461 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2026
    1. ABCA4 gene mutation

      Case#: 1 female, 12 years old.

      DiseaseAssertion: bilateral stage 2B Coats disease. ABCA4 gene mutations were found upon genetic analysis but Stargardt disease was not diagnosed.

      FamilyInfo: Single affected individual. Past medical history and family history was reported as normal. No additional information about family is provided in text.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663 - Reduced visual acuity, HP:0001147 - Retinal exudate, HP:0007763 - Retinal telangiectasia, HP:0025355 - Retinal arteriolar macroaneurysms, HP:0011505- Cystoid macular edema, HP:0020032 - Hyperreflective retinal dots on OCT, HP:0001045 - Vitiligo

      CaseHPOFreeText: bilateral significant capillary nonperfusion noted mostly in the temporal retinal periphery together with light-bulb-like capillary dilations and staining of telangiectatic vessels. Mild intravitreal hemorrhage

      CaseNotHPOs: HP:0012045 - Retinal flecks, HP:0025010 - Foveal atrophy, HP:0000603 - Central scotoma, HP:0000556 - Retinal dystrophy, HP:0000512 - Abnormal electroretinogram

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: Relatively normal foveal architecture.

      Genotyping Method: Genetic analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing for the NDP gene, which revealed no pathogenic variants. Exome sequencing was then used with the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, which identified two compound heterozygous variants in the ABCA4 gene. Lastly, no mutations were found in the TINF2 gene.

      PreviouslyPublished: N/A

      Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.1373C>T (p.Arg458Cys), NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.5882G>A (p.Gly1961Glu)

      ClinVar: Variation ID: 7888 ( for p.Arg458Cys variant however I believe this is mislabeled for this variant NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.5882G>A (p.Gly1961Glu), no variantion ID found for NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.1373C>T (p.Arg458Cys)

      CAID: N/A

      SupplementalData: N/A

    1. The proband (Patient #20

      Case#: Female, family #5, Patient #20

      DiseaseAssertion: STGD

      FamilyInfo: Proband's sister presented with same clinical prognosis. Sister diagnosed with pattern dystrophy and photoaversion at age 57, with difficulty seeing at night. Sister has nuclear sclerotic and cortical cataracts in both eyes.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000662, HP:0000603, HP:0000603, HP:0000493

      CaseHPOFreeText: Proband presented with localized blur at age 62, (late onset) in her left eye. BVCA 20/20-3 and 20/20-2 at age 70. Also has macular lesions with stage 2 fundus flecks.

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a

      Genotyping Method: Genotyping performed at Columbia University, sequencing technology used is not disclosed.

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: p.N18681, IVS36:c.5196+1G>A

      ClinVar: M2) 99067, M6) 99351

      CAID: N/A

      SupplementalData: Fig 1: Pedigree illustrating ABCA4 variants and the associated Stargardt phenotype for 5 families. Proband Labeled w/ white arrow for each family. Fig 2: retinal scan measuring melanin in 4 patients of family 2. Panel shows bull's-eye ring of RPE atropy. Fig 3: Macular SD-OCT line profile from b-scans. Reflectivity plotted against function of retinal depth. Table 1: table shows patients with p.N18681 variant, type of mutation, and pathogenicity class. Table 2: Patients, age on-set and first symptom

    1. Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease.

      Analysis of ABCA4 variants in 150 families with Stargardt disease. Most of which were of northern or central European ancestry. For comparison, 220 racially matched individuals with no personal history or known family history of STGD served as controls (Anderson et al. 1995; Allikmets et al. 1997b).

