itself because it is a confined space in which particular Futures can be legitimately brought to the fore and others are excluded
for - key insight - dramaturgy of environmental science - biased to some futures and excludes others
As is fairly typical for documentary films on such emotive subjects, people who agree with the filmmaker's point of view rate it highly and rave about the film's objectivity while those who are predisposed against that point of view disparage it as industry propaganda and attack the credibility of the filmmakers.
Local communities resisted health workers, believing thatvaccines and treatments were part of a plot to harm or sterilize them
Fact check: Information true Many fears and lots of mistrust raised with the "invasion by foreigners dressed in what looked like spacesuits, who took people to hospitals or barricaded tent-like wards from which few returned" (World Health Organization, 2015) Problem: biased, implements feelings onto others
Whenever I say man/son, I intend this irrespective of gender, which is such a rudimentary concept for spiritual beings that we are temporarily incarnated, housed in these bodies of ours for a lifetime.
Not sure if I should use trailmarks and listicle here or not? I will choose to use it.
gendered syntax - I understand, but I also pointed out that the evolutionary nature of a language's syntax gives it unique gender characteristics. - I gave the example of my own mother tongue of Cantonese which is syntactically more gender neutral instead of English, which is patriarchal: - Cantonese (play the audio at the following links) - person - https://www.cantoneseclass101.com/cantonese-dictionary/ - man - https://www.cantoneseclass101.com/cantonese-dictionary/ - woman - https://www.cantoneseclass101.com/cantonese-dictionary/ - In the Cantonese language, the suffix (Yan) means person, - It is then modified by the respective female and male prefix - Noi (female) - Nam (male) - This gives us gender neutral syntax, as opposed to English where we have patriarchal gender syntax, where the suffix is male and the female is constructed as a secondary concatenation using the male syntactical suffix - male - FEmale - man - WOman - HUman - HUmanITY - men - WOmen - The English language gives syntactical primacy to the male gender, while a language such as Cantonese does not - What the psychological effects are, I'm not sure of. For within the Cantonese language, there is as much patriarchism as any other culture. It is not a particularly feminine culture. - And the gender neutrality does not even take into account of the more recent transgender category.
to - Cantonese syntax - person - man - woman - https://hyp.is/3wgg0BQOEe-uRQ-kpQf8Eg/www.cantoneseclass101.com/cantonese-dictionary/ - With English, we have to read between the lines and project the author's salience landscape because it's not explicit in the syntax.
PROBLEM - This page does not generate a unique URL for each of the onpage search results returned. - Can Indyweb create unique CID for this?
for: elephants in the room - financial industry at the heart of the polycrisis, polycrisis - key role of finance industry, Marjorie Kelly, Capitalism crisis, Laura Flanders show, book - Wealth Supremacy - how the Extractive Economy and the Biased Rules of Captialism Drive Today's Crises
Summary
meme
Which is exactly what you do in the book. And what did you find? - So what I do, I take apart the operating system of capitalism, which is, and I look at seven myths, really that drive it.
for: book - wealth supremacy - 7 myths, 7 myths of Capitalism, capital bias, definition - capital bias
DESCRIPTION: 7 MYTHS of CAPITALISM
quote: Laura Flanders
How we arrived in a post-truth era, when “alternative facts” replace actual facts, and feelings have more weight than evidence.Are we living in a post-truth world, where “alternative facts” replace actual facts and feelings have more weight than evidence? How did we get here? In this volume in the MIT Press Essential Knowledge series, Lee McIntyre traces the development of the post-truth phenomenon from science denial through the rise of “fake news,” from our psychological blind spots to the public's retreat into “information silos.”What, exactly, is post-truth? Is it wishful thinking, political spin, mass delusion, bold-faced lying? McIntyre analyzes recent examples—claims about inauguration crowd size, crime statistics, and the popular vote—and finds that post-truth is an assertion of ideological supremacy by which its practitioners try to compel someone to believe something regardless of the evidence. Yet post-truth didn't begin with the 2016 election; the denial of scientific facts about smoking, evolution, vaccines, and climate change offers a road map for more widespread fact denial. Add to this the wired-in cognitive biases that make us feel that our conclusions are based on good reasoning even when they are not, the decline of traditional media and the rise of social media, and the emergence of fake news as a political tool, and we have the ideal conditions for post-truth. McIntyre also argues provocatively that the right wing borrowed from postmodernism—specifically, the idea that there is no such thing as objective truth—in its attacks on science and facts.McIntyre argues that we can fight post-truth, and that the first step in fighting post-truth is to understand it.
‘socially biased individual learning’
Definition - socially based individual learning - an individual learns by interacting with the embedded environment - but the environment is itself biased - so that certain learning outcomes - are more easily learned - than they would otherwise be
A brief and extremely biased timeline of standardization
How is it biased?
