https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/kzc5o3/are_gene_hackman_characters_in_the_conversation/<br /> Are Gene Hackman characters in The Conversation (1974) and Enemy of the State (1998 ) connected?

I want to circle back to this as I've had this idea since I saw Enemy of the State as a rough cut.

reply to u/FusRoDaahh at https://www.reddit.com/r/commonplacebook/comments/188j2xt/getting_over_the_fear_of_perfection/

I had this problem too, but eventually switched to keeping my commonplace entirely on index cards, which also allows me to move them around and re-arrange them as necessary or when useful. (It also fixed some of my indexing problems.)

The side benefit is that if I botch a single card, no sweat, just pull out a new one and start over! If you like the higher end stationery scene afforded in notebooks, then take a look at Clairfontaine's bristol cards from Exacompta which are lush and come in a variety of sizes, colors, and rulings. (They're roughly equivalent to the cost per square meter of paper you'll find in finer notebooks like Leuchtturm, Hobonichi, Moleskine, etc., though some of the less expensive index cards still do well with many writing instruments.) Most of their card sizes are just about perfect for capturing the sorts of entries that one might wish to commonplace.

Once you've been at it a while, if you want to keep up with the luxe route that some notebook practices allow, then find yourself a classy looking box to store them all in to make your neighbors jealous. My card indexes bring me more joy than any notebook ever did.

When penmanship becomes a problem, then you can fix it by printing your cards, or (even better in my opinion), typing them on your vintage Smith-Corona Clipper.

And of course the first thing one could type out on their first card and file it at the front where you can see it every day:

"Le mieux est le mortel ennemi du bien" (The better is the mortal enemy of the good).<br /> — Montesquieu, in Pensées, 1726

aka "Don't let perfection be the enemy of the good."

Watch the scale and scope of what you're doing. If you read a book and make a hundred highlights and small notes, DO NOT attempt to turn all of these into permanent notes. You might fell like that is the thing to do, but resist it. A large portion are small things or potentially useful facts that you'll likely never use again or would easily remember, particularly once you've read a whole book.

Find the much smaller subset (5-10% or less of the overall total of notes and highlights as a ballpark rule of thumb) of the most interesting and potentially long term useful ones, and turn those into your permanent notes. Anything beyond this is sure to cause overwhelm. Also don't think that your permanent notes need to be spectacular, awesome, or even bordering on "perfect". They just need to be useful enough for you.

If you own the books or keep your brief notes and highlights written down and need them in the future, you'll still have those to search/find and do something with later as a backstop just in case.

Making things messy from the start as advice for getting started.

I've seen this before in other settings, particularly in starting new notebooks. Some have suggested scrawling on the first page to get over the idea of perfection in a virgin notebook. I also think I've seen Ton Ziijlstra mention that his dad would ding every new car to get over the new feeling and fear of damaging it. Get the damage out of the way so you can just move on.

The fact that a notebook is damaged, messy, or used for the smallest things may be one of the benefits of a wastebook. It averts the internal need some may find for perfection in their nice notebooks or work materials.

source: https://howaboutthis.substack.com/p/rethinking-the-notebook-snob-meets/comment/14924364

It can't be a good sign that an academic who has spent over a decade studying notebooks and note taking still hasn't found the "perfect" organization method.

reply to @AnthonyJohn@pkm.social at https://mastodon.social/@AnthonyJohn@pkm.social/110230007393359308

Perfectionism and Shiny object syndrome are frequently undiagnosed diseases. Are you sure it's not preventing you from building critical mass in one place to actually accomplish your goals? Can't wait to see the essay.

syndication link

optimization-procrastination trap is related to shiny object syndrome - the idea of tweaking one's system constantly

perfect tool trap - guess what? there isn't one

https://www.reddit.com/r/Zettelkasten/comments/zl2hwh/is_the_concept_of_personal_knowledge_management/

This essay seems to be more about shiny object syndrome. The writer doesn't seem to realize any problems they've created. Way too much digging into tools and processes. Note the switching and trying out dozens of applications. (Dear god, why??!!) Also looks like a lot of collecting digitally for no clear goal. As a result of this sort of process it appears that many of the usual affordances were completely blocked, unrealized, and thus useless.

No clear goal in mind for anything other than a nebulous being "better".

One goal was to "retain what I read", but nothing was actively used toward this stated goal. Notes can help a little, but one would need mnemonic methods and possibly spaced repetition neither of which was mentioned.