      PMID: 9973280

      Gene: ABCA4

      HGNCID: HGNC:34

      GenotypingMethod: combined SSCP and heteroduplex analyses of all 50 exons of ABCA4, Sanger sequencing

      Pedigree AR417: onset at 8 years 2 segregations, 2 out of 3 offspring affected by STGD, parents and grandmother unaffected Variant: G1961E, A1038V CAID: CA119132, CA119135)

      Pedigree AR427: onset at 12 years 1 segregation, 1 out of 2 offspring affected by STGD, parents unaffected Variant: G1961E, C75G CAID: CA119132, CA226985

      Pedigree AR370: onset at 13 years 1 segregation, 1 out of 3 offspring affected by STGD, parents and grandparents unaffected Variant: G1961E, C1490Y CAID: CA119132, CA227198

      Pedigree AR 218: onset at 14 years family history of AMD, was first reported by Anderson et al. [1995] Variant: G1961E, 2160+1G>C CAID: CA119132, CA226984

      Pedigree AR 373: onset at 19 years 2 segregations, 2 out of 3 offspring affected by STGD, parents and grandparents unaffected Variant: G1961E, 4253+5G>T CAID: CA119132, CA227174

      Pedigree AR 274: onset at 20 years 1 segregation, 1 out of 4 siblings affected by STGD, parents and grandparents unaffected Variant: G1961E, A1038V CAID: CA119132, CA119135

    2. Mutation scanning and direct DNA sequencing of all 50 exons of ABCR were completed for 150 families segregating recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). ABCR variations were identified in 173 (57%) disease chromosomes, the majority of which represent missense amino acid substitutions. These ABCR variants were not found in 220 unaffected control individuals (440 chromosomes) but do cosegregate with the disease in these families with STGD1, and many occur in conserved functional domains. Missense amino acid substitutions located in the amino terminal one-third of the protein appear to be associated with earlier onset of the disease and may represent misfolding alleles. The two most common mutant alleles, G1961E and A1038V, each identified in 16 of 173 disease chromosomes, composed 18.5% of mutations identified. G1961E has been associated previously, at a statistically significant level in the heterozygous state, with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Clinical evaluation of these 150 families with STGD1 revealed a high frequency of AMD in first- and second-degree relatives. These findings support the hypothesis that compound heterozygous ABCR mutations are responsible for STGD1 and that some heterozygous ABCR mutations may enhance susceptibility to AMD.

      Annotating here since the full text is a PDF.

      Case#: Family AR321 proband, US, 6yo at onset

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt

      FamilyInfo: proband and two other siblings are affected

      CasePresentingHPOs: The essential and defining features of STGD were (1) pedigrees with at least one living affected individual compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance; (2) an ophthalmoscopically characteristic retinal disorder in families with both parents living; (3) bilateral central visual loss with both “beaten metal” elliptical foveal dystrophy and temporal pallor of the optic discs, documented by retinal color photography, with or without yellow-pigment epithelial flecks in the macular and/or retinal “near periphery”; and (4) the characteristic fluorescein angiographic feature of a dark choroid (Blacharski 1988).

      CaseHPOFreeText:

      CaseNotHPOs:

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: (1) evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance; (2) any history of night blindness, loss of peripheral vision, or "retinitis pigmentosa"; (3) cataracta complicata or cells in the vitreous; (4) substantially abnormal electroretinographic or electrooculographic responses; (5) no fluorescein angiography performed or no dark choroid documented; (6) neurological disease (including loss of cognition or seizures); 7) drug exposures (especially to antimalarial and agents known to cause crystalline retinopathies); or (8) any "atypical" maculopathies in which a unique diagnosis of STGD could not be established.

      PreviouslyPublished: PMID: 8533764

      Variant: c.3113C>T p.A1038V; c.1715G>C p.R572P . Heteroduplex and SSCP analyses were used to screen the 50 exons of ABCA4. Linkage analysis and haplotype analysis were previously performed

      ClinVar: 99073

      CAID: CA226919

      SupplementalData: n/a

    1. The variant was c.52C>T (p.Arg18Trp).

      PMID:39398711

      Gene: ABCA4

      HGNC ID: 34

      Case Annotation Template

      Case#: 19-year-old male

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease 1 (STGD1)

      FamilyInfo: No family history of eye disease reported. Autosomal recessive inheritance consistent with STGD1. Homozygous ABCA4 variant identified.

