689 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. A valid ownership claim functions as a “bundle of rights” for a specific property and can include such rights as:the right to exclusive possessionthe right to exclusive use and enclosurethe right to transfer ownership (conveyance)the right to use as collateral to secure a debt (hypothecation)the right to subdivide (partition)
    1. The rise of educational technology is part of a larger shift in political thought, from favoring government oversight to asserting free-market principles, as well as a response to the increasing costs of higher education. The technocentric view that technology can solve these challenges combines with a vision of education as a product that can be packaged, automated, and delivered to students. Unless greater collaborative efforts take place between edtech developers and the greater academic community, as well as more informed deep understandings of how learning and teaching actually occur, any efforts to make edtech education's silver bullet are doomed to fail.
    1. 1) No one can even agree on a definition of “fake news,” even though a ridiculous number of words are being spent trying to define it.2) Folks don’t seem to understand the evolving nature of the problem, the way that manipulation evolves, or how the approaches they propose can be misused by those with whom they fundamentally disagree.3) No amount of “fixing” Facebook or Google will address the underlying factors shaping the culture and information wars in which America is currently enmeshed.
  2. Mar 2017
    1. Either we own political technologies, or they will own us. The great potential of big data, big analysis and online forums will be used by us or against us. We must move fast to beat the billionaires.
  3. Feb 2017
    1. Networked publics are not just publics networked together, but they are publics that have been transformed by networked media, its properties, and its potential. The properties of bits regulate the structure of networked publics, which, in turn, introduces new possible practices and shapes the interactions that take place.
    1. As an ethical and political practice, a public pedagogy of wakefulness rejects modes of education removed from political or social concerns, divorced from history and matters of injury and injustice. Said’s notion of a pedagogy of wakefulness includes “lifting complex ideas into the public space,” recognizing human injury inside and outside of the academy, and using theory as a form of criticism to change things.[xxv] This is a pedagogy in which academics are neither afraid of controversy or the willingness to make connections that are otherwise hidden, nor are they afraid of making clear the connection between private issues and broader elements of society’s problems.
    2. In order for critical pedagogy, dialogue, and thought to have real effects,  they must advocate the message that all citizens, old and young, are equally entitled, if not equally empowered, to shape the society in which they live.
    1. Algorithms are aimed at optimizing everything. They can save lives, make things easier and conquer chaos. Still, experts worry they can also put too much control in the hands of corporations and governments, perpetuate bias, create filter bubbles, cut choices, creativity and serendipity, and could result in greater unemployment
    1. As I read Rosenblatt this week for another course, I realized that it’s the reader that is the wildcard in writing. You never know how the reader will respond to your writing. Writing in a way that the masses could understand and drop the academic jargon isn’t my main concern. But rather the response that my writing could get.

      I think Rosenblatt's writings give us a lot of perspective in these areas. Years ago we were thinking about the points that you make here and bringing it to audiences at NCTE and IRA/ILA. We were looking at integrating multimodal composition, twitpoems, and visual literacy into literacy learning to help students expand their view of text. I still think we need more of this expanding of text. Perhaps this is also the main root of this discussion.

      Keep digging into the thoughts expressed here. You've got a good kernel that needs to be unpacked.

    2. Surely, a scholar can call on those early years of writing before they were indoctrinated into academia?  Honestly, if a researcher/writer is unable to drop the academic jargon to meet the needs of their desired audience, I’d say maybe blogging isn’t for you.

      Agreed.

      Also, keep in mind that blogging is in many ways a critique, or exposition of different writing styles. I think that there are ways to unpack the discourse that we fall into. I think there are still many ways that we could/should be exploring language as a means to communicate with our intended audience.

    3. open-publishing allows us to share our work on our own terms

      Agreed. I think we also need to identify/develop a bunch of little steps in the publishing process along the way.

      Perhaps you could have alternate versions of your "pub" for different audiences. You could have the "director's cut" that includes information you couldn't get in the version approved by editors. So many angles to explore.

    4. Another challenge is scholars being able to successfully “translate” their writing for the general public. Might some have problems dropping the academic jargon so that the average reader knows what the heck they are talking about? This seems like it would be an entire new skill set that would have to be developed…maybe even courses built around this.

      YES!!!

      A million times yes.

