120 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. df_clean$sector_type

      Ich sehe zwei Möglichkeiten das zu codieren:

      1. Nach Sektoren - Gibt es Unterschiede zwischen Manufacturing und anderen ? (Agriculture hat nur 6 obs..)
      2. Nach Arbeitsintensität - Macht es einen Unterschied ob ich einen Bürojob habe oder am Fließband/am Bau/am Acker arbeite?
    2. Vorschlag “State (Law)”, “State (Law), Tripartite Comission”, “State (Law), in discussion with employers and employees”, “Agreements between firms and the president”, “State (Law), agreement between trade unions and industry”, “State (Law) & collective agreements”, “State (Law), partly collective agreements” → State “Employers and unions (collective agreements)” & “Employers and unions (collective agreements) & plant-based (firm-based agreemenst)”, “Establishment” → Collective agreement “Establishment” → ?

      WIr müssen diskutieren, ob Establishment wirklich teil von Employers and employeessein soll, oder ob wir das als eigenen Daummy kodieren und dafür Employers and employees in Collective agreements zurückbenennen.

    3. “Germany (West)”, “Germany (East)”, “Germany (Baden-Württemberg)”, “Germany (Nordrhein-Westfalen)”, “Germany (Hessen)”, “Germany (Niedersachsen)”, “Germany (Hamburg)”, “Germany (Schleswig-Holstein)” & “Germany (Baden-Württemberg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Hessen, Niedersachsen, Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein)” → Germany

      Eventuell unterteilen in BRD/DDR?

  2. Aug 2025
    1. Vorschlag

      Q

      Hier eventuell auch (oder robustness): OLS vs Rest in Regression, oder anderes. Diskutieren, SUR kann SUR sein, Tobit ist Tobit, Oder man kann probit/logit/tobit auch zusammenfassen. Maximum Likelihood Method ist MLM

    2. Vorschlag

      Q

      Ja hier eventuell DiD/RDD/ähnliche zusammenfasen. Hir müssen wir aber diskutieren ob wir hier auf Kausalität, Endogenität, etc abzielen – analog diskutieren wie zu WL-PL Paper.

      Ganz wichtig: DiD in spirit vs. DiD richtig (würde in spirit nicht zu DiD tun)

    3. Vorschlag

      Q

      Anmerkung: Hier müssen wir im Text dann genau erklären, dass wir mit „State“ dann jene meinen wo der Staat letztendlich die Entscheidung gesetzt hat, auch wenn dies zuvor in Absprache mit Organisationen stattfand -> hier ist aber auch eine Robustness-Analyse möglich wo wir das nochmal verferinern in Mitsprache/Nicht-Mitsprache (wobei das eventuell tricky ist, weil nicht immer ganz klar ob es Mitsprache gab oder nicht, aber müsste man sich anschauen im Fall).

    Tags

    Annotators

  3. Jul 2025
    1. Figure 8. Path Notation

      Shouldn't there be some additional explanation for path? E.g., difference with network, naming, main relations, etc. The other elements have this, and there also was an explanation when Path was still in the technology layer (although this text will have to be modified because the use of Path has been extended).

      Henk

    2. Figure 46. Relationships Between Strategy Elements and Motivation and Core Elements

      I'd make explicite that Value Stream influences Value. As stated by Milan, we could also discuss an additional realization (with the same distinction than for requirement: if the Value Stream contributes to the Value, then influence, if it is mandatory to get this value, then realization).

      I'd also make it explicit that Work Package realizes Course of Action. Of course that's already possible as a derived relationship (through deliverable, core elements, and strategy behavior elements), but that's also true directly as a course of action is made concrete and actionable through multiple programs and projects, modeled as work packages.

      (JB)

    3. Semantics of Dependency Relationships

      We should avoid using blue for service part in A. When changing the picture, please set the height of service A to the same as for the process B to make it more consistent. Please swhitch the order of the right part to behaviour - passive (left to right).

    1. but some of the relationships that apply to the specialized element need not be allowed for the generalized element.

      As discussed during a meeting (during Marc's holidays), this sentence is wrong as it suggests we can authorize relationships to/from a specialized element that would otherwise not be allowed on the "root" element. (JB)

      Proposal: "but some of the relationships that apply to the generalized element need not be allowed for the specialized element.

      For reference, in 2.1, used to be "Specialized concepts inherit the properties of their “parent” concepts, but additional restrictions with respect to their use may apply. For example, some of the relationships that apply to the “parent” concept need not be allowed for the specialization."

    2. Relationships of Implementation and Migration Elements with Core Elements

      Now that role is a generic element, I think we should replace role assigned to workpackage by business actor assigned to work package (for the same reasons that role can no more be assigned to a stakeholder). (JB)

      edit: or if we decide to keep role here, then we might want to do the same with stakeholder.

      @MarcLankhorst I think we should discuss this during today's call.

    3. Figure 46. Relationships Between Strategy Elements and Motivation and Core Elements

      I'd make explicite that Value Stream influences Value. As stated by Milan, we could also discuss an additional realization (with the same distinction than for requirement: if the Value Stream contributes to the Value, then influence, if it is mandatory to get this value, then realization).

