Dear wanderer:
You are looking for https://support.pkware.com/pkzip/application-note-archives.
Dear wanderer:
You are looking for https://support.pkware.com/pkzip/application-note-archives.
This is:
Gabriel, Richard P. “LISP: Good News, Bad News, How to Win Big.” AI Expert 6, no. 6 (1991): 30–39.
... and a copy (in HTML) can be found at https://www.dreamsongs.com/WIB.html
The header image here doesn't load. But I made sure that it was archived. If and when Medium stops syndicating this article, you can find a copy of the image that was used here:
Hey, traveler. You're looking for https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/948093.948095.
In Hints and Principles for Computer System Design, 2020, Lampson describes his original 1983 paper (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/800217.806614) as being "[r]eprinted with some changes in IEEE Software".
Hey, traveler. You want
look into
This text in the passage is an example of the element of water, which doesn't only take different forms, but it's also introspective and reflective. The highlighted phrase reminds one of a mirror, and guess what mirrors are made out of? Water. Water comes out of our eyes whenever our emotions get the best of us. In this context, the leader is using their memories to reflect on the past, solely based of trust and appreciation from his people/ Emotions are caused by memories, causing one to reflect and decide.
Traveler:
You're looking for https://www.w3.org/Administration/DataModel.html
404 Not Found
It's here: https://time.com/archive/6735152/the-selfish-meme/
I referred (indirectly) to this in an annotation on https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ as "the PDF". As the first page indicates this is rather a PDF—specifically someone's PDF of the ACM's reprint from 1996 (which can be found hanging off this DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/227181.227186).
The Atlantic's PDF can be found here https://cdn.theatlantic.com/media/archives/1945/07/176-1/132407932.pdf (at least for now).
Hey, traveler.
Wayback Machine has a copy of the original HTML version.
Lassila has a copy of the PDF her homepage: https://www.lassila.org/publications/2001/SciAm.html
JSTOR (PDF): https://www.jstor.org/stable/26059207
Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau
Those are: - https://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/Conferences/ECHT90/Authors.html#BernersLee - https://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/Conferences/ECHT90/Authors.html#Cailliau
This foreword is described in the book as being "written as an article in 1997". There's a brief introduction (8 paragraphs dated December 2002), and then what follows is purportedly that same article, which begins, "The Web was designed to be a universal space of information[...]". The acknowledgements of the foreword, too, says that it "is based on a talk presented at the W3C meeting, London, December 3, 1997".
The same material, including acknowledgement, but sans the 8-paragraph introduction, is available on a webpage titled "Realising the Full Potential of the Web" on the W3C site. https://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html
Dear wanderer:
You're looking for http://software.rochus-keller.ch/screenshot_oberon_ide_0.5.1.png
Dear wanderer:
You're looking for http://software.rochus-keller.ch/screenshot_oberon_system_in_debugger.png
So, here's a Vision Of The Future that's popular right now.
Me acuerdo de cuando vi ese video y me pareció que era la parte aburrida de un episodio malo de Black Mirror.
Hey, traveler. You'll be interested in: * https://archive.org/details/wholeearthreview00unse_9 * https://wholeearth.info/p/whole-earth-review-spring-1987
all mass people are learning that that you know what you put in comes out you're connected to it you are nature so you can't destroy it or you'll destroy 00:17:47 yourself so that's mirroring the reality of interconnection actually
Sorry, Insufficient Access Privileges
Traveller:
You may benefit from this link, instead https://www.w3.org/History/1991/HTRejected.wn/WNDocument.wn
(Not sure if it's actually the same as what's supposed to be available here.)
Hey, traveler. Try this instead:
Traveler:
You are probably looking for this: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/aboutapps/fileformat/pdf/automatic_format_identification.pdf
amd [sic.]
I'm having trouble determining the source of this purported error. This PDF appears to have copied the content from the version published on kurzweilai.net, which includes the same "erratum". Meanwhile, however, this document which looks like it could plausibly be a scan of the original contains no such error: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/dod/readingroom/16a/977.pdf
I wonder if someone transcribed the memo with this "amd" error and that copy was widely distributed (e.g. during the BBS era?) and then someone came across that copy and inserted the "[sic]" adornments.
This is an unfinished form of the paper that's available (without broken inline images) here:
http://diglib.stanford.edu:8091/diglib/pub/reports/commentor.html
Traveller:
Try https://dougengelbart.org/content/view/114/ instead.