    5. gate-keeper

      This question comes up immediately with academics when we talk about open edu resources, scholars blogging, etc. This came up in the session that we had at LRA. There is a concern that we'll have the "wild west"and nothing will be critically valid, or reliable.

      I suggest that we forget about those thoughts until a later date. Let's start blogging first...and then we can figure out the quality controls later.

      It's like we're the Wright Brothers and while we're experimenting with flight...we're also figuring out the members that should be on the FAA.

      Let's just write and share and see what happens.

    6. happy median

      Agreed. You could be the fact checker. You could also help your audience, or the group in your niche best understand what is happening. Identify and talk to your one group.

      That is...if you're talking to a specific public...or just yourself. :)

    7. isn’t the role of educators to teach, learn, and share knowledge

      I think our belief that teachers shouldn't be on social media is (hopefully) a dying notion. I know many superintendents and principals that would rather hire a teacher that had a strong web presence, and knew what to do with it.

      I've been thinking a lot about this as I watch my children start their educational careers. I'm thinking about how I might feel if my children had a teacher that regularly blogged and shared what was happening in class. Still thinking deeply about this....

    8. growth, feedback and learning

      Agreed. Why not have one place online where you can document and archive your thinking and learning over time?

      Also, what if you write and publish just for yourself? I'm beginning to learn that many things I write just for myself. If it does reach others...and people benefit...that's great. But, many times I find that I'm writing for myself. And...that may be okay.

    9. But putting your work out for the world to judge can be scary.

      Yes it can, but we learn in our studies how to prepare for and anticipate threats in our work. We consider all aspects of validity and reliability and identify the specific values for these as we present our work to colleagues.

      I would suggest that putting our work out to the academic community might be much scarier. :)

    1. All along the way, or perhaps somewhere along the way, we have confused surveillance for care. And that’s my takeaway for folks here today: when you work for a company or an institution that collects or trades data, you’re making it easy to surveil people and the stakes are high. They’re always high for the most vulnerable. By collecting so much data, you’re making it easy to discipline people. You’re making it easy to control people. You’re putting people at risk. You’re putting students at risk.
  4. Jan 2017
    1. A person with oppositional conversational style is a person who, in conversation, disagrees with and corrects whatever you say. He or she may do this in a friendly way, or a belligerent way, but this person frames remarks in opposition to whatever you venture.
    1. PBL is the ongoing act of learning about different subjects simultaneously. This is achieved by guiding students to identify, through research, a real-world problem (local to global) developing its solution using evidence to support the claim, and presenting the solution through a multimedia approach based in a set of 21st-century tools

      Interesting look at PBL AND 21st century learning.