      CasePresentingHPOs: DecreasedCentralVA, MacularAtrophy, MacularFlecks, PeripapillarySparing, OpticNervePallor

      CaseHPOFreeText: Five-year history of progressive bilateral central vision loss, worse at near. Alternating exotropia measuring 16 prism diopters in all gazes OU. Best corrected visual acuity 20/200 OU. Fundus examination revealed pigment deposition and macular mottling. Fundus autofluorescence showed central decreased autofluorescence surrounded by increased autofluorescence. Fluorescein angiography demonstrated dark choroid. OCT showed loss of the central ellipsoid zone with hyperreflective deposits. Multifocal ERG demonstrated significant functional loss.

      CaseNotHPOs: NightBlindness

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: Patient denied nyctalopia, photophobia, or flashes. Color vision normal on Ishihara testing.

      Genotyping Method: Genotyping Method: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) with deletion/duplication analysis (Invitae Corporation).

      PreviouslyPublished: N/A

      Variant: ABCA4 c.52C>T (p.Arg18Trp)

      ClinVar: ClinVarID:7899

      CAID: N/A

      SupplementalData: N/A

    1. Amounts of A2E in the eyes of Abca4PV/PV, Abca4−/− and WT mice at the ages of 1, 3, 6, 12 and 15 months were quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Fig. 9B). Mice were raised under a regular 12-h light (∼10 lux)/12-h dark cycle. Age-dependent A2E accumulation was noted in all genotypes, with Abca4PV/PV and Abca4−/− mice accumulating about 5-fold more A2E than WT mice. No statistically significant differences in A2E accumulation were found between Abca4PV/PV and Abca4−/− animals.

      Autofluorescence and A2E production was measured in transgenic mice and showed loss of function of ABCA4 protein indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3; PMIDs).

    1. Screening of reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 for Stargardt (STGD) The disease prevalence of STGD is estimated as 1 in 10000 individuals4. It has been estimated that about 70% of STGD patients carry variants in ABCA45. Therefore, this represents the scenario of a recessive disease with a relatively homogeneous genetic cause. We screened 945 reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 genes collected in HGMD. Among them, 11 variants are likely benign, as their population AF in is higher than 0.7% (1/20000‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)<math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="M11"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>20000</mn></mrow></msqrt></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math>, the cutoff based on STGD disease prevalence, therefore were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 934 variants were subjected to our test model. As a result, 26 variants with the AF in the range of 0.46% to 0.03% were identified as likely benign (Binomial test1, Bonferroni correction p-value ≤ 0.05/934 and test2 Bonferroni correction p-value > 0.05/934) (Figure 3A).

      This variant is reported in Table S6, but only location, predictions, frequencies, etc are reported for it, not cases.

    2. Screening of reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 for Stargardt (STGD) The disease prevalence of STGD is estimated as 1 in 10000 individuals4. It has been estimated that about 70% of STGD patients carry variants in ABCA45. Therefore, this represents the scenario of a recessive disease with a relatively homogeneous genetic cause. We screened 945 reported pathogenic variants in ABCA4 genes collected in HGMD. Among them, 11 variants are likely benign, as their population AF in is higher than 0.7% (1/20000‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)<math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="M11"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>20000</mn></mrow></msqrt></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math>, the cutoff based on STGD disease prevalence, therefore were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 934 variants were subjected to our test model. As a result, 26 variants with the AF in the range of 0.46% to 0.03% were identified as likely benign (Binomial test1, Bonferroni correction p-value ≤ 0.05/934 and test2 Bonferroni correction p-value > 0.05/934) (Figure 3A).

      This variant is reported in Table S6, but only location, predictions, frequencies, etc are reported for it, not cases.