1478-1518, Notebook of Leonardo da Vinci (''The Codex Arundel''). A collection of papers written in Italian by Leonardo da Vinci (b. 1452, d. 1519), in his characteristic left-handed mirror-writing (reading from right to left), including diagrams, drawings and brief texts, covering a broad range of topics in science and art, as well as personal notes. The core of the notebook is a collection of materials that Leonardo describes as ''a collection without order, drawn from many papers, which I have copied here, hoping to arrange them later each in its place according to the subjects of which they treat'' (f. 1r), a collection he began in the house of Piero di Braccio Martelli in Florence, in 1508. To this notebook has subsequently been added a number of other loose papers containing writing and diagrams produced by Leonardo throughout his career. Decoration: Numerous diagrams.
The Codex Arundel, named after a British collector, the Earl of Arundel, who acquired it early in the 17th century. Da Vinci composed the collection of hundreds of papers between 1478 and 1518 — that is, between the ages of 26 and 66 — the year before his death. The papers now reside in the British Library. The collection features his famous mirror-writing as well as diagrams, drawings and texts covering a range of topics in art and science.
Da Vinci composed a collection of hundreds of papers from 1478 and 1518 which are now bound in the Codex Arundel, named for the Earl of Arundel who acquired it in the 17th century.
from the start the logic reflected the social relations of the one-way mirror. They were able to see and to take — and to do this in a way that we could not contest because we had no way to know what was happening.
!- surveillance capitalism : metaphor - one way mirror
Possibly this one https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/VISSOFT55257.2022.00009
High fidelity scans are available at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/sim_whole-earth_spring-1987_54/page/n3/mode/1up
You're looking for this, I think: https://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/9703-web-apps-essay.html
Hey, traveller. You're looking for https://web.archive.org/web/20070824202955/http://www.mollyrocket.com:80/forums/viewtopic.php?t=159&sid=cb913629aa8310947c0476848a8824dd
Other versions which are available are:
Another PDF from CERN, but this one what looks like a PDF of the original as a first-class digital document, i.e., not a scan of a paper copy: https://cds.cern.ch/record/369245/files/dd-89-001.pdf
This looks like a PDF created from the RTF version described at https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html
Also available here (as a scanned PDF; original source unclear): https://designsciencelab.com/resources/HumanitysPath_BF.pdf
Also available here under the alternate title "Livingry" from BFI: https://www.bfi.org/about-fuller/big-ideas/livingry/
Also available on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/127605643
Also available here, from the Computer History Museum's channel on YouTube (parts 1 and 2): * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oGq1RcM8B0 * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ffAkshf2n8
Also available here: https://www.ayeconference.com/Articles/Whatssospecialaboutsw.html
Dear wanderer:
A copy of the content you're looking for can be found here: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/kosmos-social/media_attachments/files/105/949/240/042/806/220/original/0572af7c5d7f0191.png
imitation more generally. Emmanuel Roze hasfound that the experience of imitating patients makes the young doctors he trainsmore empathetic
Imitation can potentially help one become more empathetic.
Is there a relationship between this effect and one's mirror neurons?
Donald J. Trump is well known for is sad impersonation of impaired and disabled people. Obviously he has no empathy for them and it's unlikely that his re-enactments will create empathy for him. Is this a result of a neurological deficit on his part?
Also available elsewhere: * https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/365181.365236 * https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2001/3/7434-will-software-ever-work
Lieberman, H., Guest Ed. The debugging scandal special section. Commun. ACM 40, 3 (Mar. 1997).
That should be CACM 40, 4.
The article can be found here: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/1997/4/8423-introduction/abstract
Also available through Lieberman's homepage: https://web.media.mit.edu/~lieber/Lieberary/Softviz/CACM-Debugging/#Intro
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/80f47smhYEI
In one study, subjects who had watched a videotapedspeech were 33 percent more likely to recall a point from the talk if it wasaccompanied by a gesture. This effect, detected immediately after the subjectsviewed the recording, grew even more pronounced with the passage of time:thirty minutes after watching the speech, subjects were more than 50 percentmore likely to remember the gesture-accompanied points.
People are more likely to remember points from talks that are accompanied by gestures. This effect apparently increases with time.
What does the effect of time have on increased lengths? Does it continue to increase and then decrease at some point? Anecdotally I often recall quotes and instances from movies based on movements that I make.
What effects, if any, are seen in studies of mirror-neurons and those with impairment of them? What memory effects might be seen with those on the autism spectrum who don't have strong mirror-neuron responses? If this is impaired, what might account for their improved memories for some types of material? Which types of material do they have improved memories for?