      I'd also make it explicit that Work Package realizes Course of Action. Of course that's already possible as a derived relationship (through deliverable, core elements, and strategy behavior elements), but that's also true directly as a course of action is made concrete and actionable through multiple programs and projects, modeled as work packages.

      (JB)

    4. Semantics of Dependency Relationships

      We should avoid using blue for service part in A. When changing the picture, please set the height of service A to the same as for the process B to make it more consistent. Please swhitch the order of the right part to behaviour - passive (left to right).

    5. Assignment

      Please move the active element (interface) to the left to keep active-behaviour-passive order. Also replace composition with aggregation. I would also change the applicaiton's ambiguous name Finance to something like Financial application, ERP, ...

  4. Apr 2025
    1. The H5P activities list will indicate the total number of H5P activities created in a given book, displaying them in groups of 20 with pagination controls at the bottom of the page. Acitivites are listed by their shortcode ID number (in order of creation) and will be hidden by default. You can choose to expand all activities at once by clicking the Expand All button at the top of the page. Alternatively, you can click the Show Activity button to display a specific H5P activity.

      I feel this bit is not necessary.

    2. https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/portuguese/h5p-listing/

      I would actually prefer to refer to the Directory where they can pick any book. That way we don't need to ensure that this book continues to exist.

  5. Mar 2025
    1. Jin's operation was based in China, and he used encrypted communications and cryptocurrencies to conduct his business. The investigation involved a team of agents from various federal agencies, including the DEA, FBI, and IRS, who worked together to gather evidence and track down Jin's associates in the US. One of these associates, Bin Wang, was arrested in 2017 and later sentenced to six years in prison. The team discovered that Jin was using a company in Tonga to ship his packages, and that he was offering a wide range of synthetic opioids, including carfentanil and U-48800. As the investigation continued, the team found that Jin's operation was linked to numerous death cases across the US, and that he was using his websites to sell drugs to customers in the US. The team eventually identified Jin as Fujing Zheng, a 35-year-old man from Shanghai, and his father, Guanghua Zheng, who was 62. The Zhengs were found to be operating a sophisticated online drug trafficking operation, using encrypted communications and cryptocurrencies to conduct their business. Despite the evidence gathered, the Chinese government refused to extradite the Zhengs to the US, citing a lack of evidence. The US government eventually indicted the Zhengs and shut down their websites, but they remain at large in China. The investigation highlighted the challenges of combating online drug trafficking, particularly when it involves foreign nationals and jurisdictions.
    2. Leroy Steele, a local drug dealer, who had been purchasing fentanyl from a Chinese chemical company using the alias Gordon Jin. Detectives found emails and phone records showing Steele's communication with Jin, who was advertising fentanyl and other illegal drugs on the open internet. The detectives ordered fentanyl from Jin as part of their investigation, which was delivered to them in the mail.
    1. Valdez-Torres began producing fentanyl instead, creating a batch of ten kilos. He warned the cartel that the fentanyl needed to be diluted 50:1 to avoid killing users, but this warning was not heeded by street dealers. The fentanyl was sold as heroin, leading to many overdoses and deaths. The case was investigated by Ryan Rapaszky, who later saw the connection between this incident and the rising opioid epidemic in the US.
    2. unknown author named Siegfried, which describes a method for making fentanyl. This method, known as the Siegfried method, was later used by underground chemists to produce the drug. Fentanyl had benefits in medicine, but it also had a darker side, as it could be produced in a laboratory and replaced heroin, generating significant profits with minimal risk. The story then shifts to Dr. Michael Rhodes, a pain doctor in Tennessee, who was prescribing large amounts of OxyContin, a narcotic painkiller made by Purdue Pharma.
    3. As a result, meth lab seizures decreased, and the cooks and workers from Apatzingán returned to Mexico. The Mexican traffickers then shifted their focus to producing meth in Mexico, taking advantage of the country's access to world chemical markets and compromised authorities. This led to the creation of the modern Mexican meth trade, with traffickers controlling production from raw materials to finished product.
    4. Methamphetamine was initially produced by biker gangs in the US, but a new recipe using ephedrine was rediscovered in the 1980s. This method was easier and allowed for mass production, democratizing methamphetamine. Donald Stenger, a middle-class, organized individual, played a significant role in popularizing this method. He was eventually caught and died in 1988, but his innovation led to San Diego becoming a major meth production hub.
    5. The project, known as "the Project," is led by a chemist known as "the Brain," who is producing fentanyl, a painkiller that is far more powerful than morphine. The fentanyl is being manufactured in a lab in Mexico and is being sold on the streets of Chicago, leading to a rash of overdoses and deaths. Rapaszky's investigation leads him to uncover the truth about the Project and the Sinaloan traffickers' involvement in the fentanyl trade.

      not produced medically, produced by and for black market

  6. Feb 2025
    1. WP QuickLaTeX would render something which looks like this:

      if we want to keep the content accessible, we can't just post a screenshot, but would have to show a live version of this. this would mean either activating WP QuickLaTeX for the guide (I don't think it would interfere with MathJax as there are no MathJax examples), or actually pointing to an external link.