    1. We don’t need to change everything now, but we do need to start forgetting the assumptions that we have made. The future is more uncertain than ever, but we need to make our kids as balanced, agile, and as self-reliant as ever in order to thrive in it.
    1. Fake news is just squatting in one part of one building in an entire landscape of neglect and corruption; evicting them will make no difference to the blight.
    1. The Role of Literacy Research in Racism and Racial Violence Statement Endorsed by the Literacy Research Association [PDF] 12/19/16
    1. they may not be ready for that this year, or on the first day, and so there must to be online spaces where they can practice this kind of engagement safely and receive constructive feedback so that they can become responsible and thoughtful participants in the digital public sphere.
    2. Now you can create a hypothes.is group and invite others to join you in annotating a text or set of texts amongst yourselves
    1. No newspaper, no politician, no parent or school administrator should ever assume that a test score is a valid and meaningful indicator without looking carefully at the questions on that test to ascertain that they’re designed to measure something of importance and that they do so effectively.
    1. “really disrupt and complexify ... what they believe they know about race [and] students or families who live in poverty.”
    1. If you're tired of arguing with strangers on the Internet, try talking with one of them in real life.
    1. A new form of information manipulation is unfolding in front of our eyes. It is political. It is global. And it is populist in nature. The news media is being played like a fiddle, while decentralized networks of people are leveraging the ever-evolving networked tools around them to hack the attention economy.
    2. The techniques that are unfolding are hard to manage and combat. Some of them look like harassment, prompting people to self-censor out of fear. Others look like “fake news”, highlighting the messiness surrounding bias, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. There is hate speech that is explicit, but there’s also suggestive content that prompts people to frame the world in particular ways. Dog whistle politics have emerged in a new form of encoded content, where you have to be in the know to understand what’s happening. Companies who built tools to help people communicate are finding it hard to combat the ways their tools are being used by networks looking to skirt the edges of the law and content policies. Institutions and legal instruments designed to stop abuse are finding themselves ill-equipped to function in light of networked dynamics.
    1. personal responsibility
    2. Children are indoctrinated into this cultural logic early, even as their parents restrict their mobility and limit their access to social situations. But when it comes to information, they are taught that they are the sole proprietors of knowledge. All they have to do is “do the research” for themselves and they will know better than anyone what is real. Combine this with a deep distrust of media sources. If the media is reporting on something, and you don’t trust the media, then it is your responsibility to question their authority, to doubt the information you are being given. If they expend tremendous effort bringing on “experts” to argue that something is false, there must be something there to investigate.
    3. Many marginalized groups are justifiably angry about the ways in which their stories have been dismissed by mainstream media for decades. This is most acutely felt in communities of color. And this isn’t just about the past. It took five days for major news outlets to cover Ferguson. It took months and a lot of celebrities for journalists to start discussing the Dakota Pipeline. But feeling marginalized from news media isn’t just about people of color. For many Americans who have watched their local newspaper disappear, major urban news reporting appears disconnected from reality. The issues and topics that they feel affect their lives are often ignored.
    1. How can we, instead, meta-communicate liberation and possibility?
    2. The point is that all universities are deeply embedded in specific cultures and societies, which are also interconnected with other societies and cultures: this is the condition of globality today. The digital slips and slides across national and international borders, and changes or re-infuses national cultures with pan-global aspirations. The national mission of education has not become redundant but is in constant interplay and tension with the reach and impact of the digitally global. Studying such contradictions and developing the intellectual and cultural wherewithal to engage them in the pursuit of equality, justice, and peace can be a promising undertaking for the digital humanities within and beyond the university.
    3. While networked peer-to-peer mentoring may appear mundane and time consuming, in harkening back to Noddings’ concept of an ethic of care, we argue these connections and conversations should not be overlooked but cultivated, celebrated, and studied.
    4. More significantly, I believe, schools are losing an ability to matter, to influence things in the real world. If we are to change this, we academics must begin to rethink the arcane conventions that govern our way of being in this world. The traditional protocols of attribution, vetting, and credentialing have helped to preserve, protect, and maintain a closed and gated academic community. It may be safe, but it is also detached and, in many ways, infantilized and absurd.
    5. it is clear that we must engage them, especially those of us who educate.
    1. So, open is not good for everyone, and tends to bias those in already privileged positions — race, class, gender. The hype around open, while well-intentioned, is also unintentionally putting many people in harm’s way and they in turn end up having to endure so much. The people calling for open are often in positions of privilege, or have reaped the benefits of being open early on — when the platform wasn’t as easily used for abuse, and when we were privileged to create the kinds of networks that included others like us.
    1. Hard work makes you feel bad in the moment. The Marine Corps has a motto that embodies this principle: “Pain is weakness leaving the body.” That is, the discomfort of exertion means you’re building muscle and discipline. Superagers are like Marines: They excel at pushing past the temporary unpleasantness of intense effort. Studies suggest that the result is a more youthful brain that helps maintain a sharper memory and a greater ability to pay attention.
    2. Of course, the big question is: How do you become a superager? Which activities, if any, will increase your chances of remaining mentally sharp into old age? We’re still studying this question, but our best answer at the moment is: work hard at something. Many labs have observed that these critical brain regions increase in activity when people perform difficult tasks, whether the effort is physical or mental. You can therefore help keep these regions thick and healthy through vigorous exercise and bouts of strenuous mental effort. My father-in-law, for example, swims every day and plays tournament bridge.
    1. Almost half of eight- to 11-year-olds have agreed impenetrable terms and conditions to give social media giants such as Facebook and Instagram control over their data, without any accountability, according to the commissioner’s Growing Up Digital taskforce. The year-long study found children regularly signed up to terms including waiving privacy rights and allowing the content they posted to be sold around the world, without reading or understanding their implications.
    1. The problem isn’t the fake news itself, as much as the historical consciousness that allows so many to willingly believe it with no skepticism.
    1. Students need two skills to succeed as lawyers and as professionals: listening and communicating. We must listen with care, which requires patience, focus, eye contact and managing moments of ennui productively — perhaps by double-checking one’s notes instead of a friend’s latest Instagram. Multitasking and the mediation of screens kill empathy.
  5. Nov 2016
    1. upcoming journal article

      Here's the info and Google Doc for the latest draft. This includes a much longer and more expansive look at our thinking. The editors wanted us to cut back a bit. :)

      I also just posted this as well...as a supplemental argument.

