- Mar 2022
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Delz, Louise Aurora Katharina, Keith Gaynor, Ellen Somers, Rachel O. Connor, and Luisa Schmieder. ‘A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF A COGNITIVE MODEL OF COVID-19 RELATED DISTRESS’. PsyArXiv, 18 February 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zmf5d.
-
- Oct 2021
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Code, A., Fox, L., Asbury, K., & Toseeb, U. (2021). How did Autistic Children, and their Parents, Experience School Transition during the COVID-19 Pandemic? PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8kzsn
-
- Sep 2020
-
www.ajpmonline.org www.ajpmonline.org
-
Liu, Y., Finch, B. K., Brenneke, S. G., Thomas, K., & Le, P. D. (2020). Perceived Discrimination and Mental Distress Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From the Understanding America Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.007
-
- Aug 2020
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Chaudhry, R., Dranitsaris, G., Mubashir, T., Bartoszko, J., & Riazi, S. (2020). A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes. EClinicalMedicine, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100464
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Behrens. F., Kret. M. (2020) Under the Umbrella of Prosocial Behavior – A Critical Comparison of Paradigms. PsyArXiv Preprints. Retrieved from: https://psyarxiv.com/9uebc/
-
-
www.jahonline.org www.jahonline.org
-
Gaiha, S. M., Cheng, J., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2020). Association Between Youth Smoking, Electronic Cigarette Use, and Coronavirus Disease 2019. Journal of Adolescent Health, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.002
-
-
www.nber.org www.nber.org
-
Levin, A. T., Cochran, K. B., & Walsh, S. P. (2020). Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Meta-Analysis & Public Policy Implications (Working Paper No. 27597; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27597
-
-
covid-19.iza.org covid-19.iza.org
-
The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation. COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13532/
-
- Jul 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ahn, M. H., Shin, Y. W., Kim, J. H., Kim, H. J., Lee, K.-U., & Chung, S. (2020). High Work-related Stress and Anxiety Response to COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers in South Korea: SAVE study [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9nxth
-
-
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
-
Lighter, J., Phillips, M., Hochman, S., Sterling, S., Johnson, D., Francois, F., & Stachel, A. (n.d.). Obesity in Patients Younger Than 60 Years Is a Risk Factor for COVID-19 Hospital Admission. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa415
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Rahman, M., Ali, G. G. M. N., Li, X. J., Paul, K. C., & Chong, P. H. J. (2020). Twitter and Census Data Analytics to Explore Socioeconomic Factors for Post-COVID-19 Reopening Sentiment [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fz4ry
-
- May 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Haaf, J. M., Hoogeveen, S., Berkhout, S., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020, April 14). A Bayesian Multiverse Analysis of Many Labs 4: Quantifying the Evidence against Mortality Salience. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cb9er
-
- Apr 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Hallford, D. J., & D'Argembeau, A. (2020, April 15). Why We Imagine Our Future: Introducing the Functions of Future Thinking Scale (FoFTS). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bez4u
-
- Jul 2019
-
www.sthda.com www.sthda.com
-
it acts as PCA quantitative variables and as MCA for qualitative variables.
-
- Jan 2019
-
inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net
-
This is because most authors usually did not report a plausible theoretical model for the structure of their observed variables, and there was often insufficient information for us to create our own plausible non-g models that could be compared with a theory of the existence of Spearman’s g in the data
The EFA vs. CFA question was a stickler for one peer reviewer, and I can understand why. When measurement is based on strong theory, then I believe that CFA is preferable to EFA. But that was rarely the case in these datasets.
-
the strongest first factor accounted for 86.3% of observed variable variance
I suspect that this factor was so strong because it consisted of only four observed variables, and three of them were written measures of verbal content. All of the verbal cariables correlated r = .72 to .89. Even the "non-verbal" variable (numerical ability) correlates r = .72 to .81 with the other three variables (Rehna & Hanif, 2017, p. 25). Given these strong correlations, a very strong first factor is almost inevitable.
-
The weakest first factor accounted for 18.3% of variance
This factor may be weak because the sample consists of Sudanese gifted children, which may have restricted the range of correlations in the dataset.
-
The mean sample size of the remaining data sets was 539.6 (SD = 1,574.5). The large standard deviation in relationship to the mean is indicative of the noticeably positively skewed distribution of sample sizes, a finding supported by the much smaller median of 170 and skewness value of 6.297. There were 16,559 females (33.1%), 25,431 males (48.6%), and 10,350 individuals whose gender was unreported (19.8%). The majority of samples—62 of 97 samples (63.9%)—consisted entirely or predominantly of individuals below 18. Most of the remaining samples contained entirely or predominantly adults (32 data sets, 33.0%), and the remaining 3 datasets (3.1%) had an unknown age range or an unknown mix of adults and children). The samples span nearly the entire range of life span development, from age 2 to elderly individuals.
My colleague, Roberto Colom, stated in his blog (link below) that he would have discarded samples with fewer than 100 individuals. This is a legitimate analysis decision. See his other commentary (in Spanish) at https://robertocolom.wordpress.com/2018/06/01/la-universalidad-del-factor-general-de-inteligencia-g/
-