- Jan 2022
-
-
Fischer, O., Jeitziner, L., & Wulff, D. U. (2021). Affect in science communication: A data-driven analysis of TED talks. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/28yc5
-
- Nov 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci. (2021, November 2). The current JCVI minutes debate clearly illustrates the problems with Twitter and scientific debate: Meaning glossed, hedges and distinctions left behind, claims about arguments conflated with claims about people, paving the way to ramped up, emotive soundbites and claims. 1/7 [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1455458854637117440
-
- Aug 2020
-
psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
-
Adams, R. C., Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Barrington, A., Williams, A., Boivin, J., Chambers, C. D., & Bott, L. (2017). How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000100
Tags
- educational background
- relational expressions
- causation
- scientific findings
- conditional causation
- lexical content
- causal implication
- correlation
- exaggeration
- is:article
- syntactic construction
- practical implication
- lang:en
- media
- scientific expressions
- headline
- communicating science
- modal verbs
- degree of causation
Annotators
URL
-