    2. They recommend pre-K, and kindergarten students begin building learning portfolios within their own web domain.

      I'm thinking/wondering why we don't start as children start their educational career and build up through higher ed and adulthood. Granted, this opens up a lot (and I mean a lot of questions) about the technologies, our social systems, our philosophies of education, etc...but I think there is an opportunity that should be investigated.

      I'd be interested in some large scale discussions....and research to see what this would look like.

    3. garden

      I like this imagery. It also makes me think that some people are not "gardeners." I've experienced this push back in the past when colleagues ask why I would bother saving my work or bookmarks over time. Why build up this cyberinfracture? To some this might look like a bit of digital hoarding. I guess it also matters why you choose to engage in this practice.

    4. learning management system

      Agreed. I think sometimes some people need some scaffolding, or some privacy to tune up their digital identity as they build/revise/edit.

  6. Oct 2016
    1. challengenegativepatternsofthinkingwehavetospotthemfirstandinterrogateourownthoughts

      problematize our own thinking

  7. Aug 2016
    1. serve as a catalyst for changing teacher training programs at other institutions of higher education which prepare and support teachers

      Provide guidance for ourselves...but also provide this all openly online to give evidence/guidance to other institutions.

    2. nology, state standards; teacher performance; literacy; ELL; project-based learning; assessments; data driven instruction; college readiness; improving instruction and achievement in school through the arts; and the STEM disciplines

      definitely: technology, literacy

      possibly: ELL, project-based learning, assessment, college readiness

    3. be consistent with ongoing related curriculum, assessment, teacher preparation, or professional development activities at the South Carolina Department of Education, The Educational Accountability Act of 1998, Teacher Quality Act of 2000, theEducation Oversight Committee, the Profile of the South Carolina Graduate, and other state education initiatives

      Need to research/connect to current (and historical) state trends and initiatives.

    4. professional associations, business and industry, parents, and the privatesecto

      Possibly bring in outside partners...business, etc to act as advisors...especially since we're looking at college/career ready.

    5. collaboration with other Centers of Excellence and/or Teacher Recruitment Centers in all appropriate related activities

      Investigate what other Centers we could team up with. Take a look at Teacher recruitment centers in the state as well.

    6. in collaboration with a low-performing school(s) and/or district(s) that will be the target of its activities

      Must partner with a school district(s) as part of this.

    7. enhance the institution's professional development programs

      Must enhance and connect to the PD programs already offered from the institutions.

    8. Typical activities include

      Wondering if we need to focus on one...or all of these. Some of them seem closer to my thinking about where we might head.

    1. Unfortunately, such a cavalier approach to ‘throwing it on the blockchain’ flies in the face of the realities of distributed computing

      Agree X 1000.

      I initially thought that it would make sense to have a learner's identity on the chain, and include all of their evidence of work with their credentials. These could be docs, PDFs, videos, audio, apps, games, etc. This of course is an untenable process.

      I think that having identity on a distributed ledger technology, with links out to the domain of the learner, that houses/hosts all of this evidence would possibly make sense.

      I also think that we need to identify ways & means to archive this evidence (which would not live on the chain) so that evidence doesn't disappear.

      If we're using these technologies to address the problem of orphaned badges, what happens when the evidence is orphaned as well?

      Please note that some would suggest that we don't really need the evidence...we only need the documentation of that moment in time the learner was issued the credential as evidence of work that was completed. I see that point...but also think that building up an eportfolio, or domain of one's own and connecting this to a distributed ledger technology with read/write access on the past of the individual would be awesomesauce. :)

    2. Too bad its unlikely to come true.

      I think we still need to look at possibilities to make this blockchain and distributed ledger technologies possible. In my thinking it would be putting your identity on a distributed chain, and then linking out to evidence, credentials, etc. Yes, this will take time, space, and money. Hopefully we can learn from bitcoin, ethereum, and others to develop something that metastasize into a mess.