Is the same true of drawing points from a speech using the ideas of sketchnotes? Is drawing an extension of gestural improvement of memory?
Also available at <https://archive.org/details/hartoriginal1965>
.
This URL is referenced by Ted himself in his upload (to the Internet Archive) of the seminar "Hard and Fast Thoughts for a Softcopy World":
<https://archive.org/details/HardAndFastThoughts1966>
Meanwhile, a copy has already been available through IA, too:
<https://archive.org/details/nelson-file-structure>
(...albeit uploaded independently by Erica Fischer and not Ted.)
Also available at http://csis.pace.edu/~marchese/CS835/Lec3/nelson.pdf (apparently with Ted's blessing; see `https://archive.org/details/HardAndFastThoughts1966`).
reason can also serve empathy and social connection as well as self-interest and let me tell you how this was discovered 00:21:11 because empathy turns out to be physical back in 1996 in Parma Italy a remarkable thing happened in the neuroscience lab 00:21:24 there and I've been there Vittorio galazy was running an experiment for professor ritsu lottie's in which they had macaque monkeys and they were 00:21:36 training the monkeys too they trained them to push buttons and peel bananas and grab rings and do certain things and then they had probes in the monkeys brains neuron by neuron in what is 00:21:50 called the premotor cortex which choreographed actions it sort of puts actions together and they were looking at which neurons fired when the monkeys did which actions they had it hooked up to a computer so every time the monkey 00:22:03 moved and did this versus peel the banana etc you would see exactly which neurons were firing the monkey breast something you would see which neurons are firing and if he grasped with the right hand to be one set left hand 00:22:15 another set et cetera and this was going just fine then it was lunchtime and in Italy you take a nice lunch so you take a nice lunch for toriel comes back didn't have dessert as a pile 00:22:29 of bananas thank you take a banana he starts to peel it and he finds that the computer is registering click click click click click that the monkey's brain which we're supposed to register 00:22:42 register monkey movements is registering his movements and when they checked it out it turns out these were exactly at least 1/3 of the neurons firing 30% 00:22:54 actually will were the neurons for peeling bananas then they did further experiments and they found out that there was an interesting phenomenon that 00:23:06 there's a connection between vision and action that the same neurons that are firing when you peel a banana are firing when you see someone else peel a banana 00:23:18 well not quite all of them 30% the other 70% are doing interesting variations on that but those 30% are interesting they're called mirror neurons they mirror what you're doing and they link 00:23:31 vision in action and then they found out why there is a neural pathway Direction directly between the premotor cortex and the parietal cortex just behind it that 00:23:45 integrates a vision and they are you know tuned as you're growing up to length vision and action so that vision and action are linked together but then the other interesting thing is that 00:23:58 mirror neurons are connected to the emotional regions and emotionally something wild was discovered back in 00:24:09 the 1950s and 60s by Paul Ekman namely that we have a physiology that corresponds to our emotions Darwin first hypothesized this that around the world 00:24:23 when people are happy they smile when they're sad they frown when they're angry they bare their teeth etc and animals do a lot of the same things 00:24:35 and that basically there are other physiological adji of emotions when you're angry your skin temperature rises half a degree which is why you say my blood boils you know why you get burned 00:24:49 up and so on there's a reason for that those metaphors are for anger are based on your actual physiology and that physiology of anger is tied to the mirror neurons because the physiology 00:25:02 has to do with what your body is doing and if it's connected to vision you can see with someone else's body cuz doing and you can tell if somebody is writhing in pain or deliriously happy or really 00:25:15 sad or whatever you are emotionally connected to other people Briah your brain you have a brain and everybody else has the capacity for 00:25:29 what's called empathy it's a physical capacity linking you to others and that's how social connection works that is a physical thing and actually most 00:25:41 the reason Oh a huge amount is based on social connection and empathy it's not just self-interest and that's important for many reasons having to do with 00:25:52 morality and with politics
empathy is physical and mirror neurons make the empathy connection: the same set of neurons is connected to vision system as to movement system and that in turn is connected to emotional centers. Therefore we can see the physiological expressions of emotions in others and it triggers our associated emotions.
A lot of reason is based on social connections and empathy.