    2. If you do not see this option, please contact your network manager.

      what "option" does this refer to? the plugins menu item? or WP QuickLaTeX in the list? or the Activate link? I would suggest removing this sentence, as it is the standard to do when something doesn't work like it should. or am I missing something?

  7. Jan 2025
    1. View and Restore Previous Revisions Pressbooks saves the last 10 revisions of any changes you’ve made for each of the three separate stylesheets. You can access these revisions on the Custom Styles page below the save button. To view or restore a previous version of one of your stylesheets: Click the date stamp for the revision you’d like to view to open the Compare Revisions interface for a particular stylesheet Find the revision you’d like to restore from and click the ‘Restore This Revision‘ button

      This could be a separate chapter (or included in the Editor chapter)

  8. Dec 2024
  9. Oct 2024
    1. Video: I would replace it with a video that focuses on table accessibility. The current video shows how to create a table and then add content and then shows how to designate a row as the header row; this is not sufficient for accessibility. For accessibility reasons it is also necessary to go to Table cell properties and choose Cell type: Header cell and **Scope: Column" (or row).

  10. Jan 2023
    1. I hold it towards you.

      It is confusing what the author is offering towards the other person. They never mention an object that the other person can receive; however since this is the last line of the poem, it offers some type of significance as the author seems to be offering life to the other person.

  11. Mar 2022
  12. Jan 2022
    1. you.

      The audience of the poem is the reader. This is not known until the last word, so it is interesting to reread the poem once more with this idea in mind. The author could have included 'you' earlier in the poem, but purposefully left this until the near end of the poem.

  13. Apr 2021
    1. where hereditary CRC syndromes have been excluded

      molecularly excluded?

      We see these patients and follow up had been one off at 50 but now they get 5 yearly until 50

      standard surveillance - scope every year for 3 years?

    2. We recommend that deficient MMR tumours without hypermethylation/BRAF mutation and without a germline pathogenic variant in MMR genes should undergo somatic tumour testing with a CRC gene panel

      Zosia's point to discuss

      Small number of cases. ? pickup rate

      ? funding source

      ? needed for amsterdam

    3. We recommend screening for H elicobacter pylori in patients with LS and subsequent eradication therapy if indicated. (GRADE of evidence: low; Strength of recommendation: strong)

      explore in audit ? engagement with the GP (subgroup? i.e. males?)

    4. We recommend that gastric, small bowel, or pancreatic surveillance in LS patients is only performed in the context of a clinical trial

      Should we be identifying these trials and offering recruitment locally? maybe others already do?

      now not done, previously had been done over 50.

      something for the audit - to exclude some individuals

    5. We recommend that age of onset of surveillance colonoscopy should be stratified according to the LS-associated gene. We recommend colonoscopy from age 25 years for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers and 35 years for MSH6 and PMS2 mutation carriers

      as per lynch specific CGG guidelines

    6. We recommend that patients with a moderate familial CRC risk should have a one-off colonoscopy at age 55 years. (GRADE of evidence: moderate; Strength of recommendation: strong)

      No longer mod and high-mod just moderate.

  14. Feb 2021
  15. Jan 2021
    1. Now I can only smile.

      This makes me think of the narrator being bedridden in old age or sickness and her partner is no longer alive. Since flowers and hospitals also have a close tie like flowers and relationships, the author might be trying to convey how the narrator's relationship with her partner changed over time with old age but still kept the same in some aspects.

  16. Oct 2020
  17. May 2020
    1. wahren Wer

      Hier vorsichtig sein. Bei dir gibt es diesen wahren Wert nicht. In deinem Methodik-Kapitel sollte auch der Bezug zu deinem Anwendungsfall klar werden. Du kannst zur Einführung der Methode einen anderen Anwendungsfall wählen, musst dann aber später klarstellen wie sich das auf die Hammerform übertragen lässt.

      Das gleiche gilt auch für die Unsicherheit mit der die Parameter behaftet sind und zieht sich auch durch den Rest vom Kapitel.

      Der Unterschied ist, dass die meiste Literatur von "echten" Werten ausgeht die aber nicht genau bekannt sind, während die Hammerform genau bekannt ist aber verändert werden kann.

    2. Dies f ̈uhrt wiederum zurVereinfachung des Modells, da als unwichtig identifizierte Parameter weniger Aufmerk-samkeit beigemessen werden mus

      Stimmt. In deinem Fall geht es aber nicht um die Vereinfachung eines Modells sondern des Hammerdesigns.

    3. Die Sensitivit ̈atsanalys

      Bei diesem Absatz ist unklar ob sich die Quellenangabe am Ende auf den ganzen Absatz oder nur auf den letzten Satz bezieht. Eine Möglichkeit das zu umgehen wäre es am Anfang z.B. zu schreiben:

      In diesem Unterkapitel werden die Grundlagen der Sensitivitätsanalyse, basierend auf den Erläuterungen in (Saltelli A., 2019), eingeführt. Sofern sich vereinzelt Aussagen auf andere Literatur stützt, ist dies durch eine zusätzliche Referenz gekennzeichnet.

    Tags

    Annotators

    Tags

    Annotators

  18. Sep 2019