    1. F17-003

      Case#: Patient 225, Female, age of onset 7 y.o, Poland

      DiseaseAssertion: STGD-1

      FamilyInfo: no given family information.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007722, HP:0000608, HP:0025158

      CaseHPOFreeText: RPE atrophy, macular degeneration, central hyper-autofluorescence in fundus autofluorescence

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a, non-proband identified HPO's mentioned, but not assignable to individual proband.

      Genotyping Method: DNA isolated from peripheral blood from patients and relatives via MagNA Pure 24, samples screened with MIPs targeting 108 genes involved in pathogensis of IRD's. PCR completed on library, analysed with NGS fragment analysis kit.

      PreviouslyPublished: yes

      Variant: c.[1622T>C;3113C>T]

      ClinVar: 99067, 7894

      CAID: n/a

      gnomeAD 0.0001266 allele frequency

      SupplementalData: Fig1: List of families displaying pseudo-dominant inheritance. Fig2: Number of alleles for most common variants.

    1. WDR19-associated retinopathy presenting with adult-onset Stargardt-likephenotype

      PMID:39967245

      Gene: ABCA4

      HGNC ID: 34

      Case#:39 man

      DiseaseAssertion:NA

      FamilyInfo:NA

      CasePresentingHPOs:Snellen in both eye, visual impairment with night blindnessisual acuity was 20/20Snellen in both eyes, with a minor correction for astig-matism. The anterior segment and intraocular pressurewere within normal limits. On fundus examination, dif-fuse fleck-like lesions were scattered both inside and out-side the arcades, while sharply demarcated areas ofmacular atrophy with foveal sparing, more pronouncedin the left eye, were visible.

      CaseHPOFreeText:NA

      CaseNotHPOs:NA

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:

      Genotyping Method:Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), using theTruSight One Clinical Exome sequencing panel on anIllumina NexSeq500 platform, enriching for 4800 genesincluding ABCA4, CNGB3, ELOVL4, PROM1, and PRPH2

      PreviouslyPublished:Under refernces?

      Variant:WDR19 variants:the novel deletion at c.1777 + 1 within the donor splicingsite (class 4) and the rare c.1430 G>T variant causing theamino-acid substitution p.(Arg477Leu) (class 3) in the putative protein. Additionally, a heterozygous c.1793A>G(class 3) variant in the CDH23 gene was found, though it was deemed as not contributive to the patient’s clinical phenotype. All reported variants were confirmed throughSanger sequencing

      ClinVar:NA

      CAID:NA

      SupplementalData:NA

    1. The STGD patient from Family 12 is a compound heterozygous with p.Val931Met and a novel nonsense mutation at exon 33 (p.Glu1574X; Figure 1B). Disease onset for this patient was at age 43. Ophthalmic examination revealed moderate central retinal changes, decreased mfERG responses exclusively in the central 15 degrees, and decreased visual acuity.

      Case#: Family 12 Proband, male, 43yo at onset, Portuguese

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt

      FamilyInfo: no affected family members in pedigree (Fig. 1)

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007663

      CaseHPOFreeText: "The criteria for STGD phenotype included bilateral central vision loss and pigmentary macular lesions, normal caliber of retinal vessels, absence of pigmented bone spicules, and compatibility with recessive mode of inheritance." Moderate central retinal changes, decreased mfERG responses exclusively in the central 15 degrees

      CaseNotHPOs:

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: p.Glu1574X; p.Val931Met. Several other polymorphisms also reported. ABCR400 gene chip microarray, DHPLC

      ClinVar: 1460063

      CAID: CA341283936

      SupplementalData: n/a

    1. JB260 Stargardt ABCA4 c.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln rs148460146 Zernant et al (2014)50 c.2879del p.Ala960Aspfs*17 N/A

      Case#: Bryant Subject JB260, US

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt

      FamilyInfo:

      CasePresentingHPOs: "Stargardt disease is a childhood-onset macular degeneration and is most commonly caused by mutations in ABCA4. Characteristic yellow flecks are typically seen under the macula during a fundus exam."