Full version: https://www.dougengelbart.org/content/view/266/177/
The Programming Language Jigsaw: Mixins, Modularity and Multiple Inheritance
Also available as PDF: http://bracha.org/jigsaw.ps
Mixin-based inheritance
Also available as PDF: http://bracha.org/oopsla90.pdf
From the Conclusion section in this paper:
Note: This paper is based on a keynote paper delivered by the authors at the WILUconference held in Guelph, Canada, in May 2005 (http://dis.shef.ac.uk/literacy/adelaide-webber-johnston.pdf)
Note: This paper is based on a keynote paper delivered by the authors at the WILUconference held in Guelph, Canada, in May 2005 (http://dis.shef.ac.uk/literacy/adelaide-webber-johnston.pdf)
Pitekün: An Experimental Visual Tool to Assist Code Navigation and Code Understanding
See < http://hdl.handle.net/10863/4821>/https://bia.unibz.it/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991005773520701241/39UBZ_INST:ResearchRepository
A non-PDFied HTML version is here: https://web.archive.org/web/20200830204849/https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/printerFriendly/131/129
Regarding missing 1993/1994 archives:
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/2016JulAug/0005.html
You are (probably?) looking for https://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/Overview.html
The document you are looking for can be found at https://www.w3.org/Conferences/IETF92/udi2.txt
Comparing Java vs. C/C++ Efficiency Issues to Interpersonal Issues
Content also available (including the original word processor file) from https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html
Other versions which are available are:
From CERN, a PDF scan of the original (includes the infamous handwritten note "Vague but exciting...": https://cds.cern.ch/record/1405411/files/ARCH-WWW-4-010.pdf
Another transcript available here: https://tinlizzie.org/IA/index.php/Alan_Kay_at_OOPSLA_1997:_The_Computer_Revolution_has_not_Happened_Yet
Another copy here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYT2se94eU0
Another copy here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY
The Internet is a huge boon to free speech -over 2 billion webpages are out there, showing people's thoughts, dreams and stories. Whatever you go looking for, you will find. The Web is Caliban's mirror - when I go there I find a community of intelligent discourse, wry jokes, technological assistance and the greatest works of human history, lovingly transcribed by those who care about them. Oddly, when Jack Valenti looks there, all he finds are thieves, hucksters and crooks.
Another reference to Caliban's mirror courtesy of Kevin Marks.
In his preface to The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891), Irish humorist Oscar Wilde defines two kinds of literature by the hostile reactions of readers: “The nineteenth century dislike of Realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass. / The nineteenth century dislike of Romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass.” Professor John Hunt comments: “Wilde’s meaning seems clear enough: the self-absorbed bourgeois are like Caliban, the anti-hero of Shakespeare’s The Tempest— resistant to all civilizing influences. When realistic art accurately imitates the bourgeois, they are outraged to see themselves represented so unflatteringly. But when romantic art offers an alternative, expressing the avant-garde genius of the artist, the bourgeois howl in protest at not seeing anything like themselves.” (Ulysses Project)
An interesting literary view of Caliban's mirror with relation to Kevin Marks' use of the phrase.
By focusing on the condition of the looking glass, Joyce suggests the artist does not start his work with a clean slate. Rather there is considerable baggage he or she must overcome. This baggage might include colonial conditions or biased assumptions. Form and context influence content.
This seems a bit analogous to Peggy McIntosh's Backpack of White Privilege I was looking at yesterday.
This is the Caliban's mirror effect again. I find intelligent dicourse on the web. Chernin finds pornography and worthless content. All human life is there. What you find is what you look for.
I like the phrasing of Caliban's mirror to describe this phenomenon
of memory from thebrain to giant servers and microchips forces a consideration of “the bodyproblem”—the loss of the body
Black Mirror again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Junipero
sys.database_mirroring
Check / View SQL Mirror settings
ALTER DATABASE dbName SET PARTNER TIMEOUT 20
Adjust SQL Mirror timeout for fail over
China’s ‘social credit system’ monitors citizen behavior and punishes them with travel bans, bans from four and five star hotels, preventing them from sending children to expensive schools, and throttling internet speeds.
This is so Black Mirror.
An episode in the third season of the TV show “Black Mirror” portrays a world in which people spend nearly all their time using their phones to rate virtually everyone else on a five-star scale.
Black Mirror made me think about rating systems. Similar to the book The Circle and user surveys.
n a study cited by the Swiss group last month, researchers found Twitter data alone a more reliable predictor of heart disease than all standard health and socioeconomic measures combined.
People rightly tend to be mean to those they are sure are assholes, so continued interaction between them will probably only serve to reinforce their beliefs the other is acting in bad faith.
This reminds me of the situation of a parrot in front of a mirror. Will he fall in love with the other, or will he start hating him, ignoring the fact that he is only seeing his reflection? Once he starts acting on one of the affections, positive feedback kicks in.