The highest rating Pure Health Fungus Eliminator got on Amazon is 4.0/5 stars. Meanwhile, it got 4.9 stars out of 5 on its official website. I’m not saying that the higher rating is entirely biased. But I just think that we get to see more honest reviews outside its site.
Vaccine inventor questions mandatory shot push, Biden’s Covid-19 strategy
Overall scientific credibility: 'low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Health Feedback's analysis
Some people disagree. “Studies” about html emails are often sponsored by mailchimp
Surveys in a time of Covid [u/hamilton_ian] (2020-01-28). Reddit. Retrieved from: https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/l739ru/surveys_in_a_time_of_covid/
What we didn't want it to be was for Canonical to control the distribution of software between distributions and 3rd party editors, to prevent direct distribution from editors, to make it so software worked better in Ubuntu than anywhere else and to make its store a requirement,"
In my opinion it is okay to say your tool is revolutionary compared to existing ones. And it is hard to be fully unbiased about your own creation, I get it.
Wildfires Will Become Worse Thanks To Decades-Old Liberal Policies, Says Fire Expert Who Predicted Uptick In Blazes
Overall scientific credibility: 'low' according to the scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
Jones, Callum J, Thomas Philippon, and Venky Venkateswaran. ‘Optimal Mitigation Policies in a Pandemic: Social Distancing and Working from Home’. Working Paper. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2020. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26984.
Fenton, N. E., Neil, M., Osman, M., & McLachlan, S. (2020). COVID-19 infection and death rates: The need to incorporate causal explanations for the data and avoid bias in testing. Journal of Risk Research, 0(0), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756381
I feel like pwned is a more solid library, and certainly seems more configurable, so I'd personally prefer to keep using it (but my bias may be unfounded)
Biased towards Piwik Pro.
seeking/keep an eye out for: Would love to see a similar comparison done by the Matomo folks.
Let’s not pollute minds with carbon fears
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low' according to the scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
2 European Climate Declaration September 26, 2019There is noclimate emergency
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low' according to the scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
The great failure of the climate models
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low' according to the scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
Climate Science and the Myths of Renewable Energy
Overall scientific credibility: 'high', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
Everything You Know About Obesity Is Wrong
Overall scientific credibility: 'debated', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Health Feedback's analysis
World Health Organization Officially Declares Bacon is as Harmful as Cigarettes
Overall scientific credibility: 'low' to 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Health Feedback's analysis
Hurricane Florence is not climate change or global warming. It's just the weather.
Overall scientific credibility: 'low' to 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Repeat after me: carbon dioxide is good for us
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
The Sea Is Rising, but Not Because of Climate Change
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Not all scientists agree on cause of Great Barrier Reef damage
Overall scientific credibility: 'low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Polar bears keep thriving even as global warming alarmists keep pretending they’re dying
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Global Warming Study Canceled After Humiliating Discovery
Overall scientific credibility: 'low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Jerry Brown Blames Climate Change for California Fires: ‘The New Normal’
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Climate Feedback's analysis
Misguided renewable energy policies will ruin nation
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Climate Scientists: Climate Models Have Overestimated Global Warming
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Climate Change Isn’t the End of the World
Overall scientific credibility: 'low' to 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
DELINGPOLE: ‘Nearly All’ Recent Global Warming Is Fabricated, Study Finds
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
WHO: United States Among Least Polluting Nations on the Planet
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Trump should withdraw from Paris climate pact
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Global Quackery: Earth Has Not Warmed For Past 19 Years, New Study Finds
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Ocean acidification: yet another wobbly pillar of climate alarmism
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 6 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
About Those Non-Disappearing Pacific Islands
Overall scientific credibility: 'low', according to 12 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Hillary Clinton Boards The Climate Crisis Train To Nowhere
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 8 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Climate Exaggeration is Backfiring
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 9 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
No one ever says it, but in many ways global warming will be a good thing
Overall scientific credibility: 'low' to 'very low', according to 14 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Scientists ‘are exaggerating carbon threat to marine life’
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low' according to 5 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
The Climate Snow Job
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low' to 'low', according to 10 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
2015 Was Not Even Close To Hottest Year On Record
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 10 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 9 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Top 10 Global Warming Lies That May Shock You
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 12 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Deceptive temperature record claims
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to 7 scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in the reply+annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis
Wien-konkret.at ist ein politisch rechtes Onlinemagazin, dessen Geschäftsführer Obmann der EU-Austrittspartei ist (http://www.wien-konkret.at/k/impressum/, http://www.euaustrittspartei.at/internes/team/).
Wien-konkret.at wird zu oft mit einem neutralen Stadt-Infoportal verwechselt. Tatsächlich verfolgt es (bzw. sein Geschäftsführer) politisch rechte Ziele. Auf Suchmaschinen sind Seiten dieses Magazins oft höher gereiht als entsprechende unabhängige Portale (wie z.B. http://www.wien.gv.at/) http://www.euaustrittspartei.at/internes/team/