      CaseHPOFreeText:

      CaseNotHPOs:

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:

      GenotypingMethod: WES; previously screened using arrayed primer extension (APEX) multigene panels for the relevant disease and no disease-causing variants had been identified; PCR and Sanger for verification

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: c.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln; c.2879del p.Ala960Aspfs*17

      CAID: CA232815

      SupplementalData:

    1. An uncommon case of retinitis pigmentosa patients basedon clinical and genetic studyAyudha Bahana Bahana Ilham Perdamaian, MSc2, Dewi Kartikawati Paramita, PhD3, Riris Istighfari Jenie,PhD4, Supanji Supanji, PhD11Universitas Gadjah Mada Fakultas Kedokteran Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan, 2Doctorate Program of Health andMedicine Science, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nurse, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Departmentof Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 3Department of Histology andMolecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia,Integrated Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakar,4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaCASE REPORTThis article was accepted: 25 August 2024Corresponding Author: Supanji SupanjiEmail: supanji@ugm.ac.id19-An uncommon00304.qxp_3-PRIMARY.qxd 29/08/2024 3:47 PM Page 98

      PMID:39215425

      Gene: ABCA4

      HGNC ID: 34

      case27-year-old male, the brother of case 1

      DiseaseAssertion: Table 1 The summary of the clinical assessment of IRD patients’ family in this research fro there down they did a whole pannel on the family

      Pedigree one can be fore form the beggginnings of case presention section?

      CasePresentingHPOs: Case 2, a 27-year-old male, the brother of case 1 had blurry vision which was not corrected with an eyeglass and inconveniences under bright light starting from 14 years ago. Case 2 also underwent a fundus examination after finding that case 1 was RP. In further examination of those patients and their family members found that case 1 was confirmed as RP and case 2

      CaseHPOFreeText:NA

      CaseNotHPOs:NA

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:NA

      Genotyping Method:NA

      PreviouslyPublished:NA

      Variant:NA

      ClinVar:

      CAID:NA

      SupplementalData:NA

      Inheritance pattern Autosomal Recessive

    1. See Supplementary Table S2 for a complete genotypic glossary of the cohort.

      Case#: Patients were identified from the inherited retinal disease (IRD) database at UC San Diego (UCSD).

      DiseaseAssertion: RP with macular edema

      FamilyInfo:

      CasePresentingHPOs:

      CaseHPOFreeText: Dx of RP based on "a history of progressive peripheral vision loss or nyctalopia, and ocular examination findings of RP including bone spicule pigmentation, disc pallor and attenuated vessels and genetic confirmation."

      CaseNotHPOs:

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:

      GenotypingMethod: Next-generation sequencing (NGS), exome sequencing, and/or targeted Sanger sequencing were the primary genetic testing approaches.

      PreviouslyPublished: PMID:10206579 is referenced but it seems a reference to the variant and not the proband

      Variant: c.6383A>G (p.His2128Arg); c.3G>T (p.Met1?). phase unknown

      ClinVar: 99455

      CAID: CA227399

      SupplementalData: Variant is found in table S2

  2. Jul 2026
    1. The proband (Patient #20

      Case#: Female, family #5, Patient #20

      DiseaseAssertion: STGD

      FamilyInfo: Proband's sister presented with same clinical prognosis. Sister diagnosed with pattern dystrophy and photoaversion at age 57, with difficulty seeing at night. Sister has nuclear sclerotic and cortical cataracts in both eyes.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000662, HP:0000603, HP:0000603, HP:0000493

      CaseHPOFreeText: Proband presented with localized blur at age 62, (late onset) in her left eye. BVCA 20/20-3 and 20/20-2 at age 70. Also has macular lesions with stage 2 fundus flecks.

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a

      Genotyping Method: Genotyping performed at Columbia University, sequencing technology used is not disclosed.

