reads like a useful piece on some of the weird narratives I've heard around European digital autonomy and/or sovereignty, wrt the Eurostack initiative
- [ ] return
14 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2026
-
escapeforward.substack.com escapeforward.substack.com
-
www.nrc.nl www.nrc.nl
-
Dat blijkt uit een inventarisatie van de formulieren die de RVO in 2025 ontving van Leitmotiv, waarover nu.nl onlangs ook publiceerde. Deze ngo bestaat uit een groep juristen en informatici die pleiten voor een „digitale economie waarin de voordelen van digitalisering rechtvaardig en democratisch worden verdeeld”.
Leitmotiv, ngo v juristen/informatici wrt digital economy just / democratic / equality
-
-
www.forumstandaardisatie.nl www.forumstandaardisatie.nl
-
Actieplan NOIV NL open in verbinding. Open standards, open source software in public sector. Not sure about the date.
-
- Dec 2025
-
berthub.eu berthub.eu
-
Het versterken van digitale autonomie vergt daarom een Europese aanpak.
ja
-
-
www.ctol.digital www.ctol.digital
-
The wild card remains a behind-the-scenes "Digital Bretton Woods"—standardized frameworks for transparency, due process, and appeals that let both sides claim victory while lowering uncertainty.
Not a wild card (The wild card is the zero sum behaviour of US admin), but an aimed for outcome. Standardisation, transparency and interoperability are key digital policy aims. Note that it is exactly what big tech is clamoring against at the moment.
-
Second-order effects create opportunities: vendors selling compliance plumbing (audit trails, policy ops, transparency systems) gain; European "sovereignty stack" providers (cloud, identity, data governance) benefit if retaliation shifts to procurement preferences over fines.
This is not second order, but a primary policy aim for the EU digital single market.
-
The splinternet thesis gets its Western chapter. Not US-China separation, but US-EU divergence inside allied markets—subtler, but more margin-destructive. Big Tech that can operationally bifurcate wins near-term. X-style political defiance loses because EU enforcers smartly choose process violations over content disputes.
Regulatory differences are of all time and splinternet it is not, which implies hard (tech) breaks. Additionally the DSA is unifying for Europe, part of the digital single market. It only looks like divergence to any incumbents outside the EU.
-
-
-
the first Digital Partnership Council held today in Montreal, Canada
Canada and EU have a shared Digital Partnership Council. First meeting #2025/12/08
-
-
www.europarl.europa.eu www.europarl.europa.eu
-
EU Parl report on technological sovereignty and digital infra.
-
-
www.eljadaae.nl www.eljadaae.nl
-
The Digital Republic van Jamie Susskind (2023) is nogal een boekwerk. Niet iets dat je in een avondje uitleest. Maar het is wel een heel belangrijk boek, want het gaat over de vraag hoe we als samenleving technologie kunnen reguleren.
[[The Digital Republic by Jamie Susskind]], already jotted down the title [[Daglog 29-10-2024]] at Dussmann's in Berlin, 2023 book. [[Elja Daae]] recommends it in this list. - [ ] check for review / summary [[The Digital Republic by Jamie Susskind]] #digitalpolicy #reading
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2025
-
www.politico.eu www.politico.eu
-
In the meantime, “those who wanted to maintain the status quo have won
yes, it's key to break status quo early and in several small ways simultaneously, to signal it is at all possible. Vgl [[Een goed gesprek over digitale soevereiniteit in de gemeente]]
-
-
www.treccanilibri.it www.treccanilibri.it
-
[[Pensare Bene by Luca De Biase]] [[Luca De Biase]] 'a media ecology for the 21st century.'
New book by Luca, published Sept 2025.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Sep 2025
-
openfuture.eu openfuture.eu
-
This report came up in conversation. Compares 20yrs of EU digital policy to everything open. -[ ] lees report digital commons na 20jr EU digipol #geonovumtb
-
- Aug 2025
-
-
[[Anke Domscheit-Berg]] on Germany's digital policies , or lack thereof. First met her in 2010.
-