- Mar 2025
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Überblicksartikel von 2019 zu den Angriffen auf die Wissenschaft während der ersten Trump-Regierung und ihre kurz- und langfristigen Folgen. Forschungen zur Klimakrise und öffentlichen Gesundheit wurden behindert, weil sie den Interessen der fossilen Industrien schaden. Der Kampf gegen Foschung, die Interessen bestimmter Unternehmen und Branchen bedroht, ging aber weit über die Klimathematik hinaus und dient u.a. auch der Chemie- und Agroindustrien. Zu den Maßnahmen gehörten: - Beendigung von Forschungsprojekten - Abbau des Einflusses von Wissenschaftler:innen auf regulatorische Entscheidungen - Verhinderung von öffentlichen Stellungnahmen von Wissenschaftler:innen - Behinderung von Forschungen zum menschengemachten Klimawandel - Vorschreiben erwünschter Forschungsergebnisse - Overruling von Experten durch politische Funktionäre bei Begutachtungen und Regulierungen - Einstellungsstopps und Entlassungen - Entfernung bestimmter Wissenschaftler:innen aus Beratungsgremien - Verbot der Berücksichtigung bestimmter Wissenschaftstypen bei Regulierungen - Druck auf Forschende, unwissenschaftliche Aussagen des Präsidenten zu unterstützen - Schließung von Forschungszentren und -büros und Auflösung von Ausschüssen - Umsiedlungen von Behörden und Forschungseinrichtungen in unattraktive Gegenden
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/28/climate/trump-administration-war-on-science.html
Tags
- by: Brad Plumer
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- Heritage Foundation
- Silencing Science Tracker
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Patrick Gonzales
- by: Coral Davenport
- National Institutes of Health
- Trump administration 1
- USA
- Joel Clement
- Whose science? A new era in regulatory “science wars”
- EPA
- Wendy E. Wagner
- Kavlock
- 2019-12-28
- Scott Pruitt
- War on Science
- Matthew Davis
- Betsy Smith
- Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
- Michale Gerrard
- Elizabeth Southerland
Annotators
URL
-
- Dec 2022
-
techpolicy.press techpolicy.press
-
I am uncertain whether such a shift towards participatory governance is possible. A useful analogy is that of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, which are undergoing a significant “phase shift”, from the culture defined by the community of early contributors, to a broader and more inclusive culture– one centered not just on encyclopedic prowess, but also institutional organizing. This example suggests that such a shift is possible, but hard. It requires both significant resources, which have been invested in the case of Wikimedia, but also strong leadership that is in dialogue with the community and can negotiate together the changes (this has happened to a lesser extent).
I'm surprised that the underlying assumption (and tone) not just here but in most tech discussion of this type, is still that 'everything' around a tech tool should be done through that tech tool. Of course you need to organise around it, and professionalise that in the face of growth or becoming more central to some group's functioning. Obviously you need to leverage other types of governance and decision making than what went into creating a tech at first. Institutionalising is a time proven way to sustain an effort. Technology = politics. You need to be a politician in your own technology space. A politican in the artisanal and as a practice / behaviour sense, not in the occupation sense. Vgl [[Mijn werk is politiek 20190921114750]] which mostly implies thinking at different levels of abstraction about your situation simultaneously (Vgl [[Triz denken in systeemniveaus 20200826114731]] but then socially as well as tech)
-
- Mar 2021
-
arstechnica.com arstechnica.com
-
Mole, B. (2020, June 24). White House ordered NIH to cancel coronavirus research funding, Fauci says. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/white-house-ordered-nih-to-cancel-coronavirus-research-funding-fauci-says/
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.nih.gov www.nih.gov
-
Researchers propose that humidity from masks may lessen severity of COVID-19. (2021, February 12). National Institutes of Health (NIH). https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/researchers-propose-humidity-masks-may-lessen-severity-covid-19
-