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: p.N18681, IVS36:c.5196+1G>A

      ClinVar: M2) 99067, M6) 99351

      CAID: N/A

      SupplementalData: Fig 1: Pedigree illustrating ABCA4 variants and the associated Stargardt phenotype for 5 families. Proband Labeled w/ white arrow for each family. Fig 2: retinal scan measuring melanin in 4 patients of family 2. Panel shows bull's-eye ring of RPE atropy. Fig 3: Macular SD-OCT line profile from b-scans. Reflectivity plotted against function of retinal depth. Table 1: table shows patients with p.N18681 variant, type of mutation, and pathogenicity class. Table 2: Patients, age on-set and first symptom

    1. F17-003

      Case#: Patient 225, Female, age of onset 7 y.o, Poland

      DiseaseAssertion: STGD-1

      FamilyInfo: no given family information.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0007722, HP:0000608, HP:0025158

      CaseHPOFreeText: RPE atrophy, macular degeneration, central hyper-autofluorescence in fundus autofluorescence

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a, non-proband identified HPO's mentioned, but not assignable to individual proband.

      Genotyping Method: DNA isolated from peripheral blood from patients and relatives via MagNA Pure 24, samples screened with MIPs targeting 108 genes involved in pathogensis of IRD's. PCR completed on library, analysed with NGS fragment analysis kit.

      PreviouslyPublished: yes

      Variant: c.[1622T>C;3113C>T]

      ClinVar: 99067, 7894

      CAID: n/a

      gnomeAD 0.0001266 allele frequency

      SupplementalData: Fig1: List of families displaying pseudo-dominant inheritance. Fig2: Number of alleles for most common variants.

  3. Apr 2026
    1. proband at age 5, targeted testing of ABCA4

      Case#: 1

      DiseaseAssertion: stargardt disease originally but didn;t have fishtail flecks

      FamilyInfo: both unaffected parents carrying heterozygous MFSD8 variants

      CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0001272

      CaseHPOFreeText:at 5 years old BCVA was measured at a Snellen equivalent at 0.13 in both eyes, at age 8, BCVA had decreased to 0.07 in both eyes, complete absence of all retinal responses on full‐field flash ERG, No fishtail flecks typical of Stargardt disease were observed

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:n/a

      Genotyping Method: HaloPlex target enrichment kit amplified and sequenced using illumina, then WES

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: c.3113C>T p.(Ala1038Val)

      ClinVar: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/7894/

      SupplementalData: MFSD8 variants identified

  4. Mar 2026
    1. A 19-year-old female

      Case#: 19 year old woman

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease (STGD)

      FamilyInfo: no family history of ocular disease

      CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0025158

      CaseHPOFreeText:20/25 in the right eye and 20/25-1 in the left eye, small irregular perifoveal lesions of both increased and decreased autofluorescence

      CaseNotHPOs:na

      CaseNotHPOFreeText:na

      Genotyping Method: next gen sequencing

      PreviouslyPublished: na

      Variant: c.6079C > T, p.(Leu2027Phe) c.4139C > T, p.(Pro1380Leu)

      ClinVar: not found not found

      CAID: not found not found

      SupplementalData: “black shadow” in the right eye after getting hit by a volley ball

    1. A 43-year-old white female

      Case#: 43 year old woman II:2

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease (STGD1)

      FamilyInfo: none of family had co-existing systemic disorders, father carried variant, probands affected suster did not

      CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0000007

      CaseHPOFreeText: loss of ellipsoid zone, mascular dystrophy with features of bull's eye maculopathy,

      CaseNotHPOs: na

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: na

      Genotyping Method: sanger sequencing

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: c.4685 T > C, p.(I1562T)

      ClinVar: not found

      CAID: not found

      SupplementalData: probands affected sister did not carry the ABAA4 variant, indicating ABCA4 was not relevant to mascular dystrophy in family, CRX variant was also found

    1. The proband

      Case#:case 1 II:4

      DiseaseAssertion: Stargardt disease (STGD1)

      FamilyInfo: mother has identical phenotype as proband, dad and sister asymptomatic, brother was symptomatic at 8 years old, other brother symptomatic at 15 years old.