      I also appreciate the need to allow anyone, regardless of where they live, or means to do so, with the ability to read/write to the ledger.

    3. While the technical know-how to develop a blockchain application is significant, the success of a blockchain is at least as dependent on the continuous social negotiations required to meet the needs of its user base. And, there is little self-executing about that…

      Well stated. One of the narratives that we've heard again and again by ed technologists recently is that blockchain and distributed ledger technologies will take the humans out of the process and replace them with machines. I definitely disagree with this assessment, and think that you're correct that there is (or will be) as need for "continuous social negotiations" that are transparent, and can be audited/revised as well.

    4. Many of the issues that blockchain developers grapple with have profound implications for users and not every user would prioritize future blockchain developments in the same way

      Agreed. I think one of the other concerns embedded in this is that we bring our own value systems into this work as we code, develop, and spread this work. Our individual values might not be the value systems of the collective whole.

    5. blockchains require a system of governance and community engagement to foster continual technical and social development, including a process for communicating with and providing support to users

      Agreed. I think there are also challenges as we work to ensure that we don't reify some of the problems from the past. Just by "putting some blockchain into it" doesn't mean that things will be better. We need discussions and decisions about what we want/need in education, and how blockchain and distributed ledger technologies might address this.

    6. Blockchain misconceptions and the Future of Education

  8. Jul 2016
    1. “Think like a wise man but communicate in the language of the people.” ― W.B. Yeats

      “Think like a wise man but communicate in the language of the people.” ― W.B. Yeats

    2. “Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.” ― W.B. Yeats

      “Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.” ― W.B. Yeats

  9. Jun 2016
    1. The uncanny mind that built Ethereum - Vitalik Buterin invented the world’s hottest new cryptocurrency and inspired a movement — before he’d turned 20.

  10. d3c33hcgiwev3.cloudfront.net d3c33hcgiwev3.cloudfront.net
    1. electronic coin

      In bitcoin, these coins obviously refer to monetary units. But, it would be interesting to see how these would be adjusted given new information.

      In the case of credentialing, this could be assessments, observations, certifications, credentials, etc.

      The "digital signatures" could come from trusted parties, colleagues, peers, etc. Depending on the framing of the system...it could be anyone. With these signatures, it could link back to their own values and identify more information about the individual/organization offering the signature.

    2. mechanism exists to make paymentsover a communications channel without a trusted party

      Once again, in the initial framing of bitcoin, it appears that the idea is to utilize technology (i.e., blockchain) to make transactions over a digital channel without involving established, trusted parties (e.g., banks).

    3. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads.

      This is interesting. Much of the pushback about blockchain and bitcoin comes from questions about "trust" and issues with auditing/editing/revising information from the past.

      It seems like (at least with the initial framing here by Nakamoto) "they" recognize a need for "reversal" of information/data/values and also an increased need for "trust" in the model.

    4. financial institutions serving astrusted third parties to process electronic payments

      This system may work well for financial transactions, but what happens when we build a "proof-of-work chain" for other information/data?

    5. proof-of-work chain

      At its base, it seems like a "proof-of-work chain" using a database propagated by peer-to-peer technologies.

    6. We

      Questions about who is the "we" in this document.

  11. Mar 2016
  12. Jan 2016
    1. Would you believe in what you believe in if you were the only one who believed it? Kanye West

      Quote by Kanye West

    1. Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. Mark Twain

      Quote from Mark Twain

    1. unless it comes unasked out of your heart and your mind and your mouth and your gut, don't do it.

      From "So you want to be a writer" by Charles Bukowski

    1. “If you set your goals ridiculously high and it’s a failure, you will fail above everyone else’s success.”

      Quote from James Cameron

    1. “Don’t worry about things. Don’t push. Just do your work and you’ll survive. The important thing is to have a ball, to be joyful, to be loving and to be explosive. Out of that comes everything and you grow.”

      Quote from Ray Bradbury

    1. I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.

      Quote from Kurt Vonnegut Jr.

    1. "A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week."

      From George S. Patton