A list of specific building blocks within the methods and expected outcomes would have helped this person (and likely others), but to my knowledge this doesn't exist as a thing yet though bits and pieces are obviously floating around.<br /> TK: building blocks of note taking

Evidence here for what we'll call the "perfect system fallacy", an illness which often goes hand in hand with "shiny object syndrome".

Too many systems bound together will create so much immediate complexity that there isn't any chance for future complexity or emergence as the proximal system is doomed to failure. One should instead strive for immediate and excessive simplicity which might then build with time, use, and practice into something more rich and complex. This idea seems to be either completely missed or lost in the online literature and especially the blogosphere and social media.

people had come up with solutions Sadly, despite thousands of variations on some patterns, people don't seem to be able to settle on either "one solution" or their "own solution" and in trying to do everything all at once they become lost, set adrift, and lose focus on any particular thing they've got as their own goal.

In this particular instance, "retaining what they read" was totally ignored. Worse, they didn't seem to ever review over their notes of what they read.

I was pondering about different note types, fleeting, permanent, different organisational systems, hierarchical, non-hierarchical, you know the deal.

Why worry about all the types of notes?! This is the problem with these multi-various definitions and types. They end up confusing people without giving them clear cut use cases and methods by which to use them. They get lost in definitional overload and aren't connecting the names with actual use cases and affordances.

I often felt lost about what to takes notes on and what not to take notes on.

Why? Most sources seem to have reasonable guidance on this. Make notes on things that interest you, things which surprise you.

They seem to have gotten lost in all the other moving pieces. Perhaps advice on this should come first, again in the middle, and a third time at the end of these processes.

I'm curious how deeply they read sources and which sources they read to come to these conclusions? Did they read a lot of one page blog posts with summarizations or did they read book length works by Ahrens, Forte, Allosso, Scheper, et al? Or did they read all of these and watch lots of crazy videos as well. Doing it "all" will likely lead into the shiny object syndrome as well.

This seems to outline a list of specifically what not to do and how not to approach these systems and "popular" blog posts that are an inch deep and a mile wide rather than some which have more depth.

Worst of all, I spent so much time taking notes and figuring out a personal knowledge management system that I neglected the things I actually wanted to learn about. And even though I kind of always knew this, I kept falling into the same trap.

Definitely a symptom of shiny object syndrome!

https://www.reddit.com/r/antinet/comments/wsb1ff/iam_stressed_about_relearning_every_thing_about/

If it helps to frame things in smaller building blocks with progressive enhancement as you progress, this outline may be of help: https://boffosocko.com/2022/06/10/reframing-and-simplifying-the-idea-of-how-to-keep-a-zettelkasten/

Start small and you can evolve and revise as things progress, but you'll at least have a start.

source: https://s3.amazonaws.com/prod_foundationapp/364221/lessons/35/1384378776-john-carlton-1.pdf

from: https://campus.thefoundation.com/courses/1/lessons/35

aphrodite-bio-1

teleutias-bio-1

teuthras-bio-2

hector-bio-1

hector-bio-1

hector-bio-1

hector-bio-1

hector-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Clytemnestra-bio-1

Aegisthus-bio-1

geryon-bio-1

amphitrite-bio-1

circe-bio-1

circe-bio-1

heracles-bio-1

glaucus-bio-7

achilles-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

ajax-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

artemis-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

tarpeia-bio-1

acron-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

t-tatius-bio-1

Paris-bio-1

Hector-bio-1

Aegisthus-bio-1

Aegisthus-bio-1

Coon-bio-1

Aegisthus-bio-1

Aegisthus-bio-1

Coon-bio-1

Paris-bio-1

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

priamus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill and Kelly Burk

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

achilles-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

achilles-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

achilles-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

achilles-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

achilles-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

ajax-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

antilochus-bio-1

Carolyn Margulies, Sean Harvill, and Kelly Burk

athena-bio-1

athena-bio-1

athena-bio-1

athena-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

patroclus-bio-2

patroclus-bio-2

patroclus-bio-2

ajax-bio-1

ajax-bio-1

ajax-bio-1

diomedes-bio-1

menelaus-bio-1

menelaus-bio-1

menelaus-bio-1

protesilaus-bio-1

aegisthus-bio-1

clytaemnestra-bio-1

idomeneus-bio-1

oileus-bio-2

ajax-bio-2

aegisthus-bio-1

clytaemnestra-bio-1

hera-bio-1

She threw him into war. An enemy, for all that she protected him later.

aeneas-bio-1

aeneas-bio-1

aeneas-bio-1

aeneas-bio-1

alecto-bio-1

clymenus-bio-1

achilles-bio-1

artemis-bio-1