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000007

      CaseHPOFreeText: at age 50, with central visual imparement in right eye, 20/40 right, 20/20 left, linear and branching hyperautofluorescent subretinal deposits and extrafoveal RPE atrophy in both eyes,

      CaseNotHPOs: n/a

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: n/a

      Genotyping Method:

      PreviouslyPublished: n/a

      Variant: c.6031_6044delins18M/p.(Ile2003LeufsTer41)

      ClinVar: not found

      CAID: not found

      SupplementalData:

  5. Feb 2026
    1. A10M c.4139C>T:p(P1380L

      Case#: 10 years old

      DiseaseAssertion:See Table 1

      FamilyInfo: Not Mentioned

      CasePresentingHPOs: Not specified

      CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

      CaseNotHPOs: N/A

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: N/a

      CasePreviousTesting: See Table 2

      Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.4139C>T (p.Pro1380Leu)

      ClinVar: 7904 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/7904/

      CAID: CA129033

      gnomAD: 0.00030430 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/chr1-94031110-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

      SupplementalData: Table 2

    2. A01Fa c.4793C>A:p(A1598D)

      Case#: Age is not specified (Age of onset: 15 years old, with the time from onset: 8 years)

      DiseaseAssertion: Presented with macular flecks and alterations in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) subretinal deposits.

      FamilyInfo: Consanguinity within the family

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000608, HP:0008035 (Macular Degeneration, Retinis pigmentosa inversa)

      CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

      CaseNotHPOs: N/A

      CaseNotHPOFreeText: Visual Acuity: 20/20

      CasePreviousTesting: See Table 2

      Variant: NM_000350.3(ABCA4):C.4793C>A (p.Ala1598Asp)

      ClinVar: 99321 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/99321/

      CAID: CA227239

      gnomAD: 0.00002631 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-94021695-G-T?dataset=gnomad_r3

      SupplementalData: Table 2, Results Section

  6. Jan 2025
    1. global coding class, which is about 34 million digital nomads right now and maybe 10 million with a crypto wallet. Again, they're not rooted. They're rootless, and they should be root-full.

      for - stats - 2025 - digital nomads - 34 million - with crypto - 10 million - rootless - SOURCE - Youtube Ma Earth channel interview - Devcon 2024 - Cosmo Local Commoning with Web 3 - Michel Bauwens - 2025, Jan 2

  7. Nov 2024
  8. Oct 2024
  9. Jul 2024
  10. Jun 2024
    1. Toute décision d'orientation post-3e non conforme à la demande de la famille doit obligatoirement être motivée. Le chef d'établissement est tenu de mettre en avant des éléments objectifs sur lesquels repose sa décision. "Les motivations comportent des éléments objectifs ayant fondé les décisions, en termes de connaissances, de capacités et d'intérêts (Article D331-34 - Code de l'éducation)."
  11. Oct 2023
    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmita

      During shmita, the land is left to lie fallow and all agricultural activity, including plowing, planting, pruning and harvesting, is forbidden by halakha (Jewish law).

      The sabbath year (shmita; Hebrew: שמיטה, literally "release"), also called the sabbatical year or shǝvi'it (שביעית‎, literally "seventh"), or "Sabbath of The Land", is the seventh year of the seven-year agricultural cycle mandated by the Torah in the Land of Israel and is observed in Judaism.

