Jonathan Blow recently revisited this topic with Casey Muratori. (They last talked about this 3 years ago.)

What's a little absurd is that (a) the original discussion is something like 3–6 hours long and doesn't use recursive descent—instead they descended into some madness about trying to work out from first principles how to special-case operator precedence—and (b) they start out in this video poo-pooing people who speak about "recursive descent", saying that it's just a really obnoxious way to say writing ordinary code—again, all this after they three years ago went out of their way to not "just" write "normal" code—and (c) they do this while launching into yet another 3+ hour discussion about how to do it right—in a better, less confusing way this time, with Jon explaining that he spent "6 or 7 hours" working through this "like 5 days ago". Another really perverse thing is that when he talks about Bob's other post (Parsing Expressions) that ended up in the Crafting Interpreters book, he calls it stupid because it's doing "a lot" for something so simple. Again: this is to justify spending 12 hours to work out the vagaries of precedence levels and reviewing a bunch of papers instead of just spending, I dunno, 5 or 10 minutes or so doing it with recursive descent (the cost of which mostly comes down to just typing it in).

So which one is the real chore? Doing it the straightforward, fast way, or going off and attending to one's unrestrained impulse that you for some reason need to special-case arithmetic expressions (and a handful of other types of operations) like someone is going to throw you off a building if you don't treat them differently from all your other ("normal") code?

Major blind spots all over.

The CPython interpreter really is an interpreter. But it also is a compiler. Python must go through a few stages before ever running the first line of code:

1. scanning
2. parsing

Older versions of Python added an additional stage:

1. scanning
2. parsing
3. checking for valid assignment targets

Let’s compare this to the stages of compiling a C program:

1. ~~preprocessing~~
2. lexical analysis (another term for “scanning”)
3. syntactic analysis (another term for “parsing”)
4. ~~semantic analysis~~
5. ~~linking~~

In this article you started implementing your own version of Python. To do so, you needed to create four main components:

A tokenizer: * accepts strings as input (supposedly, source code); * chunks the input into atomic pieces called tokens; * produces tokens regardless of their sequence making sense or not.

A parser: * accepts tokens as input; * consumes the tokens one at a time, while making sense they come in an order that makes sense; * produces a tree that represents the syntax of the original code.

A compiler: * accepts a tree as input; * traverses the tree to produce bytecode operations.

An interpreter: * accepts bytecode as input; * traverses the bytecode and performs the operation that each one represents; * uses a stack to help with the computations.

• Tokenizer takes source code as input and produces tokens;
• Parser takes tokens as input and produces an AST;
• Compiler takes an AST as input and produces bytecode;
• Interpreter takes bytecode as input and produces program results.

NB: Russ talking here about flattening the NFA into a DFA that has enough synthesized states to represent e.g. in either state A or state B. He's not talking about CPU-level concurrency. But what if he were?

http://fsteeg.com/notes/from-rdf-to-json-with-json-ld

```js / * twitter-entities.js * This function converts a tweet with "entity" metadata * from plain text to linkified HTML. * * See the documentation here: http://dev.twitter.com/pages/tweet_entities * Basically, add ?include_entities=true to your timeline call * * Copyright 2010, Wade Simmons * Licensed under the MIT license * http://wades.im/mons * * Requires jQuery /

function escapeHTML(text) { return $('<div/>').text(text).html() }

function linkify_entities(tweet) { if (!(tweet.entities)) { return escapeHTML(tweet.text) }

// This is very naive, should find a better way to parse this
var index_map = {}

$.each(tweet.entities.urls, function(i,entry) {
    index_map[entry.indices[0]] = [entry.indices[1], function(text) {return "<a href='"+escapeHTML(entry.url)+"'>"+escapeHTML(text)+"</a>"}]
})

$.each(tweet.entities.hashtags, function(i,entry) {
    index_map[entry.indices[0]] = [entry.indices[1], function(text) {return "<a href='http://twitter.com/search?q="+escape("#"+entry.text)+"'>"+escapeHTML(text)+"</a>"}]
})

$.each(tweet.entities.user_mentions, function(i,entry) {
    index_map[entry.indices[0]] = [entry.indices[1], function(text) {return "<a title='"+escapeHTML(entry.name)+"' href='http://twitter.com/"+escapeHTML(entry.screen_name)+"'>"+escapeHTML(text)+"</a>"}]
})

var result = ""
var last_i = 0
var i = 0

// iterate through the string looking for matches in the index_map
for (i=0; i < tweet.text.length; ++i) {
    var ind = index_map[i]
    if (ind) {
        var end = ind[0]
        var func = ind[1]
        if (i > last_i) {
            result += escapeHTML(tweet.text.substring(last_i, i))
        }
        result += func(tweet.text.substring(i, end))
        i = end - 1
        last_i = end
    }
}

if (i > last_i) {
    result += escapeHTML(tweet.text.substring(last_i, i))
}

return result

} ```

I didn't realize recursive descent was part of the standard grugbrain catechism, too, but it makes sense. Grugbrain gets it right again.

Not unrelated—I always liked Bob's justification for using Java:

I won't do anything revolutionary[...] I'll be coding in Java, the vulgar Latin of programming languages. I figure if you can write it in Java, you can write it in anything.

https://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2011/03/19/pratt-parsers-expression-parsing-made-easy/

To be clear: when PeterisP says parse the format, they really mean lex the format (and do some minimal checks concerning e.g. balanced parentheses). To "handle the semantics of a particular field" is a parsing concern.

https://monocle.p3k.io/preview

хорошая библиотека для парсинга и автоматизации тестирования "вёрстки с js"

It would be nicer if the parse method provided an option to do it safely and always fall back to returning an object instead of raising exception if it couldn't parse the input.

This word is composed of the alpha privative and the root for "healing," which is where my name comes from! ἰάομαι (pres mid) takes the future in the active, the participle of which is ἰάσων, meaning something like "being about to heal." Therefore, ἀνίατος is something that is incurable. It may refer to wickedness that cannot be atoned for, to a person who is unforgivably evil.