I think you may underestimate how much nations do in fact work together on emerging technologies, even if they are in a heated competition.
这是作者在回复评论时的一个观点,值得进一步探究。需要核实在AI等新兴技术领域,中美之间是否存在实际的合作案例,以及这种合作的深度和广度。同时需要评估这一观点是否带有偏见,是否过于乐观地看待了国际技术合作的可能性。
I think you may underestimate how much nations do in fact work together on emerging technologies, even if they are in a heated competition.
这是作者在回复评论时的一个观点,值得进一步探究。需要核实在AI等新兴技术领域,中美之间是否存在实际的合作案例,以及这种合作的深度和广度。同时需要评估这一观点是否带有偏见,是否过于乐观地看待了国际技术合作的可能性。
The Trump administration has been happier talking to Anthropic lately, according to people familiar with the matter: They don't have to deal with CEO Dario Amodei anymore
大多数人认为政府与企业高管之间的互动是基于正式的官方渠道和职位身份,但这篇文章暗示特朗普政府更愿意与Amodei的联合创始人Tom Brown而非Amodei本人进行谈判,这表明政府可能更看重个人关系而非官方职位,这在政治与科技行业的关系中是一个非传统的观点。
the message is clear: The AI industry isn't immune from U.S. government interference
大多数人可能认为AI技术的前沿性质使其能够规避传统监管框架,但作者认为政府的禁令明确传递了一个信息:即使是尖端AI技术也不能摆脱政府干预。这与科技行业自认为能够自我监管的普遍认知相悖。
Tactical Tech book on the link between climate urgency discourse and tech.
Her proposed solution, embodied in the Eurostack Foundation, is not more regulation but an industrial strategy focused on three pillars:
With which she says the regulatory framework is useful as is?
If a major American cloud provider were to restrict European access or cease operations, the consequences would be immediate and severe. This fragility has created a market opportunity that American hyperscalers are now exploiting.
That is the reason to want change, not to not do it. How is the existing dependence an opportunity 'now' for those Europe is dependent on?
A recent analysis by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute found that of 64 crucial technologies, China leads in 57 and the United States in the remaining seven. Europe leads in none.
Another non sequitur. While a useful analysis, you don't need to 'lead' anything to do things differently than others. Doing it differently may mean you become a leader. You can't sit around waiting to be leading first and then change your practice.
I’ve had Silicon Valley friends tell me that they are planning a trip to China nearly every month this year. Silicon Valley respects and fears companies from only one other country. Game recognizes game, so to speak. Tech founders may begrudge China’s restrictions; and some companies have suffered directly from IP theft. But they also recognize that Chinese companies can move even faster than they do with their teams of motivated workers; and Chinese manufacturers are far ahead of US capabilities on anything involving physical production. Some founders and VCs are impressed with the fact that Chinese AI companies have gotten this far while suffering American tech restrictions, while leading in open-source to boot.
SV techies plan monthly trips to China, as indicator for how China is doing and how US tech sees it
reads like a useful piece on some of the weird narratives I've heard around European digital autonomy and/or sovereignty, wrt the Eurostack initiative
In tech, we have four of these constraints, anti-enshittificatory sources of discipline that make products and services better, pay workers more, and keep executives’ and shareholders' wealth from growing at the expense of customers, suppliers and labor.
1) markets 2) regulation 3) interoperability 4) labor
And I think there's good news there, because if enshittification isn't the result of a new kind of evil person, or the great forces of history bearing down on the moment to turn everything to shit, but rather the result of specific policy choices, then we can reverse those policies, make better ones and emerge from the enshittocene, consigning the enshitternet to the scrapheap of history, a mere transitional state between the old, good internet, and a new, good internet.
enshittocene enshitternet bit too cute I think. Valid point: if it's policy that results in it, we can roll things back. Also w the current Trump chaos-admin there's opportunity as US is dismantling international agreements, making room for other nations / EU regs to disalign too.
Espinoza, J. (2021, November 28). Vestager urges European legislators to push through rules to regulate Big Tech. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/1880d0fb-0651-47ed-a8f4-6cde0f729859
‘How Slovakia Tested 3.6 Million People for COVID-19 in a Single Weekend’. Accessed 26 February 2021. https://www.bi.team/blogs/how-slovakia-tested-3-6-million-people-for-covid-19-in-a-single-weekend/.
Ramamurti, R. (2020, October 27). Global Crowdsourcing Can Help the U.S. Beat the Pandemic. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/10/global-crowdsourcing-can-help-the-u-s-beat-the-pandemic
Romeo, N. (n.d.). What Can America Learn from Europe About Regulating Big Tech? The New Yorker. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/what-can-america-learn-from-europe-about-regulating-big-tech