  12. Aug 2023
  13. Jun 2023
    1. With the exception of the blues, the rhythm changes progression is probably the mostimportant chord progression in jazz. The term “rhythm changes” refers to a 32-bar AABAform based on the harmonic structure of “I Got Rhythm” by George and Ira Gershwin.The song appeared in the Aarons and Freedley production Girl Crazy (1930) andoriginally featured a 34-bar AABA form with a two-bar extension in the last A section.The two-bar extension was eventually cut and the chord changes of the last A sectionreplicated those from the second A. A newly composed line based on the rhythm changesprogression is known as a contrafact. The enormous popularity of rhythm changes hasbeen well documented by an ever-increasing number of composed contrafacts andrecordings
  14. Mar 2022
    1. nach § 122 Abs. 1

      § 122 Bekanntgabe des Verwaltungsakts

      (1) Ein Verwaltungsakt ist demjenigen Beteiligten bekannt zu geben, für den er bestimmt ist oder der von ihm betroffen wird. § 34 Abs. 2 ist entsprechend anzuwenden. Der Verwaltungsakt kann auch gegenüber einem Bevollmächtigten bekannt gegeben werden. Er soll dem Bevollmächtigten bekannt gegeben werden, wenn der Finanzbehörde eine schriftliche oder eine nach amtlich vorgeschriebenem Datensatz elektronisch übermittelte Empfangsvollmacht vorliegt, solange dem Bevollmächtigten nicht eine Zurückweisung nach § 80 Absatz 7 bekannt gegeben worden ist.

  15. Mar 2021
    1. Results for individual PALB2 variants were normalized relative to WT-PALB2 and the p.Tyr551ter (p.Y551X) truncating variant on a 1:5 scale with the fold change in GFP-positive cells for WT set at 5.0 and fold change GFP-positive cells for p.Y551X set at 1.0. The p.L24S (c.71T>C), p.L35P (c.104T>C), p.I944N (c.2831T>A), and p.L1070P (c.3209T>C) variants and all protein-truncating frame-shift and deletion variants tested were deficient in HDR activity, with normalized fold change <2.0 (approximately 40% activity) (Fig. 1a).

      AssayResult: 4.8

      AssayResultAssertion: Normal

      StandardErrorMean: 0.23

    1. Most Suspected Brugada Syndrome Variants Had (Partial) Loss of Function

      AssayResult: 0.2

      AssayResultAssertion: Abnormal

      ReplicateCount: 15

      StandardErrorMean: 0.2

      Comment: This variant had loss of function of peak current (<10% of wildtype), therefore it was considered abnormal (in vitro features consistent with Brugada Syndrome Type 1). (Personal communication: A. Glazer)

  16. Feb 2021
  17. Sep 2018
    1. In order to protect local interests, and to prevent sectional jealousies, it was found requisite that the three great divisions into which British North America is separated, should be represented in the Upper House on the principle of equality. There are three great sections, having different interests, in this proposed Confederation.

      §§. 21-36 & § 91(1) of the Constitution Act, 1867

      Referenced in Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 SCR 54, 1979 CanLII 169 (SCC)

    2. To the Upper House is to be confided the protection of sectional interests ; therefore is it that the three great divisions are there equally represented, for the purpose of defending such interests against the combinations of majorities in the Assembly.

      §§. 21-36 & § 91(1) of the Constitution Act, 1867

      Referenced in Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 SCR 54, 1979 CanLII 169 (SCC)

    1. But the very essence of our compact is that the union shall be federal and not legislative. Our Lower Canada friends have agreed to give us representation by population in the Lower House, on the express condition that they shall have equality in the Upper House. On no other condition could we have advanced a step ; and, for my part, I am quite willing they should have it. In maintaining the existing sectional boundaries and handing over the control of local matters to local bodies, we recognize, to a certain extent, a diversity of interests ; and it was quite natural that the protection for those interests, by equality in the Upper Chamber, should be demanded by the less numerous provinces.

      §§. 21-36 & § 91(1) of the Constitution Act, 1867

      Referenced in Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 SCR 54, 1979 CanLII 169 (SCC)

    1. The Speaker of the Legislative Council is also to be appointed by the Crown, this is another step backwards, and a little piece of patronage for the Government. We have heard in a speech lately delivered in Prince Edward Island or New Brunswick, I forget which, of the allurements offered to the delegates while here in the shape of prospective appointments as judges of the Court of Appeal, Speaker of the Legislative Council, and local governors

      §.34 of the Constitution Act, 1867.